Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Sexual orientation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:47, 17 November 2014 editStickee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,599 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2014: fix← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:31, 30 May 2024 edit undoAlphaBetaGamma (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,055 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
(44 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject LGBT studies}}
{{LGBTProject |class=Template}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality}}
{{WP Sexuality|class=Template}}
{{WikiProject Psychology}}
}} }}
{{Old TfD|result='''No consensus'''|date=12 August 2005|link=Not deleted/August 2005|page=Template:Sexual orientation}}
{{multidel
|list=
* '''No consensus''', 12 August 2005, ]
|small=yes
}}
__TOC__


== Pansexuality ==
== Someone (another editor) should add Pansexual/Omnisexual to the Sexual orientation template and also. . . ==


I feel as if ] should be listed as a sexual orientation rather than under related terms -- many pansexuals view their identity as its' own distinct orientation and numerous LGBT groups list it as such. ] (]) 22:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Given the meaning of 'Pansexual', probably add, and find citation for, orientation not only to 'persons' as the article now states in its paragraph 1 but 'persons or things' as personhood is likely not a distinction made by some or most pansexuals.
:It's about the difference between ] and sexual orientation. Non-academic sources sometimes conflate the terms, as people may in common speech, but they are not the same. As the ] article makes clear, many sources consider it to be under the bisexual umbrella. <span style="font-family:Palatino">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 00:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)


== Fictosexuality and Nijikon ==
After all, 'Asexual' is already included in this template.


I have reverted edits that add ] and ] to the template.() This is clearly overgranular, and Nijikon is not widely accepted as a sexual orientation, but I would also like to question whether Fictosexuality is even a genuine subject at all. If anybody wants to take a look and see what they think, please do. --] (]) 13:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
You might also have to distinguish between generally Pansexual, meaning some people and/or things of any kind MIGHT attract a Pansexual, just as only some women are attractive to homosexual/lesbian women, not all, and Omnisexual which is really just the same word using Latin instead of Greek but is more likely to imply that EVERYTHING attracts an Omnisexual, probably still in varying degree, but possibly more than to a Pansexual in the series homo-, hetero-, a-.


== Semi-protected edit request on 26 May 2024 ==
So there's a possibility that the Pansexuality article might have a subsection making this distinction, or that Omnisexual needs to be broken out as a separate entry, and if so, would qualify for separate inclusion in this template, too.


{{edit semi-protected|Template:Sexual orientation|answered=yes}}
I defer in both these recommended edits to those who are already editing this template and topic, and leave you colleagues to consider and implement these suggestions.
In the Research section, can someone add ]? Or another appropriate section. It would be useful to be together with ] and ] but I guess they would be alphabetically separated, though not that bad. ] (]) 20:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Although I have concerns someone may object to this change. ] <small> (]) </small> 02:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
] (]) 12:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

:] is already listed, under "Non-binary categories". It looks like it was added on 30 September 2012 . ] (]) 12:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

:Yes, pansexuality is already on the template. The reason that it is not listed on the template as a sexual orientation is because the vast majority of scholars do not see it as a sexual orientation, but rather, if they mention it at all, as a ] that indicates bisexuality. No authoritative sources on sexual orientation label pansexuality as a sexual orientation, and the vast majority of those sources don't even mention it. See ] and ], where this matter has been discussed extensively and that ] is to not list it on the template as a sexual orientation. At this point in time, it is ] to call pansexuality a sexual orientation. Also see the debate about pansexuality vs. bisexuality in the Pansexuality article, which clarifies things even further; some people see pansexuality as distinct from bisexuality; some people do not see it as distinct from bisexuality. This is also clear by the debates at ]; a ] is This bisexuality vs. pansexuality argument is one of the biggest consistent issues I have dealt with at Misplaced Pages. As for why ] is listed as a sexual orientation, despite there being debate among scholars as to whether or not it is a sexual orientation, see ] and ] (my view of what a ] means was somewhat faulty back then, though). WP:Consensus has been to leave it listed as a sexual orientation. Unlike with pansexuality, scholars are in a significant debate about whether or not to call asexuality a sexual orientation. With pansexuality, again, they usually don't mention it, or they define it as an aspect of bisexuality...either by calling it bisexuality or by directly calling it an aspect of bisexuality. ] (]) 05:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

== Recent changes to the template ==

Take note that I don't necessarily agree with any changes that ] makes to the template, and I have him that changes to the template should generally be discussed on the template talk page first. Unfortunately, like I indicated on Sharif uddin's talk page, it appears that Sharif uddin is one of those editors who does not interact with other editors (despite what he has stated on his user page), which also means that he is the type of editor who will revert and revert without explanation and drive other editors to engage in a ] with him and possibly cross the ] line. ] (]) 09:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Flyer22, i have read the message u gave me. I usually edit from my mobile so unfortunately i could not point out notification because of my small screen.So, I am very sorry for that. Now let me explain. sexual psycology doesn't mean only the homosexual psycology; and animal sexual behaviour is not only limited in homosexual act. For this reason, i did the recent edits. ] (]) 10:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

:], with , I was about to ask: Am I supposed to believe there is a language barrier between us? Because judging from your user page and , you can surely communicate far better than stating "explain." It's obviously good that you've replied. With regard to Template:Sexual orientation, I already know those things. I've only taken issue with one change you've made to it so far, and I noted that after reverting you. Additionally, I am asking you to slow down with your changes to the template and to propose changes regarding it here on the talk page first. This is because changes to Template:Sexual orientation can be controversial and should have ]. ] (]) 10:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

:And let's not forget that the template also states, "Please note that gender material on this template should have similar content to the 'Non-binary' section of ]. If editing one, please edit the other to ensure consistency." ] (]) 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits changed this wikitext:
<pre>
*]
;Non-human animals:
] (])
</pre>
to:
<pre>
*]
|heading4=Non-human animals
|content4=
*]
*]
*] (])
</pre>

The use of heading4 is good, although I'm not sure non-human animals should be included as I imagine this template is used mainly as a navigation box for human sexuality topics. Why is the Psychology link changed? My guess is that ] is more on-topic than ] (which is the target of the ] redirect). Also, the former article includes this navbox, while the latter does not. ] (]) 10:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2014 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Template:Sexual orientation|answered=yes}}
<!-- Begin request -->
{{Sidebar
|name = Sexual orientation
|title = ]
|headingstyle = background-color: #E6E6FA
|contentclass = hlist
|image = ]
|heading1=Sexual orientations
|content1=
*]
*]<!-- NOTE: As pansexuality is not recognized as a sexual orientation by authoritative sources (such as the American Psychological Association) because it is not viewed as distinct from bisexuality by these sources, WP:Consensus is against adding it under the Sexual orientations heading. If you feel that this should be discussed further, then start a new discussion about it on the template's talk page, or partake in a current discussion that may be going on about it there, without listing pansexuality under this heading. Pansexuality is listed lower, under the Non-binary categories heading. The same applies to polysexuality. -->
*]
*]
|heading2=Non-binary categories
|content2=
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
|heading3=Research
|content3=
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
|heading4=Non-human animals
|content4=
*]
*]
*] (])
|belowclass = hlist
|belowstyle = background-color: #E6E6FA
|below=
*{{Icon|category}} ]
}}
<!-- End request -->
] (]) 05:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> the article you have requested to be added is tagged for deletion. ] <small>]</small> 06:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:31, 30 May 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexual orientation template.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
This template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconThis template is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
WikiProject iconPsychology
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This template was considered for deletion on 12 August 2005. The result of the discussion was "'No consensus'".

Pansexuality

I feel as if Pansexuality should be listed as a sexual orientation rather than under related terms -- many pansexuals view their identity as its' own distinct orientation and numerous LGBT groups list it as such. NekomancerJaidyn (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

It's about the difference between sexual identity and sexual orientation. Non-academic sources sometimes conflate the terms, as people may in common speech, but they are not the same. As the pansexuality article makes clear, many sources consider it to be under the bisexual umbrella. Crossroads 00:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Fictosexuality and Nijikon

I have reverted edits that add Fictosexuality and Nijikon to the template.(diff) This is clearly overgranular, and Nijikon is not widely accepted as a sexual orientation, but I would also like to question whether Fictosexuality is even a genuine subject at all. If anybody wants to take a look and see what they think, please do. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the Research section, can someone add Transgender sexuality? Or another appropriate section. It would be useful to be together with Human male sexuality and Human female sexuality but I guess they would be alphabetically separated, though not that bad. Soares2000 (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Although I have concerns someone may object to this change. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories: