Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dhurma Massacre (1818): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:30, 24 March 2024 editⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,994 editsm ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ moved page Talk:Siege Of Dhurma (1818) to Talk:Dhurma Massacre (1818) over redirect← Previous edit Revision as of 19:43, 24 March 2024 edit undoR Prazeres (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users30,534 edits →March 2024: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


<b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> (]) 18:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> (]) 18:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

== March 2024 ==

@], you have been clearly warned about edit-warring. Explain your disagreements here on the talk page and solicit a ] from editors. This is how Misplaced Pages works. If you continue to edit ] then you will be reported to administrators and likely blocked. I've opened a new discussion section here for everyone's convenience; please use it. ] (]) 19:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:43, 24 March 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Middle East / Ottoman
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Middle Eastern military history task force
Taskforce icon
Ottoman military history task force

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. Needs work on referencing format and also more references. Happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

@Araboud, you have been clearly warned about edit-warring. Explain your disagreements here on the talk page and solicit a consensus from editors. This is how Misplaced Pages works. If you continue to edit disruptively then you will be reported to administrators and likely blocked. I've opened a new discussion section here for everyone's convenience; please use it. R Prazeres (talk) 19:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Categories: