| Revision as of 20:14, 7 February 2005 edit216.174.135.2 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:50, 6 February 2024 edit undoZefr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers69,221 edits Reverting edit(s) by 199.217.33.21 (talk) to rev. 1194088217 by Cewbot: Vandalism (RW 16.1)Tags: RW Undo |
| (78 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
Do we know who first suggested that the sun is just another star? That's always seemed to me to be a rather massive development in our understanding of our place in the universe... ] 00:22, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Astronomy|importance=high}} |
|
: Hmm, found an answer at . ] 00:43, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Occupations|importance=low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
I thank whoever did the report on astronomy as a job. It was very informative and helped me to understand what my brother was actually doing - :) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Proposed rewrite== |
|
|
|
|
|
With due respect to all who have edited this article previously, I think it could be improved enormously up your ass. It containts some very unencyclopaedic writing (e.g. in section 1.1 Introduction), is entirely US-centric, and contains some very broad and sometimes bizarre sweeping statements about what astronomers do. It seems to me actually most of the article could be deleted, and replaced with a much more concise summary of what astronomers do. Would anyone else support a substantial re-write and compression of this article? ] 14:54, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Most of the middle section was added December 26 and reads like a school essay about careers rather than an encyclopedia article. I trimmed a fair bit of it, but it could probably still be tightened up. -- ] 23:06, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) |
|
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale..jpg){kind=small}
