| Revision as of 23:55, 6 March 2006 editNrcprm2026 (talk | contribs)7,109 editsm →Medical doctorate: sp.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:51, 9 February 2024 edit undoBoleyn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers307,295 edits Notification: listing of Levi Stewart at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (61 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| ==Unspecified source for ]== | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- ] | ] 11:09, 15 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Strawberries == | |||
| ] | |||
| I wonder if you are planning to expand the various ''Fragaria'' spp. articles? If not, then since each article is short and contains much the same information as the others, maybe they could be merged into a section of the ] article? ] 05:10:36, 2005-08-19 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
| As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. | |||
| Yes, I am planning to expand the articles. If you'll notice, a few have already been expanded, and I deleted links to 5 which I have decided not to do. I have also just added more infor to the tanonomy section of the main Strawberry article] 06:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 15:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Image source --> ]≈<small>]</small> 15:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Footnotes== | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Arizlegis1933.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 08:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <sup>1</sup>The easternmost/westernmost points of the U.S. throughout the world are disputed. | |||
| What is most eastern or western depends on one's point of view about what east and west really mean. | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Lawrence Kestenbaum== | |||
| By cartographical convention, the ] running through ] is the ''least eastern'' and ''least western'' place in the world. It is defined as 0 degrees longitude. The 180th Meridian, on the opposite side of the globe represents the absolute limit of how far east or west one can travel, from a cartographical perspective. Anything exactly on the 180th meridian is neither east nor west; but take a single step to either side and one is at 179+ degrees east or 179+ degrees west, the highest achievable numbers. By this mode of reconing, the most eastern and western spots in the US are both in the Aluetian Islands, Alaska. | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> --]<sup>]·]</sup> 17:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==License tagging for Image:FrankBriggs.jpg== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ]. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of ] to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from ], click on ], then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on ]. Thank you for your cooperation. --] (]) 09:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If one takes the view that the easternmost place is where the day first begins, and the westernmost is where the day last ends, then the International Date Line is the defining limit for what is most eastern or western. In a new year, the earliest US sunrise takes place on Wake Island. Less than an hour ealier, the sun also rose over Attu Island, Alaska but for December 31. | |||
| ==AfD== | |||
| On the other hand, if one defines what is most eastern and most western by which direction he or she must travel to reach a given point over the shortest distance, then Udall Point, Virgin Islands and Point Udall, Guam are the easternmost and westernmost points, respectively. While the world is round, and any point can be reached by traveling either east or west, it is always more direct to head east to reach Udall Point, VI when traveling from any other spot in the U.S. Likewise, there is not a single point in the United States from which heading east is a shorter route to Point Udall, Guam than heading west would be, even accounting for circumpolar routes. This holds true because all U.S. territory is spread across less than 180 degrees of longitude. | |||
| Please see: ]. ] (]) 18:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==File copyright problem with File:DavidKingUdall.jpg== | |||
| ==Survey of sexual harassment and assault at West Point== | |||
| ] | |||
| It is inappropriate to remove well referenced information from an article. While the information could be organized differently it is significant information which belongs in the article. After all the information comes from reports of the Department of Defense. ] 03:20, August 31, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the ]. You may refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is . | |||
| ==West Point== | |||
| I'm not defending West Point or policing relevant content. I could similarly place well referenced information about the varieties of snack food most consumed on campus in 1955, broken down by percentage, and it too would be way out of place. The National Enquirer and Ken Starr might be interested and feel that it appropriate to report what percentage of people at an institution had anal sex in a certain year. Within the context of an article about a 200 year institution which has had dozens of scandals which dwarf your reference, your information is simply out of place. | |||
| ] 03:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :There was no directive by Congress to the Department of defense to survey snack food nor would a report on snack food find prominent coverage in the media. See and ] 11:28, August 31, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> --] (]/]) 16:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I see that you did edit the article more or less the same way I did with the exception of the links in this language, "Following the ] and due to concern with ]" These probably should remain in the article as the Task Force was created due to the publicity which resulted from the Air Force scandal and it is the intention of the DoD to apply the new policies military-wide. ] 11:35, August 31, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==File copyright problem with File:JesseAddisonUdall.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the ]. You may refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is . | |||
| ==Fragaria × Potentilla hybrids== | |||
| Hi Dr U - query: shouldn't the two named cultivars have registered trade marks (R in a ring, I don't know how to type it!) rather than copyright symbols? - Thanks, ] 22:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> --] (]/]) 16:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Actually, although I left it as is in my last edit of that page, I don't think Lipstick is a registered trademark, at least not in the United States. Pink Panda may be. Glad to see the article there...I would be interested in discussing strawberry breeding with you at some point. ] 06:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==File copyright problem with File:LeviStewartUdall.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the ]. You may refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is . | |||
| ==Thank you!== | |||
| Appreciate your great updates to history topics! And yay the Army. All my military friends--all two of them--are Army. :) Cheers. ] 22:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> --] (]/]) 16:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Function of the ] article == | |||
| OK -- I'll bite. "Political" in ], the ] and Utah Territory was intimately tied to religion. We find descendents of all these folks in the upper councils of the LDS church (and RLDS for a couple of generations) during the first 50 - 60 years after Joseph's Smith's death, and serving in Utah territorial positions as well. Church responsibility led to being a "judge in Israel" and hence to political activity. Many of these families are still prominent socially, politically and religiously, but prominence is still centered around the hub of the LDS Church. Many modern Mormons feel that political activity and public service can be a religious duty. But the title of the article implies a different viewpoint -- a look at a family tree or generational history. So, can you spell out your central concept about the article and/or where the article is going? It would be good to define things in the first paragraph. Best wishes. ] 03:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==File copyright problem with File:DonTaylorUdall.jpg== | |||
| :Well, it is true that it doesn't take much to find a new cousin in any Mormon crowd. ]/polygamy will make your family relationships more intricate, and the concept and mechanism may need to be explained. I'm still not clear on exactly where you are going with the article, but you might look at "Uncle" John Smith's family, the brother of Joseph Smith, Sr. Also consider the Mayor's of Salt Lake City and Provo, Utah, and prominent southern Utah families -- i.e. Cannon, Matheson and Leavitt as well. Many of the early mayors (and Church Stake Presidents and authorities) involved in these areas were tied in with your families, and some may have given rise to the present batch involved in national politics. Other ideas may be available from editors in the LDS project - ]. We welcome editors from a variety of backgrounds. Feel free to check in. Good luck -- I'll "watch" your article with interest. ] 04:35, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the ]. You may refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is . | |||
| ::See my recent draft of an article on Utah state senator ]. She's only related to the Cannon's on the distaff side, but might be worth a mention. Your comments welcome there too. ] 04:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> --] (]/]) 16:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Nuclear reactor at West Point? == | |||
| ==File source and copyright licensing problem with File:JohnHuntUdall.jpg== | |||
| I guess we are both editing the same article right now. I saw in your edit that you mentioned a nuclear reactor at USMA. Are you referring to a small, research reactor on campus? Or are you referring to the nearby ]? When I Google , I get no relevant hits --] 06:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, it currently is missing information on its '''copyright''' status and its '''source'''. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. | |||
| If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on ''']''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. | |||
| == James M. Gavin == | |||
| Please add this information by editing the ]. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| Hi. You write, you're paratrooper. Could you maybe organize images of James M. Gavin. That would be great. ;) Kind Reagrds, ] 11:40, 11 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is . If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source no license-notice --> --] (]/]) 16:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Civet coffee == | |||
| ==Category:Sanchez family== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hilarious! I tweaked the style a bit and added it to the unusual articles page. I might even put that on the "Did You Know?" section of the main page! Thanks for the chuckle just before bed. - ] 07:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| I'd never heard of it, frankly. Just when you think all the fun has gone out of Misplaced Pages, along comes civet coffee! Man, I can't wait to tell that story at the office tomorrow. - ] 07:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :'''The article is an arbitrarily defined stand-alone list that fails to meet the notability criteria of ] in that there is no evidence cited that the topic has been discussed as a group or set by any sources whatsoever let alone any independent reliable ones.''' | |||
| Just want to thank you for your attention to this article. Hang around patiently for a while and within 6 months the article should be looking very nice once cooler heads and meaningful discussion prevail. ] 16:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| :Thank you for your recent efforts on the article. Although I haven't had much Wiki time, I have been keeping an eye on the "action." I would appreciate your comments on my suggested outline/content for the article, which should allow us to include much of the current information (a good edit is always useful) and other information as well. Thank you. ] 09:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == 1/1000 common ancestry == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I am stunned and hugely flattered to find the article about the 1/1000 ancestry rule, citing me as the originator. I had no idea it would be useful to others. | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ] ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 21:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Though the rule has the effect of definining the boundaries of political families, I was more concerned at the time with what relations were reasonable to list in a biographical entry. Those links (from entry to entry for related individuals) preceded the creation of the political family pages. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I came up with the rule because I was getting contributions to Political Graveyard citing this or that individual as being the 8th or 12th cousin of some president. It was plain to me that such remote cousinships were not very meaningful, but I needed a neutral, mathematical way to draw the line. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Previous to this, the limitation had been simply the length of the field for the relationship. I had room for "tenth cousin", but not enough for "first cousin four times removed", even though the latter is a much closer relationship. In tandem with the 1/1024 rule, I began storing the relationships as codes, which was both more efficient and allowed me to document and display more complex relations. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The new version of the site, which I hope will be up soon, takes that a step further by enabling relations that involve intermediaries. For example, instead of "brother-in-law" or "uncle by marriage", the entry will be more like "married to Jane Doe (sister of Politician Doe)", at least where I have the names of those intermediaries. In some cases, the intermediaries are themselves politicians: for example, Hillary Clinton is the intermediary between Bill Clinton and Hugh Rodham. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| Many thanks for your interest in my efforts on the site. | |||
| ] 15:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Dr U. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| ==Interest== | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Since you seem to have some interest in the subject and some knowledge, I would invite you to join the discussion. ]. ] 17:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == DU edits duing mediation == | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/10&oldid=750552495 --> | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| If you aren't a party to the Depleted uranium article mediation, would you mind making your own version of the article to edit while it's protected, or using the ] version with which I believe you will be more satisfied? The differences will be discussed when a mediator takes up the issue in a few days. --'']'' 20:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>I can't find the slightest indication that this has gained any academic traction outside of Political Graveyard. Checked Google, Gbooks, Gnews, Gscholar, JSTOR.</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| :Hello Dr. U. I see you to have also had some issues with the current way that ] interprets its references. ], ], and I have brought the article under mediation (]) due to problems with how the sources were sited (primarily by user ], aka James) and the conclusions made from them. This may get confusing, but currently parts of the eventual article may come from ], ], or ]. ] 02:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Best that we shouldn't bate Janes, as tempting as it is, and as guilty as I have been of it myself. If this is ever picked up for mediaton, or as I suspect arbitration down the line these teasings may come back to haunt us. --] 18:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ♠]♠ ] 04:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Well, since its an encyclopedia, the descision to include things shouldn't be made on who said what to who. That being said, my 1st posting today might have been a bit over the top. You do have to get to know me though. Clearly my cow catapult comment was just humor, and not meant to offend or sway debate. ] 18:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == On your offer to James == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 20:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| On Jan16 I posted to James' talk page: | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ''"Please work with us. We are willing to work with you, and we have the background to help polish this section to the point where the statements of risk would be unassailable from a scientific POV. And while I have no idea what other reasons you have for pursuing this matter outside of Misplaced Pages, you have the opportunity to draw on free expertise whose input can only help strengthen the technical side of your project and help you avoid embarrassing errors that might undermine your case."'' | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 10:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| For which I received the answer: | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ''"My motivation is protecting the health of my family and society. I came on the issue in 2004, spending days searching online and in libraries, and when I was finished I was upset that there had never been any attempt by the military to measure the gaseous combustion products (uranyl oxide gas), only the particulates. I don't know whether that was an honest mistake. Also, there is the matter of a c.1945 memo from General Leslie Groves recommending using uranium as a chemical weapon, which is hard to ignore. The fact that UO3(g) is a combustion product has been known since as early as 1960, and I don't see how any responsible researcher could possibly miss it. So I do believe that at least gross negligence if not outright malice, or both, has been involved. You will note, however, that I have never expressed that point of view in any of my edits.'' | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 10:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ..we have the background to help polish this section to the point where the statements of risk would be unassailable.... | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ''Who is we and what background are you referring to?'' | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ...you don't really have the knowledge to mount an effective argument.. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ''I've spent hours on the phone with Army, Navy, Air Force, and NRC officials in officially transcribed teleconferences going over the minutae of the issues. If that has taught me anything it is that the research is sorely lacking in some areas, ignored in others, and often presented in a very misleading way.'' | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| ''I can, and have, provided peer-reviewed sources supporting all aspects of my argument. When I asked the same of you, you balked. Do I have any reason not to say, therefore, that you lack the basic ethics to participate in a debate without an unfair double standard?'' | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ''After half a century of uranium use, mining, metalworking, etc., why have there been no toxicological studies to detect anything more than its nephrotoxicity in humans?'' | |||
| == File:JosephCSBlackburn.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> --]<sup>«¦]¦»</sup> 08:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:ElizaStewart.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ''If you want to propose changes or additions, you don't need my cooperation to do so'' | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 18:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you, I doubt he has any intention of taking you up on your offer, he just doesn't want to look truculent to a potential mediator. I have come to the conclusion that James and I (at least) are heading to ArbCom as I have been at this of and on since Nov of last year with little or no progress. --] 20:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Depleted uranium dispute resolution == | |||
