| Revision as of 15:48, 3 July 2017 editAtsme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,804 edits →Proposal: add-on← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:00, 19 May 2024 edit undoHarryboyles (talk | contribs)Administrators153,037 editsm →top: essay's impact is automatically assessed - removing unsupported 'impact' parameterTag: AWB |
| (13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProject Essays|impact=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Essays}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Integrity}} |
|
{{Oldmfd|date=23 May 2015|result=keep|votepage=Misplaced Pages:Advocacy ducks}} |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
== Proposal == |
|
|
|
| action1 = MFD |
|
|
|
|
|
| action1date = 23 May 2015 |
|
I propose to add a WL to a . ] (]) 22:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Advocacy ducks |
|
:My suggestion is to add the link to the section "Related essays, policies, and guidelines" because the wikilink you're proposing is not the only behavioral characteristic. <sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font>]]</sup> 22:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1result = keep |
|
::Since you have concerns about my editing here I will let you decide if you really want it in the essay. You can archive this discussion now. Good luck. ] (]) 14:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action1oldid = 663667267 |
|
:::I made a suggestion because the essay you want to wikilink is unrelated to what you've chosen for the link - your essay focuses on citations, which is not a behaviorial characteristic. Considering your history with the AVDUCK essay, and the multiple "-1 edits" you've made here for no valid reason, as evidenced in the edit history, and the fact that you deleted my questions on your TP does raise a legitimate question - WHY? - but with all that aside, my position about the wikilink to your essay remains the same. Over-citing and under-citing is a sourcing issue, not an advocacy issue. Your wikilink will be better served in an essay about MOS or sources and inline citations. I wish you luck promoting your "serious essay" and hope it helps others become better editors as what AVDUCKS was created to do.<sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font>]]</sup> 15:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)<sup>I added the wikilink to a relevant phrase in this essay.<sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font>]]</sup> 15:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)</sup> |
|
|
|
}} |
