Misplaced Pages

Talk:Rajendra K. Pachauri: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:29, 12 July 2012 editKmhkmh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,806 edits →'Global warming' gets a rebranding: if it is off topic anyhow no need to keep an empty section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:57, 6 March 2024 edit undoDreamy Jazz Bot (talk | contribs)Bots106,824 editsm Replacing Template:Ds/talk notice with Template:Contentious topics/talk notice. BRFA. 
(43 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|cc}}
{{sanctions|See ].}}
{{BLP}} {{Talk header}}
{{Indian English}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=no|listas=Pachauri, Rajendra|
{{WPBiography
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes
|living=yes
|class=Stub
|priority=
|listas=Pachauri, Rajendra
|auto=yes }} |auto=yes }}
{{WikiProject Economics|class=Stub|auto=inherit|importance=}} {{WikiProject Economics|auto=inherit|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Environment}}
{{Environment|class=Stub|auto=inherit|climate change=yes}}
{{WikiProject Climate change}}
{{WP India
{{WikiProject India|importance=low
|class=stub
|importance=low
}} }}
}} }}
Line 31: Line 27:
{{Clear}} {{Clear}}


== External links modified ==
== Nobody has the right to arbitrarily remove posts from the Talk page. This is not the Article page. ==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Dave Souza has no right to arbitrarily remove posts from the Talk page. This is not the Article page. ] (]) 21:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
== Biased and selective quoting of Revkin? ==
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100119232528/http://www.ise.ncsu.edu:80/pages/alumni/distinguished/pachauri/index.php to http://www.ise.ncsu.edu/pages/alumni/distinguished/pachauri/index.php


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.
StS, I don't wish to unfairly summarize Revkin's point. What nuance has been left out? I am sure that we can find a way to work it in. The main point here is that a knowledgable and unbiased observer has made the observation that in their opinion Pachauri often crosses the line from neutrality into advocacy and is hurting the IPCC by doing so. This is an important point given the charter and importance of the IPCC. Including example(s) of where Revkin believes that Pachauri has crossed that line seems pertinent to helping the reader understand his point. What else do you think needs to be included to compose a fair summary of Revkin's piece? --] (]) 17:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
:While Revkin is one of the better journalists on the topic, it's one blog and highlighting it in this way gives a degree of ] that seems rather inappropriate in a ]. While Revkin's indicates he holds a view on these lines, it's obviously contested by the historian Spencer Weart. So, more context and a more authoritative source would be needed. . . ], ] 17:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
::Thanks for pointing to the follow on post. Revkin represents a knowledgable voice from outside the climate science community. He is a strong supporter of the IPCC view and so his criticism can be taken as unbiased. If you feel that including only Revkin's comments is biased then let us also include Weart's point as well to provide the needed context and balance. Would this satisfy your concern? The fact that Weart responded at all points to the significance and notability of Revkin's point so I think some discussion of this is worth including in a summary form, or do you fundamentally disagree on that point? --] (]) 18:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
:Revkin wrote a longish piece that mixes advice and criticism. It's clear that the "one way ticket" joke was, in fact, Branson's. You concentrate on the criticism ''and'' repeat the wrong impression about the joke. Moreover, this is one opinion piece. I tend to agree that it is hard to avoid undue weight when introducing it. I also find it confusing to have a "Controversies" section that covers his IPCC work and also add criticism to the general IPCC section. We should keep it consistent. --] (]) 19:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
::You haven't answered the question: ''What else needs to be included to compose a fair summary of Revkin's piece?'' It is clear that Branson originated the one way ticket joke and directed it specifically at federal housing authorities. It is also quite clear that but broadened the scope of those to whom it was directed to be "those who are becoming obstacles ...". So to say that the joke was purely Branson's in disengenuous and misleading. Pachauri made the joke although it is unclear exactly toward whom he was directing it at the time. Clearly Revkin and Mark Hertsgaard both felt that he was at least including climate change deniers in his phrasing. So I have not repeated the wrong impression of anything. I originally included this where I did because I don't consider this to be a "controversy" so much as a comment on his work at the IPCC. If you feel it is a controversy then fine we can included it in that section. --] (]) 20:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}
== Accusations of Advocacy and Activism ==


Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">]:Online</sub></small> 17:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
We need to include some discussion of the accusations of advocacy and activism which are coming from both sides of the debate:
* Andrew Revkin: ,
* Mark Hertsgaard:
* Don Surber:
* Donna Laframboise:
This is more than sufficient material to establish weight for the topic and to provide a cross section of opinion on the matter. I don't want to misrepresent what is being said here so what specifically are the points from all this that should be included to make a fair summary of the situation?


: Checked -- ] (]) 17:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
I believe that the key points that jump out at me are:
* Revkin is a supporter of the IPCC view and he believes that Pachauri crosses the line into advocacy.
* The event that caused Revkin to speak up on this point was the one way ticket joke, among other things.
* Hertsgaard is included merely to substantiate that Pachauri actually made the joke.
* Hertsgaard can be used to include that Pachauri claims he didn't mean to include climate change deniers.
* Surber makes the point that Revkin is more politically aligned with Pachauri than the deniers and still has this opinion of the man.
* Laframboise argues that Pachauri's actions are indistinguishable from those of a green activist.


== Researcher quits after sex claims against ex-UN climate chief ==
These are all sources published in the mainstream media and by people known to be knowledgable of the subject matter involved. What other points should be addressed to make a fair summary in the controversies section? --] (]) 21:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
http://news.yahoo.com/researcher-quits-sex-claims-against-ex-un-climate-075223842.html


<small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Body Blow To German Global Warming Movement. Major Media Outlets Unload On “CO2 Lies!” ==
: I had included but User: Ecofem123 has removed it. {{yo|Ecofem123}} please voice your concerns about including this content, failing which the content would be put back into the article. -- ] (]) 18:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


== External links content to be put into article prose? ==
http://notrickszone.com/2012/02/06/body-blow-to-german-global-warming-movement-major-media-outlets-unload-on-co2-lies/


*, 15 October 2010
Excerpt: "Today, not one, but two of Germany’s most widely read news media published comprehensive skeptical climate science articles in their print and online editions, coinciding with the release of a major climate skeptical book, Die kalte Sonne (The Cold Sun). Germany has now plunged into raucus discord on the heated topic of climate change." ] (]) 19:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
* Video, audio, and print transcript from '']''.
:And your suggestion for improving this article is...?--] (]) 19:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
* , Winter 2007
:Yawn. "Bild" is roughly on a level with the ]. Next week nobody will remember what they wrote. And what they wrote is actually fairly tame to begin with. And if there is "raucus discord" here, it has carefully managed to escape my notice (as "raucus" seems to have escaped the eye of lexicographers). --] (]) 21:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
*
*{{YouTube|tIcW0-iQMRw|''One on One – Rajendra Pachauri''}} – interview with Pachauri on ] (video, retrieved 2010-1-30)
* interviewed by Sophie Elmhirst of ].
ツ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
* The Pachuri deniers won't like this. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== External links modified ==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,


I have just modified 11 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
== 'I Feel Duped on Climate Change' ==
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/at-dlw-pachy-still-brings-a-smile-on-employees-faces/228140/
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5nC4oFAg6?url=http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/bios/pachauri.htm to http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/bios/pachauri.htm
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Daily-Telegraph-apologises-to-Pachauri-over-an-article-alleging-corruption/Article1-589993.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113210324/http://lifestyle.iloveindia.com/lounge/ndtv-indian-of-the-year-540.html to http://lifestyle.iloveindia.com/lounge/ndtv-indian-of-the-year-540.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514125801/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/11/30/the_fp_top_100_global_thinkers?page=full to https://foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/11/30/the_fp_top_100_global_thinkers?page=full
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=9089242&privcapId=22361&previousCapId=138823&previousTitle=General%20Catalyst%20Partners
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/bios/pachauri.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hacayDuUcngLmhNkplHB5VtG5GNw
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-toi/book-mark/Return-to-Almora-A-spiritual-potboiler-/articleshow/5491811.cms
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111068/Revealed-the-racy-novel-written-by-the-worlds-most-powerful-climate-scientist.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729163720/http://www.mha.nic.in/uniquepage.asp?Id_Pk=490 to http://mha.nic.in/uniquepage.asp?ID_PK=490
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2007/ipcc-lecture_en.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/12/nasas-james-han/


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Page 2:


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
SPIEGEL: Why are you taking on the role of the climate rebel with such passion? Where does this rage come from?


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 21:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Vahrenholt: For years, I disseminated the hypotheses of the IPCC, and I feel duped. Renewable energy is near and dear to me, and I've been fighting for its expansion for more than 30 years. My concern is that if citizens discover that the people who warn of a climate disaster are only telling half the truth, they will no longer be prepared to pay higher electricity costs for wind and solar (energy). Then the conversion of our energy supply will lack the necessary acceptance. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,813814,00.html ] (]) 17:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
:And what exactly does this have to do with the article at hand? --] (]) 18:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


== Flagged neutrality of Sexual Harassment section ==
Here's another that may be helpful:


The section cherry-picks parts of different news articles to present a biased view of the case. It relies too heavily on Pachauri's own testimony, with little mention of the statement of the accuser, which can be found in the same John Vidal Guardian article that has been cited multiple times.
UK Daily Mail - article: "Tree-rings prove climate was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now - and world has been cooling for 2,000 years"


Besides, I am not sure of the value the Richard North statement is adding here.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2171973/Tree-ring-study-proves-climate-WARMER-Roman-Medieval-times-modern-industrial-age.html
-- ] (]) 11:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


Suggestion for article improvement: State that Dr. Pachauri is the head of an organization which is based on false premises, man made global warming, and is a political creature who aimes at global wealth redistribution rather than anything to do with science. ] (]) 15:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC) : I´m removing the label, since it seems this was made by a Single purpose account. Also the section clearly says alegations.] (]) 17:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

:You really should try critical thinking. A) Daily Mail != ] on science. B) England was warmer != The world was warmer. --] (]) 23:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
==Himalayan glacier melting public relations fiasco==
I'm sure he's mostly very well-intentioned, but he doesn't seem to deal with criticism very well, and his response to the whole Himalayan glacier melting thing was quite poor overall... ] (]) 10:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:57, 6 March 2024

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rajendra K. Pachauri article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconEconomics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconEnvironment
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Misplaced Pages:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconClimate change
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide
WikiProject iconIndia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rajendra K. Pachauri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 17:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Checked -- Rohini (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Researcher quits after sex claims against ex-UN climate chief

http://news.yahoo.com/researcher-quits-sex-claims-against-ex-un-climate-075223842.html

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.141.165.55 (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I had included that but User: Ecofem123 has removed it. @Ecofem123: please voice your concerns about including this content, failing which the content would be put back into the article. -- Rohini (talk) 18:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

External links content to be put into article prose?

ツStacey (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Rajendra K. Pachauri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Flagged neutrality of Sexual Harassment section

The section cherry-picks parts of different news articles to present a biased view of the case. It relies too heavily on Pachauri's own testimony, with little mention of the statement of the accuser, which can be found in the same John Vidal Guardian article that has been cited multiple times.

Besides, I am not sure of the value the Richard North statement is adding here. -- Doof10 (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

I´m removing the label, since it seems this was made by a Single purpose account. Also the section clearly says alegations.Mr.User200 (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Himalayan glacier melting public relations fiasco

I'm sure he's mostly very well-intentioned, but he doesn't seem to deal with criticism very well, and his response to the whole Himalayan glacier melting thing was quite poor overall... AnonMoos (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Categories: