Misplaced Pages

A Short Guide to Office of Special Affairs Tactics on Misplaced Pages

Anyone who wishes to understand the lunacy of Church of Scientology-directed editors on Misplaced Pages should listen to the famous Monty Python Argument Clinic. Experience with these characters here has shown that:

• They may pretend to not understand the topic of a discussion.
• They may refuse to acknowledge the existence of verifiable data that conflicts with their point of view.
• They may falsely accuse you of a personal attack if you are able to defend your position, after they attempt to bait you.
• They may misrepresent Misplaced Pages policy and pretend their fabrications are true.
• They may attempt to change the subject of a thread if they have made a foolish statement (not uncommon) and the discussion has gone against them.
• They may ally themselves with Misplaced Pages policy makers in an attempt to change editing policy so as to make Scientology-related articles less disreputable.
• They may put nuisance comments on a discussion page, either overtly or anonymously.
• They troll discussion pages to stir up trouble.

The best solutions are to ignore or quickly end discussions with them as their malicious intentions are to waste your time and/or provoke you. Incidentally, the two Office of Special Affairs personnel presently in charge of internet related operations are Gloria Idda and Lynn Varney.

Fair Use links

Precedent link

A discussion with User:COFS

Just curious, COFS. How much data has been culled from your folders in answer to the question, "Have you done something that someone almost found out about?"--Fahrenheit451 02:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

None. That does not read ;-) COFS 02:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

You are not being truthful as OSA will not tell you what is culled and when. Your answer "That does not read" indicates some anxiety on the subject. Were you given a sec check by OSA to qualify to edit on wikipedia? --Fahrenheit451 02:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

You talking like a master psychologist. I can almost see you index finger hysterically waving around. However, you are making personal comments and not good ones. I'll let that slide and take one myself. The answer is "no". And I might comment that you are pretty lunatic to think that. Over and out. COFS 02:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Are those images of my index finger hysterically waving around from an implant you have received? Where did that occur? Who would represent a master psychologist?--Fahrenheit451 03:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Note: User:COFS blanked this discussion from his talk page and moved it to the Scientology Template talk page. It was removed there and parked here for safekeeping.

Ah, there it is. I thought you deleted it from the talk page. And here comes the other half. COFS 03:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

O.K. So are you being disruptive for OSA under the guise of pretending to speculate?--Fahrenheit451 02:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

That is not a question, but covered insult. I think, we've met. You are one of those "alternative Scientologists" who are using fu**ed-up processing with the purpose to do people in. Have ever produced cancer on someone? How many of your PCs have died from your squirrel processes? Did you know the FZ leader in Germany who blew herself up in flames after enjoying one of processes "improved" by Freezoners? Were you the auditor? COFS 02:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

No offense intended. I am not an auditor. The only cancer I have known to be produced by auditing is in the cofs from their NOTS. Then there's the insanity produced in Lisa McPherson after getting L11 at Flag, after which they allowed her to die. You seem to have some charge on the subject of auditing. What bad auditing have you had? Where did it occur? --Fahrenheit451 03:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)