Misplaced Pages

Talk:Marshall Plan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:39, 30 January 2022 editValereee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits →Committee for Economic Development: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:41, 6 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,321,503 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 7 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 6 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject European history}}, {{WikiProject Socialism}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject United States History}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject National Archives}}. 
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{Article history
{{Vital article|topic=History|level=5|class=B}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=PR |action1=PR
|action1date=12:00, 15 September 2005 |action1date=12:00, 15 September 2005
Line 22: Line 21:
|maindate=April 22, 2006 |maindate=April 22, 2006
|currentstatus=FFA |currentstatus=FFA
|otd1date=2004-04-03|otd1oldid=3478716
|otd2date=2004-06-05|otd2oldid=3963293
|otd3date=2005-04-03|otd3oldid=12414386
|otd4date=2006-04-03|otd4oldid=46690094
|otd5date=2007-04-03|otd5oldid=119966147
|otd6date=2008-04-03|otd6oldid=202969208
|otd7date=2009-04-03|otd7oldid=281449286
|otd8date=2010-04-03|otd8oldid=353776339
|otd9date=2015-04-03|otd9oldid=654760821
⚫ }}
⚫ {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
⚫ {{WikiProject European history|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Socialism|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}}
⚫ {{WikiProject United States History|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject United States|importance=mid}}
⚫ {{WikiProject National Archives}}
{{WikiProject Law}}
}} }}
⚫ {{WikiProject banner shell|1=
⚫ {{WikiProject European history|class=B|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Socialism|class= B|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Politics|class= B|importance=mid}}
⚫ {{WikiProject United States History|class= B|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject United States|class=B|importance=mid}}
⚫ {{WikiProject National Archives|class= B}}
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=B|category=History|importance=Mid}}
⚫ }}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-04-03|oldid1=3478716|date2=2004-06-05|oldid2=3963293|date3=2005-04-03|oldid3=12414386|date4=2006-04-03|oldid4=46690094|date5=2007-04-03|oldid5=119966147|date6=2008-04-03|oldid6=202969208|date7=2009-04-03|oldid7=281449286|date8=2010-04-03|oldid8=353776339|date9=2015-04-03|oldid9=654760821}}
{{Refideas {{Refideas
|free=yes |free=yes
Line 48: Line 55:
{{annual readership}} {{annual readership}}


==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ].

{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 03:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
== Public opinion data on the Marshall Plan == == Public opinion data on the Marshall Plan ==


Line 72: Line 75:
==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist-talk}} {{reflist-talk}}

== Multiple referencing styles ==

Probably as a result of the efforts of diverse editors over the years, this article has multiple referencing styles. This issue was also mentioned prominently in the FAR/FARC when the article was delisted from ]. I would like to standardize them, if no one objects. In particular, I would alter them to rely on {{tl|sfn}} to link to the references. I just finished doing the same thing to ] and ]... <s>Will wait about 3 days for replies.</s>&nbsp;♦&nbsp;] (]) 14:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
:PS - Actually, this one is extra messy. Given that the issue was raised in the FAR/FARC, I'm gonna go ahead and start. If anyone is unhappy, we can discuss...&nbsp;&diams;&nbsp;] (]) 02:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
::{{reply|Lingzhi.Random}} Thanks for taking this on. And thanks for inviting me to help you with the first pass at organizing the references. It looks most of the citations have now been standardized, pending some small stylistic choices. They are now ready for updating as many of the citations are incomplete: They sometimes lack page numbers, templates need to be completed, citations verified. But, this is a relatively minor issue, in my opinion. It appears that all the information needed is in the article is available. In fact, it might be the case that some of the references and further reading could be pruned.
::The bigger issue from my perspective is the article structure. This is best illustrated in the lead, seems which doesn't seem to follow ]. It is filled with information that doesn't appear elsewhere in the article, and the points and their citations get quite complex for a summary. This may require someone to take on a lead editor role here to restructure the article to include all the information in the lead and rebuild the lead as a brief summary. (Also, I feel a lead should have no citations, though I'd support whatever choice a lead editor would take.) This restructuring would take a bit of work. If someone adopts this article to restructure it, I will certainly help as a supporting editor. ] (]) 18:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


== ] == == ] ==
Line 85: Line 81:


{{reflist talk}} ] (]) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC) {{reflist talk}} ] (]) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

== "Its role in rapid recovery has been debated." ==

never underestimate the psychological fuel you give to a desperate population with the knowledge that someone is helping you. (no refs required). on another note, the article repeatedly says france and uk received less aid than germany, yet when one totals up the figures from the two tables one gets the following: '''grants/loans''' - germany 1,390.6, france 2,713.6, uk 3,189.8.
'''expenditures''' - germany 1,448, france 2,296, uk 3,297.
'''totals:''' germany 2,838.6, france 5,009.6, uk 6,486.6. germany received 57% of the aid given france, and almost 44% of the aid given the uk. what am i missing? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Broken File==
PDF file for Public Law is broken. Idk why or how. ] (]) 17:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:41, 6 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marshall Plan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Former featured articleMarshall Plan is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 22, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 15, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 18, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
May 7, 2010Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 3, 2004, June 5, 2004, April 3, 2005, April 3, 2006, April 3, 2007, April 3, 2008, April 3, 2009, April 3, 2010, and April 3, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconEuropean history High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSocialism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject United States History To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconUnited States Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNational Archives (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of National Archives project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National ArchivesWikipedia:WikiProject National ArchivesTemplate:WikiProject National ArchivesNational Archives
WikiProject iconLaw
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Category		The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
‌


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.


Public opinion data on the Marshall Plan

Eliannalandau (talk)

Notes

References

  1. Lukacs, John. “A LOOK AT . . . THE LEGACY OF THE MARSHALL PLAN.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 25 May 1997, www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1997/05/25/a-look-at-the-legacy-of-the-marshall-plan/47b5b44c-e1eb-4c68-bd46-5a29c5c76c73/?utm_term=.b758f5822e5f.
  2. Machado, Barry. “Selling the Marshall Plan.” The George C. Marshall Foundation, George C Marshall Foundation, marshallfoundation.org/library/digital-archive/selling-the-marshall-plan-chapter-2-monograph-collection/.
  3. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Foreign Affairs Survey, Jun, 1952 . USNORC.520327.R16. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago . Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL , accessed Oct-13-2017.
  4. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Foreign Affairs Survey, Mar, 1949 . USNORC.490164.R11. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago . Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL , accessed Oct-13-2017.
  5. Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll, Feb, 1948 . USGALLUP.030348.RT07C. Gallup Organization . Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL , accessed Oct-13-2017.
  6. Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll (AIPO), Sep, 1941 . USGALLUP.41-248.QKT09. Gallup Organization . Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL , accessed Oct-13-2017

Committee for Economic Development

No idea where to work this in, but from that article: The CED has been credited with helping to create the Bretton Woods Agreement, the Employment Act of 1946 (and therefore the Council of Economic Advisers and the Joint Economic Committee) and the Marshall Plan. valereee (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. Mudge, Stephanie L. (30 May 2019). "Commentary: An Alliance Between Big Business and Democratic Socialists Isn't as Unlikely as It Sounds". Fortune. Retrieved 2022-01-30.
  2. Allott, Daniel (2020-01-21). "Capitalism must meet the challenge: Prosperity for all Americans". The Hill. Retrieved 2022-01-30.

valereee (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

"Its role in rapid recovery has been debated."

never underestimate the psychological fuel you give to a desperate population with the knowledge that someone is helping you. (no refs required). on another note, the article repeatedly says france and uk received less aid than germany, yet when one totals up the figures from the two tables one gets the following: grants/loans - germany 1,390.6, france 2,713.6, uk 3,189.8. expenditures - germany 1,448, france 2,296, uk 3,297. totals: germany 2,838.6, france 5,009.6, uk 6,486.6. germany received 57% of the aid given france, and almost 44% of the aid given the uk. what am i missing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.36.71 (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Broken File

PDF file for Public Law is broken. Idk why or how. A. Rosenberg (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Categories: