| Revision as of 15:42, 30 March 2007 editAzaToth (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators23,224 editsm Changing protection template from {{protected}} to {{pp-dispute}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:37, 12 April 2007 edit undoVlad fedorov (talk | contribs)4,845 edits I have reinserted my contributions that do not violate BLP, are referenced by reliable sources.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{pp-dispute}} | {{pp-dispute}} | ||
| '''Boris Vladimirovich Stomakhin''' ('']'': Борис Владимирович Стомахин), (born ], ], ]), is a ]n ] ], ], and editor of ] periodicals. He was one of a few journalists in Russia who openly challenged policies of ]'s administration with respect to ]. He was |
'''Boris Vladimirovich Stomakhin''' ('']'': Борис Владимирович Стомахин), (born ], ], ]), is a ]n ] ], ], and editor of ] periodicals. He was one of a few journalists in Russia who openly challenged policies of ]'s administration with respect to ]. He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements(articles 280 and 282 of the Russian Criminal Code).<ref name=sent/>. | ||
| ==Journalism and political activism== | ==Journalism and political activism== | ||
| Boris Stomakhin was an editor of monthly newspaper "Radical Politics" since 2000. Besides, he contributed numerous materials to ], the ] internet agency that promotes independence of ] and is maintained by Chechen separatists. | Boris Stomakhin was an editor of monthly newspaper "Radical Politics" since 2000. Besides, he contributed numerous materials to ], the ] internet agency that promotes independence of ] and is maintained by Chechen separatists. | ||
| Stomakhin claimed that Russian troops in Chechnya are "occupiers" and compared President ] to ] and ]<ref name="hrh"> </ref>. | Stomakhin in his articles advocated terrorist attacks on Russian civilians<ref name=sent/>,<ref name="conviction"></ref><ref name="Lenta"></ref> called to overthrow violently current government of Russian Federation<ref name=sent/><ref name=conviction/><ref name=Lenta/>, advocated extermination of all Russians<ref name=sent/><ref name=conviction/><ref name=Lenta/>, claimed that Russian troops in Chechnya are "occupiers" and compared President ] to ] and ]<ref name="hrh"> </ref>. | ||
| According to his court sentence, Stomakhin also stated that modern Russia is ] and therefore must be destroyed, and considered ] and ] as heroes of Chechen resistance whose ] activities are ] <ref name="sent"> </ref>. However, some human rights activists like ] and ] did not believe that he actually promoted any terrorist activities <ref name=Svoboda> ] {{ru icon}} </ref> | According to his court sentence, Stomakhin also stated that modern Russia is ] and therefore must be destroyed, and considered ] and ] as heroes of Chechen resistance whose ] activities are ] <ref name="sent"> </ref>. However, some human rights activists like ] and ] did not believe that he actually promoted any terrorist activities <ref name=Svoboda> ] {{ru icon}} </ref> | ||
| Some journalists like M. Smolin from ] described his views as extremely russophobic, and suggested that Stomakhin is mentally ill. <ref name="KM"></ref>. Prominent ] journalist Maksim Sokolov, described Stomakhin political views as worse than those published in ].<ref name="Izves"/> | |||
| ⚫ | Stomakhin was a leader of a ] political group "Revolutionary Contact Association" (RCA). Other members of this organization are Pavel Kantor, Dmitry Tarasov, Ludmila Evstifeeva, and Pavel Luzakov. They organized a number of ]s against Russian foreign policy in Ukraine, Estonia, Belarus, Chechnya. | ||
| Stomakhin criticized Russian government in defamatory and obscene statements.<ref name=sent/><ref name=conviction/> | |||
| ⚫ | Stomakhin was accused of ] in |
||
| <blockquote></blockquote> | |||
| Orthodox religion, according to Stomakhin opinion, should be liquidated and he called not to recognize such religion. <ref name="fedosenko"></ref> | |||
| ⚫ | Stomakhin was a leader of a ] political group "Revolutionary Contact Association" (RCA). Other members of this organization are Pavel Kantor, Dmitry Tarasov, Ludmila Evstifeeva, and Pavel Luzakov. They organized a number of ]s against Russian foreign policy in Ukraine, Estonia, Belarus, Chechnya. | ||
| According to the Russian newspaper '']'' Stomakhin's organization might be involved with Chechen hostage-takers, based on information provided by ]. ''Utro'' alleged that during the ], terrorists had "contacted with activists of Revolutionary Contact Association" and they "may be involved in supplying terrorists with ammunition and its storing at Moscow"<ref name="Utro"> </ref> | |||
| ⚫ | Stomakhin was accused of of the ] activities, calls to violent change of Constitutional regime, calls to violate territorial integrity of Russian Federation, ], inciting ethnic and religious hatred in his articles, which covered among other things, the Chechen conflict, the Russian Orthodox Church, and Russian nation.<ref name=sent/><ref name=conviction/>. His home was raided in April 2004 and his computers and books were confiscated for the expertise. Stomakhin was interrogated. The Psychiatric expertise at ] found that Stomakhin is ] for the trial. Stomakhin escaped to the ] seeking political asylum status, which was eventually denied Stomakhin's claims that he is politically prosecuted in Russian Federation<ref name=Lenta/>. | ||
| ==Arrest and trial== | ==Arrest and trial== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 25: | ||
| He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements(articles 280 and 282 of the Russian Criminal Code). | He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements(articles 280 and 282 of the Russian Criminal Code). | ||
| Below are |
Below are several Stomakhin's citations cited as incriminating evidence in the court sentence: | ||
| *"Let tens of new Chechen snipers take their positions in the mountain ridges and the city ruins and let hundreds, thousands of aggressors fall under righteous bullets! No mercy! Death to the Russian occupiers!"<ref name="sent"> </ref> (the article was written in response to rape and murder of Chechen women ] by ]) | |||
| *"We, 'Revolutionary Contact Association' and 'Radical Politics' are united with the ] and are ready to cooperate with it. However we a lot more radical. We are for not waiting until 2008 and bothering ourselves particularly with the Constitution, but we are for calling people to overthrow the Putin's regime as soon as possible. And we do not see any possibility of preserving Russian Federation as a single state. But we are ready to unite with all allies, even those that are more moderate".<ref name="sent"> </ref> | |||
| *"] was justified, natural and legal... The Chechens have full moral right to blow up anything they want in Russia after all that Russia and Russians did to them, none objections on humanism and philanthropy could be accepted."<ref name="sent"> </ref> | *"] was justified, natural and legal... The Chechens have full moral right to blow up anything they want in Russia after all that Russia and Russians did to them, none objections on humanism and philanthropy could be accepted."<ref name="sent"> </ref> | ||
| *" |
*"We, 'Revolutionary Contact Association' and 'Radical Politics' are united with the Committee and are ready to cooperate with it. It is understood that we are lot more radical than it. We are for not waiting until 2008 and we shouldn't bother ourselves particularly with Constitution, but we are for calling people to overthrow and liquidate Putin's regime as soon as possible. And we at all do not see possibility of preserving of present Russian Federation as a single state. But we are for common front with all our allies, even more moderate".<ref name="sent"> </ref> | ||
| *" |
*"Let tens of new Chechen snipers take their positions in the mountain ridges and the city ruins and let hundreds, thousands of aggressors fall under righteous bullets! No mercy! Death to the Russian occupiers!"<ref name="sent"> </ref> | ||
| *"After all, with the same Budanov's - maniacs, blood lusting sadists, murderers and degenerates with epaulets - all Chechnya is currently filled up. And it is Russian occupation army consists of these same Budanov's".<ref name="sent"> </ref> | |||
| *"In Chechnya Russian army ceased to exist as a military structure of a state, finally turned into devilish gang of marauders and killers, intoxicated with narcotics gang".<ref name="sent"> </ref> | |||
| Stomakhin pleaded not guilty. According to ], news agency, cited by the Committee to Protect Journalists he said he was "tried for his views and not for any real crime. ... In the articles, I expressed my opinion, with which people were free to agree or disagree." He said an opinion was not a “call to action.”. | Stomakhin pleaded not guilty. According to ], news agency, cited by the Committee to Protect Journalists he said he was "tried for his views and not for any real crime. ... In the articles, I expressed my opinion, with which people were free to agree or disagree." He said an opinion was not a “call to action.”. | ||
| However, according to the official court sentence, Stomahin pleaded not guilty on the grounds that he never made public appeals for extremist activities, never called for violent change of the constitutional regime, and never incited ethnic hatred.<ref name=sent/> | |||
| ==Commentaries== | ==Commentaries== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 40: | ||
| ], government opposition figure, leader of the ], claimed that the prosecution of Stomakhin was the start of a wider campaign, "because together with him, the entire human rights sector and the entire democratic movement will be put on trial for disagreeing with the majority, for not accepting the state policy of the Russian Federation, for sympathizing with the Chechen people, for anti-war demonstrations and pickets." <ref name="Novo"> - by Jamestown Foundation </ref> | ], government opposition figure, leader of the ], claimed that the prosecution of Stomakhin was the start of a wider campaign, "because together with him, the entire human rights sector and the entire democratic movement will be put on trial for disagreeing with the majority, for not accepting the state policy of the Russian Federation, for sympathizing with the Chechen people, for anti-war demonstrations and pickets." <ref name="Novo"> - by Jamestown Foundation </ref> | ||
| Human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician Valeria Novodvorskaya argued that Stomakhin's writings while outrageous had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody. According to Gannushkina and Novodvorskaya the ] who pose a real threat usually receive only minimal sentences or no sentences at all. Thus, the five year prison term to Stomahin is extremely excessive <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val1"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val2"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref>. However, Gannushkina in the same interview acknowledged that some Stomakhin's articles were 'absolutely outrageous' and she 'categorically disagrees with what was written or told by Stomakhin'.<ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> | |||
| According to Micah H. Naftalin, Director of ], "Bogus charges aimed at stifling dissent, cruel police tactics, ethnic bias, and blatant disregard for criminal procedural statutes are all on open display. We hope that others will join us in condemning this travesty of justice" <ref name="Micah"> , statement of UCSJ November 9, 2006) </ref>. He noted "ethic bias" because Stomakhin was prosecuted as a "Jewish activist", according to him. Mr. Naftalin acknowledged that Stomakhin's statements were ''radical'', but emphasized that Stomakhin did not do anything violent, whereas many other real ] cases were not prosecuted by Russian authorities. | According to Micah H. Naftalin, Director of ], "Bogus charges aimed at stifling dissent, cruel police tactics, ethnic bias, and blatant disregard for criminal procedural statutes are all on open display. We hope that others will join us in condemning this travesty of justice" <ref name="Micah"> , statement of UCSJ November 9, 2006) </ref>. He noted "ethic bias" because Stomakhin was prosecuted as a "Jewish activist", according to him. Mr. Naftalin acknowledged that Stomakhin's statements were ''radical'', but emphasized that Stomakhin did not do anything violent, whereas many other real ] cases were not prosecuted by Russian authorities. | ||
| According to the statement of ], Stomakhin 'was probably pushed from the window', however this accusation contradicts to numerous mass media and NGO reports<ref name="press1"> </ref><ref name="press2"> </ref><ref name="press3"> </ref><ref name="press4"> </ref><ref name="press5"> </ref> <ref name="ngo1"> </ref><ref name="ngo2"> </ref> and statements by Stomakhin's lawyer Alexei Golubev<ref name="inter1"> </ref><ref name="inter2"> </ref> according to which Stomakhin jumped out of the window voluntarily. | |||
| A group of Russian citizens including ] condemned the conviction of Stomakhin as prosecution of ]. They noted that many famous Russian writers were very critical of Russian nation and cited ] who said that Russians are "a pitiful nation of slaves. We are all slaves, from the top to the bottom " <ref name="Bukovsky1"> | A group of Russian citizens including ] condemned the conviction of Stomakhin as prosecution of ]. They noted that many famous Russian writers were very critical of Russian nation and cited ] who said that Russians are "a pitiful nation of slaves. We are all slaves, from the top to the bottom " <ref name="Bukovsky1"> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 53: | ||
| Widow of ] ] compared Stomakhin with Soviet dissidents who were prosecuted for their writings by ]. <ref name="Bonner"> | Widow of ] ] compared Stomakhin with Soviet dissidents who were prosecuted for their writings by ]. <ref name="Bonner"> | ||
| . </ref> Human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician Valeria Novodvorskaya argued that Stomakhin's writings while "outrageous" had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val1"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val2"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> | . </ref> Human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician Valeria Novodvorskaya argued that Stomakhin's writings while "outrageous" had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val1"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val2"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> | ||
| Former FSB officer, writer, and dissident ] praised Stomakhin as "last conscience of Russia" <ref name="Litvinenko"> </ref>. Litvinenko also stated the he fully supports the following Stomakhin's citation: "Not pacifist wails of 'human rights activists', not agreements and 'negotiations' with executioners and sadists - but only an armed strike!", compromising his alleged status as a ]. Even such vocal supporters of Stomakhin as Valeria Novodvorskaya agree that Stomakhin is not a "prisoner of conscience" since he supported violence <ref name=Svoboda/>. | |||
| Journalist Vladimir Abarinov criticized court proceedings as an example of ] <ref name="Abarinov"> - by Vladimir Abarinov for grani.ru.</ref> He noted that the criminal case against Stomakhin was opened based on an article about ] that was not written by Stomakhin. It was decided by the court that Stomakhin actually copied this article from the Live Journal entry, as well as other publications of numerous news agencies <ref name="Sentence"></ref>. The authors of the original article were not ever accused of hate crimes. The authors of the original work disagree to share their responsibility with Stomakhin citing that he had reproduced their works without permission and distorted the original meaning <ref name="Abarinov"/> | Journalist Vladimir Abarinov criticized court proceedings as an example of ] <ref name="Abarinov"> - by Vladimir Abarinov for grani.ru.</ref> He noted that the criminal case against Stomakhin was opened based on an article about ] that was not written by Stomakhin. It was decided by the court that Stomakhin actually copied this article from the Live Journal entry, as well as other publications of numerous news agencies <ref name="Sentence"></ref>. The authors of the original article were not ever accused of hate crimes. The authors of the original work disagree to share their responsibility with Stomakhin citing that he had reproduced their works without permission and distorted the original meaning <ref name="Abarinov"/> | ||
| Critics of the court decision were strongly censured by | |||
| Critics of the court decision were censured by Russian publicist Maxim Sokolov. In his article published in pro-governmental ] after the conviction of Stomakhin <ref name="Izves"> ] ] ]</ref> he argued that Stomakhin's writings are worse than ] by ] and that unlimited ] must be prosecuted according to the article 282 of the Russian criminal code. He cited a text allegedly written by Boris Stomakhin, which claimed that "] must be destroyed" by all available means including ], because all Russians are collectively responsible for actions of their government with respect to ]. According to Sokolov, the cited passage made application of the article 282 completely appropriate, although this text was not cited as incriminating evidence in the court sentence.<ref name="sent"/> | |||
| Russian publicist Maxim Sokolov. In his newspaper article published after the conviction of Stomakhin <ref name="Izves"> ] ] ]</ref> he argued that unlimited ] should be prosecuted according to the article 282 of the criminal code. | |||
| He cited Stomakhin's article ''Death to Russia'' published on the website of the ''Revolutionary Contact Association'' <ref name=Sto></ref>. The article was written | |||
| in response to murder of last elected president of unrecognized by the world community ] ] by Russian forces. | |||
| The Stomakhin's article contained the following passages written by Stomakhin: ''Kill, Kill, Kill! To flood all Russia with blood, to not give a quarter to anyone, to try to make at least one atomic explosion on the territory of Russian Federation -- this is like the program of radical Resistance should be, and Russian's, and Chechen's, and anyone's! Let the Russians, according to their deserts, reap as they has sown''<ref name="Izves"/> <ref name=Sto/>. ''Russians should be killed, and only killed, for there is no one among them who is normal, intelligent, or who can be talked with and for understanding of whom we could rely. Harsh collective responsibility of all Russians should be introduced, of all loyal Russian citizens for the actions of the government elected by them -- for the genocide, executions, ordeals, trade with corpses... From that moment there should be no division of killers on combatant and non-combatant, wilful or forced''<ref name=Sto/>. | |||
| According to Sokolov the cited passages made application of the article 282 completely appropriate. | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 07:37, 12 April 2007
Boris Vladimirovich Stomakhin (Russian: Борис Владимирович Стомахин), (born August 24, 1974, Moscow), is a Russian radical political activist, journalist, and editor of dissident periodicals. He was one of a few journalists in Russia who openly challenged policies of Putin's administration with respect to Chechnya. He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements(articles 280 and 282 of the Russian Criminal Code)..
Journalism and political activism
Boris Stomakhin was an editor of monthly newspaper "Radical Politics" since 2000. Besides, he contributed numerous materials to Kavkaz Center, the Islamic internet agency that promotes independence of Chechnya and is maintained by Chechen separatists.
Stomakhin in his articles advocated terrorist attacks on Russian civilians, called to overthrow violently current government of Russian Federation, advocated extermination of all Russians, claimed that Russian troops in Chechnya are "occupiers" and compared President Vladimir Putin to Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milošević. According to his court sentence, Stomakhin also stated that modern Russia is Evil empire and therefore must be destroyed, and considered Shamil Basaev and Salman Raduev as heroes of Chechen resistance whose terrorist activities are legitimate . However, some human rights activists like Valeria Novodvorskaya and Yakov Krotov did not believe that he actually promoted any terrorist activities
Some journalists like M. Smolin from Komsomolskaya Pravda described his views as extremely russophobic, and suggested that Stomakhin is mentally ill. . Prominent Izvestia journalist Maksim Sokolov, described Stomakhin political views as worse than those published in Mein Kampf.
Stomakhin criticized Russian government in defamatory and obscene statements.
Orthodox religion, according to Stomakhin opinion, should be liquidated and he called not to recognize such religion.
Stomakhin was a leader of a radical political group "Revolutionary Contact Association" (RCA). Other members of this organization are Pavel Kantor, Dmitry Tarasov, Ludmila Evstifeeva, and Pavel Luzakov. They organized a number of pickets against Russian foreign policy in Ukraine, Estonia, Belarus, Chechnya.
According to the Russian newspaper Utro Stomakhin's organization might be involved with Chechen hostage-takers, based on information provided by FSB. Utro alleged that during the Moscow theater hostage crisis, terrorists had "contacted with activists of Revolutionary Contact Association" and they "may be involved in supplying terrorists with ammunition and its storing at Moscow"
Stomakhin was accused of of the extremist activities, calls to violent change of Constitutional regime, calls to violate territorial integrity of Russian Federation, hate speech, inciting ethnic and religious hatred in his articles, which covered among other things, the Chechen conflict, the Russian Orthodox Church, and Russian nation.. His home was raided in April 2004 and his computers and books were confiscated for the expertise. Stomakhin was interrogated. The Psychiatric expertise at Moscow Serbsky Institute found that Stomakhin is competent for the trial. Stomakhin escaped to the Ukraine seeking political asylum status, which was eventually denied Stomakhin's claims that he is politically prosecuted in Russian Federation.
Arrest and trial
Having returned to Moscow, Stomakhin was arrested on March 21 2006. Stomakhin tried to escape during his arrest and fell down from fourth floor of his building, according to his lawyer Alexei Golubev and news reports His spine and bones were broken as a result.
He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements(articles 280 and 282 of the Russian Criminal Code).
Below are several Stomakhin's citations cited as incriminating evidence in the court sentence:
- "Bombing in Moscow subway was justified, natural and legal... The Chechens have full moral right to blow up anything they want in Russia after all that Russia and Russians did to them, none objections on humanism and philanthropy could be accepted."
- "We, 'Revolutionary Contact Association' and 'Radical Politics' are united with the Committee and are ready to cooperate with it. It is understood that we are lot more radical than it. We are for not waiting until 2008 and we shouldn't bother ourselves particularly with Constitution, but we are for calling people to overthrow and liquidate Putin's regime as soon as possible. And we at all do not see possibility of preserving of present Russian Federation as a single state. But we are for common front with all our allies, even more moderate".
