Revision as of 06:44, 2 October 2021 edit2a02:2f0f:b1ff:ffff::6463:d051 (talk) →Polygamy in Myanmar was made illegal in 2015: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:48, 26 March 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,275,040 edits Reminder of an inactive anchor: Remove 1 non-defunct anchor |
(24 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
|
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Life|class=B}} |
|
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{Not a forum|personal beliefs, nor for engaging in ]/]s}} |
|
{{Not a forum|personal beliefs, nor for engaging in ]/]s}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Anthropology|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Anthropology|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sexuality|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Religion|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Family and relationships|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Family and relationships}} |
|
{{WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement|importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Notable Citation|Berkeley Journal of International Law}} |
|
{{Notable Citation|Berkeley Journal of International Law}} |
Line 37: |
Line 36: |
|
| indexhere = yes |
|
| indexhere = yes |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
== Polygamy in Indonesia == |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Howard_University,_Washington,_DC,_USA/Civil_Engineering_Economy_(Spring_2019) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2019-01-14 | end_date = 2019-04-02 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke {{ping|Pharexia}}) -- ] ] 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
== Map Accuracy? == |
|
|
|
== "Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
== "Bigamy (in Civil Law)" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Lack of research == |
|
The map notes say "India, Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and Sri Lanka:legal for Muslims only," but those countries represent 3/4 colors from the key. At the very least, Sri Lanka's dark blue color contradicts that statement (and Eritrea's contradicts note 2), and it brings into question the accuracy of the map as a whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The prevalence section of the article says „Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited“ but then doesnt stick to it. I think we should be trimming this section, specifically the percentages. We should be grounded here and stick with the simple fact that there is not much solid research. |
|
Polygamy is illegal in Myanmar since 2015 . ] (]) 02:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Also, Amy Moors specifically is not a good source. There is a lot of criiticism against her, like her messing around with samples and sample sizes. At the very least we shouldnt quote her. But generally I think the section should be smaller. ] (]) 13:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
=== Germany === |
|
|
|
|
|
Polygamy is now tolerated in Germany. See https://www.nordbayern.de/region/zwei-frauen-13-kinder-mehrfach-ehe-darf-fortgesetzt-werden-1.7369834 |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified 9 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://etymonline.com/?term=Polygamy |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.greek-language.gr/greekLang/modern_greek/tools/lexica/triantafyllides/search.html?lq=%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%BB%CF%85%CE%B3%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%AF%CE%B1 |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?context=anthropologyfacpub&article=1049 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050901081957/http://www.sudhirlaw.com/Marriages.html to http://www.sudhirlaw.com/Marriages.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141231001450/http://ciarraide.org/sinnsreachd101.html to http://ciarraide.org/sinnsreachd101.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130406020341/http://en.wikisource.org/Shulchan_Aruch/Even_ha-Ezer/1 to http://en.wikisource.org/Shulchan_Aruch/Even_ha-Ezer/1 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414212442/http://www.wwrn.org/article.php?idd=13900&sec=40&con=35 to http://www.wwrn.org/article.php?idd=13900&sec=40&con=35 |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010053517/http://www.ushistory.org/gop/convention_1856.htm to http://www.ushistory.org/gop/convention_1856.htm |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070719143759/http://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/polygamy/The_Primer.pdf to http://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/polygamy/The_Primer.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Johnbod== |
|
|
{{Reply to|Johnbod}} |
|
|
|
|
|
The image is not obscure. Jacob is a notable biblical figure, and every Christian, Jew, and Muslim who reads their Scriptures know about him.] (]) 01:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Not only that, rabbis, priests, and imams talk about him in churches, synagogues and mosques, where every member of the Abrahamic religions can hear them. ] (]) 02:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{Reply to|Johnbod}}, could you care to reply to this talk page please?] (]) 05:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
::You're just wrong; the incident, and its relevance to polygamy, will be very obscure to most readers. UI notice a lot of your bold postings of images are running into trouble, and not just from me. ] (]) 13:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Well, since Misplaced Pages is meant for the intelligent layman, most Abrahamic readers would be knowedgeable enough about Jacob. The nation Israel even gets its name from him. Strong point about the relevance to polygamy though. Thanks for the commentary!] (]) 01:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
::Wait, now that I think about it, obscurity is not even an argument, since the purpose of WIkipedia is to inform! What do you have to say about this?] (]) 05:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::], per ], ] is correct. You keep adding religious and mythology images all over as lead images, the ] article. You need to think about lead images more carefully, and keep in mind what I stated about them on your talk page. ] (]) 11:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://studybuddhism.com/en/tibetan-buddhism/path-to-enlightenment/karma-rebirth/buddhist-sexual-ethics-main-issues |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110921072222/http://www.mormonfundamentalism.com/NEWFILES/1886RevelationNew.htm to http://www.mormonfundamentalism.com/NEWFILES/1886RevelationNew.htm |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113202411/http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2925222 to http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2925222 |
|
|
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://content.lib.utah.edu/u?%2Fdialogue%2C20218 |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 01:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Minor edit == |
|
|
|
|
|
Changed "polygamy is currently illegal" to "polygamy is illegal" in the United States. The "currently" seemed extraneous. Cheers. ] (]) 09:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Thelastauroch |
|
|
|
|
|
== Polygamy in Myanmar was made illegal in 2015 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Polygamy }} |
|
|
] was made illegal in 2015. Please change the map to dark blue. ] (]) 06:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke @Pharexia:) -- BayuAH 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
The prevalence section of the article says „Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited“ but then doesnt stick to it. I think we should be trimming this section, specifically the percentages. We should be grounded here and stick with the simple fact that there is not much solid research.
Also, Amy Moors specifically is not a good source. There is a lot of criiticism against her, like her messing around with samples and sample sizes. At the very least we shouldnt quote her. But generally I think the section should be smaller. 141.15.24.32 (talk) 13:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)