Misplaced Pages

Talk:Philosophy of mind: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:39, 26 July 2018 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,200 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Philosophy of mind/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:57, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,228 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] 
(47 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skiptotoctalk}} {{Talk header}}
{{ArticleHistory {{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN |action1=GAN
Line 24: Line 24:
|action4oldid=111124715 |action4oldid=111124715


|action5 = FAR
|action5date = 2020-09-26
|action5link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Philosophy of mind/archive2
|action5result = demoted
|action5oldid = 978978943

|currentstatus=FFA
|maindate=May 17, 2006 |maindate=May 17, 2006
|currentstatus=FA
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=High|mind=yes}}
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Philosophy|class=FA}}
{{WikiProject Cognitive science|importance=Top}}
{{notice|{{Graph:PageViews|365}}|heading=Daily page views |center=y |image=Open data small color.png}}
{{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=Top}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Transhumanism|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=FA|importance=Top|mind=yes}} {{WikiProject Psychology|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Cognitive science|class=FA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Neuroscience|class=FA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Transhumanism|class=FA|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=FA|importance=Top}}
{{V0.5|class=FA|category=Philrelig}}
{{Portal|Mind and Brain}}
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 49: Line 49:
| minthreadsleft = 4 | minthreadsleft = 4
}} }}
{{Broken anchors|links=
{{auto archiving notice |bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=90 |units=days }}
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#Criticism) is no longer available because it was ] before. <!-- {"title":"Criticism","appear":{"revid":69742786,"parentid":68959673,"timestamp":"2006-08-15T05:40:01Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":420438882,"parentid":418194155,"timestamp":"2011-03-24T04:25:34Z","replaced_anchors":{"Types of zombies":"Types of zombie"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} -->
}}


== Identity Theory criticisms unfounded ==
== External links modified ==


"Despite its initial plausibility, the identity theory faces a strong challenge in the form of the thesis of multiple realizability, first formulated by Hilary Putnam."
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
This section has a ton of weasel words and the citations do not support the statements made. Footnote 27 is not a source that supports the sentence "identity theory faces a strong challenge in the form of the thesis of multiple realizability"; it is a reference to Hilary Putnam's paper which attempts to dispute identity theory and&mdash;by any rational account&mdash;fails. It is not a challenge at all to identity theory, let along a "strong" one. A diverse array of organisms can all feel pain and all have different brains, there's no issue with that. A proponent of Identity theory would just say that each of those experiences would be slightly different, in the same way that all humans will have slightly different experiences of pain because we ourselves don't have ''exactly'' the same physical brains. Footnote 27 is also used at the end of the sentence "The identity theory is thus empirically unfounded." Again, the linked source does not say that.


== Philosophy ==
I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060515215340/http://www.experiencefestival.com:80/a/Sankhya/id/23117 to http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Sankhya/id/23117
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928101441/http://art-mind.org/review/IMG/pdf/McGinn_1989_Mind-body-problem_M.pdf to http://art-mind.org/review/IMG/pdf/McGinn_1989_Mind-body-problem_M.pdf


Philosophy of mind is a branch of philosophy that studies the ontology and nature of the mind and its relationship with the body. The mind–body problem is a paradigmatic issue in philosophy of mind, although a number of other issues are addressed, such as the hard problem of consciousness and the nature of particular mental states. Aspects of the mind that are studied include mental events, mental functions, mental properties, consciousness, the ontology of the mind, the nature of thought, and the relationship of the mind to the body. ] (]) 08:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).


== External links ==
{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}


:There are nine entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 01:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC) – &nbsp;''''']'''''<small>&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp;</small>&nbsp;<small>22:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)</small>
*] states: {{tq|Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.}}
*] states: {{tq|There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Misplaced Pages. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.}}
*]: {{tq|Minimize the number of links}}.
The "External links needs to be trimmed. -- ] (]) 08:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
== Psychology ==


The section on Psychology reads thusly (italics added in the "Talk" section solely for emphasis there):
== External links modified ==


"''Psychology is the science that investigates mental states directly''. It uses generally empirical methods to investigate concrete mental states like joy, fear or obsessions. Psychology investigates the laws that bind these mental states to each other or with inputs and outputs to the human organism.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


An example of this is the psychology of perception. Scientists working in this field have discovered general principles of the perception of forms. A law of the psychology of forms says that objects that move in the same direction are perceived as related to each other. This law describes a relation between visual input and mental perceptual states. However, it does not suggest anything about the nature of perceptual states. ''The laws discovered by psychology are compatible with all the answers to the mind–body problem already described.''"
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304105534/http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~c720126/humanethologie/ws/medicus/block5/Medicus_engl_Cover.pdf to http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~c720126/humanethologie/ws/medicus/block5/Medicus_engl_Cover.pdf


I understand that writing the section on psychology would be quite an undertaking, if not impossible to do well. Same with criticism of any attempt. In the least, I must say that the first sentence in these two paragraphs seems a very specific assertion, and the last sentence in these two paragraphs seems overly broad. I cannot reconcile the former and the latter.
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=true|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 08:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC) – &nbsp;''''']'''''<small>&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp;</small>&nbsp;<small>22:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)</small>

== Identity Theory criticisms unfounded ==

"Despite its initial plausibility, the identity theory faces a strong challenge in the form of the thesis of multiple realizability, first formulated by Hilary Putnam."
This section has a ton of weasel words and the citations do not support the statements made. Footnote 27 is not a source that supports the sentence "identity theory faces a strong challenge in the form of the thesis of multiple realizability"; it is a reference to Hilary Putnam's paper which attempts to dispute identity theory and&mdash;by any rational account&mdash;fails. It is not a challenge at all to identity theory, let along a "strong" one. A diverse array of organisms can all feel pain and all have different brains, there's no issue with that. A proponent of Identity theory would just say that each of those experiences would be slightly different, in the same way that all humans will have slightly different experiences of pain because we ourselves don't have ''exactly'' the same physical brains. Footnote 27 is also used at the end of the sentence "The identity theory is thus empirically unfounded." Again, the linked source does not say that.

== External links ==


] (]) 21:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Sometimes things just "creep in" so could someone take a look at the "External links" section for possible article integrating or trimming? 10 links give rise to concerns of ]. ] (]) 09:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:57, 10 July 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philosophy of mind article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Former featured articlePhilosophy of mind is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 17, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 17, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
March 27, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
February 28, 2007Featured article reviewKept
September 26, 2020Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article
This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Mind High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of mind
WikiProject iconCognitive science (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science
WikiProject iconNeuroscience Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTranshumanism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconPhilosophy of mind' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help click Show:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.

Quick help:
See changes to:

To Do List: edit - history - watch - purge

Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold

Be consistent

Maintenance / Etc

Create

  • Notable transhumanist articles

Shorten / merge into others

Expand

Your immediate attention

WikiProject iconPsychology Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

  • ] The anchor (#Criticism) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Identity Theory criticisms unfounded

"Despite its initial plausibility, the identity theory faces a strong challenge in the form of the thesis of multiple realizability, first formulated by Hilary Putnam." This section has a ton of weasel words and the citations do not support the statements made. Footnote 27 is not a source that supports the sentence "identity theory faces a strong challenge in the form of the thesis of multiple realizability"; it is a reference to Hilary Putnam's paper which attempts to dispute identity theory and—by any rational account—fails. It is not a challenge at all to identity theory, let along a "strong" one. A diverse array of organisms can all feel pain and all have different brains, there's no issue with that. A proponent of Identity theory would just say that each of those experiences would be slightly different, in the same way that all humans will have slightly different experiences of pain because we ourselves don't have exactly the same physical brains. Footnote 27 is also used at the end of the sentence "The identity theory is thus empirically unfounded." Again, the linked source does not say that.

Philosophy

Philosophy of mind is a branch of philosophy that studies the ontology and nature of the mind and its relationship with the body. The mind–body problem is a paradigmatic issue in philosophy of mind, although a number of other issues are addressed, such as the hard problem of consciousness and the nature of particular mental states. Aspects of the mind that are studied include mental events, mental functions, mental properties, consciousness, the ontology of the mind, the nature of thought, and the relationship of the mind to the body. 41.48.167.100 (talk) 08:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

External links

There are nine entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Misplaced Pages. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.

The "External links needs to be trimmed. -- Otr500 (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Psychology

The section on Psychology reads thusly (italics added in the "Talk" section solely for emphasis there):

"Psychology is the science that investigates mental states directly. It uses generally empirical methods to investigate concrete mental states like joy, fear or obsessions. Psychology investigates the laws that bind these mental states to each other or with inputs and outputs to the human organism.

An example of this is the psychology of perception. Scientists working in this field have discovered general principles of the perception of forms. A law of the psychology of forms says that objects that move in the same direction are perceived as related to each other. This law describes a relation between visual input and mental perceptual states. However, it does not suggest anything about the nature of perceptual states. The laws discovered by psychology are compatible with all the answers to the mind–body problem already described."

I understand that writing the section on psychology would be quite an undertaking, if not impossible to do well. Same with criticism of any attempt. In the least, I must say that the first sentence in these two paragraphs seems a very specific assertion, and the last sentence in these two paragraphs seems overly broad. I cannot reconcile the former and the latter.

Ritten Wright (talk) 21:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories: