Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:40, 4 April 2007 view sourceBikeable (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,103 edits →{{la|Rodolfo Valentin}}: -- no← Previous edit Revision as of 23:17, 4 April 2007 view source Yakuman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,214 edits →Current requests for protectionNext edit →
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
==Current requests for protection== ==Current requests for protection==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}} {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}

⚫ ===={{la|Nadine Gordimer}}====
⚫ '''full protection''' Ongoing NPOV debate over verified fact in controversial graf in article. Edit warring and criss-crossing policy violation claims. A compromise edit was produced, but editor refused it. Reversions mixed in with other, non-controversial edits ] 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

⚫ ===={{la|Paul McKenna}}====
'''Semi-protect.''' High level of IP vandalism/reverts. ] 22:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

⚫ ===={{la|Richard Bandler}}====
'''Semi-protect.''' High level of IP vandalism/reverts. ] 22:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


===={{la|Korčula}}==== ===={{la|Korčula}}====
Line 85: Line 94:
'''semi-protection''' Semi-protection: Vandalism, ip edit war — <font face="Verdana"><small>]] ]</small></font> 16:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC) '''semi-protection''' Semi-protection: Vandalism, ip edit war — <font face="Verdana"><small>]] ]</small></font> 16:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s}} ] <sup>]</sup> 19:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) :{{RFPP|s}} ] <sup>]</sup> 19:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

⚫ ===={{lu|Ryanpostlethwaite}}====
⚫ '''semi-protection''' Semi-protection: Vandalism, — <font face="Verdana"><small>]] ]</small></font> 16:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
⚫ :{{RFPP|s}} by Alison. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 16:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


===={{la|Watergate scandal}}==== ===={{la|Watergate scandal}}====
Line 121: Line 126:


==Fulfilled/denied requests== ==Fulfilled/denied requests==
===={{lu|Ryanpostlethwaite}}====
⚫ '''semi-protection''' Semi-protection: Vandalism, — <font face="Verdana"><small>]] ]</small></font> 16:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
⚫ :{{RFPP|s}} by Alison. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 16:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


===={{la|Christian Children's Fund}}==== ===={{la|Christian Children's Fund}}====
'''full-protect'''. To protect against people entering incorrect data about Christian Children's Fund - we're a highly reputable organization and wish to remain above reproach. Entering incorrect data can tremendously affect our hard-earned excellent reputation. ] 15:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC) '''full-protect'''. To protect against people entering incorrect data about Christian Children's Fund - we're a highly reputable organization and wish to remain above reproach. Entering incorrect data can tremendously affect our hard-earned excellent reputation. ] 15:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Line 186: Line 196:
'''Semi-protection''' - Being a current event and linked from the front page, this gets a lot of attention. One or two anons think that calling the sailors detainees is "Pro Iranian POV" and keep changing the wording to "hostages" (see talk page). There is also the problem of American anons "correcting" the Commonwealth English spelling. --] 02:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC) '''Semi-protection''' - Being a current event and linked from the front page, this gets a lot of attention. One or two anons think that calling the sailors detainees is "Pro Iranian POV" and keep changing the wording to "hostages" (see talk page). There is also the problem of American anons "correcting" the Commonwealth English spelling. --] 02:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}} Insufficient vandalism for protection. Articles like this must be available for the public to edit, unless there are extreme circumstances, and there are none here. --] ] 04:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC) :{{RFPP|d}} Insufficient vandalism for protection. Articles like this must be available for the public to edit, unless there are extreme circumstances, and there are none here. --] ] 04:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

⚫ ===={{la|Dora the Explorer}}====
'''Semi-Protection''' - Recent additions to this article have included the addition to Trivia that rumours exists (Dora the Explorer is an illegal immigrant), and the last edit by Princedebonair blanked the whole page and replaced it with a full statement that Droa was an illegal immigrant. There have been several reversions of this nature in last 72 hours, and request is now for this page to be semi protected. ] 01:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC) (CVU)
:{{RFPP|nea}} - sorry (and I just reverted vandalism there myself) - ]<sup>]</sup> 02:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

⚫ ===={{la|Nadine Gordimer}}====
⚫ '''full protection''' Ongoing NPOV debate over verified fact in controversial graf in article. Edit warring and criss-crossing policy violation claims. A compromise edit was produced, but editor refused it. Reversions mixed in with other, non-controversial edits ] 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:17, 4 April 2007


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: view • edit



    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024



    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Nadine Gordimer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Ongoing NPOV debate over verified fact in controversial graf in article. Edit warring and criss-crossing policy violation claims. A compromise edit was produced, but editor refused it. Reversions mixed in with other, non-controversial edits Yakuman (数え役満) 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Paul McKenna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism/reverts. Yakuman (数え役満) 22:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Richard Bandler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism/reverts. Yakuman (数え役満) 22:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Korčula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Too much spam from anons. It appears tourist agencies are on a mass Misplaced Pages commercial-spreading campaign across Dalmatia related articles. --PaxEquilibrium 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Rodolfo Valentin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Large amount of anonymous vandalism from IP 71.252.49.164.,all in the same day 2-april=2007; after the third spam, the editor KaragouniS reverted the article to the last revision, but again IP 71.252.49.164 returned four more times and spammed the article again! a total of 7 spams. 151.202.72.149 22:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)justice all the way

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison 22:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
    Certainly doesn't need protection, although it needs discussion on the Talk page. The page reads like a terribly biased advertisement. Edits by 71.252.49.164 look like good faith attempts to remove advertising to me. bikeable (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Tom Tancredo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection Persistent vandalism. Wooyi 22:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Woman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection. Due to an on going conflict over which image is better suited to be the lead for the article. possibly headed for edit/revert wars.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 21:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined Things do not look too bad right now; discussion is ongoing, but if things continue to go downhill, protection could be needed. I'll put the article on my watchlist. -- tariqabjotu 22:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Hezbollah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Lots of vandalism recently. Seems mostly isolated to two newly-registered users. — George Saliba 21:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. The appropriate users have been blocked, so I don't believe protection is necessary now. -- tariqabjotu 21:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Harry Flood Byrd Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Large amount of anonymous vandalism, mostly from kids who go to the school, or from rival schools. Ben151 20:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Michaelas10 21:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Bomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism: about 20 out of last 50 edits are vandalisms, and about as much are reverts. Elenthel 20:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Michaelas10 20:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Wheaton Warrenville South High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect Ongoing vandalism from multiple IP addresses. --Minderbinder 19:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Michaelas10 21:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Dutch conjugation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection (for a week or so?). I heard there will be a huge vandalism attack on this page. If it doesn't get protection, a lot of reverts will have to be done.

    Scavenger 19:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined - let us know when it starts. I note that anon editors are making constructive edits there and it would be wrong to prevent them needlessly - Alison 19:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Thomas Jefferson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect It was unprotected (from semi-protection) approximately 12 hours ago, and has since suffered repeatedly vandalisation. --Iamunknown 19:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - also move protected per history - Alison 19:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Butter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Daily IP vandalism. Peter G Werner 19:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison 19:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Mushroom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Daily IP vandalism. Peter G Werner 19:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison 19:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Eeee!_Doctor_Who (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    protect. Deleted article recreated several times in the past few days mikm 18:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected Listed at Misplaced Pages:Protected titles. Michaelas10 18:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Iraq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. With the amount of vandalism, this page might as well be in Iraq. Also, request permanent full move protection. Patstuart 18:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected Michaelas10 18:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    One-child policy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Prominent, important page with moderate levels of vandalism from anonymous users. Would benefit from semi-protection. --Dancraggs 15:07, Wednesday December 25 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Michaelas10 18:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    User:Vishwin60/to do (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protection because of persistent vandalism by many IPs.  V60 16:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected John Reaves (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Spotsylvania County Public Schools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, ip edit war — zero » 16:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected Tom Harrison 19:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Watergate scandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect - constant vandalism to this article by anons --AW 15:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - It looks manageable for now. Tom Harrison 19:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
    Comment - there have been 8 reverts because of vandalism since the 2nd, including one about a minute ago --AW 19:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
    See Spotsylvania County Public Schools above. Tom Harrison 19:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Minutes to Midnight (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. significant level of street team referral link vandalism by anonymous users. Impasse 06:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected -- tariqabjotu 22:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Fellowship of Friends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request unprotection because editors are in a consensus on the Talk page. Mario Fantoni 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request unprotection so that improvements and rewordings can be made, as discussed on the talk page. >Radiant< Unprotected John Reaves (talk) 18:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Discordian Works (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Edit warring has died down, needs to be subject to the editing process again. People need to be able to provide sources. Moreschi 08:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Anchor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This article recently fully protected following edit war and vandalism (content deletion under pretense of spam) from Russeasby (now 24-hr blocked for 3RR violation). The deleted content in question is sourced and perfectly NPOV. Third party opinions in Talk:Anchor are against this deletion, e.g. that from Hoof Hearted, and advice from one other solicited third party (Shell Kinney) warned cessation of these edits. Protection fell upon final revert by Russeasby before revision could take place. Suggest this be rolled back. Badmonkey 15:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

    Declined The consensus is hard to see on that page, all I see is arguments. In addition, if a consensus is reached, asking for unprotection is better. This section is for non-controversial edits to protected pages; unprotection may be more appropriate. --Deskana (ya rly) 21:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    User:Ryanpostlethwaite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, — zero » 16:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected by Alison. -- zzuuzz 16:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


    Christian Children's Fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full-protect. To protect against people entering incorrect data about Christian Children's Fund - we're a highly reputable organization and wish to remain above reproach. Entering incorrect data can tremendously affect our hard-earned excellent reputation. Tabrumett 15:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If you're concerned about the article, watchlist it and revert vandalism. But there is no justification for semi-protection, much less full protection. Heimstern Läufer 15:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Republic of Ragusa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Permanent semi-protect. Check the amount of reverts caused by the banned user:Afrika_paprika and the sockpuupets of him. The last sockpuppet (User talk:Joker 13) has been just bloked, but in few minutes a new one has appeared. This is the 4th request, I hope this time I will be understood. Same problem for Giacomo Micaglia‎, Giovanni Serafino Bona‎, Marino Ghettaldi--Giovanni Giove 08:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected by Aldux. -- zzuuzz 16:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


    Bhutan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism from multiple IP addresses to suppress legitimate information. Sylvain1972 14:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 14:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Bubba the Love Sponge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism from multiple IP addresses that produce the same edits. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 14:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Euphonium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full Protection - Repeated, obvious vandalism: 129.120.244.17 constantly changes every instance of the word "euphonium" to "baritone" and posts obnoxious, flame-bait messages on the talk page. This page has been semi-protected before and the vandalism started again immediately after the protection was lifted, so it seems nothing but full, indefinite protection will stop this nonsense. --NetherlandishYankee 13:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected due to revert warring. Majorly (o rly?) 14:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Year Zero (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Swarms of users using unreliable sources (forums, torrent sites) about the "high quality" leak. Will 13:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 14:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    WrestleMania 24 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full Protection - IP users are constantly attacking the page and it's still a year before the event, so it's just bound to get worse. Davnel03 13:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 14:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Northern Ireland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection Content dispute regarding the use of flags in the article's infobox. The article was previously protected for this. User:Vintagekits and User:padraig3uk have decided the issue has been resolved and removed the flag/crest from the article. As you'll see from the article's talk page no consensus has been reached and the steps from the dispute resoltion process have not been carried out. It needs to go to mediation and/or Arbcom and as per policy the status quo (the flag/crest being included) should remain until that happens. Until yestersay all users in the dispute had followed procedure and not edited the article to insert/remove the flag. I realise I have broken 3RR, but Vintagekits and padraig have also broken the essence of the policy. I request the article be reverted to include the flag/crest and full protection until the dispute is resolved. Stu 11:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected due to revert warring. Majorly (o rly?) 14:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
    Please amend the protection to the status quo version before it was changed today (before the issue has been resolved) Stu 14:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    LOL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection +expiry 2 days, Semi-protection: Vandalism, constant vandalism. As soon as changes are reverted, the page is vandalised again Aiyda 10:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined Vandalism is mainly from one IP user who has stopped after a final warning on their user talk page. If they vandalise again, please report them to WP:AIV. -- Waggers 11:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Jamie Hyneman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi protection Anons keep adding that he's died, but I can't find any sources on it yet. - Denny 05:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected by Ryulong. -- zzuuzz 13:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Stephen Cassidy Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Full protection, recreated article made by the same user — zero » 04:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. - user blocked - Alison 04:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
    Note: Listed at Misplaced Pages:Protected titles/April 2007. John Reaves (talk) 04:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. IP addresses are coming in and posted fraudalent roster data and location data. Thank you. ---- GIGGAS2 | Talk 03:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Alison 03:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Armenia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect.. User:Ararat arev and his army of socks is wreaking havoc.. The page got fully protected, along with another article, four times in the last days for the same precise reason. Check user was done and apparently his proxies were blocked a couple of hours ago, but he seems to have found a way to sneak right back in.. Baristarim 02:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected - by User:Seraphimblade - Alison 03:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - Being a current event and linked from the front page, this gets a lot of attention. One or two anons think that calling the sailors detainees is "Pro Iranian POV" and keep changing the wording to "hostages" (see talk page). There is also the problem of American anons "correcting" the Commonwealth English spelling. --Imroy 02:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

    Declined Insufficient vandalism for protection. Articles like this must be available for the public to edit, unless there are extreme circumstances, and there are none here. --Deskana (ya rly) 04:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)