Revision as of 19:25, 1 April 2007 editLilkunta (talk | contribs)814 edits →Reverted Talk page changes← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:03, 1 April 2007 edit undoAthaenara (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,866 edits 3RR warningNext edit → | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==read attribution== | ==read attribution== | ||
Please read ]. It will explain the difference between a ] and an unverifiable source. I have tried to explain it many times. Bloggingbaby.com is UNVERIFIABLE and thus IT CANNOT BE USED AS A SOURCE. ] 19:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)<FONT FACE="Chiller" SIZE="2" COLOR="green"> What specifically? Thats a long page.'''] 19:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)''' | Please read ]. It will explain the difference between a ] and an unverifiable source. I have tried to explain it many times. Bloggingbaby.com is UNVERIFIABLE and thus IT CANNOT BE USED AS A SOURCE. ] 19:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)<FONT FACE="Chiller" SIZE="2" COLOR="green"> What specifically? Thats a long page.'''] 19:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)''' | ||
== 3RR warning == | |||
] | |||
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Jim Bob Duggar|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> 20:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:03, 1 April 2007
lilkunta Archives
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:lilkunta/Archive1"
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:lilkunta/Archive2
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive3
Thank You
Thank you for trying to help - it says "place helpme on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions." (INXS-Girl 15:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
O ok. I was told to place {helpme} it on an admin's page. Did n e 1 come & help u?Lilkunta 14:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Archiving
You can make as many archives as you want; for instance, User talk:Lilkunta/Archive1, User talk:Lilkunta/Archive2, and so on. You can create a page by typing its name into the search box and clicking on 'Go', which will provide you with a link to create it. Hope that helps! --ais523 14:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Jim Bob Duggar... again
I noticed that you reverted my edit. I find that it doesn't work out when editors revert content without any discussion. I would really prefer it if you would come to Talk:Jim_Bob_Duggar#Biography and discuss your concerns so we can reach a consensus about what the article should say. I have already stated my piece on the Talk page, and I would appreciate it if you would join me there to talk about the article. Thank you. Joie de Vivre 20:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Joie, you have numerous on the Duggar wiki page.You are dominating the Duggar wiki page. You act like you own this wiki page. Alot of ppl have added info but you always revert.Lilkunta 00:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
- That's not really accurate. A lot of people add poorly sourced (prohibited) material, particularly about a supposed new pregnancy. I revert that because it is encouraged per WP:BLP. Please see the talk page for my response to you. Joie de Vivre 20:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Reverted Talk page changes
I noticed that you reverted some of the changes I made to Talk:Jim Bob Duggar. I would like to ask you to familiarize yourself with WP:TALK, the Talk page guidelines. I didnt revert the talk page. I added my comment back in bc I feel it needs to be on duggar disc page. It needs to be there bc n e 1 looking @ the history will see numerous "joie" edits. So that section on the disc page is the place to discuss y u feel the duggar page is owned by u.
The problems: 1) you interspersed your commentary within my comments (rather than placing them at the bottom) Wiki allos COLOUR. U should try it. Lilkunta 18:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
2) you addressed me personally in a talk page section header (not allowed) U were the 1 who wrote me to post on the disc page. NOw u dont like it. whatever.Lilkunta 18:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
3) the statement about "dominating the talk page" is not appropriate for an article Talk page. You are allowed to make personal comments to other editors but an article Talk page is not the place to do it. I moved that comment to my Talk page where it belongs. I feel it needs to be on duggar disc page. It needs to be there bc n e 1 looking @ the history will see numerous "joie" edits. So that section on the disc page is the place to discuss y u feel the duggar page is owned by u.Lilkunta 18:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
4) your tone is borderline as far as WP:NPA so I would cool it with the insults if I were you. & again u come with intimidating comments... U COOL IT! I am not attacking u. Did I insult u? No did not. I stated a fact: u do repeatedly revert to ur version of the page; & u do have numerous edits to the page. & again u cme with intimidating comments; U COOL IT! Stop changing/moving editing my comments.Lilkunta 18:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I have reinstated your new comment, the one that started with "Same thing 2 u."
Please abide by the rules and stop making a mess of the Talk page. I am perfectly willing to work with you if you will communicate civilly and appropriately. Joie de Vivre 18:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)U stop messing with the talk page. I have a mother thanks very much!Lilkunta 18:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
read attribution
Please read WP:Attribution. It will explain the difference between a verifiable source and an unverifiable source. I have tried to explain it many times. Bloggingbaby.com is UNVERIFIABLE and thus IT CANNOT BE USED AS A SOURCE. Joie de Vivre 19:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC) What specifically? Thats a long page.Lilkunta 19:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
3RR warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Jim Bob Duggar. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 20:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)