| As agreed, I had the DU article unlocked and replaced it with the /basic verson with links to the Health effects and Gulf War syndrome pages, bringing this round to an end. I think the fact that we managed to hammer this out by ourselves is a feather in our caps and an example to all who are in conflicts on the 'pedia. I thank you all. --] 01:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Cowbell! == | |||
| Thank you very much for supporting the ]. However, I don't feel I can support your category, as it is not utterly necessary, and as the List has been nominated for deletion twice now, I am loath to do anything that would bring the exclusionists knocking back on the door. As it is, from the ] article anyone can reach the list. Since the cowbell is such an interesting and rare instrument in Western popular music, it is more likely that the link to the list from the main instrument article would be more helpful to those interested than a category linking all the songs on the list that have their own articles. | |||
| Better to put the list in a "see also" section than to add a category to every song's article. That's my opinion. But thank you again for supporting the List! --] 22:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I noticed you created the ] article, and immediately blanked it. Did you want to have it speedily deleted? If so, you may want to put in the <nowiki>{{db|Page created by accident}}</nowiki> or a similar tag. If you're planning to expand it and didn't like that text, you may want to use <nowiki>{{inuse}}</nowiki>, which lets other users know more is coming in the immediate future. Please feel free to write a note on my ] if I can help with anything. --] 03:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==DU== | |||
| I am at my wits end with James and the DU article. Suggestions would be nice because his behavior is leading me to beleive that arbitration might be the only avenue to deal with this. ] 19:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *In response to your inquiry, I need to know more about what the dispute is about before I can do anything. I am completely unknowledgable in this area, and the "edit war" seems low key at this point for protection.--] 22:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'll keep an eye on the situation...it appears you and TDC are dealing with one editor...before I can objectively intervene, summarize what the two sides of the story are for me.--] 22:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I will look at it agin later on tonight and see what I can do.--] 23:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Time for RfArb== | |||
| Time for RfArb | |||
| Since ] cannot have his way on ] he has decide to scrap the outcome of the mediation. , , , . I see little other option at this point. ] 19:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The dispute has not even entered mediation yet; if you or TDC wish to request a return to mediation, I will agree and cooperate. --'']'' 19:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: We are, to put it mildly, beyond that. ] 19:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Medical doctorate== | |||
| Dr U, you claim a medical doctorate, but this claim can not be verified. What is your name, and what are the names and titles of the people who signed your M.D.? --'']'' 19:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have an MD, but as I am neither diagnosing nor treating anyone, my identity and credentials are my own damn business. ] 19:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I am not surprised that you refuse to reveal your identity, because if you did, your attempt at disclaiming diagnostic activities would not keep the gross scientific, medical, and ethical misconduct apparent in your edits from reflecting directly on you and potentially endangering your professional standing. If you can not own up to your credentials, then you have no business claiming the benefit of them. There is no way to distinguish you from a pretender, and the slant of your edits suggests worse. --'']'' 20:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I claim nothing. I only read the articles and cite the sources. I am not posting original research, and have never said my edits were more important than anyone elses because of my degree. Once again, AS I AM NOT DIAGNOSING OR TREATING ANYONE, MY IDENTITY IS MY OWN DAMN BUSINESS. You are committing libel, and I suggest you cease your personal attacks now. ] 20:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : The RfArb is posted, please make a statement if you want. ] 20:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Hey, make a statement and provide links on the Rfarb. ] 20:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| For what reason do you claim that "Any connection between Gulf War Syndrome and depleted uranium exposure is purely speculative...." is not a diagnostic statment? --'']'' 21:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I didn't diagnose anybody with anything. If you are suggesting that such statements constitute a diagnosis, you are severely misinformed. If that was true, the YOU would be guilty of practicing medicine without a license. ] 22:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Are you willing to take personal responsibility for the statements made on the subject of the profession you claim, or will you continue to hide behind anonymity? What do you think would happen to a physician who went on TV and said that a known teratogen isn't toxic? --'']'' 22:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| James, should we ban the NEW ENGLAND JOURANAL OF MEDICINE, the source of that statement? I have never said that my statements carry any special weight because of my life experiences. I AM NOT DIAGNOSING ANYBODY WITH ANYTHING. I AM NOT DISPENSING MEDICAL ADVICE. I AM POSTING OTHER AUTHORS CONCLUSIONS. And most of all, I NEVER EVER EVER said DU was not toxic, so don't put words in my mouth.] 22:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : The NEJM never said that DU wasn't toxic. If you think you can make general diagnostic statements, expressing your opinion of the medical condition of tens if not hundreds of thousands contrary to peer-reviewed research, and not run afoul of professional misconduct regulations, then I would like to know why. M.D.s are frequently charged with just such misconduct. It is no wonder that you refuse to associate your name with your edits. --'']'' 22:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have warned you to discontinue your personal attacks. Yet you persist. The edit you point to clearly reflects a mass revert, and not an individual change by me. Even if I did make that change originally (which the history shows that I clearly did not), so freakin what? Making an opening paragraph NPOV and saying "uranium is not toxic" are two different things. ] 22:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Are you saying that you think my complaints about your edits reflecting misconduct are personal attacks? I disagree. I am complaining about what you have said, not who you are. --'']'' 23:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been warned against personal attacks. Feel free to contact me if he persists, and I have your page watched as well. --] 13:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Don't fall into his trap== | |||
| Doc, James is trying to provoke all of us by attacking our credentials. I suspect that he hopes to get us to make an actionable statement, or bias ArbCom. The best thing to do is not engage - he is going to be hoist on his own petard over the next few months and he is experienced enough around here to know it. Getting one or more of his enemies suspended or otherwise disciplined for coming on too strong is about the only thing that will delay the inevitable. Stay cool and we will put this nonsence to rest. --] 02:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It good advice Doc, the merits of James' works will be decided in mediation, his conduct in arbitration. Like water off a duck's back. ] 05:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your comments on arbitration == | |||
| I understand your feelings about the personal attacks which you have suffered. If you are correct in your judgment, the issue will soon return before ArbCom (not that it has actually left ArbCom for the moment). If not, there will be better articles on these topics and a saner editing environment. If you wish to join in the mediation debate, you will find it at ]. ] ] 01:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of joinder == | |||
| I have joined you to our ]. --'']'' 18:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks... == | |||
| ... for the barnstar Doc, I hope I can live up to the accolade --] 23:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == UO3 (gas) == | |||
| Sorry for interfering with U03! I will help when the dispute is over. I will try to follow the discussion, but I am away for a week.] 15:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --] 19:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 9 February 2024
Unspecified source for Image:ACF81C.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ACF81C.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Arizlegis1933.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arizlegis1933.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
AfD nomination of Lawrence Kestenbaum
I have nominated Lawrence Kestenbaum, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Kestenbaum. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Michael White 17:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:FrankBriggs.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FrankBriggs.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD
Please see: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pratt–Romney family. BigJim707 (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:DavidKingUdall.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DavidKingUdall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --ARTEST4ECHO (/contribs) 16:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:JesseAddisonUdall.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JesseAddisonUdall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --ARTEST4ECHO (/contribs) 16:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:LeviStewartUdall.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LeviStewartUdall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --ARTEST4ECHO (/contribs) 16:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:DonTaylorUdall.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DonTaylorUdall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --ARTEST4ECHO (/contribs) 16:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:JohnHuntUdall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JohnHuntUdall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (/contribs) 16:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Sanchez family
Category:Sanchez family, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Secret 06:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Kimball–Snow–Woolley family
The article Kimball–Snow–Woolley family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The article is an arbitrarily defined stand-alone list that fails to meet the notability criteria of WP:LISTN in that there is no evidence cited that the topic has been discussed as a group or set by any sources whatsoever let alone any independent reliable ones.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 92.25.21.108 (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Nilocia/Mediterranean tropical cyclone
User:Nilocia/Mediterranean tropical cyclone, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nilocia/Mediterranean tropical cyclone and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nilocia/Mediterranean tropical cyclone during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Dr U. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rule of 1/1000 common ancestry
The article Rule of 1/1000 common ancestry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I can't find the slightest indication that this has gained any academic traction outside of Political Graveyard. Checked Google, Gbooks, Gnews, Gscholar, JSTOR.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Kimball–Snow–Woolley family for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimball–Snow–Woolley family is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kimball–Snow–Woolley family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America 20:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Richards–Young family for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richards–Young family is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richards–Young family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America 10:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Dudley–Winthrop family for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dudley–Winthrop family is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dudley–Winthrop family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America 10:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:JosephCSBlackburn.jpg
The file File:JosephCSBlackburn.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File:JosephCSBlackburn.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JosephCSBlackburn.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax 08:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ElizaStewart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ElizaStewart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Levi Stewart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Levi Stewart is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Levi Stewart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.