| Revision as of 22:50, 13 April 2007 editMivonks (talk | contribs)5 edits rv lovelight edit + unlogged in lovelight edits← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:57, 13 April 2007 edit undoLovelight (talk | contribs)1,461 edits + Scott Ritter), hey user Mivonks, I'm not the one to start your talk page, state your concerns, join the discussion…Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| <br /> | <br /> | ||
| '''Notable proponents and supporters'''<br /> | '''Notable proponents and supporters'''<br /> | ||
| ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]<br /> | ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]<br /> | ||
| <br /> | <br /> | ||
| '''Groups'''<br /> | '''Groups'''<br /> | ||
Revision as of 22:57, 13 April 2007
The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.
When adding articles to the template please do so in alphabetical order. When adding an article to the template do not forget to add the template to the article. Simply add {{911ct}} directly above the categories the article is part of.
| 9/11 conspiracy theories |
|---|
This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist.
Categories: