Misplaced Pages

Allegations of Saudi Arabian apartheid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:26, 31 July 2007 editBless sins (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers16,862 edits →Non-Muslims and Mecca: please don't make conclusions Freedom House doesn't make← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:20, 15 December 2023 edit undoXTheBedrockX (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,524 edits retargeted to Allegations of apartheid by country#Saudi ArabiaTags: Redirect target changed Visual edit 
(39 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{quotefarm}}
{{R from merge}}

{{Allegations of apartheid}}
'''Allegations of Saudi Arabian apartheid''' draw an analogy from the policies of ] ] to those of ]. Those who use the analogy point to Saudi treatment of women and religious minorities, policies of physical separation between the two groups, and/or allege second-class treatment of these groups in Saudi Arabia.

==Treatment of women==
''See also ]''

]'s practices with respect to women have been referred to as "gender apartheid". <ref>Handrahan, L.M. , Human Rights Internet, ''Human Rights Tribune'', Vol. 8, No. 1, Spring 2001.</ref> According to Rita Henley Jensen" while Saudi Arabian women "have the right to own property, transact business, go to school and be supported by their husbands, while maintaining their separate bank accounts", "Women on Saudi soil must have a husband or male relative as an escort. We are not allowed to drive. When sight-seeing we must wear a full-length black gown known as an abaya. During Saudi Arabia's first elections, held the week before my arrival, women were not permitted to vote or run for office." She states that hotels have no female employees, and that segregated eating areas in hotels and beaches for women have poorer facilities. She also criticizes Saudi law for setting female inheritance at half of what men inherit (see ]).<ref>Jensen, Rita Henley. , ''Women's eNews'', 03/07/2005.</ref>

] refers to these practices simply as "apartheid":
<blockquote>Seductive mirages of progress notwithstanding, nowhere in the world is apartheid practiced with more cruelty and finality than in Saudi Arabia. Of course, it is women who are locked in and kept out, exiled to invisibility and abject powerlessness within their own country. It is women who are degraded systematically from birth to early death, utterly and totally and without exception deprived of freedom. It is women who are sold into marriage or concubinage, often before puberty; killed if their hymens are not intact on the wedding night; kept confined, ignorant, pregnant, poor, without choice or recourse. It is women who are raped and beaten with full sanction of the law. It is women who cannot own property or work for a living or determine in any way the circumstances of their own lives. It is women who are subject to a despotism that knows no restraint. Women locked out and locked in.<ref>]. . In "Letters from a War Zone: Writings 1976-1989", Lawrence Hill Books, Reprint edition (May 28, 1993). ISBN 1-55652-185-5</ref></blockquote>

] quotes an American official who accuses Western companies of complicity in Saudi Arabia's sexual apartheid:
<blockquote>One of the (still) untold stories, however, is the cooperation of U.S. and other Western companies in enforcing sexual apartheid in Saudi Arabia. ], ], ], and other U.S. firms, for instance, maintain strictly segregated eating zones in their restaurants. The men's sections are typically lavish, comfortable and up to Western standards, whereas the women's or families' sections are often run-down, neglected and, in the case of Starbucks, have no seats. Worse, these firms will bar entrance to Western women who show up without their husbands. My wife and other women were regularly forbidden entrance to the local McDonald's unless there was a man with them."
<ref>]. , '']'', December 22, 2001.</ref> </blockquote>

Azar Majedi, of the Centre for Women and Socialism, attributes sexual apartheid in Saudi Arabia to political Islam:
<blockquote>Women are the first victims of political Islam and Islamic terrorist gangs. Sexual apartheid, stoning, compulsory Islamic veil and covering and stripping women of all rights are the fruits of this reactionary and fascistic movement.<ref>Majedi, Azar. , ''Medusa'' - the Journal of the Centre for Women and Socialism.</ref></blockquote>

According to '']'', "n the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, sexual apartheid rules", and this sexual apartheid is enforced by '']'', religious police, though not as strongly in some areas:
<blockquote>The kingdom's sexual apartheid is enforced, in a crude fashion, by the religious police, the mutawa. Thuggish, bigoted and with little real training in Islamic law, they are much feared in some areas but also increasingly ridiculed. In ] - a more laid-back city than ] - they are rarely seen nowadays.<ref>Whitaker, Brian. , "Special Report: Saudi Arabia", '']'', February 21, 2006.</ref></blockquote>

==Treatment of religious minorities==
''See also ]''

Saudi Arabia's treatment of religious minorities has also been described by both Saudis and non-Saudis as "apartheid" and "religious apartheid".<ref>, Saudi Institute, November 5, 2001.</ref>

Testifying before the ] on June 4, 2002, in a briefing entitled "Human Rights in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Women"", Ali Al-Ahmed, Director of the Saudi Institute, stated:
<blockquote>Saudi Arabia is a glaring example of religious apartheid. The religious institutions from government clerics to judges, to religious curricula, and all religious instructions in media are restricted to the ] understanding of ], adhered to by less than 40% of the population. The Saudi government communized Islam, through its monopoly of both religious thoughts and practice. Wahhabi Islam is imposed and enforced on all Saudis regardless of their religious orientations. The Wahhabi sect does not tolerate other religious or ideological beliefs, Muslim or not. Religious symbols by Muslims, ], ] and other believers are all banned. The Saudi embassy in Washington is a living example of religious apartheid. In its 50 years, there has not been a single non-Sunni Muslim diplomat in the embassy. The branch of Imam Mohamed Bin Saud University in Fairfax, Virginia instructs its students that ] is a Jewish conspiracy. <ref>"Human Rights in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Women", Congressional Human Rights Caucus, Testimony of Ali Al-Ahmed, Director of the Saudi Institute, June 4, 2002.</ref> </blockquote>

] quotes a Shi'ite businessman from ] as saying "It is not normal that there are no Shi'ite army officers, ministers, governors, mayors and ambassadors in this kingdom. This form of religious apartheid is as intolerable as was apartheid based on race." <ref>]. , '']'', May 22, 2003.</ref>

==Non-Muslims and Mecca==
]
According to ], "in Saudi Arabia apartheid is practiced against non-Muslims, with signs indicating that Muslims must go to certain areas and non-Muslims to others." <ref>]. , '']'', November 5, 2002.</ref> On December 14, 2005, ] ] ] and ] Representative ] introduced a bill in Congress urging American divestiture from Saudi Arabia, and giving as its rationale (among other things) "Saudi Arabia is a country that practices religious apartheid and continuously subjugates its citizenry, both Muslim and non-Muslim, to a specific interpretation of Islam." <ref> 109th CONGRESS, 1st Session, H. R. 4543.</ref> ] showed a picture on its website, and titled it "religious apartheid in Saudi Arabia".<ref>Religious Apartheid in Saudi Arabia, ] website. Retrieved July 11, 2006.</ref>

==References==
<references />
{{Types of Segregation}}
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:20, 15 December 2023

Redirect to:

  • From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.