Misplaced Pages

Talk:Replisome: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:22, 31 December 2006 editArtman40 (talk | contribs)2,039 edits ←Created page with '{{Wikiproject MCB|importance=mid|class=stub}} Really needs some cleanup! --~~~~'  Latest revision as of 05:34, 30 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,179 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikiproject MCB|importance=mid|class=stub}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|genetics=yes|genetics-importance=High|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=high}}
⚫ Really needs some cleanup! --] 12:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
}}

==Untitled==
A table listing the enzymes and their tasks should be added. An image would also be helpful. --] 12:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

==More information for replisome==
http://research.chem.psu.edu/sjbgroup/T4Replisome/T4mainpage.html
http://www.wehi.edu.au/education/wehi-tv/dna/replication.html
⚫ These links should help to organize the article. --] 15:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

==Replisome Pro/Euk==
There are some significant differences in replisome factors between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. What's the best way to make sure these differences are made clear?

This article is missing lots of major pieces:

*In addition to preventing the formation of hairpins, the combination of SSB/RPA + single strand serves as a better substrate for the polymerisation reaction that takes place inside DNA polymerase III.
*There is almost no discussion about clamp loader/clamp or pre-initiation / initiation complex.
*There is almost no discussion about how error correction works in DNA polymerase III.
*There is almost no discussion about processivity.
] (]) 04:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Is anyone interested in coming up with a realistic table of contents? I can contribute significant portions of the writing for the article, but I'd really like community involvement for the TOC.
] (]) 05:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

== Not Exact Copy ==

The Intro says the copy is exact, but this is not quite true, even with proofreading there's a finite (but very small) chance of a mistake in the copied strand (with of course huge consequences, like evolu
tion.] (]) 15:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2019-05-14T07:55:15.586978 | DNA replication en.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 07:55, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

== Error in the first illustration? ==

I don't understand why is the DNA polymerase delta on the leading strand of the first illustration of the article, while it's in the article that the polymerase of the leading strand should be a polymerase epsilon... Am I missing something? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 05:34, 30 January 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMolecular Biology: Genetics / MCB
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

A table listing the enzymes and their tasks should be added. An image would also be helpful. --Artman40 12:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

More information for replisome

http://research.chem.psu.edu/sjbgroup/T4Replisome/T4mainpage.html http://www.wehi.edu.au/education/wehi-tv/dna/replication.html These links should help to organize the article. --Artman40 15:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Replisome Pro/Euk

There are some significant differences in replisome factors between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. What's the best way to make sure these differences are made clear?

This article is missing lots of major pieces:

  • In addition to preventing the formation of hairpins, the combination of SSB/RPA + single strand serves as a better substrate for the polymerisation reaction that takes place inside DNA polymerase III.
  • There is almost no discussion about clamp loader/clamp or pre-initiation / initiation complex.
  • There is almost no discussion about how error correction works in DNA polymerase III.
  • There is almost no discussion about processivity.

Thermodynamic (talk) 04:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Is anyone interested in coming up with a realistic table of contents? I can contribute significant portions of the writing for the article, but I'd really like community involvement for the TOC. Thermodynamic (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Not Exact Copy

The Intro says the copy is exact, but this is not quite true, even with proofreading there's a finite (but very small) chance of a mistake in the copied strand (with of course huge consequences, like evolu tion.Paulhummerman (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:55, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Error in the first illustration?

I don't understand why is the DNA polymerase delta on the leading strand of the first illustration of the article, while it's in the article that the polymerase of the leading strand should be a polymerase epsilon... Am I missing something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexisbu (talk • contribs) 07:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Categories: