| Revision as of 05:08, 17 July 2006 editBuchanan-Hermit (talk | contribs)19,555 edits Re: Journalist← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:40, 24 June 2024 edit undo48JCL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,068 edits Notification: listing of Misplaced Pages:FM at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (86 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] 21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] 21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Re: your reverts to CIVI, CFPL, CKNX, CHRO, and CHWI== | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Travel Cuts== | |||
| Ardenn, recently you reverted a useful edit by ] in the article on ]. Following up on that change, I noticed that you had in fact proceeded to bulk-revert all of that same editor's additions to five different A-Channel stations. While you are correct in stating that the sale of CHUM assets to Bell hasn't completed yet, it does not invalidate the information about the sale. Those edits were relevant to the respective articles, and should not have been removed ''en masse''. Please use caution in future before pursuing such actions. Thanks! --] 04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please stop the unnecessary reverts on these pages. There is no need to undo this editor's work. Thank you. --] 04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Ardenn, I do not believe that I have attacked you personally. Please explain why you believe that I have. The issue that I have raised is whether "non-notability" is a grounds for deletion, not you. Many deletionists do use "non-notability" as if it were an accepted grounds for deletion, so other contributors, like you, seem to believe that it is policy. I have not been able to find anywhere in Misplaced Pages policy that it is. Perhaps you could point out something that I have missed. ] | ] 11:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I guess that what I wrote was not as clear as it could have been: let me make it clear that I am not calling you a deletionist. I said that "non-notability" was a term that deletionists bandy about as if it were grounds for deletion. ] | ] 12:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::''"The sale of CHUM is irrelevant to the individual stations. The only article it belongs in is perhaps the main A-Channel and CHUM articles. I will revert it, because of the above."(Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| ==Please don't bite the newcomers== | |||
| ::It is definitely relevant to the individual stations, as they are directly affected by this change. Trust me, as someone who has worked in media for the better part of two decades, "who owns you" is '''very''' relevant. Besides, you're now continually reverting information that two editors (at least) agree is important. The proper course of action would be to discuss the issue on a talk page, probably at ] (or somewhere similar). Cheers. --] 04:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. I try to welcome new editors that post new, useful articles, then I track them for a few days afterwards I noticed you proposed ] first article, "]" for deletion, then reverted his edits to "]" for violating ] spelling rules. Take a look at my comments on his ] -- I think you're a little confused on the spelling issue if you look at the links I included. Also, I'm not sure "Who cares" is exactly a useful or tactful basis for recommending article deletion. Take a look at ] and ] (the ]) section. | |||
| :::Pursuant to this discussion (and to stop it from degenerating) I'm posting a note at ] to initiate a discussion about this information. Hopefully, that will help to resolve things. Cheers. --] | |||
| I encourage you to give Slagish a break for a while and not follow him around to reverse his edits. He's brand-new and editing in good faith. I suggest you let him work on his Toronto RDC stub a little more. I'd hate to turn off a potentially productive new editor. | |||
| ::::''"The other guy doesn't count. He's not registered. For all I know, he's you." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| Thanks! | |||
| --] |
::::Please, Ardenn, don't do this. Let's resolve this peacefully, okay? --] 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::::''"In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| :Ardenn, thanks for your patience with new contributor ] -- I notice you later helped him with links and categories for his ] article . Statistical research is not exactly my cup of tea either, but the centre did seem like it would meet Misplaced Pages's notability criteria once the article was expanded. | |||
| :::::I've no interest in playing games with Wiki rules, Ardenn. I've asked - quite nicely, I think - that we take this to a discussion. What do you have against that course of action? --] 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::''"I'll agree that who owns you is important, but the transaction isn't complete. Right now, it's only speculation. The CRTC may say no." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)'' | |||
| :Also, I'm glad to learn you weren't following Slagish around as I'd initially thought. I had noticed that within one or two minutes, you'd both PROD'ed his first article and reverted his edit on another, so I thought maybe you were following him or had an itchy trigger finger. | |||
| :::::"Speculation" is a bit of an understatement - yes, the CRTC may overturn the deal, but it probably will go through in some form. Regardless of the outcome, however, just the fact that the deal is pending is of direct relevance to each and every station. Furthermore, someone reading up on their local station may not click through to the main articles - but they still could stand to know about what is proposed. --] 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I've posted a request for comment ] and a call for discussion ] to get some outside input on this matter. I would appreciate it if you could hold off on resuming your reversions to these articles so that there is sufficient time to allow people to comment. This is, I feel, a reasonable request. Thank you. --] 05:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :--] 03:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki> | |||
| Hi Ardenn - How do I flag a section as not NPOV? Thanks. | |||
| ==Help me== | |||
| See ] -- ] <small>]</small> 05:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for your help. He didn't even have the decency to let me know about the block. <span style="border: 1px solid green;">]</span> 05:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. -- ] <small>]</small> 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me. <span style="border: 1px solid green;">]</span> 05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I will e-mail Tawker -- ] <small>]</small> 05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look -- ] 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked. <span style="border: 1px solid green;">]</span> 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Forgive me if I over-estimated you in assuming that you would read the block message, I figured the block reason would say plenty.... you know, it is there for a reason... it shouldn't be critical to have a talk page message saying the exact same -- ] 07:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==CCOTW heads up== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Since ] will be the August ] I hope You'll read the comments in the nomination and as a nominator prepare to co-ordinate the effort. ] 21:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I've reverted your edits. It is not an American-centered project, and the article should use Canadian English. If you have a problem with that, too bad. See ] and ]. There is a policy on what spelling should be used, I'm looking for it. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">]</font></span> 19:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :In the future, I would advise that you calm yourself in situations like these before you 'attack' a person and further quote rules that have nothing to do with the situation at hand. And what's this supposed to mean: "If you have a problem with that, too bad"? — you do not own the article. I too was looking at the convention for spelling and discovered that you were right, and was just about to revert it. Anyway, could you be a little less confrontational? It really goes a long way in ensuring that others do not snap back at you. ]] ] ] ] 19:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| PS: In case you didn't know, the article that you quoted at me says "Telling someone "Don't be a dick" is something of a dick-move in itself, so don't bandy the criticism about lightly." ]] ] ] ] 19:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==You quitting Misplaced Pages..== | |||
| ::This pair of sentences, taken together, show Ardenn's ironic sense of humour: "If you have a problem with that, too bad. See ] and ]." ] | ] 19:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I personally won't beg you to stay, only ask you to stay. You are not contributing by just saying "Well..ok fine, I'm gone". If something doesn't please you, well, help contributing to Misplaced Pages by finding solutions. --] 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :As an aside, I've noticed that the quit message has been in place for a week, but you're still editing. You may wish to remove the quit message or edit it to provide a cutoff date to reflect your change in status. Happy editing! ] * ] 19:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Gandi.net== | |||
| Although it seems that you have alreadly retired from Misplaced Pages, I post this message because you were the person virtually removed the article ]. If you want to delete the article, try ] instead. | |||
| --]] 16:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Meh== | |||
| The wikibreak was actually due to the fact that I was out of broadband range on this weird thing called a vacation. The entire media stink (and man was it elevated way higher than it needed to be) came later. I know, I'm the most unjust crazy rogue admin out there for doing a username block... oh well, all in a day :) - Thanks for the reminder to take down the wikibreak sign, I had totally forgotten about it :) -- ] 00:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==IMPORTANT== | |||
| ::In the future, I would advise you, since you '''are''' an admin, to read your policies and ] before you revert. It's your job to know these things, not mine. I'm not an admin. --<span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">]</font></span> 19:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Queens University has been nominated for collaboration of the week and artcle improvement drive please help out!! --] 19:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::As an admin, I expect you to have higher standards than the rest of us. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">]</font></span> 19:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Don't give me this bull. Admin or not, there is simply no way that someone can know all the policies in all areas of Misplaced Pages. All admins are regular users too, and they are expected to make mistakes now and then, so don't bring this to me. And, yes, it ''is'' also ''your'' job to know these things. ]] ] ] ] 20:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==I Quit== | |||
| == canadian charities == | |||
| I've noticed you have posted a dozen or so edits since you quit. Perhaps you should unquit.] 02:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :None of Ardenn's edits have been since the 14th of August, and then only very, very minor. Many users will perform a few edits to finish up a few things once and for all before leaving the project. For all intents and purposes, Ardenn has left the project. ] * ] 05:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your edit to User talk:209.17.148.143== | |||
| ] is pretty unambiguous in its outcome. May I ask why you are reversing it? If you feel that the result was less than optimal, I would suggest cfr'ing it again, or trying deletion review, thanks. — <small>Jun. 30, '06</small><tt> ''' <<u class=plainlinks>|</u>>'''</tt> | |||
| Hello Ardenn, thank you for the invitation you gave me about creating an account. However, I already have an account and forgot to sign in at that time. Thank you, anyways! ] 16:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==I wonder what happened== | |||
| What is up with your edit summaries of "rvv"? Changing categories per a CFD outcome is ''clearly'' not vandalism! You know, we even have ] that say that calling non-vandalism edits vandalism is a bad thing, and you are doing it on a ''massive'' scale. --] 18:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Ardenn. I find your name from reading about it on Wikitruth's article on Misplaced Pages's article about them. I really like your orange disclaimer so I'm going to use it for my talk page if that's okay, but I'll take it down if you tell me to. I'm sorry to hear about your dropping out of Misplaced Pages, it's really something I wish the whole world would get in on doing. I understand it must suck getting harassed for your decisions. I still need to read more about the occurances to figure out just exactly what they were and whether or not they're right, but still, you look okay enough. ] 19:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :To satisfy your curiosity: Based on my review of his contribution history and my own memories of following the dispute, Ardenn left Misplaced Pages after being blocked numerous times for violations of the 3RR rule, which was in keeping with a generally mutually hostile relationship with the Misplaced Pages community at large. There was also a long and tendentious dispute between Ardenn and WCityMike, which was one of many factors that led to that contributor's choice to leave the project. Ardenn's relationship with the community was a stormy one, and it appears that he has wrapped up the dangling threads of his participation and permanently left the project (or reregistered as a new user). As for the disclaimer, remember that automatically deleting posts from anonymous users is an egregious violation of Misplaced Pages's policy of ], which includes anonymous contributors; I caution you in the strongest of terms to avoid implementing that particular clause of the notice. Anyway, I think it would be best if we all just let Ardenn slip away quietly; while I don't think the Right to Vanish applies due to the extensive block log, it would be nice to adhere to the spirit of the policy. ] * ] 02:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It's very sad that someone pushed this user this far, to quit Misplaced Pages. --] 02:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It's not a regional issue, it's a standard naming convention issue. Demonyms should be avoided in category names whenever possible, and analagous categories for different countries should follow a predictable pattern, especially due to the fact that redirects do not work (well) with categories. — <small>Jun. 30, '06</small><tt> ''' <<u class=plainlinks>|</u>>'''</tt> | |||
| I didn't violate any policies. I was unfairly blocked. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">]</font></span> 18:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Image:L-chapman.jpg == | ||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
| You have been blocked for a "cool-off" period. You've been warned by other admins regarding the category ]. Please note that you cannot arbitrarily reverse a decision made by consensus. Furthermore, there was a Canadian involved in the discussion. ]<span class="Unicode" style="color:#FF72E3;">▼</span>'''<sup>]</sup>''' <sub>''']'''</sub> 18:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| # Go to ] and edit it to add {{]}} | |||
| # On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you. – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 20:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You were blocked for disruption. ]<span class="Unicode" style="color:#FF72E3;">▼</span>'''<sup>]</sup>''' <sub>''']'''</sub> 18:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice== | |||
| ==Firefox browser / Google Toolbar== | |||
| '''NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT''' the scope of ] is being . Your input is requested. Thank you. ] 20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Deaf == | |||
| Are you using the above software combination? If so, that probably explains <span class="plainlinks"></span>. A bug in the Google Toolbar extension for Firefox causes page text to sometimes be cut off when it's saved. This occurs even when the extension is disabled (which happened to me) and the only current solution is to uninstall it. | |||
| I notice you are a member of WikiProject Deaf. You may also add {{tl|User WikiProject Deaf}}, which also adds a userbox to your page, or ]]] to your userpage. If you do, it will list you in ]. ] 20:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I recommend the as an alternative extension. —] 21:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I added you to ]. ] 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Erik Eastaugh== | |||
| :Thanks for the advice. I've turned off the Google toolbar. I try to watch that articles don't get cut off, but sometimes I miss one. Thanks again. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">]</font></span> 21:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have renominated this for deletion. I notice you voted against last time. If you have any views one way or another, please post them. It appears like it will be a clear deletion anyway. Cheers. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == TfD nomination of ] == | |||
| ::You're welcome! I'm not sure what you meant by "turned off," so I'll remind you that disabling the extension doesn't seem to help. (I had the extension disabled, but I still experienced the problem until I actually uninstalled it.) —] 21:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — ] <small>(] • ])</small> 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| :::How do you uninstall it? I can't seen to find it in the programs list under the control panel on Win2K. Thanks. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">]</font></span> 21:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi..how are you? i saw at your main page..that you left wikipedia!..what is the proplem?..i Knew that is not my business.but if you want to tell me,it will be good? regards.--] (]) 11:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::1. In Firefox, click on "Tools" near the top of the window. | |||
| ::::2. Select "Extensions." | |||
| ::::3. Find and select "Google Toolbar" on the scroll menu. | |||
| ::::4. Click on the "Uninstall" button. | |||
| ::::5. When the confirmation window appears, select "OK." | |||
| ::::6. Close all Firefox windows. When you restart the browser, the extension should be gone. | |||
| ::::—] 21:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of List of Ryerson University people== | |||
| ==Unprotecting the talk page== | |||
| I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <small>'''TRAVELLINGCARI'''</small>'''<sup>]</sup>'''<sub>]</sub> 20:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of Category:You Can't Do That on Television== | |||
| Hi, | |||
| ]''']''', which you created, has been nominated for ], ], or ]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. – ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 00:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Can you tell me why the page was protected in the first place? ] 03:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| == Canada Day == | |||
| You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the ] ]. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visit ] and move your name over to the ] list. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on the ]. Thank you for your time. ]] 08:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of ]== | |||
| Same to you. I spent the day ] for the first time! It was beautiful out when I jumped, but now it's all rainy, so I guess I won't be going out to watch ] tonight. How's the weather in Ottawa? Gonna go see fireworks? <font color="black">]</font><font color="red">]</font> 23:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have nominated {{lc|Green politicians in Canada}} for renaming to {{lc|Green Party politicians in Canada}}. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) - 19:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for File:Lgibbons.jpg== | |||
| ==Good faith== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 11:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I have, until obviously bad faith comes in. I'm not naive. Have you posted the above to "the others". ] 23:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| Yes I posted using the tag "Bad faith", as per blatant bad faith shown by others. As I have stated, I’m not naïve. ] 23:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello Ardenn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Gabriel Draven}}</small> | |||
| Thanks for asuming good faith, at all times. ] 00:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Al Bowers}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 04:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Non-free rationale for File:NickWright.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Re Undoing other people's edits repeatedly == | |||
| ==Category:Healthcare in Ottawa== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 02:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I am of the impression that 3RR does not apply for reverting vandalism or spam. I always try my darndest to stay way clear of 3RR, and if there is anything not clear cut, I always discuss it on talk pages rather than revert repeatedly. I am not sure which reverts you specifically refer to, but if I acted too quickly I do apologise to whoever was affected. I would appreciate if you could be more specific, though, so I can try to improve my conduct. ] 16:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Politics in Canada == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I wouldn’t be interested in ''starting'' a “Politics in Canada wikiproject,” but I’d be willing to participate in one if someone else sets it up. —] 22:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 --> | |||
| :Thanks for getting it going, and for the invite. I've signed up and started work on it. —] 22:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| == {{tl|Ontario-school-stub}} == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24#Misplaced Pages:FM}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]] 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, please don't redirect this to {{tl|Canada-school-stub}}. It has been approved by stubsorting, will definitely threshhold to 65 stubs, and is helping me sort the Canada school stubs out. ] 05:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Myocad == | |||
| Hello Ardenn, I was just wondering - why did you decide to remove the blurb about myocad from the ocad wikipedia article? They are, after all, the largest and most interdisciplinary student organization at the school. Care to clarify your choice? | |||
| -jonna | |||
| == External link on domain kiting == | |||
| I wanted to add this important ressource to the article. | |||
| http://www.h05t.com/domain-name/how-to-spot-domain-kiting-registrars | |||
| Is there a particular reason why you deleted it? | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please be careful not to describe edits made in good-faith as vandalism. While certainly the repeating could be called vandalism, the original edits probably were not. Thanks. ] (]) 09:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: your edit summary at Template:GPC == | |||
| Re: . I'm not targeting anything. I remove violations as I find them. If you are aware of other fair use violations, you are free to remove them as they violate Misplaced Pages policy as described at ] item #9 and quite possibly copyright law as well. If you have questions about this, please feel free to ask. Thanks, --] 19:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Heads up == | |||
| Thanks for the heads up. I’m “actively pursuing a resolution to the matter.” :-) (See, I ''can'' sound like a politician!) —] 07:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Image removal at ] == | |||
| Hi Ardenn, you removed nearly all content of ] with the explanation ''Removing fair use image(s) per terms of Misplaced Pages:Fair_use#Policy item #9 (please see User:Durin/Removal of fair use images for further explanation)''. Since I can't see how ] #9 should apply to an article in the main namespace, I reverted your edit. Could you please explain the exact reason why you removed the images? --] 07:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : The same question for ]. --] 07:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*Ardenn, it's great that you've taken up fair use violation removal. I '''really''' appreciate it as this problem is rampant in Misplaced Pages and needs attention! However, the issue that Jergen raises above is valid. It's ok to use copyrighted material in the main article namespace under terms of ] if the copyrighted material applies directly to the subject of the article. Thus, your removals of these images from the main article namespaces that you've made, such as , have been reverted because the removals were improper. Your other work in the template space, such as is spot on! Keep it up! I might suggest though that instead of linking to my page in the edit summary, you may wish to link to ] instead. I intend on removing my page in the near future, and instead linking to that page. Thanks, and again bravo for good work! --] 15:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ditto to all the above. Fair use in articles is perfectly ok by all wiki rules. ] 10:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Naming convention== | |||
| If you read carefully the Canadian Education Wiki Project, when an Article is about a French School, we keep the french name. | |||
| --] 02:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Okay but I mean... It's the name of the establishement. You can't change the name of an ESTABLISHEMENT. | |||
| --] 02:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yes you are. The article is about the establishement, therefore, I decided to put the name of the establishement as the title. | |||
| In the article, in the beginning, I clearly put École secondaire publique De La Salle (De La Salle Secondary School). | |||
| --] 02:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Okay so there is no problem anymore if I put it that way? Title : French Name of the school... and in the article in parenthesis the english equivalent? | |||
| Great :). | |||
| --] 02:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| See talk page. Please discuss before further moves -- ] <small>]</small> 02:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Lawsuit agianst Liberal Party== | |||
| My appologies, I am new to this site. I was confused. Sorry. | |||
| ] 04:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Dear Arden, | |||
| In: | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Liberal_Party_of_Canada_leadership_convention%2C_2006&action=history | |||
| (cur) (last) 04:26, 13 July 2006 CJCurrie (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Moez roy (talk) to last version by CJCurrie) | |||
| (cur) (last) 04:24, 13 July 2006 Moez roy (Talk | contribs) (Unofficial Candidates) | |||
| (cur) (last) 04:17, 13 July 2006 Moez roy (Talk | contribs) m (] 04:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)) | |||
| Is there any method by which CJCurrie cannot delete any additions I have made? Please reply. Thank You. --] 04:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Consensus vote== | |||
| Hi Ardenn, I believe I have found a solution to the logo crisis. I am calling for a consensus vote for the restoration of political party logos in templates, based on a not withstanting type clause, in the rule that was used to remove them. See ] for more. --] 06:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == University of Toronto == | |||
| Thank you for your recent change to the ] page in accordance with ]. However, you provided no rationale for removing the content from the '''Student Groups''' section. I have reinstated the deleted content (without the external link). If you have concerns about this, let's please ] them. Thanks. ] 18:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Imacomp == | |||
| You may wish to comment at Suspected Sockpuppets ]. ] 21:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Status of religious freedom in Canada== | |||
| Wow my article lasted 3 min hehe could you tell me what the problems are (keep in mind source are coming) Deet put his piece up so go to this page for mine ]. .] 02:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Spam== | |||
| Actually, I'm starting to get the picture. However, what ''I'' want you to understand is that confronting people and proclaiming what they should or shouldn't know is now way to get your point across. I have not attacked you, but merely reprimand you for your childish behaviour, which you continue to show, despite my attempt(s) to reason with you. Be nice to people, and the attitude will be reciprocated. Attitude like this gets you nowhere (and I am going to assert this every chance that I get). ] (] • ]) 03:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :"Surely you know how to use those." See what I mean? Its petulant points like these that prove what I'm saying. Yes you can get your point across, but dont insult and patronize someone else in the process. ] (] • ]) 03:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Deal. ] (] • ]) 03:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Journalist == | |||
| Sorry I wasn't around when you posted that. Is the situation resolved yet? -→]]/] 05:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 24 June 2024
Read BEFORE Posting:
- Vandalism and other offensive commentary/trolling will be deleted expeditiously.
- If you want me to respond/take your comments seriously, sign them with ~~~~.
- Be sure to be signed in. Anonymous users will have their messages deleted without comment.
- I will respond on your talk page, but I will not return to your talk page after that unless you've responded on my talk page. Sounds convoluted, but I'd rather be editing articles than reading your talk page.
- Add your comments to the bottom of the page.
- If you don't agree with a change that I've made to an article, please let me know nicely and I will address the issue.
Welcome!
Hello, Ardenn, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist 21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Re: your reverts to CIVI, CFPL, CKNX, CHRO, and CHWI
Ardenn, recently you reverted a useful edit by 72.60.128.187 in the article on CIVI-TV. Following up on that change, I noticed that you had in fact proceeded to bulk-revert all of that same editor's additions to five different A-Channel stations. While you are correct in stating that the sale of CHUM assets to Bell hasn't completed yet, it does not invalidate the information about the sale. Those edits were relevant to the respective articles, and should not have been removed en masse. Please use caution in future before pursuing such actions. Thanks! --Ckatz 04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop the unnecessary reverts on these pages. There is no need to undo this editor's work. Thank you. --Ckatz 04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "The sale of CHUM is irrelevant to the individual stations. The only article it belongs in is perhaps the main A-Channel and CHUM articles. I will revert it, because of the above."(Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- It is definitely relevant to the individual stations, as they are directly affected by this change. Trust me, as someone who has worked in media for the better part of two decades, "who owns you" is very relevant. Besides, you're now continually reverting information that two editors (at least) agree is important. The proper course of action would be to discuss the issue on a talk page, probably at A-Channel (or somewhere similar). Cheers. --Ckatz 04:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "The other guy doesn't count. He's not registered. For all I know, he's you." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- Please, Ardenn, don't do this. Let's resolve this peacefully, okay? --Ckatz 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- I've no interest in playing games with Wiki rules, Ardenn. I've asked - quite nicely, I think - that we take this to a discussion. What do you have against that course of action? --Ckatz 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- "I'll agree that who owns you is important, but the transaction isn't complete. Right now, it's only speculation. The CRTC may say no." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)
- "Speculation" is a bit of an understatement - yes, the CRTC may overturn the deal, but it probably will go through in some form. Regardless of the outcome, however, just the fact that the deal is pending is of direct relevance to each and every station. Furthermore, someone reading up on their local station may not click through to the main articles - but they still could stand to know about what is proposed. --Ckatz 04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've posted a request for comment here and a call for discussion here to get some outside input on this matter. I would appreciate it if you could hold off on resuming your reversions to these articles so that there is sufficient time to allow people to comment. This is, I feel, a reasonable request. Thank you. --Ckatz 05:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Help me
See User talk:Tawker -- Samir धर्म 05:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. He didn't even have the decency to let me know about the block. Ardenn 05:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. -- Samir धर्म 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me. Ardenn 05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I will e-mail Tawker -- Samir धर्म 05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look -- Tawker 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked. Ardenn 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Forgive me if I over-estimated you in assuming that you would read the block message, I figured the block reason would say plenty.... you know, it is there for a reason... it shouldn't be critical to have a talk page message saying the exact same -- Tawker 07:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked. Ardenn 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look -- Tawker 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I will e-mail Tawker -- Samir धर्म 05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me. Ardenn 05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. -- Samir धर्म 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
CCOTW heads up
Since Flag of Canada will be the August Canada collaboration I hope You'll read the comments in the nomination and as a nominator prepare to co-ordinate the effort. feydey 21:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
You quitting Misplaced Pages..
I personally won't beg you to stay, only ask you to stay. You are not contributing by just saying "Well..ok fine, I'm gone". If something doesn't please you, well, help contributing to Misplaced Pages by finding solutions. --Deenoe 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- As an aside, I've noticed that the quit message has been in place for a week, but you're still editing. You may wish to remove the quit message or edit it to provide a cutoff date to reflect your change in status. Happy editing! Captainktainer * Talk 19:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Gandi.net
Although it seems that you have alreadly retired from Misplaced Pages, I post this message because you were the person virtually removed the article Gandi. If you want to delete the article, try Misplaced Pages:AFD instead. --16 16:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Meh
The wikibreak was actually due to the fact that I was out of broadband range on this weird thing called a vacation. The entire media stink (and man was it elevated way higher than it needed to be) came later. I know, I'm the most unjust crazy rogue admin out there for doing a username block... oh well, all in a day :) - Thanks for the reminder to take down the wikibreak sign, I had totally forgotten about it :) -- Tawker 00:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
IMPORTANT
Queens University has been nominated for collaboration of the week and artcle improvement drive please help out!! --Speedystickd 19:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I Quit
I've noticed you have posted a dozen or so edits since you quit. Perhaps you should unquit.JEdward 02:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- None of Ardenn's edits have been since the 14th of August, and then only very, very minor. Many users will perform a few edits to finish up a few things once and for all before leaving the project. For all intents and purposes, Ardenn has left the project. Captainktainer * Talk 05:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to User talk:209.17.148.143
Hello Ardenn, thank you for the invitation you gave me about creating an account. However, I already have an account and forgot to sign in at that time. Thank you, anyways! Sir Studieselot 16:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I wonder what happened
Hello Ardenn. I find your name from reading about it on Wikitruth's article on Misplaced Pages's article about them. I really like your orange disclaimer so I'm going to use it for my talk page if that's okay, but I'll take it down if you tell me to. I'm sorry to hear about your dropping out of Misplaced Pages, it's really something I wish the whole world would get in on doing. I understand it must suck getting harassed for your decisions. I still need to read more about the occurances to figure out just exactly what they were and whether or not they're right, but still, you look okay enough. Tyciol 19:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- To satisfy your curiosity: Based on my review of his contribution history and my own memories of following the dispute, Ardenn left Misplaced Pages after being blocked numerous times for violations of the 3RR rule, which was in keeping with a generally mutually hostile relationship with the Misplaced Pages community at large. There was also a long and tendentious dispute between Ardenn and WCityMike, which was one of many factors that led to that contributor's choice to leave the project. Ardenn's relationship with the community was a stormy one, and it appears that he has wrapped up the dangling threads of his participation and permanently left the project (or reregistered as a new user). As for the disclaimer, remember that automatically deleting posts from anonymous users is an egregious violation of Misplaced Pages's policy of assuming good faith, which includes anonymous contributors; I caution you in the strongest of terms to avoid implementing that particular clause of the notice. Anyway, I think it would be best if we all just let Ardenn slip away quietly; while I don't think the Right to Vanish applies due to the extensive block log, it would be nice to adhere to the spirit of the policy. Captainktainer * Talk 02:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
It's very sad that someone pushed this user this far, to quit Misplaced Pages. --66.218.12.217 02:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:L-chapman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:L-chapman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell 20:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Notice
NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT the scope of WikiProject Ottawa is being debated. Your input is requested. Thank you. GreenJoe 20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Deaf
I notice you are a member of WikiProject Deaf. You may also add {{User WikiProject Deaf}}, which also adds a userbox to your page, or ] to your userpage. If you do, it will list you in Category:WikiProject Deaf participants. Taric25 20:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I added you to Category:WikiProject Deaf participants. Taric25 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Erik Eastaugh
I have renominated this for deletion. I notice you voted against last time. If you have any views one way or another, please post them. It appears like it will be a clear deletion anyway. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:PPAP
Template:PPAP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Hi..how are you? i saw at your main page..that you left wikipedia!..what is the proplem?..i Knew that is not my business.but if you want to tell me,it will be good? regards.--O.waqfi (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Ryerson University people
I have nominated List of Ryerson University people, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Ryerson University people. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARITell me yours 20:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:You Can't Do That on Television
Category:You Can't Do That on Television, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon 00:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Vancouver
You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Vancouver Inactive list. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visit Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Vancouver/Inactive and move your name over to the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Vancouver/Members list. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on the talk page. Thank you for your time. Mkdw 08:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Green politicians in Canada
I have nominated Category:Green politicians in Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Green Party politicians in Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Lgibbons.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lgibbons.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ardenn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Gabriel Draven - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Al Bowers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:NickWright.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NickWright.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Category:Healthcare in Ottawa
Category:Healthcare in Ottawa, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Karl.brown (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:PPAP-Join
Template:PPAP-Join has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:FM" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:FM has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24 § Misplaced Pages:FM until a consensus is reached. 48JCL 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)