- "Let tens of new Chechen snipers take their positions in the mountain ridges and the city ruins and let hundreds, thousands of aggressors fall under righteous bullets! No mercy! Death to the Russian occupiers!"
- "After all, with the same Budanov's - maniacs, blood lusting sadists, murderers and degenerates with epaulets - all Chechnya is currently filled up. And it is Russian occupation army consists of these same Budanov's".
- "In Chechnya Russian army ceased to exist as a military structure of a state, finally turned into devilish gang of marauders and killers, intoxicated with narcotics gang".
Stomakhin pleaded not guilty. According to RIA Novosti, news agency, cited by the Committee to Protect Journalists he said he was "tried for his views and not for any real crime. ... In the articles, I expressed my opinion, with which people were free to agree or disagree." He said an opinion was not a “call to action.”.
However, according to the official court sentence, Stomahin pleaded not guilty on the grounds that he never made public appeals for extremist activities, never called for violent change of the constitutional regime, and never incited ethnic hatred.
Commentaries
ARTICLE 19 international organization, which protects free speech, stated that "we do not believe Mr. Stomakhin’s comments can be interpreted as incitement to ethnic hatred." He is currently one of two political prisoners in Russia listed by Committee to Protect Journalists , a member of International Freedom of Expression Exchange.
Valeria Novodvorskaya, government opposition figure, leader of the Democratic Union, claimed that the prosecution of Stomakhin was the start of a wider campaign, "because together with him, the entire human rights sector and the entire democratic movement will be put on trial for disagreeing with the majority, for not accepting the state policy of the Russian Federation, for sympathizing with the Chechen people, for anti-war demonstrations and pickets."
Human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician Valeria Novodvorskaya argued that Stomakhin's writings while outrageous had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody. According to Gannushkina and Novodvorskaya the neofascists who pose a real threat usually receive only minimal sentences or no sentences at all. Thus, the five year prison term to Stomahin is extremely excessive . However, Gannushkina in the same interview acknowledged that some Stomakhin's articles were 'absolutely outrageous' and she 'categorically disagrees with what was written or told by Stomakhin'.
According to Micah H. Naftalin, Director of Union of Councils for Soviet Jews, "Bogus charges aimed at stifling dissent, cruel police tactics, ethnic bias, and blatant disregard for criminal procedural statutes are all on open display. We hope that others will join us in condemning this travesty of justice" . He noted "ethic bias" because Stomakhin was prosecuted as a "Jewish activist", according to him. Mr. Naftalin acknowledged that Stomakhin's statements were radical, but emphasized that Stomakhin did not do anything violent, whereas many other real hate crime cases were not prosecuted by Russian authorities.
According to the statement of Union of Councils for Jews in the Former Soviet Union, Stomakhin 'was probably pushed from the window', however this accusation contradicts to numerous mass media and NGO reports and statements by Stomakhin's lawyer Alexei Golubev according to which Stomakhin jumped out of the window voluntarily.
A group of Russian citizens including Vladimir Bukovsky condemned the conviction of Stomakhin as prosecution of free speech. They noted that many famous Russian writers were very critical of Russian nation and cited Nikolai Chernyshevsky who said that Russians are "a pitiful nation of slaves. We are all slaves, from the top to the bottom "
Widow of Andrei Sakharov Elena Bonner compared Stomakhin with Soviet dissidents who were prosecuted for their writings by Yuri Andropov. Human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician Valeria Novodvorskaya argued that Stomakhin's writings while "outrageous" had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody
Former FSB officer, writer, and dissident Aleksander Litvinenko praised Stomakhin as "last conscience of Russia" . Litvinenko also stated the he fully supports the following Stomakhin's citation: "Not pacifist wails of 'human rights activists', not agreements and 'negotiations' with executioners and sadists - but only an armed strike!", compromising his alleged status as a prisoner of conscience. Even such vocal supporters of Stomakhin as Valeria Novodvorskaya agree that Stomakhin is not a "prisoner of conscience" since he supported violence .
Journalist Vladimir Abarinov criticized court proceedings as an example of Kangaroo court He noted that the criminal case against Stomakhin was opened based on an article about Russian Orthodox Church that was not written by Stomakhin. It was decided by the court that Stomakhin actually copied this article from the Live Journal entry, as well as other publications of numerous news agencies . The authors of the original article were not ever accused of hate crimes. The authors of the original work disagree to share their responsibility with Stomakhin citing that he had reproduced their works without permission and distorted the original meaning
Critics of the court decision were strongly censured by Russian publicist Maxim Sokolov. In his newspaper article published after the conviction of Stomakhin he argued that unlimited hate speech should be prosecuted according to the article 282 of the criminal code. He cited Stomakhin's article Death to Russia published on the website of the Revolutionary Contact Association . The article was written in response to murder of last elected president of unrecognized by the world community Chechen Republic of Ichkeria Aslan Maskhadov by Russian forces.
The Stomakhin's article contained the following passages written by Stomakhin: Kill, Kill, Kill! To flood all Russia with blood, to not give a quarter to anyone, to try to make at least one atomic explosion on the territory of Russian Federation -- this is like the program of radical Resistance should be, and Russian's, and Chechen's, and anyone's! Let the Russians, according to their deserts, reap as they has sown . Russians should be killed, and only killed, for there is no one among them who is normal, intelligent, or who can be talked with and for understanding of whom we could rely. Harsh collective responsibility of all Russians should be introduced, of all loyal Russian citizens for the actions of the government elected by them -- for the genocide, executions, ordeals, trade with corpses... From that moment there should be no division of killers on combatant and non-combatant, wilful or forced. According to Sokolov the cited passages made application of the article 282 completely appropriate.
References
- ^ Official Court Sentence on Russian language dated 20.11.2006 Cite error: The named reference "sent" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Official conviction of Boris Stomakhin
- ^ Lenta.ru news agency article
- Independent journalist given five-year sentence allegedly for inciting ethnic strife
- ^ Boris Stomakhin:Victim of the Regime or a Terrorist Radio Liberty Template:Ru icon
- Komsomolskaya Pravda article
- ^ Maxim Sokolov Trap-282 Izvestia 23 November 2006
- Rossiyskaya Gazeta article
- Press article Baraev's group was assisted by someone from Moscow
- ^ Prima News Agency report
- ^ NewsRu Agency report
- ^ Lenta.Ru Agency report
- ^ Regnum News Agency report
- ^ Grani News Agency report
- ^ Human Rights Activists Website of Valeria Novodvorskaya article
- ^ Center of Extremal Journalism article
- ^ RIAN News Agency investigation
- ^ RIAN News Agency news article
- ARTICLE 19’S STATEMENT ON THE CONVICTION OF RUSSIAN NEWSPAPER EDITOR BORIS STOMAKHIN, 23 November 2006
- KAVKAZ-CENTER WRITER APPEALS JAIL SENTENCE - by Jamestown Foundation
- ^ Conviction of Boris Stomakhin: Opinions (Russian) - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru
- ^ Scapegoats - by Valeria Novodvorskaya for grani.ru
- ^ Second-hand fascism - by Valeria Novodvorskaya for grani.ru
- UCSJ Calls For Fair Trial of Russian Jewish Activist, statement of UCSJ November 9, 2006)
- Open letter in support of Boris Stomakhin
- Open letter in support of Boris Stomakhin
- Letter by Sannikova and Bonner.
- Opinion of Aleksander Litvineko (Russian)
- ^ Stomakhin Case - by Vladimir Abarinov for grani.ru.
- Official Court Sentence on Russian language dated 20.11.2006
- ^ Boris Stomakhin article Death to Russia
External links
- Official Court Sentence on Russian language dated 20.11.2006
- Web site in support of Boris Stomakhin
- Articles by Boris Stomakhin
- The article 'Death to Russia' by Boris Stomkahin in Google cache
- Revolutionary Contact Association website
- Revolutionary Contact Association website
- Another website of Revolutionary Contact Association