| Revision as of 01:24, 20 July 2018 editDavemck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users119,186 editsm rmv extra "|"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:00, 19 May 2024 edit undoHarryboyles (talk | contribs)Administrators153,037 editsm →top: essay's impact is automatically assessed - removing unsupported 'impact' parameterTag: AWB |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Essays|impact=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Essays}} |
|
{{WikiProject Integrity}} |
|
{{WikiProject Integrity}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
| action1oldid = 663667267 |
|
| action1oldid = 663667267 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Banner shell == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'd the banner shell because at that time it was wrapped around a single wikiproject and the article history milestones. Obviously article history milestones are not a wikiproject and so don't belong in the banner shell. That left a single wikiproject included in the banner shell, which made the banner shell (which refers to *multiple* wikiprojects) incorrect. Obviously now that a second wikiproject apparently associated with this essay has been added, the use of the banner shell is no longer incorrect (weird, maybe, with only two wikiprojects listed, but not incorrect). |
|
|
|
|
|
{{u|Atsme}}, I don't know why you me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. ] (]) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:My edit summaries are self-explanatory. <sup>]]]</sup> 19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::Sure, except for the one I linked above which said: "Undid revision 850275608 by Ca2james (talk) added another project - please discuss on TP". So here I am, discussing, but I don't understand why you said to do this and I'm asking for clarity. Did you mean something like "discuss on talk page before reverting?" That's not what your words say, so in the future if that is your meaning, please do say that in your edit summary so that your words match your intent. For the present, could you please explain what you wanted me to discuss? ] (]) 20:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
