Revision as of 08:31, 15 April 2017 editInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,382,355 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.3beta6)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:17, 16 March 2024 edit undoHarryboyles (talk | contribs)Administrators159,000 editsm →top: fixing Islam-and-Controversy parameter in {{WikiProject Islam}}Tag: AWB |
(86 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{talk header}} |
|
{{talk header}} |
|
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
|
{{Old AfD multi|result='''keep'''|date=] ]}} |
|
{{WikiProject Islam|class=C|importance=mid|Islam and Controversy=yes}} |
|
|
|
{{summary in|Criticism of the Qur'an|Women and Islam}} |
|
{{WikiProject Gender Studies|class=C}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=Mid|Islam-and-Controversy=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=Mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
Line 16: |
Line 23: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Source does not support what is written == |
|
{{summary in|Criticism of the Qur'an|Women and Islam}} |
|
|
{{Old AfD multi|result='''keep'''|date=] ]}} |
|
|
== Marital rape in Islam == |
|
|
|
|
|
Does Islam recognize forced sex in marriage as a form of abuse? If so, does it advocate for its prosecution under any law? Does the concept of ] exist under any shape?] (]) 07:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Islam promotes humanity and condemns any kind of abuse, be it domestic or forced sex "Marital rape within marriage". One can be prosecuted if found guilty. Yes Marital rape does exist..I have seen this happen. |
|
|
] (]) 09:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Possible ] Violation== |
|
|
This passage ] isn't NPOV. It should probably be removed, but for such a controversial issue, a talk page discussion is probably the way to go. Any thoughts? {{ping|Al-Andalusi}}. ] ] 17:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{ping|ThePlatypusofDoom}} I removed the 2 paragraphs on the grounds that they are ]. For example, "Muhammad believed women were inferior to men with regards to intelligence" is based on ] sources which is problematic on its own. Further, the sources make no reference whatsoever to domestic violence to begin with, which makes their inclusion here a violation of ] because there is an implied conclusion (not supported by the sources) that domestic violence happens in Islam ''because'' Muhammad believed that women were inferior to men. The end of the paragraph with the "woman is considered to have been created for his pleasure" claim is uncited, and and is a false one as Muslims unanimously believe that human beings were created for the sole purpose of worshiping Allah. As for my other edit ("Violence against non-Muslim women and girls"), this is ] propaganda and the link to Islam is unfounded and does not hold up to scrutiny, not to mention the abysmal sources. ] (]) 18:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{{ping|Jason from nyc}}, what is your defense for the restoration of the sexual assault claims to an article on domestic violence and Islam? where do you see the connection? ] (]) 15:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:Domestic violence is violence against women. It is about male supremacy and the wider context is relevant. Please restore the consensus until a new consensus is reached per ]. Please do not edit war. ] (]) 21:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::I have no problem with the removal of the paragraphs that cited only religious texts; this was pure original research. |
|
|
::However, Al-Andalusi's arguments against the paragraph about violence against women are mostly groundless. Sources like The Guardian and The New York Times are not "abysmal" sources, they are reliable sources. The reports in those sources are factual, and easily verifiable that countries like Sweden and Germany have experienced a disproportionate number of incidents of rape perpetrated by Muslims, and those countries are trying to do something about this. The deleted paragraph doesn't claim that a culture of rape is a characteristic of Islam, although including it in this article does have that implication, I'll admit. ~] <small>(])</small> 04:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{ping|Jason from nyc }} Not according to Misplaced Pages: "Domestic violence is a pattern of behavior which involves violence or other abuse by one person against another in a domestic setting, such as in marriage or cohabitation". ] (]) 15:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:::{{ping|Amatulic}} The paragraph has Counterjihad and Eurotrash propaganda written all over it. |
|
|
::#The described sexual assault/rape claims are not reported as domestic violence. Again, why is this content here? |
|
|
::#The title "Violence against non-Muslim women and girls" is statement that claims non-Muslims are particularly targeted among possible targets. |
|
|
::#The first source is an opinion titled: "Sweden Opened Its Doors To Muslim Immigration, Today It’s The Rape Capital Of The West". This IS an abysmal source. It correlates between the rise in the number of reported sexual assaults and the increase in "Muslim" immigration. A disputed claim. ] goes into more analysis. |
|
|
::#"Muslims have also targeted children in sex trafficking schemes and child rape." Cites The Guardian, but the article makes no such claim. The word "Muslim" is not even there in the article. |
|
|
::#NY Times on immigrants being taught wisdom from Norway. And this is relevant here because? |
|
|
::#Breitbart is a crappy source. |
|
|
:::I don't see any good intentions behind including this content here. ] (]) 15:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I agree with you, {{ping|Amatulic}}, that the New York Times article is substantial and it is used several times through out the paragraph. The cultural context discussed in the article is important to understand the general cultural factors that have importance to our article. Al-Andalusi does have a point with the Guardian article. While the individuals mentioned are Muslims, the Guardian article does not connect that fact with the behavior involved. A better source would be needed. PS, Your last concern about miss-implications is valid. ] (]) 01:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Agreed. ] (]) 22:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
{{od}}As there is a consensus for this section, I'll insert an edited version largely relying on the New York Times. I omitted the Guardian article but left the sentence with a note for a citation if one can be found. ] (]) 12:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{ping|Jason from nyc}} No consensus was ever reached, and the content remained largely unchanged. Let me make it clear to you Jason, if you are to insert your ] propaganda crap again into this article, then you leave us with no option other than to report you to ANI. ] (]) 14:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::You do not have veto-power. Your argument, that this type of background material shouldn't be in the article, wasn't accepted. Several people agree with me that it should. I agreed with you that the Bretibart source isn't reliable and the Guardian source doesn't support the given statement. But we have a consensus for the rest. Stop edit-warring and accept the consensus. And please stop the personal attacks. They don't intimidate me but they create a hostile atmosphere that might discourage new editors from contributing. ] (]) 14:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
*What's reliable here is a NYT article, which is misrepresented in the section, and a Guardian article, which has nothing to say whatsoever on the topic. The offending paragraphs (they used to be even worse) are not neutral, they suggest that Islam is a rape-friendly culture and that Europe is being flooded by rapists, and they lack reliable sources to verify the statements made. Also, I see no consensus for anything whatsoever; edit summaries by {{U|Amatulic}} and others merely indicate that "there seem to be reliable sources", if I may paraphrase. ] (]) 16:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{ping| Drmies}}, You don't agree that ], ] and myself are in agreement on the need for this section? We also find it needs to be rewritten to avoid miss-implications. Are you agreeing with ] that the New York Times citation has no relevance for our article? I want to understand clearly your objections. I thought we had an agreement on the need for a section but that it required more work. ] (]) 17:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Misimplications? I don't see a need to rewrite what was cut for all the right reasons. I am not really interested in parsing the arguments of others here, and I don't see there is consensus for a need for such a section. In general, if we're going to have content of this kind, this possibly inflammatory kind, in an encyclopedic article, we should require strong sourcing--that means books and academic articles, not a few newspaper articles from here or there. And note the comments below. ] (]) 21:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
*The whole NPOV, Islamophobia, RS stuff aside, how is the paragraph in question at all about ''domestic violence''? Only one sentence about spousal rape and honor killings seems remotely related. On top of all the other concerns, the paragraph is COATRACK. ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 18:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
**<small></small> - Completely agree with {{u|Drmies}} and {{u|EvergreenFir}} above. Non-neutral paragraph which misrepresents the only reliable sources it uses and is tangential at best to the subject of the article. — <tt>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></tt> \\ 20:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
*Agree with Drmies etc. Section was POV synthesis which used unreliable sources and misrepresented the one reliable source. ] (]) 21:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
* I'm fine with the removal too. In my initial comment I expressed some reservation about the implied connection between Islam and a culture of rape, and I agree that the connection with domestic violence is tenuous. ~] <small>(])</small> 23:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Upon further inspection, the entire "women in islam" section has little, if any, connection to domestic violence except insofar as to insinuate that there is a connection. It would be one thing if it were actually a summary of ] given as background/context, but instead it selectively highlights e.g. clothing, leaving us to assume that one is connected to the other. This may be unpopular, but given we have a pretty well developed article on the subject, I removed the section save the {{tl|main}} links pending the addition of an adequate, less contentious summary (ideally one which attempts a connection between the role of women in Islam and domestic violence). — <tt>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></tt> \\ 21:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
*{{U|Rhododendrites}}, good move. Yes, no connection, besides implication that is. ] (]) 22:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
*Yes, I agree with the removal of that too - there was nothing about domestic violence in it. ] (]) 09:04, 21 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified 10 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140704112113/http://www.childinfo.org/attitudes_data.php to http://www.childinfo.org/attitudes_data.php |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070414164755/http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/sau-summary-eng to http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/sau-summary-eng |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123082442/http://www.idrc.ca:80/en/ev-5311-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html to http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-5311-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131129135804/http://www.un.org:80/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 to http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the chapter "Incidence among Muslims" it sais at the very top: ''"Domestic violence is considered to be a problem in Muslim-majority cultures, but because women conceal signs of abuse and don't report domestic abuse to authorities, the incidence in many Muslim-majority countries is uncertain, but believed to be great by Muslim feminists."''. The first sentence is supported by the source. The second sentence is not supported by the source (https://web.archive.org/web/20060112080841/http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/sau-summary-eng). |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
# The source covers only Saudi-Arabia, so all statements about "many Muslim-majority countries" although they are probably true, are unsupported. |
|
|
# The source does not say anything about "Muslim feminists". |
|
|
# The source does not say anything about what those supposed feminists believe to be true. The source focuses on the case of Rania al-Baz und connected issues. The only part where supposed feminists might have been addressed is ''"Women activists, writers, journalists and lawyers called for legal and judicial changes to end such discrimination and combat the impunity enjoyed by perpetrators of violence against women."''. This is by any means not what this Misplaced Pages article instanciated. |
|
|
# The source sais nothing about "concealing signs of abuse" and not "report domestic abuse". |
|
|
Since the article is in a protected state, whoever has the right to edit it, please fix the part of the article as soon as possible. Add a supporting source and/or re-write it in a way that matches the source. Using the term "feminists", which is often used and/or understood in a pejorative way and even if not, implies a bias, is uncalled for, unscientific and misleading. Name who or what actually expressed their belief that the number of incidents is great. The issue is way too important to be this misleading. Readers who check sources or dislike "feminists" are driven to just go to the source, discover that it does not support the statement written in the Misplaced Pages article and dismiss it as unfactual, stop reading further and walk around high and mighty telling people that domestic abuse is a rare occurence in the realm of Islam. Well done, whoever wrote that introduction. Whoever is willing to help us all out by correcting the part, be assured of my deepest gratitude. --] (]) 10:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Thanks for pointing this out. I've expanded the part based on the Washington Post piece a bit to provide more context, while removing the dated Amnesty International report specific only to Saudi Arabia, as this is not useful to cite in a general summary. ] (]) 12:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== WikiProject Crime banner reinstated == |
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure why {{User|Akh of an akh}} removed the banner for ], but I have reinstated it because this topic is definitely of interest to WikiProject Crime. In doing so, I realized that the WikiProject Crime was displaying a C-class rating because the B-class assessment questions had not been completed. When this is the case the rating defaults to C-class. Given the assessment of other projects I am going to answer the B-class assessment in the positive. If anybody wants to remove the WikiProject Crime banner in the future please provide a sound explanation for doing so in the edit summary or discuss its removal, first. - 09:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
:I notice that {{User|Akh of an akh}} again removed the banner for ] though this time stating in the edit summary that ''This page has nothing related to "crime". This is a critical implication of that Islam promotes a "crime"'' By adding the WikiProject Crime banner, I am not implying that "''Islam promotes "crime"''" and I am sorry if the user has taken that implication from addition of the WikiProject Crime banner. Addition of the banner means the article is "''of interest''" to WikiProject Crime, because it falls within the project's scope. The overarching article about ] is currently included in the scope of WikiProject Crime, so it is inconsistent to say that "''This page has nothing related to "crime".''" when the article title includes the words ''domestic violence''. How Islam views and deals with domestic violence and whether or not it considers the concept of domestic violence to be criminal, considering the laws of many nations where Islam is practiced do consider domestic violence to be a crime, is a topic that is of interest to readers of Misplaced Pages. The summary of the article notes that the way Islamic jurisprudence interprets the subject varies and there are often difficulties having abuse recognized by police or the judicial system. In my view, the article is discussing a criminal related topic merely by mentioning the police and judicial system. If one reads deeper, one find that the article discusses a husband's liability for the death of his wife, as well a initiatives in different countries to move domestic violence cases away from religious courts to penal code driven courts. The later part of the article also talks about various laws in Muslim-majority countries where rape or murder of one's wife are now subject to criminal penalties. Given this sort of content, I would content that this article is a crime related topic, so it remains of interest to WikiProject Crime. So I think the banner should be reinstated. However, before I do that, I would welcome others opinions. - ] (]) 10:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2023 == |
|
I have just modified 8 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150408021742/http://www.tyndalearchive.com/tabs/lane/ to http://www.tyndalearchive.com/TABS/Lane/ |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2F61%2F122%2FAdd.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Islam and domestic violence|answered=yes}} |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
1: |
|
|
in the part of the article that says "Ibn Kathir(1300-1373AD) and Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari(839-923AD)" |
|
|
needs spaces between names and dates, spaces before AD, and dashes should be en dashes. change to "Ibn Kathir (1300–1373 AD) and Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (839–923 AD)" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2: |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
remove the 2 excess blank lines before the section header <nowiki> |
|
|
===Undesirability of beating===</nowiki> ] (]) 05:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Changes applied ] (]) 17:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 08:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC) |
|
Since the article is in a protected state, whoever has the right to edit it, please fix the part of the article as soon as possible. Add a supporting source and/or re-write it in a way that matches the source. Using the term "feminists", which is often used and/or understood in a pejorative way and even if not, implies a bias, is uncalled for, unscientific and misleading. Name who or what actually expressed their belief that the number of incidents is great. The issue is way too important to be this misleading. Readers who check sources or dislike "feminists" are driven to just go to the source, discover that it does not support the statement written in the Misplaced Pages article and dismiss it as unfactual, stop reading further and walk around high and mighty telling people that domestic abuse is a rare occurence in the realm of Islam. Well done, whoever wrote that introduction. Whoever is willing to help us all out by correcting the part, be assured of my deepest gratitude. --77.8.234.217 (talk) 10:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
1:
in the part of the article that says "Ibn Kathir(1300-1373AD) and Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari(839-923AD)"
needs spaces between names and dates, spaces before AD, and dashes should be en dashes. change to "Ibn Kathir (1300–1373 AD) and Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (839–923 AD)"