| Revision as of 22:04, 10 April 2007 editHagermanBot (talk | contribs)95,722 editsm 76.164.23.2 didn't sign: "→Advice on a potential CfD: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:12, 11 April 2007 edit undoPurples (talk | contribs)823 edits Hi Slim.....Next edit → | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| Why did you delete my request for help? -- User:BurningCandy <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 22:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | Why did you delete my request for help? -- User:BurningCandy <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 22:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | ||
| == Hi Slim..... == | |||
| we seem to have set off on the wrong foot! - it's nice to meet you, and maybe some simple clarifications might help; | |||
| I'm not breaking any rules, guidelines or policies on the sockpuppet thing - an obvious sockpuppet account can have obvious, and valid, reasons for existing. | |||
| I've felt nervous about opening discussion on some of these sensitive issues, particularly with people I perceive to hold much power, like essjay previously, and yourself in this instance. | |||
| When I approached essjay i did feel a little shouted down by him, and various editors who supported him - and I felt this was unnecessary on their part - in the same way i feel it's mean of you to to say that there's no reason to pay attention to me, and that you won't take my views seriously.... please do! | |||
| I've read (you probably have too) some speculation about Denny's editing also - and if history and editing experience are important factors in considering an argument, can you see there may be questions there too? - it's probably not worth worrying about really. | |||
| We've never spoken on-wiki before, and you do so much hard work round here i don't want to annoy you (or get on the wrong side of you!) - so hopefully we'll move forward from here! - pop into my talk page anytime if you've still got concerns, and have a nice day! - ] 02:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:12, 11 April 2007
Misplaced Pages:Attack sitesQuestion for you... what could it take to get this to at least Guideline if not policy status...? Theoretically... - Denny 00:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Darvon Cocktail DeletionHi, I'd just like to challenge your deletion of the Darvon Cocktail article. Being "dangerous" is not a reason for deletion and I could cite a few WP pages that also give "dangerous" information. Please don't censor Misplaced Pages or push your POV. Greener grasses 09:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm responding to this from the Wikiquette alerts page. Could you please help Greener grasses (talk · contribs) figure out what policy/procedure you are enforcing by making this deletion? I assume part of the reason can be found in your deletion log comments, but can you articulate the issue here, so it doesn't look like you're just ignoring this user? Thanks much! --MalcolmGin 16:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Have some chocolate
BüSoI have left you a message on the discussion page there, as well as doing some editing. It would be appreciated if you read this and we discuss each others changes concerning this page. --Nemesis1981 01:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC) maybe of intresthttp://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/839/sc1.htm Zeq 04:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Template:InterruptedHi! I remember on ATT awhile back you responded in the middle of some of my comments. Anyway, I just discovered that template, and it might be less confusing to use it the next time you make a reply midway through someone's comment. Cheers, Armed Blowfish (mail) 05:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Help if you canYou may be able to do more justice to this subject than I can: Etty_Hilesum. Thanks. Zeq 07:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Deletion review - Darvon cocktailAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Darvon cocktail. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. File:GershomScholem.jpgHi, you added, then deleted, this picture a while ago. It is currently being used in Hebrew wiki (he:גרשם שלום). Should I delete it now from there (I am a SYSOP there) or is it only a local problem? DGtal 14:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Advice on a potential CfDCategory:Virtual_reality_pioneers. Hopelessly POV (and OR) category, or am I being too prickly? Nandesuka 21:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Why?Why did you delete my request for help? -- User:BurningCandy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.164.23.2 (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC). Hi Slim.....we seem to have set off on the wrong foot! - it's nice to meet you, and maybe some simple clarifications might help; I'm not breaking any rules, guidelines or policies on the sockpuppet thing - an obvious sockpuppet account can have obvious, and valid, reasons for existing. I've felt nervous about opening discussion on some of these sensitive issues, particularly with people I perceive to hold much power, like essjay previously, and yourself in this instance. When I approached essjay i did feel a little shouted down by him, and various editors who supported him - and I felt this was unnecessary on their part - in the same way i feel it's mean of you to to say that there's no reason to pay attention to me, and that you won't take my views seriously.... please do! I've read (you probably have too) some speculation about Denny's editing also - and if history and editing experience are important factors in considering an argument, can you see there may be questions there too? - it's probably not worth worrying about really. We've never spoken on-wiki before, and you do so much hard work round here i don't want to annoy you (or get on the wrong side of you!) - so hopefully we'll move forward from here! - pop into my talk page anytime if you've still got concerns, and have a nice day! - Purples 02:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
