Revision as of 02:25, 18 April 2021 editVanished user 325896 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,033 edits Removed Chinese from lede; already in infobox (per WP:MOS-ZH)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:25, 9 June 2024 edit undoProKMT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,327 edits Add cat | ||
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | {{Hatnote|This article is about the Reform Club in Hong Kong. For other uses, see ]}} | ||
{{Use Hong Kong English|date=April 2021}} | {{Use Hong Kong English|date=April 2021}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2021}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2021}} | ||
{{Short description|One of oldest political organisations in Hong Kong}} | |||
⚫ | {{Hatnote|This article is about the Reform Club in Hong Kong. For other uses, see ]}} | ||
{{Infobox political party | {{Infobox political party | ||
|name |
| name = Reform Club of Hong Kong | ||
|native_name = {{noitalics|{{nobold|香港革新會}}}} | | native_name = {{noitalics|{{nobold|香港革新會}}}} | ||
|logo |
| logo = Logo of the Reform Club of Hong Kong.svg | ||
|logo_size |
| logo_size = 200px | ||
|colorcode |
| colorcode = {{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}} | ||
|country |
| country = Hong Kong | ||
|founder |
| founder = | ||
|leader1_title |
| leader1_title = Chairman | ||
|leader1_name |
| leader1_name = ] | ||
|leader2_title |
| leader2_title = | ||
|leader2_name |
| leader2_name = | ||
|founded |
| founded = {{Start date|1949|1|20|df=yes}}<ref>{{cite book|title=Memorandum and articles of Association of the Reform Club of Hong Kong : incorporated the 20th day of January, 1949|author=Reform Club of Hong Kong|publisher=Ts'o & Hodgson|year=1949}}</ref> | ||
|dissolved |
| dissolved = {{circa}} 1995 | ||
|merger |
| merger = | ||
|split |
| split = | ||
|predecessor |
| predecessor = | ||
|merged |
| merged = | ||
|successor |
| successor = | ||
|ideology |
| ideology = ] (]) | ||
⚫ | | affiliation1_title = {{nowrap|Regional affiliation}} | ||
|position = ] to ] | |||
⚫ | | affiliation1 = | ||
⚫ | |affiliation1_title = {{nowrap|Regional affiliation}} | ||
| religion = | |||
⚫ | |affiliation1 = | ||
| |
| national = | ||
| |
| international = | ||
| |
| colors = | ||
| |
| website = | ||
| |
| footnotes = | ||
|footnotes = | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Infobox Chinese | {{Infobox Chinese | ||
|order= | | order = | ||
|showflag= | | showflag = | ||
|t=香港革新會 | | t = 香港革新會 | ||
|j=Hoeng1 gong2 gaak3 san1 wui6 |
| j = Hoeng1 gong2 gaak3 san1 wui6 | ||
|y=Hēung góng gaak sān wuih | | y = Hēung góng gaak sān wuih | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Liberalism in China}} | |||
The '''Reform Club of Hong Kong''' was one of the oldest ] in ], existing from 1949 until the mid-1990s. Established by expatriates who were concerned about the ] proposed by ] ] in 1949, the Reform Club was the first semi-political party to contest in the ] elections, with its longtime chairman ] serving on the Council for about forty years. | The '''Reform Club of Hong Kong''' was one of the oldest ] in ], existing from 1949 until the mid-1990s. Established by expatriates who were concerned about the ] proposed by ] ] in 1949, the Reform Club was the first semi-political party to contest in the ] elections, with its longtime chairman ] serving on the Council for about forty years. | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The Reform Club was founded by ] ] ] in 1949 in the midst of the debate over the ], a plan for wide constitutional reform in Hong Kong. The immediate target of the Club was to campaign for direct elections to the ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Promoting Prosperity: The Hong Kong Way of Social Policy|first=Catherine M.|last=Jones|page=78|publisher=Chinese University Press|year=1990}}</ref> Unlike the ], which was set up during the same time for similar causes, the Reform Club was dominated by expatriates. | The Reform Club was founded by ] ] ] in 1949 in the midst of the debate over the ], a plan for wide constitutional reform in Hong Kong. The immediate target of the Club was to campaign for direct elections to the ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Promoting Prosperity: The Hong Kong Way of Social Policy|first=Catherine M.|last=Jones|page=78|publisher=Chinese University Press|year=1990}}</ref> Unlike the ], which was set up during the same time for similar causes, the Reform Club was dominated by expatriates.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Miners|first1=N. J.|date=1986|title=Plans for Constitutional Reform in Hong Kong, 1946-52|journal=]|language=en|volume=107|issue=|pages=473|issn=0305-7410|doi=10.1017/S0305741000039862|s2cid=154299156 }}</ref> | ||
For decades the Reform Club and the ] dominated municipal politics as they provided most of the elected members of the ].<ref>{{cite journal | last=King| first=Ambrose Yeo-chi |date= 1975 | title=Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level | journal=] | volume= 15 | issue= 5 | pages=431| doi=10. |
For decades the Reform Club and the ] dominated municipal politics as they provided most of the elected members of the ].<ref>{{cite journal | last=King| first=Ambrose Yeo-chi |date= 1975 | title=Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level | journal=] | volume= 15 | issue= 5 | pages=431| doi=10.2307/2643255| jstor=2643255 }}</ref> It advocated more representative government in the territory and the improvement of public sector social services. In 1960, the two groups formed a coalition and sent a delegate to London to demand direct elections to the Legislative Council. The Reform Club adopted a modest stance amid the ], opposing violent actions from both protesters and the police.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Klein|first1=Richard|date=1997|title=The Empire Strikes Back: Britain's Use of the Law to Suppress Political Dissent in Hong Kong|journal=]|language=en|volume=15|issue=1|pages=31|issn=0737-8947}}</ref> In 1979, the Reform Club threatened to boycott elections if the Urban Council would not receive a majority of elected members and universal franchise was extended to all Hong Kong citizens. In 1982, it took part in the elections for the newly established ]s in the urban districts, which significantly extended the franchise. | ||
Starting from the late 1960s, the Club's ability to monopolise Urban Council elections with the Civic Association eroded, in light of the emergence of the popular independent candidates.<ref>{{cite book|page=11|title=Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization|first=Wai-man|last=Lam|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|year=2004}}</ref> Before the expansion of the franchise, the Reform Club had 15 members in the Urban Council of 1983. But the Reform Club's influence in the Urban Council reduced during the 1980s. Following the ], only five Reform Club members remained due to its lack of grassroots support. The Reform Club and Civic Association were gradually supplanted by the new ] including the ] and ]. When at the ] Brook Bernacchi retired, the Reform Club ceased to be active in the Hong Kong political scene. | Starting from the late 1960s, the Club's ability to monopolise Urban Council elections with the Civic Association eroded, in light of the emergence of the popular independent candidates.<ref>{{cite book|page=11|title=Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization|first=Wai-man|last=Lam|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|year=2004}}</ref> Before the expansion of the franchise, the Reform Club had 15 members in the Urban Council of 1983. But the Reform Club's influence in the Urban Council reduced during the 1980s. Following the ], only five Reform Club members remained due to its lack of grassroots support. The Reform Club and Civic Association were gradually supplanted by the new ] including the ] and ]. When at the ] Brook Bernacchi retired, the Reform Club ceased to be active in the Hong Kong political scene. | ||
==Notable members== | ==Notable members== | ||
*] | *] (founder) | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] (later known as Elsie Tu) | *] (later known as Elsie Tu) | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| 2,199{{nochange}} | | 2,199{{nochange}} | ||
| 33.58{{nochange}} | | 33.58{{nochange}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|1|2|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|1|2|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| - | | - | ||
| rowspan=19| | | rowspan=19| | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
| 6,374{{increase}} | | 6,374{{increase}} | ||
| 71.25{{increase}} | | 71.25{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|4|4|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|4|4|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| 7,773{{increase}} | | 7,773{{increase}} | ||
| 79.64{{increase}} | | 79.64{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|4|4|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|4|4|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
| 3,283{{decrease}} | | 3,283{{decrease}} | ||
| 89.62{{increase}} | | 89.62{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|4|4|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|4|4|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| 17,085{{increase}} | | 17,085{{increase}} | ||
| 56.97{{decrease}} | | 56.97{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|6|8|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|6|8|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| 11,716{{increase}} | | 11,716{{increase}} | ||
| 43.50{{decrease}} | | 43.50{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|5|8|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|5|8|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
| 12,030{{decrease}} | | 12,030{{decrease}} | ||
| 47.67{{decrease}} | | 47.67{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|4|8|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|4|8|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| ''uncontested'' | | ''uncontested'' | ||
| ''uncontested'' | | ''uncontested'' | ||
| {{Composition bar|4|8|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|4|8|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| 5,177{{decrease}} | | 5,177{{decrease}} | ||
| 39.43{{decrease}} | | 39.43{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|8|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|8|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| {{Composition bar|5|10|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|5|10|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
| 9,789{{increase}} | | 9,789{{increase}} | ||
| 24.90{{decrease}} | | 24.90{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|4|10|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|4|10|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
| 16,571{{increase}} | | 16,571{{increase}} | ||
| 49.22{{increase}} | | 49.22{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|10|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|10|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
| 6,139{{decrease}} | | 6,139{{decrease}} | ||
| 16.22{{decrease}} | | 16.22{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|10|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|10|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
| 25,709{{increase}} | | 25,709{{increase}} | ||
| 55.14{{increase}} | | 55.14{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|5|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|5|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
| 6,141{{increase}} | | 6,141{{increase}} | ||
| 12.41{{decrease}} | | 12.41{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
| 13,249{{decrease}} | | 13,249{{decrease}} | ||
| 41.05{{increase}} | | 41.05{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
| 9,579{{increase}} | | 9,579{{increase}} | ||
| 18.76{{increase}} | | 18.76{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
| 7,291{{decrease}} | | 7,291{{decrease}} | ||
| 28.29{{decrease}} | | 28.29{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
| 13,894{{increase}} | | 13,894{{increase}} | ||
| 15.38{{decrease}} | | 15.38{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|3|15|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|3|15|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
| 24,486{{increase}} | | 24,486{{increase}} | ||
| 6.95{{decrease}} | | 6.95{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|15|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|15|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|0|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|0|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|27|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|27|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! ] | ! ] | ||
| 13,404{{decrease}} | | 13,404{{decrease}} | ||
| 6.31{{decrease}} | | 6.31{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|15|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|15|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|0|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|0|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|27|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|27|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! ] | ! ] | ||
| 9,045{{decrease}} | | 9,045{{decrease}} | ||
| 2.31{{decrease}} | | 2.31{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|15|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|15|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|0|12|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|0|12|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|27|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|27|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
| 13,644{{nochange}} | | 13,644{{nochange}} | ||
| 3.83{{nochange}} | | 3.83{{nochange}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|2|132|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|2|132|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
| 39,929{{increase}} | | 39,929{{increase}} | ||
| 5.77{{increase}} | | 5.77{{increase}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|17|237|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|17|237|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| 7{{increase}} | | 7{{increase}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
| 13,572{{decrease}} | | 13,572{{decrease}} | ||
| 2.13{{decrease}} | | 2.13{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|5|264|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|5|264|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| 5{{decrease}} | | 5{{decrease}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 240: | Line 240: | ||
| 2,136{{decrease}} | | 2,136{{decrease}} | ||
| 0.40{{decrease}} | | 0.40{{decrease}} | ||
| {{Composition bar|1|272|hex={{Reform Club of Hong Kong |
| {{Composition bar|1|272|hex={{party color|Reform Club of Hong Kong}}}} | ||
| 5{{decrease}} | | 5{{decrease}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 01:25, 9 June 2024
This article is about the Reform Club in Hong Kong. For other uses, see Reform Club (disambiguation)One of oldest political organisations in Hong Kong
Reform Club of Hong Kong 香港革新會 | |
---|---|
Chairman | Brook Bernacchi |
Founded | 20 January 1949 (1949-01-20) |
Dissolved | c. 1995 |
Ideology | Liberalism (HK) |
Reform Club of Hong Kong | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional Chinese | 香港革新會 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
The Reform Club of Hong Kong was one of the oldest political organisations in Hong Kong, existing from 1949 until the mid-1990s. Established by expatriates who were concerned about the Young Plan proposed by Governor Mark Aitchison Young in 1949, the Reform Club was the first semi-political party to contest in the Urban Council elections, with its longtime chairman Brook Bernacchi serving on the Council for about forty years.
It demanded expansion of the power of the Urban Council and elected representatives in the Legislative Council for years. Together with the Hong Kong Civic Association, they were the closest to opposition parties in Hong Kong active in the municipal electoral politics during the post-war colonial period. With the expansion of the franchise in the 1980s, the Reform Club gradually declined and was replaced by the more energetic political groups. The Club ceased to function after its chairman Bernacchi retired from the Urban Council in 1995.
History
The Reform Club was founded by expatriate barrister Brook Bernacchi in 1949 in the midst of the debate over the Young Plan, a plan for wide constitutional reform in Hong Kong. The immediate target of the Club was to campaign for direct elections to the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Unlike the Hong Kong Chinese Reform Association, which was set up during the same time for similar causes, the Reform Club was dominated by expatriates.
For decades the Reform Club and the Civic Association dominated municipal politics as they provided most of the elected members of the Urban Council. It advocated more representative government in the territory and the improvement of public sector social services. In 1960, the two groups formed a coalition and sent a delegate to London to demand direct elections to the Legislative Council. The Reform Club adopted a modest stance amid the 1966 riots, opposing violent actions from both protesters and the police. In 1979, the Reform Club threatened to boycott elections if the Urban Council would not receive a majority of elected members and universal franchise was extended to all Hong Kong citizens. In 1982, it took part in the elections for the newly established district boards in the urban districts, which significantly extended the franchise.
Starting from the late 1960s, the Club's ability to monopolise Urban Council elections with the Civic Association eroded, in light of the emergence of the popular independent candidates. Before the expansion of the franchise, the Reform Club had 15 members in the Urban Council of 1983. But the Reform Club's influence in the Urban Council reduced during the 1980s. Following the 1989 municipal elections, only five Reform Club members remained due to its lack of grassroots support. The Reform Club and Civic Association were gradually supplanted by the new pro-democracy groups including the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood and Meeting Point. When at the 1995 municipal elections Brook Bernacchi retired, the Reform Club ceased to be active in the Hong Kong political scene.
Notable members
- Brook Bernacchi (founder)
- Alison Bell
- Chan Shu-woon
- Elsie Elliott (later known as Elsie Tu)
- Henry Hu
- Kan Yuet Keung
- Charles Edgar Loseby
- Cecilia Yeung
Election performance
Municipal elections
Election | Number of popular votes |
% of popular votes |
UrbCo seats |
RegCo seats |
Total elected seats |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1952 | 2,199 | 33.58 | 1 / 2 | - | |
1953 | 6,374 | 71.25 | 4 / 4 | - | |
1954 | 7,773 | 79.64 | 4 / 4 | - | |
1955 | 3,283 | 89.62 | 4 / 4 | - | |
1956 | 17,085 | 56.97 | 6 / 8 | – | |
1957 | 11,716 | 43.50 | 5 / 8 | – | |
1959 | 12,030 | 47.67 | 4 / 8 | – | |
1961 | uncontested | uncontested | 4 / 8 | – | |
1963 | 5,177 | 39.43 | 3 / 8 | – | |
1965 | unknown | unknown | 5 / 10 | – | |
1967 | 9,789 | 24.90 | 4 / 10 | – | |
1969 | 16,571 | 49.22 | 3 / 10 | – | |
1971 | 6,139 | 16.22 | 3 / 10 | – | |
1973 | 25,709 | 55.14 | 5 / 12 | – | |
1975 | 6,141 | 12.41 | 3 / 12 | – | |
1977 | 13,249 | 41.05 | 3 / 12 | – | |
1979 | 9,579 | 18.76 | 3 / 12 | – | |
1981 | 7,291 | 28.29 | 2 / 12 | – | |
1983 | 13,894 | 15.38 | 3 / 15 | – | |
1986 | 24,486 | 6.95 | 2 / 15 | 0 / 12 | 2 / 27 |
1989 | 13,404 | 6.31 | 2 / 15 | 0 / 12 | 2 / 27 |
1991 | 9,045 | 2.31 | 2 / 15 | 0 / 12 | 2 / 27 |
District Board/Council elections
Election | Number of popular votes |
% of popular votes |
Total elected seats |
+/− |
---|---|---|---|---|
1982 | 13,644 | 3.83 | 2 / 132 | |
1985 | 39,929 | 5.77 | 17 / 237 | 7 |
1988 | 13,572 | 2.13 | 5 / 264 | 5 |
1991 | 2,136 | 0.40 | 1 / 272 | 5 |
References
- Reform Club of Hong Kong (1949). Memorandum and articles of Association of the Reform Club of Hong Kong : incorporated the 20th day of January, 1949. Ts'o & Hodgson.
- Jones, Catherine M. (1990). Promoting Prosperity: The Hong Kong Way of Social Policy. Chinese University Press. p. 78.
- Miners, N. J. (1986). "Plans for Constitutional Reform in Hong Kong, 1946-52". The China Quarterly. 107: 473. doi:10.1017/S0305741000039862. ISSN 0305-7410. S2CID 154299156.
- King, Ambrose Yeo-chi (1975). "Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level". Asian Survey. 15 (5): 431. doi:10.2307/2643255. JSTOR 2643255.
- Klein, Richard (1997). "The Empire Strikes Back: Britain's Use of the Law to Suppress Political Dissent in Hong Kong". Boston University International Law Journal. 15 (1): 31. ISSN 0737-8947.
- Lam, Wai-man (2004). Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization. M.E. Sharpe. p. 11.
External links
Political parties in Hong Kong | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||