Revision as of 02:22, 8 June 2011 editCesiumfrog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,924 edits →layout: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:24, 17 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,250 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: paws [2.2] |
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Merged-to|Orders of magnitude (length)|13 July 2016}} |
|
{{oldafdfull|date= ] ] |result= '''Keep''' |page= 1 E0 m }} |
|
|
|
{{oldafdmulti |
|
|
|date= 18 March 2008 |
|
|
|result= '''Keep''' |
|
|
|page= 1 E0 m |
|
|
|date2=12 January 2013 |
|
|
|page2=1 gigametre |
|
|
|result2='''Procedural Close''' |
|
|
|date3=13 January 2013 |
|
|
|page3=1 metre |
|
|
|result3='''No Consensus''' |
|
|
|date4=4 July 2016 |
|
|
|page4=1 myriametre |
|
|
|result4='''Merge''' to ]}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Measurement|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Lists|importance=low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
<!-- Formerly assessed as list-class --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== layout == |
|
== layout == |
Line 6: |
Line 24: |
|
|
|
|
|
Besides, I don't see why each order of magnitude needs a separate article (and talk page - for example, this comment is probably not going to get appropriate attention on this page, since the problem is common to the related pages, but i couldn't guess where the more appropriate place would be). Why not make all these pages just be subsections of one article, "orders of magnitude (length)"?. ] (]) 02:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
Besides, I don't see why each order of magnitude needs a separate article (and talk page - for example, this comment is probably not going to get appropriate attention on this page, since the problem is common to the related pages, but i couldn't guess where the more appropriate place would be). Why not make all these pages just be subsections of one article, "orders of magnitude (length)"?. ] (]) 02:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Dead link == |
|
|
|
|
|
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case! |
|
|
|
|
|
* http://www.braincampaign.org/Pub/Pub_Main_Display.asp?LC_Docs_ID=2769 |
|
|
** In ] on 2011-06-09 12:30:18, HTTP Redirect Loop: -> -> -> |
|
|
** In ] on 2011-06-20 03:35:39, HTTP Redirect Loop: -> -> -> |
|
|
|
|
|
--] (]) 03:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
the layout is really confusing: the heading "shorter than distance X" if followed by a list of entries that are greater than X, which makes no sense.
Besides, I don't see why each order of magnitude needs a separate article (and talk page - for example, this comment is probably not going to get appropriate attention on this page, since the problem is common to the related pages, but i couldn't guess where the more appropriate place would be). Why not make all these pages just be subsections of one article, "orders of magnitude (length)"?. Cesiumfrog (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!