Revision as of 12:51, 12 March 2022 editVeverve (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,628 edits Notification: listing of Bigamy (in Canon Law) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:48, 26 March 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,276,000 edits Reminder of an inactive anchor: Remove 1 non-defunct anchor |
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
|
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Life|class=B}} |
|
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{Not a forum|personal beliefs, nor for engaging in ]/]s}} |
|
{{Not a forum|personal beliefs, nor for engaging in ]/]s}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Anthropology|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Anthropology|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sexuality|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Religion|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Family and relationships|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Family and relationships}} |
|
{{WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement|class=b|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement|importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Notable Citation|Berkeley Journal of International Law}} |
|
{{Notable Citation|Berkeley Journal of International Law}} |
Line 37: |
Line 36: |
|
| indexhere = yes |
|
| indexhere = yes |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|
|
] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2019-01-14">14 January 2019</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2019-04-02">2 April 2019</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 06:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|
|
== Map Accuracy? == |
|
|
|
|
|
The map notes say "India, Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and Sri Lanka:legal for Muslims only," but those countries represent 3/4 colors from the key. At the very least, Sri Lanka's dark blue color contradicts that statement (and Eritrea's contradicts note 2), and it brings into question the accuracy of the map as a whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
Polygamy is illegal in Myanmar since 2015 . ] (]) 02:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Germany === |
|
|
|
|
|
Polygamy is now tolerated in Germany. See https://www.nordbayern.de/region/zwei-frauen-13-kinder-mehrfach-ehe-darf-fortgesetzt-werden-1.7369834 |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Polygamy in Myanmar was made illegal in 2015 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Polygamy|answered=yes}} |
|
|
] was made illegal in 2015. Please change the map to dark blue. ] (]) 06:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' Please make your request for a new image to be uploaded to ]. Once the file has been properly uploaded, feel free to reactivate this request to have the new image used.<!-- Template:ESp --> You should go to the page of the respective file; ] (which is on Commons); and make your request there ] (] / ]) 13:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Well, perhaps somebody else can fix it...] (]) 13:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Polygamy == |
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship between women ] (]) 06:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Polygamy in Indonesia == |
|
== Polygamy in Indonesia == |
|
|
|
|
|
Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke {{ping|Pharexia}}) -- ] ] 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke {{ping|Pharexia}}) -- ] ] 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
== "Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at ] == |
|
== "Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at ] == |
|
] |
|
] |
|
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
== "Bigamy (in Civil Law)" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Lack of research == |
|
|
|
|
|
The prevalence section of the article says „Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited“ but then doesnt stick to it. I think we should be trimming this section, specifically the percentages. We should be grounded here and stick with the simple fact that there is not much solid research. |
|
|
Also, Amy Moors specifically is not a good source. There is a lot of criiticism against her, like her messing around with samples and sample sizes. At the very least we shouldnt quote her. But generally I think the section should be smaller. ] (]) 13:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
Why map say "Polygamy is legal in some regions (Indonesia)"? There is no national law than ban polygamy national wide. Even the latest law (the 2019 Marriage Law) does not prohibit it. (Poke @Pharexia:) -- BayuAH 09:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
The prevalence section of the article says „Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited“ but then doesnt stick to it. I think we should be trimming this section, specifically the percentages. We should be grounded here and stick with the simple fact that there is not much solid research.
Also, Amy Moors specifically is not a good source. There is a lot of criiticism against her, like her messing around with samples and sample sizes. At the very least we shouldnt quote her. But generally I think the section should be smaller. 141.15.24.32 (talk) 13:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)