| Revision as of 18:59, 2 November 2010 edit80.202.70.59 (talk)No edit summaryTag: repeating characters← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 10 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,534,368 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
| (15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{talkheader}} |
|
I expanded this from a stub to a full entry... actually I consider that the entry needs more work but I guess its too big to be a stub anymore... ] 06:05, 30 October 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start |
|
that was me, forgot to log in ] 06:24, 30 October 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|B1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> =no |
|
|
|
|
|
|B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> =no |
|
Liked piece, I thought that mention of the tactics of Chaka Zulu and Ghengis Khan might add to article El Jigüe 11/30/05 |
|
|
|
|B3 <!-- Structure --> =yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|B4 <!-- Grammar and style --> =yes |
|
== Examples in WW II ? == |
|
|
|
|B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> =no |
|
|
|
|
|
|National=yes}} |
|
What about examples in WW II ? Of course battles like ] or ] or Ruhrkessel didn't end the war, but annihilated big armies. ] 12:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
|
Wouldn't the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor be considered an (attempted) Battle of Annihilation? If the US' aircraft carriers were present at the time of the bombing, the Navy's strength in the Pacific would shatter <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|archiveprefix=Talk:Battle of annihilation/Archives/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|format=Y/F |
|
== This was a German main strategy in Blitzkrieg 1939-1942 == |
|
|
|
|age=120 |
|
It was one of the elements in blitzkrieg (Vernichtungsschlacht). Trew & Sheffield claims that Adolf Hitler wanted to fulfil his political program by short decisive wars. For the German armed forces that meant the annihilation of the enemy through a single, crushing blow and became the strategy concept they wanted to carry out with their warfare. The difference from Helmuth von Moltke’s thoughts of it in 1870 was their means including the possibility to gain higher speed during operations with their mechanized and airborne units. |
|
|
|
|index=yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|archivebox=yes |
|
Annihilation of the enemy did also become one the responsibility for why the germans abondoned Blitzkrieg in the Sovietunion. They could not defeat the russians in one single decisive battle. Logistically was they not prepared either. |
|
|
|
|box-advert=yes}} |
Referencing and citation: criterion not met
Structure: criterion met
