Revision as of 15:24, 13 April 2007 editCalaka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,921 editsm Anyone there?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:49, 8 March 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,354,073 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Keep 2 different ratings in {{WikiProject Medicine}}, {{WikiProject Viruses}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: b1.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(17 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=B|importance=mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=B|importance=high}} | |||
{{WikiProject Japan|importance=mid|science=y}} | |||
}}{{Reliable sources for medical articles}} | |||
==Article length== | |||
This article is long enough, so it doesn't need a <s><nowiki>{{sm}}</nowiki></s> template--] 03:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | This article is long enough, so it doesn't need a <s><nowiki>{{sm}}</nowiki></s> template--] 03:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
==History section== | |||
:Really too bad these diseases don't have a dedicated historical section within the article. I mean, yeah, you can get an idea from the name where the disease comes from, but as is the case with many names of objects or diseases, they aren't necessarily accurate. ] 20:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | :Really too bad these diseases don't have a dedicated historical section within the article. I mean, yeah, you can get an idea from the name where the disease comes from, but as is the case with many names of objects or diseases, they aren't necessarily accurate. ] 20:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Encephalitis endoplasmic reticulum == | == Encephalitis endoplasmic reticulum == | ||
Line 12: | Line 19: | ||
:Well it's been like a week and a half and no comment or contributions so I decided to do the above suggestion my self. Telm me what you think from my edit on the article. petze 15:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | :Well it's been like a week and a half and no comment or contributions so I decided to do the above suggestion my self. Telm me what you think from my edit on the article. petze 15:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
==Vandalism== | |||
The page had been vandalized (5 to 15 centuries as incubation time etc. etc.). I have undone it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Offensive name == | |||
The name this is listed with is offensive and must be changed. ] (]) 01:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:49, 8 March 2024
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Japanese encephalitis.
|
Article length
This article is long enough, so it doesn't need a {{sm}} template--Piedras grandes 03:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
History section
- Really too bad these diseases don't have a dedicated historical section within the article. I mean, yeah, you can get an idea from the name where the disease comes from, but as is the case with many names of objects or diseases, they aren't necessarily accurate. Shadowrun 20:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Encephalitis endoplasmic reticulum
I believe that the request for the article Encephalitis endoplasmic reticulum was accidently suggested from a missunderstanding of Japanese encephalitis (which is known to affect the endoplasmic reticulum). Would someone be bold enough to add in this information in this article. (Then enceplalitis endoplasmic reticulum can be removed as a requested article) A redirect shouldnt be necessary as it was just confusion to even suggest such an article. Thanks in advance. If I get time, I shall do this my self, hopefully someone else will (who is better at wikifying than I am) Here are some resources/refferences:
- http://www.nature.com/cdd/journal/v13/n3/full/4401833a.html
- http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/76/9/4162
petze 09:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well it's been like a week and a half and no comment or contributions so I decided to do the above suggestion my self. Telm me what you think from my edit on the article. petze 15:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
The page had been vandalized (5 to 15 centuries as incubation time etc. etc.). I have undone it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.13.46.163 (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Offensive name
The name this is listed with is offensive and must be changed. ThighFish (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories:- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class virus articles
- High-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles