| Revision as of 12:08, 22 February 2022 editBrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,942,733 edits {{Dead link}} tag on bare URL refs which return HTTP 404 or 410Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:18, 4 April 2024 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,048,605 editsm →top: Task 44 (trial): clean up shortdesc whitespace issuesTag: AWB | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|Villa on the Peak, Hong Kong}} | |||
| {{EngvarB|date=November 2013}} | {{EngvarB|date=November 2013}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2013}} | ||
| {{Infobox building | {{Infobox building | ||
| | name = Ho Tung Gardens<br />何東花園 | | name = Ho Tung Gardens<br />何東花園 | ||
| Line 69: | Line 71: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ⚫ | {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2013}} | ||
| '''Ho Tung Gardens''', also known by its Cantonese name 'Hiu Kok Yuen', was a villa on ], ]. It was built by ] and his wife Clara in 1927. They referred to it as "The Falls", but it later became known as Ho Tung Gardens. | '''Ho Tung Gardens''', also known by its Cantonese name 'Hiu Kok Yuen', was a villa on ], ]. It was built by ] and his wife Clara in 1927. They referred to it as "The Falls", but it later became known as Ho Tung Gardens. | ||
| Line 83: | Line 84: | ||
| === Plot history === | === Plot history === | ||
| The site, reported to be a {{convert|120000|sqft|m2|adj=on}} lot,<ref name=hks20110126/> was originally known as "The Falls", because of a stream in the vicinity.<ref name=lcsd/> Originally owned by C.D. Wilkinson, the site was sold to Ho in about 1923 or 1924. Its street address at the time was 82 Aberdeen Road, RBL No. 28. and was changed in 1924 to No. 254. Later, it became No. 75 Peak Road. Lease plans of 1923 and 1928 indicate that the mansion of Ho Tung Gardens was built on the foundations of "The Falls".<ref>. Hotunggardens2011.com. Archived from on 20 December 2011</ref> | The site, reported to be a {{convert|120000|sqft|m2|adj=on}} lot,<ref name=hks20110126/> was originally known as "The Falls", because of a stream in the vicinity.<ref name=lcsd/> Originally owned by C.D. Wilkinson, the site was sold to Ho in about 1923 or 1924. Its street address at the time was 82 Aberdeen Road, RBL No. 28. and was changed in 1924 to No. 254. Later, it became No. 75 Peak Road. Lease plans of 1923 and 1928 indicate that the mansion of Ho Tung Gardens was built on the foundations of "The Falls".<ref>. Hotunggardens2011.com. Archived from on 20 December 2011</ref> | ||
| === Construction === | === Construction === | ||
| Line 92: | Line 93: | ||
| ] (2nd right) at Ho Tung Gardens in 1935; wives Margaret (2nd left) and Clara (1st right) both in cheongsam|alt= outdoor shot with four men and three women: three (Western men) wearing top hat and tails and one oriental-looking man wearing Chinese garments; two of the three women wearing Chinese robes, one wearing western dress with hat]] | ] (2nd right) at Ho Tung Gardens in 1935; wives Margaret (2nd left) and Clara (1st right) both in cheongsam|alt= outdoor shot with four men and three women: three (Western men) wearing top hat and tails and one oriental-looking man wearing Chinese garments; two of the three women wearing Chinese robes, one wearing western dress with hat]] | ||
| ] (right) in Hong Kong in 1933|alt= outdoor shot with two men on steps of a large house: bearded Western men (seated, right) wearing suit; one oriental-looking man (left, standing) wearing Chinese garments]] | ] (right) in Hong Kong in 1933|alt= outdoor shot with two men on steps of a large house: bearded Western men (seated, right) wearing suit; one oriental-looking man (left, standing) wearing Chinese garments]] | ||
| According to the ], only Europeans were allowed to live on ]. Hotung, who was half-European and half-Chinese, was already living on the Peak when the law was enacted.<ref>Jason Wordie, ''South China Morning Post'', 13 February 2011</ref> Ho had a retreat on The Peak named "The Neuk", at 48 Aberdeen Road, but he primarily lived at a property named "Idlewild" at 8 Seymour Road in the city.<ref>. Hotunggardens2011.com. Archived from on 20 December 2011</ref> Ho never lived in Ho Tung Gardens.<ref name=hks20110126/> | According to the ], only Europeans were allowed to live on ]. Hotung, who was half-European and half-Chinese, was already living on the Peak when the law was enacted.<ref>Jason Wordie, ''South China Morning Post'', 13 February 2011</ref> Ho had a retreat on The Peak named "The Neuk", at 48 Aberdeen Road, but he primarily lived at a property named "Idlewild" at 8 Seymour Road in the city.<ref>. Hotunggardens2011.com. Archived from on 20 December 2011</ref> Ho never lived in Ho Tung Gardens.<ref name=hks20110126/> | ||
| As a prominent businessman at the time, Hotung received many famous visitors at the villa, including ];<ref name=scmp20110125Regina>Leung, Regina (25 January 2011). "Government declares Ho Tung Gardens villa 'proposed historic monument'", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> US Vice President ] visited in 1935.<ref name=scmp20110126Joyce/> It was commandeered as a military base to fight the Japanese Imperial Army in 1941. Parts of the structure, including the roof, were damaged in heavy fighting and the building became dilapidated thereafter. In 1946, Hotung sought compensation from the government for the damage; the building was then renovated several times.<ref name=lcsd/> The property has been extensively modified.<ref name=hks20110126/> | As a prominent businessman at the time, Hotung received many famous visitors at the villa, including ];<ref name=scmp20110125Regina>Leung, Regina (25 January 2011). "Government declares Ho Tung Gardens villa 'proposed historic monument'", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> US Vice President ] visited in 1935.<ref name=scmp20110126Joyce/> It was commandeered as a military base to fight the Japanese Imperial Army in 1941. Parts of the structure, including the roof, were damaged in heavy fighting and the building became dilapidated thereafter. In 1946, Hotung sought compensation from the government for the damage; the building was then renovated several times.<ref name=lcsd/> The property has been extensively modified.<ref name=hks20110126/> | ||
| Line 101: | Line 102: | ||
| The owner, Hotung's granddaughter, applied for permission to redevelop in mid-2010; technical approval was gained from the Buildings Department in December 2010 as it satisfied planning requirements.<ref name=hks20110126/> According to building plan submitted – by the original firm that designed the villa,<ref name=scmp20110129Joyce>Ng, Joyce (29 Jan 2011). "Ho Tung Gardens owner told of listing", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> 11 blocks of four-storey houses would be built; a total floor area would be 60,000 square feet.<ref name=scmp20110126Joyce/> The case came before the ] in July 2010,<ref name=hks20110126/> where it was listed as a Grade I historic building,<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111215155849/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/Monument/form/AAB-SM-chi.pdf |date=15 December 2011 }}, page 1, ''List of the Historic Buildings in Building Assessment (as of 25 January 2011)'', Antiquities Advisory Board</ref><ref name="Audit60">Report No. 60 of the Director of Audit, , 28 March 2013.</ref> although such declaration does not confer statutory protection. In late January 2011, the Government of Hong Kong invoked the ] for the fourth time in history, declared it a "]", thus imposing a 12-month moratorium on redevelopment of the site, pending negotiations with the owner.<ref name=scmp20110126Joyce>Ng, Joyce (26 Jan 2011). "Ho Tung mansion saved from demolition", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> In October 2011, two government consultancy reports, by experts at the ] and submitted to the Antiquity Advisory Board, concluded that it has high historical and architectural value.<ref>Tha standard {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111015010753/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=4&art_id=115925&sid=34023275&con_type=1&d_str=20111011&fc=2 |date=15 October 2011 }} 11 October 2011. Retrieved 11 October 2011</ref> On 24 October 2011, the Antiquities Advisory Board approved the government proposal to declare the Ho Tung Gardens on the Peak ].<ref> RTHK English News. 24 October 2011.</ref> Bernard Chan, Chairman of the AAB argued to preserve the mansions because "The choice of a very Chinese-looking style of architecture for the new house in 1927 ... was a statement that a racial barrier was being broken. It was also a declaration by Hotung that he was different from his neighbors, who were only living in the colony temporarily before going home."<ref>Chan, Bernard Charnwut (23 November 2011). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111053729/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=117322&sid=34551054&con_type=1&d_str=20111123&isSearch=1&sear_year=2011 |date=11 January 2014 }}. ''The Standard''.</ref> However, some other architectural historians believe that the mansion is an ordinary piece of architecture at the time that cannot be compared with other examples of "Chinese Renaissance" architecture such as ] and ].<ref name=20111219benitez>Benitez, Mary Ann (19 December 2011). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111053830/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=118102&sid=34828639&con_type=1&d_str=20111219&isSearch=1&sear_year=2011 |date=11 January 2014 }}. ''The Standard''.</ref> | The owner, Hotung's granddaughter, applied for permission to redevelop in mid-2010; technical approval was gained from the Buildings Department in December 2010 as it satisfied planning requirements.<ref name=hks20110126/> According to building plan submitted – by the original firm that designed the villa,<ref name=scmp20110129Joyce>Ng, Joyce (29 Jan 2011). "Ho Tung Gardens owner told of listing", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> 11 blocks of four-storey houses would be built; a total floor area would be 60,000 square feet.<ref name=scmp20110126Joyce/> The case came before the ] in July 2010,<ref name=hks20110126/> where it was listed as a Grade I historic building,<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111215155849/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/Monument/form/AAB-SM-chi.pdf |date=15 December 2011 }}, page 1, ''List of the Historic Buildings in Building Assessment (as of 25 January 2011)'', Antiquities Advisory Board</ref><ref name="Audit60">Report No. 60 of the Director of Audit, , 28 March 2013.</ref> although such declaration does not confer statutory protection. In late January 2011, the Government of Hong Kong invoked the ] for the fourth time in history, declared it a "]", thus imposing a 12-month moratorium on redevelopment of the site, pending negotiations with the owner.<ref name=scmp20110126Joyce>Ng, Joyce (26 Jan 2011). "Ho Tung mansion saved from demolition", ''South China Morning Post''</ref> In October 2011, two government consultancy reports, by experts at the ] and submitted to the Antiquity Advisory Board, concluded that it has high historical and architectural value.<ref>Tha standard {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111015010753/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=4&art_id=115925&sid=34023275&con_type=1&d_str=20111011&fc=2 |date=15 October 2011 }} 11 October 2011. Retrieved 11 October 2011</ref> On 24 October 2011, the Antiquities Advisory Board approved the government proposal to declare the Ho Tung Gardens on the Peak ].<ref> RTHK English News. 24 October 2011.</ref> Bernard Chan, Chairman of the AAB argued to preserve the mansions because "The choice of a very Chinese-looking style of architecture for the new house in 1927 ... was a statement that a racial barrier was being broken. It was also a declaration by Hotung that he was different from his neighbors, who were only living in the colony temporarily before going home."<ref>Chan, Bernard Charnwut (23 November 2011). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111053729/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=117322&sid=34551054&con_type=1&d_str=20111123&isSearch=1&sear_year=2011 |date=11 January 2014 }}. ''The Standard''.</ref> However, some other architectural historians believe that the mansion is an ordinary piece of architecture at the time that cannot be compared with other examples of "Chinese Renaissance" architecture such as ] and ].<ref name=20111219benitez>Benitez, Mary Ann (19 December 2011). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111053830/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=118102&sid=34828639&con_type=1&d_str=20111219&isSearch=1&sear_year=2011 |date=11 January 2014 }}. ''The Standard''.</ref> | ||
| In December 2011, the government announced that it would declare Hotung Gardens a protected monument prior to the expiry of the temporary injunctive declaration made in January.<ref>. RTHK 18 December 2011. Archived from on 19 December 2011.</ref> This put the government at loggerheads with the site's owner, who insisted on retaining the site and living in one of the ten units she wished to have built there. Ho Min-kwan argued that the existing main building is "unexceptional ... does not have the requisite historical or architectural value or authenticity; it is not a rare example of an architectural style, and it is not a distinctive building structure." She also noted that her grandfather never lived there, and that the main building had already been converted into six apartments.<ref name=20111219benitez/> | In December 2011, the government announced that it would declare Hotung Gardens a protected monument prior to the expiry of the temporary injunctive declaration made in January.<ref>. RTHK 18 December 2011. Archived from on 19 December 2011.</ref> This put the government at loggerheads with the site's owner, who insisted on retaining the site and living in one of the ten units she wished to have built there. Ho Min-kwan argued that the existing main building is "unexceptional ... does not have the requisite historical or architectural value or authenticity; it is not a rare example of an architectural style, and it is not a distinctive building structure." She also noted that her grandfather never lived there, and that the main building had already been converted into six apartments.<ref name=20111219benitez/> | ||
| The government announced in early December 2012 that it would not declare the house a monument after all. The secretary for development, ] admitted a policy failure and said the government believed that "not everyone would agree with spending billions of dollars of public money on private heritage sites" – the valuation was between HK$3 billion and 7 billion.<ref>Ng, Joyce; Wong, Olga (5 December 2012) "Ho Tung Gardens to be bulldozed; minister admits policy failure". ''South China Morning Post''</ref> Demolition work of the principal building started in July 2013 and was completed in late October, paving the way for construction of a series of town houses on the site.<ref name=hks20131025>'Central Station' (25 October 2013). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105045019/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=21&art_id=138869&sid=40711299&con_type=1&d_str=20131025&fc=7 |date=5 November 2013 }}, ''The Standard''</ref> | The government announced in early December 2012 that it would not declare the house a monument after all. The secretary for development, ] admitted a policy failure and said the government believed that "not everyone would agree with spending billions of dollars of public money on private heritage sites" – the valuation was between HK$3 billion and 7 billion.<ref>Ng, Joyce; Wong, Olga (5 December 2012) "Ho Tung Gardens to be bulldozed; minister admits policy failure". ''South China Morning Post''</ref> Demolition work of the principal building started in July 2013 and was completed in late October, paving the way for construction of a series of town houses on the site.<ref name=hks20131025>'Central Station' (25 October 2013). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105045019/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=21&art_id=138869&sid=40711299&con_type=1&d_str=20131025&fc=7 |date=5 November 2013 }}, ''The Standard''</ref> | ||
| Ho Tung Gardens was sold in February 2015 for a sum of HKD5.1 billion. At HKD82,258 per sq.ft of buildable area, this marks the most expensive residential plot sold by private tender in Hong Kong. The sale also shone the global spotlight on the property, with the deal placing Peak Road atop the list of ‘The World's Top 10 Most Exclusive Streets’ in survey results released in July 2015 by Billionaire.com - notably above Upper Fifth Avenue in the United States and Knightsbridge in London. The new buyer is alleged to be Cheung Chung Kiu, Chairman of C C Land Holdings Ltd. The 120,000 sq.ft site is expected to be redeveloped, and as per Cap 117 Part IIIA Division 5 of the Stamp Duty Ordinance, will grant the buyer a refund of HKD980 million in stamp duty should the redevelopment go ahead.<ref>http://www.okay.com/en/property-news/Ho-Tung-Garden-Sale-Tops-Exclusive-List-After-Conservation-Controversy/317?nid=32#.VcK6efmqqko |
Ho Tung Gardens was sold in February 2015 for a sum of HKD5.1 billion. At HKD82,258 per sq.ft of buildable area, this marks the most expensive residential plot sold by private tender in Hong Kong. The sale also shone the global spotlight on the property, with the deal placing Peak Road atop the list of ‘The World's Top 10 Most Exclusive Streets’ in survey results released in July 2015 by Billionaire.com - notably above Upper Fifth Avenue in the United States and Knightsbridge in London. The new buyer is alleged to be Cheung Chung Kiu, Chairman of C C Land Holdings Ltd. The 120,000 sq.ft site is expected to be redeveloped, and as per Cap 117 Part IIIA Division 5 of the Stamp Duty Ordinance, will grant the buyer a refund of HKD980 million in stamp duty should the redevelopment go ahead.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.okay.com/en/property-news/Ho-Tung-Garden-Sale-Tops-Exclusive-List-After-Conservation-Controversy/317?nid=32#.VcK6efmqqko |title=Ho Tung Garden Sale Tops Exclusive List After Conservation Controversy- OKAY.com |website=www.okay.com |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924055537/http://www.okay.com/en/property-news/Ho-Tung-Garden-Sale-Tops-Exclusive-List-After-Conservation-Controversy/317?nid=32 |archive-date=2015-09-24}} </ref> | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| Line 123: | Line 124: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:18, 4 April 2024
Villa on the Peak, Hong Kong
| Ho Tung Gardens 何東花園 | |
|---|---|
 Ho Tung Gardens (foreground left) | |
  | |
| Alternative names | Hiu Kok Yuen (曉覺園) |
| General information | |
| Type | Villa + gardens with pagoda |
| Architectural style | Chinese Renaissance |
| Location | The Peak, Hong Kong |
| Address | 75 Peak Road |
| Country | Hong Kong |
| Coordinates | 22°15′50″N 114°09′09″E / 22.2640°N 114.1525°E / 22.2640; 114.1525 |
| Construction started | 1927 |
| Completed | 1937 |
| Renovated | 1946 |
| Demolished | 24 October 2013 (2013-10-24) |
| Owner | Ho Min-kwan |
| Technical details | |
| Floor count | 2 (villa); 5 (pagoda) |
| Design and construction | |
| Architecture firm | Palmer and Turner Architects |
| Hong Kong Graded Building – Grade I | |
| Designated | 2011-01-25 |
Ho Tung Gardens, also known by its Cantonese name 'Hiu Kok Yuen', was a villa on the Peak, Hong Kong. It was built by Robert Hotung and his wife Clara in 1927. They referred to it as "The Falls", but it later became known as Ho Tung Gardens.
In 2011, it was listed as a Grade I historic building by the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB). Invoking the relevant section of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance for the fourth time in history, it was declared a "proposed historic monument" by the Government of Hong Kong in 2011. Negotiations between the owner and the government to save the mansion failed, and demolition work was completed in October 2013.
Etymology
While the property is known by the name of 'Ho Tung Gardens' in Chinese (何東花園) after its original owner, the property's alternative given Chinese name is "Hiu Kok Yuen" (曉覺園) – an amalgam of names of Ho and his second wife, Clara. Hotung's alternative Chinese name Hiu-sang (何曉生); his wife was Cheung Lin-kok (何張蓮覺).
History
.jpg)
Plot history
The site, reported to be a 120,000-square-foot (11,000 m) lot, was originally known as "The Falls", because of a stream in the vicinity. Originally owned by C.D. Wilkinson, the site was sold to Ho in about 1923 or 1924. Its street address at the time was 82 Aberdeen Road, RBL No. 28. and was changed in 1924 to No. 254. Later, it became No. 75 Peak Road. Lease plans of 1923 and 1928 indicate that the mansion of Ho Tung Gardens was built on the foundations of "The Falls".
Construction
The 4,000 square feet residence was constructed between 1927 and 1938. The compound was designed by Palmer and Turner Architects, a noted architectural practice, in a Chinese Renaissance style. It is known that the 2-storey main building was built in 1927, whilst parts of the gardens, in particular the ornamental gateway, were completed in 1938, after the death of Lady Hotung. Within the extensive gardens are a pavilion and a 5-storey pagoda, built with reinforced concrete and Chinese roof-tiles. One of the pavilions in the gardens also house calligraphy by Qing Dynasty officials, Zeng Guofan and Zuo Zongtang.
Uses and visitors
According to the Peak Reservation Ordinance, only Europeans were allowed to live on Victoria Peak. Hotung, who was half-European and half-Chinese, was already living on the Peak when the law was enacted. Ho had a retreat on The Peak named "The Neuk", at 48 Aberdeen Road, but he primarily lived at a property named "Idlewild" at 8 Seymour Road in the city. Ho never lived in Ho Tung Gardens.
As a prominent businessman at the time, Hotung received many famous visitors at the villa, including George Bernard Shaw; US Vice President John Nance Garner visited in 1935. It was commandeered as a military base to fight the Japanese Imperial Army in 1941. Parts of the structure, including the roof, were damaged in heavy fighting and the building became dilapidated thereafter. In 1946, Hotung sought compensation from the government for the damage; the building was then renovated several times. The property has been extensively modified.
Hotung's son, Robert, lived on the property between the 1960s and 1990s, and ownership passed onto granddaughter Ho Min-kwan in 2003.
2010s
The owner, Hotung's granddaughter, applied for permission to redevelop in mid-2010; technical approval was gained from the Buildings Department in December 2010 as it satisfied planning requirements. According to building plan submitted – by the original firm that designed the villa, 11 blocks of four-storey houses would be built; a total floor area would be 60,000 square feet. The case came before the Antiquities Advisory Board in July 2010, where it was listed as a Grade I historic building, although such declaration does not confer statutory protection. In late January 2011, the Government of Hong Kong invoked the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance for the fourth time in history, declared it a "proposed historic monument", thus imposing a 12-month moratorium on redevelopment of the site, pending negotiations with the owner. In October 2011, two government consultancy reports, by experts at the University of Hong Kong and submitted to the Antiquity Advisory Board, concluded that it has high historical and architectural value. On 24 October 2011, the Antiquities Advisory Board approved the government proposal to declare the Ho Tung Gardens on the Peak a monument. Bernard Chan, Chairman of the AAB argued to preserve the mansions because "The choice of a very Chinese-looking style of architecture for the new house in 1927 ... was a statement that a racial barrier was being broken. It was also a declaration by Hotung that he was different from his neighbors, who were only living in the colony temporarily before going home." However, some other architectural historians believe that the mansion is an ordinary piece of architecture at the time that cannot be compared with other examples of "Chinese Renaissance" architecture such as King Yin Lei and Haw Par Mansion.
In December 2011, the government announced that it would declare Hotung Gardens a protected monument prior to the expiry of the temporary injunctive declaration made in January. This put the government at loggerheads with the site's owner, who insisted on retaining the site and living in one of the ten units she wished to have built there. Ho Min-kwan argued that the existing main building is "unexceptional ... does not have the requisite historical or architectural value or authenticity; it is not a rare example of an architectural style, and it is not a distinctive building structure." She also noted that her grandfather never lived there, and that the main building had already been converted into six apartments.
The government announced in early December 2012 that it would not declare the house a monument after all. The secretary for development, Paul Chan admitted a policy failure and said the government believed that "not everyone would agree with spending billions of dollars of public money on private heritage sites" – the valuation was between HK$3 billion and 7 billion. Demolition work of the principal building started in July 2013 and was completed in late October, paving the way for construction of a series of town houses on the site.
Ho Tung Gardens was sold in February 2015 for a sum of HKD5.1 billion. At HKD82,258 per sq.ft of buildable area, this marks the most expensive residential plot sold by private tender in Hong Kong. The sale also shone the global spotlight on the property, with the deal placing Peak Road atop the list of ‘The World's Top 10 Most Exclusive Streets’ in survey results released in July 2015 by Billionaire.com - notably above Upper Fifth Avenue in the United States and Knightsbridge in London. The new buyer is alleged to be Cheung Chung Kiu, Chairman of C C Land Holdings Ltd. The 120,000 sq.ft site is expected to be redeveloped, and as per Cap 117 Part IIIA Division 5 of the Stamp Duty Ordinance, will grant the buyer a refund of HKD980 million in stamp duty should the redevelopment go ahead.
See also
References
- ^ Chong, Dennis (26 January 2011). "Hotung Peak villa saved from jaws of developers" Archived 29 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine, The Standard
- ^ Ng, Joyce (26 Jan 2011). "Ho Tung mansion saved from demolition", South China Morning Post
- ^ "Historic Building Appraisal, Ho Tung Gardens" Archived 13 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Item 38, Brief Information on Proposed Grade I Items, Leisure and Cultural Services Department, Hong Kong
- The Falls. Hotunggardens2011.com. Archived from the original on 20 December 2011
- ^ Ip, Kelly (6 January 2012). "It's flat crazy". Archived 5 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine The Standard.
- ^ Leung, Regina (25 January 2011). "Government declares Ho Tung Gardens villa 'proposed historic monument'", South China Morning Post
- Jason Wordie, South China Morning Post, 13 February 2011
- The Chalet & Dunford. Hotunggardens2011.com. Archived from the original on 20 December 2011
- Ng, Joyce (29 Jan 2011). "Ho Tung Gardens owner told of listing", South China Morning Post
- #38 Archived 15 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine, page 1, List of the Historic Buildings in Building Assessment (as of 25 January 2011), Antiquities Advisory Board
- Report No. 60 of the Director of Audit, Chapter 1: "Conservation of monuments and historic buildings", 28 March 2013.
- Tha standard Ho Tung villa awaits monumental verdict Archived 15 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine 11 October 2011. Retrieved 11 October 2011
- Board approves Ho Tung monument RTHK English News. 24 October 2011.
- Chan, Bernard Charnwut (23 November 2011). "Hotung rammed home staying power" Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine. The Standard.
- ^ Benitez, Mary Ann (19 December 2011). "Just leave my home alone" Archived 11 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine. The Standard.
- "Hotung Gardens to be protected monument". RTHK 18 December 2011. Archived from the original on 19 December 2011.
- Ng, Joyce; Wong, Olga (5 December 2012) "Ho Tung Gardens to be bulldozed; minister admits policy failure". South China Morning Post
- 'Central Station' (25 October 2013). "Bye-bye mansion dream, hello $25 billion" Archived 5 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine, The Standard
- "Ho Tung Garden Sale Tops Exclusive List After Conservation Controversy- OKAY.com". www.okay.com. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.
External links
- Hotunggardens2011 – A study commissioned by Heritage Hong Kong Foundation Limited to formulate "after use" options of Ho Tung Gardens for the Government of Hong Kong
