Revision as of 04:13, 5 February 2006 editInFairness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users701 edits Add reason for NPOV dispute |
Latest revision as of 23:24, 29 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,214 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(60 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
==NPOV== |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Slovakia|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology|portal=November 2006}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
|
Though I am not an expert in this area, it seems that the writer(s) wish(es) to push a particular point of view, one of somewhat fanatic (if fervent and heartfelt) Slovak nationalism. |
|
|
|
|archiveprefix=Talk:Coat of arms of Slovakia/Archive |
|
|
|
|
|
|format= %%i |
|
Referring to the double cross as coming from the Byzantine tradition (ultimately true enough) without mentioning that it was adopted by 'Hungarian' ruler Bela III, who was brought up in the Byzantine court, seems to have no other purpose than completely ignoring Hungarian presence and rule in the area of modern Slovakia, as does referring to "Bratislava", which was not called that at that time--it actually had many different names. |
|
|
|
|age=2160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|maxarchsize=150000 |
|
Also, is the info on the patriarchal cross better placed in the article ]? |
|
|
|
|numberstart=1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|archivebox=yes |
|
Please refer to the article on the ] for a better example of a neutral toned article. |
|
|
|
|box-advert=yes |
|
|
}} |