| Revision as of 04:04, 13 December 2016 editValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,271 edits archiving old content← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:33, 9 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,011,964 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Skip to talk}} | {{Skip to talk}} | ||
| {{Talk header |
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes |search=no}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{Homeopathy/Warning}} | ||
| {{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= | |||
| {{Not a forum}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
| ⚫ | {{Round in circles}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{WikiProject Skepticism| |
||
| ⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|listas=Barrett, Stephen| | ||
| {{WikiProject Biography|old-peer-review=yes}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=low}} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Notable Wikipedian|Sbinfo|Barrett, Stephen}} | {{Notable Wikipedian|Sbinfo|Barrett, Stephen}} | ||
| {{off topic warning}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{Round in circles}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{Homeopathy/Warning}} | ||
| {{Image requested|people}} | |||
| {{archives|search=yes}} | {{archives|search=yes}} | ||
| Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
| Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC) | Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Defamation == | |||
| Why nothing about Barrett’s failed defamation suit against chiropractor Tedd Koren? It is relevant to his work. ] (]) 04:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Psychiatric boards == | |||
| that Barrett "failed his psychiatric boards.” Is there a credible source to substantiate that claim? ] (]) 04:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Self-Sourced Content == | |||
| Barrett appears to be the original source for many references which, according to Ronz via ] and ] violates several policies. A consistent editing policy seems necessary for both articles. Either interviews and articles are legitimate or they are not. Unless there's a WP:HYPOCRISY policy I missed? --] (]) 13:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussions about the status of QW (and thus Barrett) here at Misplaced Pages == | |||
| For some odd reason, existing discussions have not been announced here, which is a big violation of our usual practice. There are two major places where participation is encouraged: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ] (]) 16:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Rule 11 Sanctions in "Quackwatch" Libel Case == | |||
| I'm not sure if there's anything worth using here, but someone else may think so, so leaving it here. -- ] (]) 01:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Probably not without more coverage. Applies to ] as well. --] (]) 02:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:33, 9 February 2024
| Skip to table of contents |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stephen Barrett article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Stephen Barrett. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Stephen Barrett at the Reference desk. |
 | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stephen Barrett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103051137/http://new.thegoodwebguide.co.uk:80/index.php?rid=1772 to http://new.thegoodwebguide.co.uk/index.php?rid=1772
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.health.gov/scipich/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Defamation
Why nothing about Barrett’s failed defamation suit against chiropractor Tedd Koren? It is relevant to his work. Nicmart (talk) 04:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Psychiatric boards
It is asserted that Barrett "failed his psychiatric boards.” Is there a credible source to substantiate that claim? Nicmart (talk) 04:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Self-Sourced Content
Barrett appears to be the original source for many references which, according to Ronz via Naveen Jain and Naveen Jain Talk violates several policies. A consistent editing policy seems necessary for both articles. Either interviews and articles are legitimate or they are not. Unless there's a WP:HYPOCRISY policy I missed? --Lawfulneutral (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Discussions about the status of QW (and thus Barrett) here at Misplaced Pages
For some odd reason, existing discussions have not been announced here, which is a big violation of our usual practice. There are two major places where participation is encouraged:
- Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Is Quackwatch an SPS and thus not allowed as a source on BLPs?
- Misplaced Pages talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#SPS and Quackwatch
BullRangifer (talk) 16:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Rule 11 Sanctions in "Quackwatch" Libel Case
Rule 11 Sanctions in "Quackwatch" Libel Case I'm not sure if there's anything worth using here, but someone else may think so, so leaving it here. -- Valjean (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Probably not without more coverage. Applies to American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine as well. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)