Misplaced Pages

Talk:Because I Got High: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:48, 10 November 2006 editJ.smith (talk | contribs)12,359 edits Adding "Check your YouTube Links Please" note using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:26, 11 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,281,877 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Cannabis}}, {{WikiProject Songs}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(44 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProjectSongs|class=}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Cannabis|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Songs}}
{{WikiProject View Askew}}
}}

==Initial comment==
This article is hilarious, the way it treats the song so seriously. LOL! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:55, 2 July 2005 (UTC)</small>


== YouTube links == == YouTube links ==
] This article is one of on Misplaced Pages that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the ] policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. '''99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a ]'''. 2. ''']'''. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on ]. Thanks,<!--Subst::User:J.smith/YT--> ---] (]|]) 03:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC) ] This article is one of on Misplaced Pages that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the ] policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. '''99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a ]'''. 2. ''']'''. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on ]. Thanks,<!--Subst::User:J.smith/YT--> ---] (]|]) 03:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

== Trivia Section? ==
Shouldn't something like the factoid about Matthew Fournier's punishment be in a trivia section instead of under "Reception?" ] (]) 20:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

== Requested move ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the move request was: '''moved'''. After over two weeks of inactivity, there remains a unanimous consensus that some renaming is necessary, namely that the album requires the disambiguating term "(album)". A majority favor retaining the disambiguating term "(song)" for the song, so there is no consensus for removing that qualifier. There appears to be consensus also that the base title should redirect to the song. ] (]) 16:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

----


* ] → {{no redirect|Because I Got High}}
* ] → {{no redirect|Because I Got High (album)}}
– I was mildly ]ed when I put in the base title and got to an article on the album. I would say in most cases of title tracks, the album ''is'' the ], especially in a ] situation. But there are cases, as with ], where the song is better known than the album as a whole. I think this qualifies as well. Just compare the articles and it's fairly clear to see that the song is more notable. Browse {{Google|"because i got high" -wikipedia}} and you'll see references to the song predominate. ] (]) 23:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
::See also RM article swap in the other direction at ]
*'''Title both articles clearly''' - is a generic solution for all these cases: the problem only exists if there's a will to ambiguate. The two covers look pretty much the same on iPhone search results, having both (song) and (album) would make life easier for everyone, particularly Android users (given that the two jpgs are almost identical). The baseline can go to whichever historically got the most results, everybody wins, no downside. Also suddenly flipping a to b between two articles can cause problems with linking. ] (]) 05:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
*'''Title both articles clearly''' per IIO. I, too was astonished to find WP giving primarytopic to albums, after all, in cases like this it is obvious the album is named after the song. --] (]) 15:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:::There's a similar case at ] vs ] and how many more. Logically the name of the song usually comes first, rarely will an artist decide an album name, then write a song to fit. ] (]) 04:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as proposed. The song is clearly the ] in a ] situation. In addition to its predominance in Google Books returns, gets significantly more page views than , despite the album being at the base title. Clearly when people type in "Because I Get High", they're looking for the song.--] ]/] 15:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as proposed per Cúchullain and BDD. We have a clear primary topic here, there are only ] that "Because I Got High" could refer to and the usage criterion of primary topic clearly favours the song (as shown by Cúchullain's stats) and the encyclopedic value criterion doesn't favour either article. ] (]) 17:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' swapping which title gets to be ambiguous. Per several others above, disambiguate both. ] (]) 22:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
<hr />
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a ]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== Grammy ==

No mention of the song's Grammy Nomination for Best Solo Rap Performance, which is mentioned on the ] page. - ] ] 09:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

==Requested move 23 December 2015==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the move request was: '''moved.''' ] ]] 23:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

----

] → {{no redirect|Because I Got High}} – This is the ] in a ] situation: it received page views in 90 days, more than double the views for ] at views. Google Books returns for are virtually all for the novelty song rather than the album. Additionally, the base name ] already redirects here, meaning the "(song)" is ] and serves no disambiguation purpose. ] ]/] 17:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' - (song) serves a purpose for anyone using a mobile phone. ] (]) 14:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
::I'm on my smart phone now and it doesn't help with anything.--] ]/] 18:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nom. Clear primary topic. ] (]) 01:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per ] and ]. Easy call. --] 09:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Support''' very obvious primary topic. ] (] / ]) 19:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per my comments in 2014. Clear primary topic. ] (]) 07:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Primary topic. ''']''' 19:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a ]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081219123553/http://chrismoyles.net:80/mw/lyricsafro.shtml to http://chrismoyles.net/mw/lyricsafro.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 03:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030092803/http://infodisc.fr/Single_Certif.php to http://infodisc.fr/Single_Certif.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 21:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:26, 11 February 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCannabis Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSongs
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
View Askew
This article is within the scope of WikiProject View Askew, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kevin Smith's View Askewniverse and related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.View AskewWikipedia:WikiProject View AskewTemplate:WikiProject View AskewView Askew

Initial comment

This article is hilarious, the way it treats the song so seriously. LOL! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anharmyenone (talk • contribs) 07:55, 2 July 2005 (UTC)

YouTube links

This article is one of thousands on Misplaced Pages that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Trivia Section?

Shouldn't something like the factoid about Matthew Fournier's punishment be in a trivia section instead of under "Reception?" Dcook32p (talk) 20:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. After over two weeks of inactivity, there remains a unanimous consensus that some renaming is necessary, namely that the album requires the disambiguating term "(album)". A majority favor retaining the disambiguating term "(song)" for the song, so there is no consensus for removing that qualifier. There appears to be consensus also that the base title should redirect to the song. Xoloz (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


– I was mildly ASTONISHed when I put in the base title and got to an article on the album. I would say in most cases of title tracks, the album is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, especially in a WP:TWODABS situation. But there are cases, as with ...Baby One More Time, where the song is better known than the album as a whole. I think this qualifies as well. Just compare the articles and it's fairly clear to see that the song is more notable. Browse "because i got high" -wikipedia and you'll see references to the song predominate. BDD (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

See also RM article swap in the other direction at Talk:Evacuate the Dancefloor
  • Title both articles clearly - is a generic solution for all these cases: the problem only exists if there's a will to ambiguate. The two covers look pretty much the same on iPhone search results, having both (song) and (album) would make life easier for everyone, particularly Android users (given that the two jpgs are almost identical). The baseline can go to whichever historically got the most results, everybody wins, no downside. Also suddenly flipping a to b between two articles can cause problems with linking. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Title both articles clearly per IIO. I, too was astonished to find WP giving primarytopic to albums, after all, in cases like this it is obvious the album is named after the song. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
There's a similar case at Burn It! vs Burn It! (song) and how many more. Logically the name of the song usually comes first, rarely will an artist decide an album name, then write a song to fit. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Support as proposed. The song is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation. In addition to its predominance in Google Books returns, the song gets significantly more page views than the album, despite the album being at the base title. Clearly when people type in "Because I Get High", they're looking for the song.--Cúchullain /c 15:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Support as proposed per Cúchullain and BDD. We have a clear primary topic here, there are only two articles that "Because I Got High" could refer to and the usage criterion of primary topic clearly favours the song (as shown by Cúchullain's stats) and the encyclopedic value criterion doesn't favour either article. Jenks24 (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose swapping which title gets to be ambiguous. Per several others above, disambiguate both. Dicklyon (talk) 22:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Grammy

No mention of the song's Grammy Nomination for Best Solo Rap Performance, which is mentioned on the Afroman page. - Keith D. Tyler 09:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 23 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 23:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Because I Got High (song) → Because I Got High – This is the primary topic in a WP:TWODABS situation: it received 8248 page views in 90 days, more than double the views for Because I Got High (album) at 3403 views. Google Books returns for "Because I Got High" are virtually all for the novelty song rather than the album. Additionally, the base name Because I Got High already redirects here, meaning the "(song)" is WP:MALPLACED and serves no disambiguation purpose. Cúchullain /c 17:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm on my smart phone now and it doesn't help with anything.--Cúchullain /c 18:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Because I Got High. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 03:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Because I Got High. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Categories: