| Revision as of 17:24, 10 April 2007 editSamuel Blanning (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,108 edits →Candidate pages: gaillimh uncertified← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:24, 11 April 2007 edit undoMihai cartoaje (talk | contribs)704 edits →Candidate pages: tenseNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top. | These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top. | ||
| ] | |||
| :] harrassing everyone who disagrees with him. 18:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Approved pages=== | ===Approved pages=== | ||
Revision as of 02:24, 11 April 2007
Shortcut- ]
- WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Request for checkuser (WP:RFCU).
This process is for discussing specific users who have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in Article content disputes.
Uncertified user RfCs
Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#Request comment on users for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.
Closing and archiving
Disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:
- If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
- The parties to the dispute agree.
- The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.
Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.
General user conduct
Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:
- Example user
- {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~ (note: that is five tildes, not four, RFCs are signed with the date only, not your username)
Candidate pages
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
- WP:CIVIL harrassing everyone who disagrees with him. 18:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Approved pages
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
- BassxForte
- WP:3RR,WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:NOT#OR, WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE, WP:CON, WP:ATT (WP:OR, WP:VERIFY, WP:RS), WP:NPA, WP:EW 02:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Desiphral
- Ignoring consensus, repeated insertion of Original Research, and refusal to provide reliable published sources. WP:NOR, WP:CON, WP:ATT, WP:NPOV (especially WP:UNDUE). 22:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/CineWorld
- WP:BLP, WP:BIO, WP:CIVIL, WP:3RR, WP:NPA, WP:POINT, WP:USER. 07:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Certified.Gangsta
- Misplaced Pages:Consensus, Misplaced Pages:Edit war. 01:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- DorisH
- WP:CIVIL, WP:VAND; Acting in an uncivil, disruptive manner by blanking large section of article and making personal attacks. 13:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Emir Arven
- WP:CIVIL, WP:NPOV, WP:OWN, WP:AGF, WP:RS, WP:NOR, WP:3RR, WP:VAND, WP:NOT, WP:BITE, WP:NPA, WP:CANVAS, WP:POINT, WP:ATT, WP:BLP, WP:CON. WP:DR, WP:DE; long history of incivility, disruption, extreme ethnic stereotype & prejudice canvasing 15:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Use of administrator privileges
This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example admin
- Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~
As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.
Candidate pages
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
none currently listed
Approved pages
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
- Darwinek
- Allegations: Misuse of blocking in content disputes 15:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)