Misplaced Pages

Talk:Total quality management: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:32, 24 October 2005 editMatador (talk | contribs)50 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:36, 5 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,474 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(152 intermediate revisions by 57 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- industrial engineering -->
;'';
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
I've been comparing this article to Bergman & Klefsjö (2001), Kvalitet - från behov till användning, ISBN 91-44-01917-3, Studentlitteratur: Sweden, Lund and I've found several differences (the book is available in English: Bergman & Klefsjö, Quality - from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction, ISBN 91-44-04166-7, Studentlitteratur: Sweden, Lund). The authors also point out that it is not clear who came up with TQM. They refer to the Naval Aviation Logistics Command (NALC) when they in 1984 tried to implement Ishikawa's “Total Management Control” but didn't like the word “Control”. One of the members, Nancy Warren, suggested replacing the word with “Management”.
|archiveprefix=Talk:Total quality management/Archives/

|format=Y
So I'm wondering whether my facts are wrong or not? Foremost on NALC and Ishikawa's “TQC”. I have changed and added that the origin is not clear with some poeple's views.
|age=26298
|index=yes
|archivebox=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}
{{American English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Business|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Engineering|importance=Mid}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:36, 5 February 2024



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBusiness High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEngineering Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Categories: