Misplaced Pages

Criticism of the Anti-Defamation League: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:14, 14 June 2009 editTheCatalyst31 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators108,556 editsm Quick-adding category Criticisms (using HotCat)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:08, 16 April 2024 edit undoVanished user e3208328r8 (talk | contribs)277 edits dead linkTag: Redirect target changed 
(16 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect ]
Linguist and activist ], who repeatedly came under the ADL's criticism,<ref> by ]. DIMENSIONS, Vol. 14, No. 1. A Journal of Holocaust Studies. Published by the Anti-Defamation League's Braun Holocaust
Institute. Accessed 2007-08-23</ref><ref> September 24, 2001. Accessed 2007-08-23</ref> wrote in his 1989 book '']'':
<blockquote>The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli ] in the U.S., as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on. These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement.<ref name="Chomsky">{{cite book
| last = Chomsky
| first = Noam.
| title = ]
| publisher = ]
| date = 1989
| pages = 317
| isbn = 0896083667}}</ref></blockquote>

], a prominent left-wing rabbi, has criticized the ADL on similar grounds:

<blockquote>The ADL lost most of it credibility in my eyes as a civil rights organization when it began to identify criticisms of Israel with anti-Semitism, still more when it failed to defend me when I was receiving threats to my life from right-wing Jewish groups because of my critique of Israeli policy toward Palestinians (it said that these were not threats that came from my being Jewish, so therefore they were not within their area of concern).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tikkun.org/rabbi_lerner/ask_the_rabbi |title=Ask the Rabbi |accessdate=2007-05-31 |first=Michael |last=Lerner |authorlink=Michael Lerner (rabbi) |publisher=] |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20051110072600/http://www.tikkun.org/rabbi_lerner/ask_the_rabbi |archivedate=2005-11-10}}</ref></blockquote>

The ADL has also drawn fire from some Orthodox Jewish leaders who charge it is more interested in promoting a dogmatic form of secularism than in promoting religious tolerance and in the process promoting anti-Christian bigotry and hatred.
Orthodox Rabbi ] has charged:
<blockquote>The most deeply held values of the ADL are a hatred of Judaism and Christianity—and a secularization of society.<ref></ref></blockquote>

===Role in cancellation of speech by Tony Judt at Polish Consulate===
The ADL, in addition to the ], was criticized by academic ] for allegedly pressuring the Polish Consul General in New York to cancel a scheduled appearance by Judt at a non-profit organization that rents space from the consulate. In an interview with the ], Foxman, claimed that the group "had nothing to do with the cancellation",<ref>{{cite journal |last=Stoll |first=Ira |authorlink=Ira Stoll |date=2006-10-04 |title=Poland Abruptly Cancels a Speech By Local Critic of the Jewish State |journal=] |url=http://www.nysun.com/article/40911?page_no=1}}</ref> insisting that the ADL only called to ask if the event was being sponsored by the Polish government.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.adl.org/media_watch/newspapers/20061116-Chronicle+of+Higher+Ed.htm |title=Article on Free Speech and Israel Gets it Wrong |author= |last=Foxman |first=Abraham H. |authorlink=Abraham Foxman |date=2006-11-16 |publisher=ADL}}</ref> Polish Consul General Krzysztof Kasprzyk suggested in an interview with the ] that calls by the ADL and the American Jewish Committee were "exercising a delicate pressure".<ref name="WP sparks">{{cite journal |last=Powell |first=Michael |date=2006-10-09 |title=In N.Y., Sparks Fly Over Israel Criticism |journal=] |pages=A03 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/08/AR2006100800817.html}}</ref> In reference to the role of the ADL and American Jewish Committee in organizing the cancellations, Judt told the Washington Post: "This is serious and frightening, and only in America—not in Israel—is this a problem. These are Jewish organizations that believe they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from anyone who might listen."<ref name="WP sparks"/> The ADL denied the charges. According to Foxman, "I think they made the right decision... He's taken the position that Israel shouldn't exist. That puts him on our radar." <ref name="WP sparks"/>

===Denver defamation suit===
According to an ] ] article in '']'', a federal judge "lambasted the organization for labeling a nasty neighborhood feud as an anti-Semitic event" and upheld most of William and Dorothy Quigley's $10 million ] for ]. In 1994, Candace and Mitchell Aronson, Jewish next door neighbors of the Quigleys, contacted the Denver ADL office, reporting overheard cordless phone conversations of the Quigleys discussing putting pictures of oven doors on the Aronsons' home (a reference to the Holocaust), burning the Aronson children and wishing the Aronsons had been killed in a suicide bombing. (The Quigleys later indicated that these remarks had been intended to be humorous.) <ref> </ref> The Quigleys and the Aronsons had been engaged in an escalating series of petty disputes prior to this incident. The ADL also labelled the Quigleys as anti-Semites in a press conference which led to felony federal charges being filed against them.

Judge ] of the ] wrote "it is not unreasonable to infer that public charges of anti-Semitism leveled by the ADL will be taken seriously and assumed by many to be true without question. In that respect, the ADL is in a unique position of being able to cause substantial harm to individuals when it lends its backing to allegations of anti-Semitism." The judge concluded that the ADL supported the Aronsons' accusations without investigating the case, or weighing of the consequences.<ref></ref>

===New antisemitism controversy===
{{main|New antisemitism}}
In 1974, ADL national leaders Arnold Forster and Benjamin R. Epstein published a book called ''The New Anti-Semitism'' (New York, 1974), arguing that a new kind of anti-Semitism is on the rise. In 1982, ADL national leader Nathan Perlmutter and his wife, Ruth Ann Perlmutter, released a book entitled ''The Real Anti-Semitism in America'' (New York, 1982). In 2003, ADL's national director Abraham Foxman published ''Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism'' (San Francisco, 2003), where on page 4 he states: "We currently face as great a threat to the safety and security of the Jewish people as the one we faced in the 1930s—if not a greater one."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.adl.org/Anti_semitism/never_again.asp |title=Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism |publisher=ADL}}</ref>

In 2005, ADL critic ] published ] which devotes Part 1 to "The Not-So-New 'New Anti-Semitism'." In a 2006 appearance on Amy Goodman's ], Finkelstein said:

<blockquote>All the evidence shows there's no—there's no evidence at all for a rise of a ], whether in Europe or in North America. The evidence is zero. Every time Israel comes under international pressure, as it did recently because of the war crimes committed in Lebanon, it steps up the claim of anti-Semitism, and all of Israel's critics are anti-Semitic. 1974, the ADL, the Anti-Defamation League, puts out a book called ''The New Anti-Semitism''. 1981, the Anti-Defamation League puts out a book, ''The New Anti-Semitism''. And then, again in 2000, Abraham Foxman and people like ], they put out these books called ''The New Anti-Semitism''. So the use of the charge "anti-Semitism" is pretty conventional whenever Israel comes under attack, and frankly it has no content whatsoever nowadays. ... What does the evidence show? There has been good investigation done, serious investigation. There's some in Europe among the Muslim community, there's some anti-Semitism, but the notion that in the heart of European society or North American society there's anti-Semitism is preposterous."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/30/1418200 |title=Congressmember Weiner Gets It Wrong On Palestinian Group He Tried To Bar From U.S. |date=2006-08-30 |publisher=]}}</ref></blockquote>

===Conflict with Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO)===
ADL is an advocate for ] legislation.<ref>
{{cite web
|url= http://www.adl.org/civil_rights/platformcommittee-2004.pdf
|title= ADL Presentation to the Platform Committees of the Democratic and Republican National Conventions – June 2004
|accessdate= 2008-01-23
|date=
|year= 2004
|month=
|format=pdf
|work=
|publisher= ADL
|pages=
|language=
|doi=
|archiveurl=
|archivedate=
|quote= The Anti-Defamation League has been an advocate for strong, effective, and sensible gun
control legislation.
}}</ref> The ADL supported the District of Columbia before the US Supreme Court in '']'' which argued that the city's ban on the possession of handguns and any functional firearms, even for self-defense in the home is not prohibited by the ].<ref>
{{cite press release
|title=ADL To Supreme Court: States Should Regulate Firearms
|publisher=ADL
|date=2008-01-11
|url=http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/4645_12.htm
|quote="The League urged the Court to ensure that states retain the ability to keep guns out of the hands of "violent bigots.""
}}
</ref>. The League urged the Court to ensure that states retain the ability to keep guns out of the hands of "violent bigots."

], a gun rights group has been highly critical of the Anti-Defamation League. In pamphlets such as "Why Does the ADL Support Nazi-Based Laws?"<ref>The Liberty Crew (September 20, 2007) JPFO.org.</ref> and "JPFO Facts vs. ADL Lies,"<ref>Editors (1997-1999) JPFO.org.</ref> the JPFO has accused the ADL of undermining the welfare of the Jewish people by promoting ]. In a 2007 handbill, the JPFO accused Director Abraham Foxman of knowingly supporting the "use of Nazi gun control laws in America."<ref>JPFO editors JPFO.org.</ref> Foxman has written about the JPFO: "] has a long and painful history, and the linkage to gun control is a tactic by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership to manipulate the fear of anti-Semitism toward their own end."<ref>Foxman, Abraham H. (May 21, 1995) ''New York Times.''</ref>

===Opposition by Daniel Lapin===
Orthodox Rabbi ] has declared that the Anti-Defamation League and its allies are "dangerous organizations, organizations that are driving a wedge between ] and Christians." Referring to ADL national director ], Lapin said that by calling ''The Passion of the Christ'' ], "what he is saying is that the only way (for Christians) to escape the wrath of Foxman is to repudiate (their own) faith."

Lapin also rejects the idea that the ] represents Judaism. A Jewish conservative, has excoriated many Jewish people for their leadership in promotion of ideas contrary to traditional Judaism, such as ], ] and ]. He argues that Jewish-born liberals have redefined "Judaism" to mean "liberalism" &mdash; and redefined "anti-liberalism" as "anti-Semitism." Lapin has said: "It is time for us to recognize the charge of anti-Semitism for what it often is: a political weapon intended to silence critics of liberalism."

==References==

{{reflist}}

]

Latest revision as of 13:08, 16 April 2024

Redirect to: