| Revision as of 05:27, 17 September 2007 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Automatically signing comment made by 222.152.101.104← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:31, 14 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,279,048 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Russia}}, {{WikiProject Alternative Views}}. |
| (48 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Noosphere|1= |
|
If you can write an article about Raymond's ''Homesteading the Noosphere'', please go ahead and do so. I've tried reading the whole thing and found it too hard to follow. How about summarizing it in a new Misplaced Pages article to be called ], please? --] |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=Low |attention=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Psychology |importance=Low |needs-infobox=no |attention=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Russia |importance=High |sci=yes |attention=yes |needs-infobox=no |imageneeded=no |mapneeded=no |unref=no |needs-cyrillic=no}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Alternative Views |importance=Low }} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
| counter = 1 |
|
|
| algo = old(730d) |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 75k |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|
| archive = Talk:Noosphere/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semantically incorrect redirection == |
|
:Thanks, Brion. --] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redirection to the article "noosphere", the name "noogenesis", which is not a synonym for the term represented by the name of redirection, and the article does not fully describe this term as part of a more general article. An article about "noogenesis", the concept, the history of its appearance, scientific research and development in modern times deserves, in my opinion, an independent existence. It may be advisable to disconnect "noogenesis" from redirection, designate an independent article "noogenesis" for further editing. ] (]) 05:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
:I read it when it first came out and it seemed to make some kind of sense at the time, but I don't remember the details too clearly. I'll try to expand the stub when I get a chance to reread. --] |
|
|
|
:Discussion of this is happening at ]. ] (]) 15:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
'''(cur) (last) . . 13:26, 31 Mar 2004 . . David Gerard (rv Vogelspam (the noosphere is not about white separatism))''' |
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 20#Noogenesis}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
That is right, David, the "noosphere" is related to ], and ] ,alone, is NOT what ] itself, is really all about, whatsoever! |
|
|
(rv POV Gerardspam) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
I removed the "nousphere" spelling. I've never seen it spelled that way, and Google has 100 references for it versus 137,000 for noosphere. ] 19:03, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I put it back because it is a redirect to this page, if you want to get ''nousphere'' removed, then get the redirect vfd'ed. According to the ], all alternative names should appear in the opening paragraph bolded. I don't care if the word stays or goes, I am just following the rules. --{{User:Sunborn/si}} 21:32, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
How about a little blurb on pronunciation? |
|
|
|
|
|
A second for that. The Greek pronunciation would suggest "nus" with a long U, but "noetic" suggests a double long "O" as in German. ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
==The "See Also" section== |
|
|
|
|
|
This section seems to be a bit cluttered with all sorts of references that are only marginally relevant. I think we ought to establish some criteria for what belongs there; Noosphere should not be treated as a catch-all phrase for any sort of "new age" material that someone wants to promote (like, for example, the ] film.) --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">]</font></font> 21:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:How about: the linked article must contain the term "noosphere". — ] ] 23:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Well, that would certainly pare down the list a bit. --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">]</font></font> 23:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
The folowing sentence could use some elaboration. |
|
|
''A somewhat different approach focuses on "sustainability," and begins to look at this concept in terms of "co-evolution" .'' |
|
|
--] 06:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Removing memetics category== |
|
|
|
|
|
I am removing the memetics category from this article since you learn no more about the article's contents from the category and v.v. Since so many things may be memes we should try to keep the category closely defined in order to remain useful. Hope you're okay with that. The link to meme would be enough I suggest. ] 17:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== nousphere == |
|
|
|
|
|
Nousphere: Is a notion offered by Tielhard de Chardin, Jesuit Priest and world renowned anthrapologist, he referred to the biosphere as sphere of life, lithosphere as sphere of rock, and nousphere as sphere of thought. Some would have it that the web is a practical expression of de Chardin's nousphere, but this is far to simplistic for what he intended, best see it as the tenuous framework of thought linking people in societies, and now via the web, does link people across social boundaries. Nousphere is perhaps best expressed as Popper's World III which is a less spiritual idea but nonetheless a sharp and profound expression of the idea behind the nousphere. I am sure Popper and de Chardin would have found much in common. Nousphere could be seen as the core of culture, carried forward via Poppers World III, and existing beyond any individual, forming the glue of the society binding people together today, and binding generations together. I see the nousphere as humankind's rudder, giving ideological and moral direction. It is a rudder influecing all but influenced by only the few. Graham Little <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
Redirection to the article "noosphere", the name "noogenesis", which is not a synonym for the term represented by the name of redirection, and the article does not fully describe this term as part of a more general article. An article about "noogenesis", the concept, the history of its appearance, scientific research and development in modern times deserves, in my opinion, an independent existence. It may be advisable to disconnect "noogenesis" from redirection, designate an independent article "noogenesis" for further editing. DoubleNoo (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Noogenesis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 20 § Noogenesis until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)