Misplaced Pages

Talk:MTR: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:50, 20 April 2021 editFinnusertop (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users89,190 edits top: C← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:56, 24 May 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,384 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:MTR/Archive 4) (bot 
(37 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 47: Line 47:
|otd2date=2014-09-30|otd2oldid=627511548 |otd2date=2014-09-30|otd2oldid=627511548
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{TrainsWikiProject|subway=yes|subway-importance=high|class=C|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Trains|subway=yes|subway-importance=high|importance=High}}
{{WPHK|class=C|importance=high|transport=yes}} {{WikiProject Hong Kong|importance=high|transport=yes}}
{{WP1.0|v0.5=held|class=C}}
{{Vital article|topic=Technology|level=5|class=C}}
}} }}
{{Hong Kong English}} {{Hong Kong English}}
{{Archive box| {{Archive box|auto=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
*]
|maxarchivesize = 100K
*]
|counter = 4
*]
|minthreadsleft = 5
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:MTR/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
== Route Table of Light Rail ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Should we make a table JUST for Light Rail? It doesn't quite seem to fit in the current "MTR Line" one. But it's going to need a lot of effort.
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-07-04T14:41:03.130558 | PRDIR logo without text.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 14:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
== Spinning off the section ] according to ] ==
The previous edits to spin off #Modified Initial System as its own article (and to expand with more, encyclopaedic details; considering the length of this main article, ''and'', the existing practice for other sections) and to downsize that section according to summary style had met with unexplained edit warring and extensive simple vandalism/overdone reverts by ], among others. No discussion had ever been launched on either talk pages (neither here nor ]). Please state here your concern and valid reason to oppose such an operation, if there's any. Otherwise ] will be adhered to and all such disruptive edits will be reported. Thanks. ] (]) 02:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


: I didn't carry out any vandalism. Please do not make false accusations. I don't think splitting off Modified Initial System is necessary unless you intend to significantly expand the coverage of that subject. Secondly you need to stop adding links to a so-called "Harbour Crossing Tunnel" unless you can provide evidence that this is a well-established name, as I have asked of you ] – per ]. I also don't understand why you keep adding circular redirects to this nonexistent article. ''']''' (]) 06:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
] (]) 11:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


:: BTW I already suggested the alternative names "Tsuen Wan Line immersed tube" or "Modified Initial System immersed tube" since "Harbour Crossing Tunnel" is not an official name nor is it widely used. It also looks clumsy and ungrammatical. ''']''' (]) 06:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
:My opinion is that '''both''' Airport Express and Light Rail should be separated from the network table, as they have different fare system and network system from the 9 lines. – ]&amp;] 14:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


::: I would concur but these are like neologisms invented by the Wikipedian community. The existing name appears at least in scholastic publications. ] (]) 06:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
== Criticism of MTR==
::: @Citobun: These names don't exist anywhere else apart from this talk page. ] (]) 13:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
:::: {{Ping|Citobun}} Where have you been? ] (]) 13:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


::: Where did you find these names? ] (]) 05:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Read this http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=61468&sid=17571556&con_type=1 (THE STANDARD)--should we add it????
::I went through the edit history and found that you actually did. Meanwhile that article on the MIS has been expanded quite considerably and I would suppose you too would consider it necessary to have a separate article on that, given your precondition has been fulfilled. ] (]) 06:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
::: Given your precondition has been fulfilled there's so far clear consensus to spin off the section. On the other hand it isn't uncommon for former lines of rapid transit system to have their own articles, e.g., ] of Singapore, the ] in London or the IRT Trunk Line and the Fulton Street Line in the NYC. ] (]) 07:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
: I found no reason that this shouldn't be carried out. The name of that tunnel isn't quite a relevant point and should be settled separately. ] (]) 06:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
:: Agree. Go to an appropriate venue to discuss the naming issue around the article for that immersed tube tunnel. Its name got nothing directly to do with whether the MIS section warrants a split. Meanwhile would anyone request to unprotect that page? ] (]) 13:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
: Is this getting anywhere? ] (]) 11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
:: Please stop jumping from IP to IP, it makes this discussion extremely hard to follow and probably constitutes ]. ''']''' (]) 05:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)


] (]) 01:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC) ::: What? ] (]) 13:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
=== The expanded article ===
Now that while there's no longer by logical deduction any opposition towards spinning off the section ] and given the spun-off article has been considerably expanded JalenFolf has gone way further to argue not even the redirect is printworthy and removed the R with possibilities tag. The page has also been locked upon their request. They've also proceeded to de-link the redirect to the article section ] from as many as ten articles which amounted to ]. The question would be that whether such disruptions (including, but not limited to Citobun's blanket reverts mentioned above) should be tolerated, and whether the new materials in the expanded article should be incorporated for the being under the MTR § MIS section or should that expanded article be restored. ] (]) 11:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
: I did wonder why ] had removed the link to the MIS section of the ] article from the ] article. Also 124.217.188.171, I recommend you sign up for an actual wikipedia account. ] (]) 12:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
:: Are those edits reverted already? ] (]) 11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


::: Please stop jumping from IP to IP, it makes this discussion extremely hard to follow and probably constitutes ]. ''']''' (]) 05:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
:The so-called "early retirement package" is quite common among Hong Kong enterprises and government departments, so I doubt the need of such information. But I am not against it and I think if someone is gonna include this cite, it worth to open a new section about MTR staff to include their uniform style as well in order to stuff the new section. -- ] (]) 02:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
:::: What are you talking about? ] (]) 08:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
: This is simply counterproductive. The content of the enriched article isn't incorporated anywhere. It's like simply scraped. ] (]) 05:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
:: Cant agree more. ] (]) 08:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
== MTR-KCR merge ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-03-06T18:39:58.861982 | HK MTR logo (PD).svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 18:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 24#Rail Merger}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 09:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


== Art culture inspired by MTR ==
I've started a discussion on the MTR-KCR merge at WPHK (so we can have one consolidated discussion about it instead of having the same discussion across the few relevant articles). . ] <small>(] - ])</small> 16:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


Hi, I believe we should also touch the topic of '''Mosaic Tiles''' in each MTR station (and provide local photos) as it plays a significant role on some of the artworks and inspiration for artists. We should also touch base on other temporary art exhibition in the MTR station.
After the merger on 2 Dec, should we merge ] with ]?, but, if we do, it's a loss of history. Another important topic is to improve ] since it is important and should attract more attention. ] (]) 05:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
:Do you mind bringing this up at the WPHK talk page so we have a consolidated discussion? ] <small>(] - ])</small> 07:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

==Safety on The MTR==
do you think MTR deserves an article on safety (http://en.wikipedia.org/Safety_on_the_Mass_Rapid_Transit) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== BVE Trainsim ==

It looks like this isn't actually initiated by MTR itself, and was just created by some train enthusiasts. I propose we remove it. ] <small>(] - ])</small> 05:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
:Surely. -- ] (]) 06:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
:* Removed. - ] (]) 08:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

== ] or ]? ==

There's an anon insist "correcting" the MTR gauge width standard in ZH version. After 3RR with the resultant full-protection, he finally gives his word in the talk page. Unsurprizingly, no response. As I've witnessed several times the editwar happens again after protected article unprotected. We need some expert to do the judge and prove whether it is standard gauge or narrow gauge. -- ] (]) 09:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

:According to the article on Hong Kong railways, the MTR runs on 1432 mm
(≈ 4'8<sup>3</sup>/<sub>8</sub>") gauge, which is 3 mm (≈ <sup>1</sup>/<sub>8</sub>") narrower than standard gauge. I'd call it standard gauge, since I think a few mm of leeway is built into any definition (e.g., a 995 mm railway would probably still be considered meter-gauge). If you want, I suppose you could call it a ]. ] (]) 06:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

::Is there a reference for why they picked ''near standard gauge'' - to make sure main line trains never can use it? I believe the TTC in Canada did this on some of their tram / trolley lines. ] (]) 06:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
:::I tend to think it's because of the rolling stock requirement. ] uses narrow gauge, but of course it is a much older railway. --] (]) 06:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

== 1991 MTR Disruptions ==

I saw from a TV show on ] about a malfunction in 1991 that took almost the entire MTR network offline, forcing passengers to take other forms of transportation. Can we add that in there after some research? ] (]) 06:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
: Linky? - ] 16:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

== Oyster Card Section ==

I was noticing a problem with one of the references within the last sentence of the second paragraph where it states on other cities that use smart card systems. It states Chicago uses the EasyCard when it uses the Chicago Card smart card. The EasyCard is the system used in Taipei. I'm new to editing so am still unfamiliar how to correct the links (either replacing Chicago for Taipei or EasyCard for Chicago Card) so until I can figure things out if someone can assist with the editing of the links it would be greatly appreciated.

Chicago Card
http://en.wikipedia.org/Chicago_Card

EasyCard
http://en.wikipedia.org/EasyCard

(] (]) 18:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC))

: Fixed! Thank you for noticing and pointing it out! -] <small>]</small> 23:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

== Ownership ==

Isn't the MTR not 100% government owned? I don't know the exact percentage of the public ownership vs private (after the merger), but I propose changing the infobox section on its ownership. ] (]) 00:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

:It is not 100% gov't owned, see here: ]; I believe the HKSAR owns about half of MTR Corp now. -] <small>]</small> 18:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

]
]

== Changes to Kwun Tong line ==

The article says:

:Since the opening in 1982, the Tsuen Wan Line is the only line whose alignment has virtually remained the same for the past 23 years. For example, the Kwun Tong Line's alignment has changed twice since its opening — the taking over of Tsuen Wan Line from Mong Kok to Central, and the taking over of Eastern Harbour Crossing section by the Tseung Kwan O Line.

That cannot be quite right. When I first visited Hong Kong in the late 1980s there was no Eastern Harbour Crossing, but the Tsuen Wan Line was as it is now. The Kwun Tong line ran from Mong Kok to Kwun Tong. Thus there must have been at least three changes to the route of the Kwun Tong line:

* When the Tsuen Wan line took over the section from Mong Kok to Central
* When the Kwun Tong line was extended through the new Eastern Harbour Crossing
* When the Tseung Kwan O line took over the Eastern Harbour Crossing

There may have been others. I seem to remember that after the Eastern Harbour Crossing opened, the Kwun Tong line's terminus was Quarry Bay, not North Point. -- ] (]) 19:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

== Freight and inter-city passenger traffic ==
What happened to the KCRC's freight and inter-city passenger traffic?. The section on the merger would suggest that the MTR took this over, but I can find no reference to it in this article or its line-specific daughter articles.

The rolling stock summaries make no reference to freight locomotives or longer distance passenger stock. I seem to remember that the KCRC used to own some Swiss-built double-deck inter-city trains, but again there is no reference to these. Has that traffic all gone, is it all operated by railway companies from the north, or is it just missing from this family of articles?. -- ] (]) 19:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

:I'm not an expert on this topic, but I'm guessing all the same KCRC services still run under MTR, as I'm pretty sure the inter-city trains you mention are the ] trains used on the Hong Kong to ] service. I don't know about freight trains. I agree that this info should be incorporated into the article.] (]) 21:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

== New article ==

Should we split the ] into a new article? It would be easier to organise and edit that way, and would make the MTR parent article much clearer to read. ]<sup>(] • ])</sup> 01:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

== Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page ==

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the ].
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the ].
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the ].
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

'''Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:'''

*<nowiki>http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/hong_kong/</nowiki>
*:''Triggered by <code>\brailway-technology\.com\b</code> on the local blacklist''

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact ] and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—] ]<sub style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 12:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

==86 stations or 87 stations?==
I used Notepad to count how many stations does the MTR have. Of course the number of stations is 86 when I counted them. NOT 87. ] (]) 04:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070302113319/http://www.hkaaa.com:80/hkaaa/event/event/Year%202007/mtr%202007/website/main.htm to http://www.hkaaa.com/hkaaa/event/event/Year%202007/mtr%202007/website/main.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120331102137/http://topics.scmp.com/news/hk-news-watch/article/MTR-tree-felling-angers-greens to http://topics.scmp.com/news/hk-news-watch/article/MTR-tree-felling-angers-greens

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 20:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311023453/http://home.netvigator.com/~wonglt/his/ar1.htm to http://home.netvigator.com/~wonglt/his/ar1.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.transport.alstom.com/home/Products_and_Services/RAIL_VEHICLES/Passenger_trains/Urban_trains/10918.EN.php?languageId=EN&dir=%2Fhome%2FProducts_and_Services%2FRAIL_VEHICLES%2FPassenger_trains%2FUrban_trains%2F&docLink=7628
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtr-shatincentrallink.hk/en/construction/related-work.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hkaaa.com/hkaaa/event/event/mtr%2006/website/MTR%2006/info_index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 11:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224153634/http://www.architecture.com/NewsAndPress/News/InternationalNews/Press/2002/HongKong-ACityOnTheMove.aspx to http://www.architecture.com/NewsAndPress/News/InternationalNews/Press/2002/HongKong-ACityOnTheMove.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 14:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65WoWY1Yn?url=http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/June2005/1550.htm to http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/June2005/1550.htm
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DDd34Yvq?url=http://www.octopus.com.hk/about-us/corporate-profile/our-history/en/index.html to http://www.octopus.com.hk/history/en/index.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

== Move discussion in progress ==

There is a move discussion in progress on ] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:MTR (disambiguation) crosspost --> —] 18:00, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

== Stuxnetlike computer bug chaos ==
October 2018 saw huge disruptions due to Stuxnetlike computer bug hitting the MTR systems, but no official acknowledgement of whether it was ] or otherwise. The malicious Israeli virus Stuxnet, although purportedly designed to target ] bus controllers (] for centifuges), it has spread far beyond. They may simply refer to it as a "bug" rather than make any official statement about foreign meddling. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: Please provide a citation to a reliable source. Otherwise it appears to be ]. Thank you, ''']''' (]) 09:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

== Section "The First railroad" ==

As explained on IP's user page already, I am removing the section on "The First railroad" because the history of the KCR is already covered in the article for ]. MTR originated in the 1960s and 1970s. ''']''' (]) 10:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

== LGBT advertisement ==

{{ping|Jacky138}} The IPs are probably referring to . ] (]) 13:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2019-11-29T00:04:24.008811 | ChinaRailwayHighspeed-notext.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 00:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2020-06-07T03:38:08.453622 | MTR-High Speed Rail logo.svg -->
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —] (]) 03:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

== Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-06-07T11:40:21.774794 | MTR (logo with text).svg -->
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-06-07T11:40:21.774794 | MTR Corporation logo.svg -->
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-06-07T11:40:21.774794 | MTR logo.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 11:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-10-04T15:10:12.149061 | PRDIR logo without text.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 15:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


== Featured article review ==
This article was promoted to FA status way back in 2005, almost 15 years ago now as of 2020. Since then, the article has gone through many changes that has diminished its status as a FA, or even as a GA. It's too cluttered, contains outdated or unsourced information, and formatting issues at some sections. Not to mention the controversies section which contains material bordering on ] and ] from ] sources. The talk page over the past few years is mostly dead with bots notifying of copyrighted images being removed or modifying external links. ] (]) 00:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


] (]) 18:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
== Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-02-03T18:25:44.708354 | MTR (logo with text).svg -->
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-02-03T18:25:44.708354 | MTR logo.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 18:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:56, 24 May 2024

Former featured articleMTR is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 11, 2005.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
January 1, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 17, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
April 5, 2007Featured article reviewKept
May 9, 2008Featured article reviewKept
March 12, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
March 25, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2014.
Current status: Former featured article
This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconTrains: Rapid transit High‑importance
WikiProject icon
Trains Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconHong Kong: Transport High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Hong Kong Transport workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

Collaboration needed

Improvement needed

Cleanup needed

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Deorphan needed

Page creation needed

Miscellaneous tasks

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4



This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Spinning off the section Modified Initial System according to summary style

The previous edits to spin off #Modified Initial System as its own article (and to expand with more, encyclopaedic details; considering the length of this main article, and, the existing practice for other sections) and to downsize that section according to summary style had met with unexplained edit warring and extensive simple vandalism/overdone reverts by Citobun, among others. No discussion had ever been launched on either talk pages (neither here nor Talk:Modified Initial System). Please state here your concern and valid reason to oppose such an operation, if there's any. Otherwise Misplaced Pages:BOLD will be adhered to and all such disruptive edits will be reported. Thanks. 219.73.29.243 (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

I didn't carry out any vandalism. Please do not make false accusations. I don't think splitting off Modified Initial System is necessary unless you intend to significantly expand the coverage of that subject. Secondly you need to stop adding links to a so-called "Harbour Crossing Tunnel" unless you can provide evidence that this is a well-established name, as I have asked of you repeatedly – per WP:BURDEN. I also don't understand why you keep adding circular redirects to this nonexistent article. Citobun (talk) 06:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
BTW I already suggested the alternative names "Tsuen Wan Line immersed tube" or "Modified Initial System immersed tube" since "Harbour Crossing Tunnel" is not an official name nor is it widely used. It also looks clumsy and ungrammatical. Citobun (talk) 06:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I would concur but these are like neologisms invented by the Wikipedian community. The existing name appears at least in scholastic publications. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
@Citobun: These names don't exist anywhere else apart from this talk page. 203.218.155.184 (talk) 13:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
@Citobun: Where have you been? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 13:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Where did you find these names? 220.246.91.139 (talk) 05:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I went through the edit history and found that you actually did. Meanwhile that article on the MIS has been expanded quite considerably and I would suppose you too would consider it necessary to have a separate article on that, given your precondition has been fulfilled. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Given your precondition has been fulfilled there's so far clear consensus to spin off the section. On the other hand it isn't uncommon for former lines of rapid transit system to have their own articles, e.g., Branch MRT Line of Singapore, the District Railway in London or the IRT Trunk Line and the Fulton Street Line in the NYC. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 07:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I found no reason that this shouldn't be carried out. The name of that tunnel isn't quite a relevant point and should be settled separately. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Agree. Go to an appropriate venue to discuss the naming issue around the article for that immersed tube tunnel. Its name got nothing directly to do with whether the MIS section warrants a split. Meanwhile would anyone request to unprotect that page? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Is this getting anywhere? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop jumping from IP to IP, it makes this discussion extremely hard to follow and probably constitutes Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppetry. Citobun (talk) 05:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
What? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 13:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

The expanded article

Now that while there's no longer by logical deduction any opposition towards spinning off the section MTR § MIS and given the spun-off article has been considerably expanded JalenFolf has gone way further to argue not even the redirect is printworthy and removed the R with possibilities tag. The page has also been locked upon their request. They've also proceeded to de-link the redirect to the article section MTR § MIS from as many as ten articles which amounted to disrupting Misplaced Pages to illustrate a point. The question would be that whether such disruptions (including, but not limited to Citobun's blanket reverts mentioned above) should be tolerated, and whether the new materials in the expanded article should be incorporated for the being under the MTR § MIS section or should that expanded article be restored. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 11:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I did wonder why JalenFolf had removed the link to the MIS section of the MTR article from the Wilfrid Newton article. Also 124.217.188.171, I recommend you sign up for an actual wikipedia account. Turini2 (talk) 12:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Are those edits reverted already? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop jumping from IP to IP, it makes this discussion extremely hard to follow and probably constitutes Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppetry. Citobun (talk) 05:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
What are you talking about? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 08:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
This is simply counterproductive. The content of the enriched article isn't incorporated anywhere. It's like simply scraped. 220.246.91.139 (talk) 05:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Cant agree more. 203.218.155.184 (talk) 08:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

"Rail Merger" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rail Merger has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 24 § Rail Merger until a consensus is reached. Fork99 (talk) 09:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Art culture inspired by MTR

Hi, I believe we should also touch the topic of Mosaic Tiles in each MTR station (and provide local photos) as it plays a significant role on some of the artworks and inspiration for artists. We should also touch base on other temporary art exhibition in the MTR station.

How Hong Kong's MTR stations got their colours | Cathay (cathaypacific.com)

Hong Kong Secret Art: MTR Artworks You've Never Noticed (thebeat.asia) Clcherry (talk) 18:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Categories: