Revision as of 16:45, 17 August 2023 editBlacky the Bre (talk | contribs)30 edits →10.5.9 Sorbet Leopard: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:20, 28 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,436 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| | ||
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=high}} | |||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| archiveheader = {{tan}} | | archiveheader = {{tan}} | ||
| maxarchivesize = 175k | | maxarchivesize = 175k | ||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| minthreadsleft = |
| minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| counter = 4 | | counter = 4 | ||
| algo = old(365d) | | algo = old(365d) | ||
| archive = Talk:Mac OS X Leopard/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = Talk:Mac OS X Leopard/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
{{Archive box|auto=yes|age=365|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} | {{Archive box|auto=yes|age=365|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
I've heard of an unofficial version of Mac OS X 10.5 called ''Sorbet Leopard''. Maybe include some info about Sorbet Leopard in the article? (Or maybe create a separate article about that subject?) ] (]) 16:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC) | I've heard of an unofficial version of Mac OS X 10.5 called ''Sorbet Leopard''. Maybe include some info about Sorbet Leopard in the article? (Or maybe create a separate article about that subject?) ] (]) 16:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
:A quick Google Search found , but that's not much of a ], and the references it gives are on Reddit and MacRumors forums, so not exactly reliable sources, either. | |||
:I didn't see any official site for it. There seems to be enough talk about it to indicate that it's not just a hoax (i.e., a big troll by multiple contributors), but not much in the way of details. My ''guess'' is that, ''if'' it exists, it's probably somebody taking a Leopard release, tweaking the open-source parts from the equivalent Darwin release, and releasing that, but that's just a bit of ] (if a quick guess even qualifies as "research") on my part, so there's no chance that I'd put that in an article. | |||
:I'm not inclined to say anything about it in the article without reliable sources. ] (]) 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:20, 28 January 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mac OS X Leopard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
10.5.9 Sorbet Leopard
I've heard of an unofficial version of Mac OS X 10.5 called Sorbet Leopard. Maybe include some info about Sorbet Leopard in the article? (Or maybe create a separate article about that subject?) Blacky the Bre (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- A quick Google Search found this page on the Apple wiki on fandom.com, but that's not much of a reliable source, and the references it gives are on Reddit and MacRumors forums, so not exactly reliable sources, either.
- I didn't see any official site for it. There seems to be enough talk about it to indicate that it's not just a hoax (i.e., a big troll by multiple contributors), but not much in the way of details. My guess is that, if it exists, it's probably somebody taking a Leopard release, tweaking the open-source parts from the equivalent Darwin release, and releasing that, but that's just a bit of original research (if a quick guess even qualifies as "research") on my part, so there's no chance that I'd put that in an article.
- I'm not inclined to say anything about it in the article without reliable sources. Guy Harris (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)