Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ravi Shankar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:12, 11 June 2013 editMiszaBot I (talk | contribs)234,552 editsm Robot: Archiving 3 threads (older than 180d) to Talk:Ravi Shankar/Archive 2.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:43, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,011,927 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] 
(40 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header|search=yes}} {{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{British English}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{Article history
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 2
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Ravi Shankar/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I |age=6 |units=months}}
{{Stable version|465207270|date=2011-12-12|class=GA}}
{{ArticleHistory
| action1 = GAN | action1 = GAN
| action1date = 19:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | action1date = 19:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Line 17: Line 9:


| currentstatus = GA | currentstatus = GA
| topic = music}} | topic = music

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=
| itn1date = 2012-12-12
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|musician-priority=High|musician-work-group=yes|listas=Shankar, Ravi}}
{{WikiProject California|class=GA|importance=Low|southerncalifornia=yes|southerncalifornia-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Composers|class=GA}}
{{WikiProject India|class=GA|importance=Mid|music=yes|music-importance=Top|cinema=yes|cinema-importance=Mid|uttar=yes|uttar-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Record Production|class=start |importance= }}
{{WikiProject The Beatles|class=GA|importance=High|apple=yes|george=yes}}
{{WikiProject University of California|class=GA|importance=low}}
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Shankar, Ravi|1=
{{ITN talk|12 December|2012}}
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-priority=High|musician-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject California|importance=Low|southerncalifornia=yes|southerncalifornia-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Composers}}
{{WikiProject India|importance=Mid|music=yes|music-importance=Top|uttar=yes|uttar-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Record Production|importance= }}
{{WikiProject The Beatles|importance=High|apple=yes|george=yes}}
{{WikiProject University of California|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|importance=Low}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 2
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Ravi Shankar/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Banner holder |collapsed=yes |1=
{{Top 25 Report|Apr 3 2016 (8th)}}
}}

==Two Birthplaces?==

Intro paragraph says he was born in Narail, which is in present-day Bangladesh, while in the Early Life section it says he was born in Benares, a city in India. I think the fact is that his father was from Narail, and the family was living in Benares at that time. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Pundit ==
The name should be Pundit Ravi Shankar, that is how he is known. There is hardly anybody who ever knew of him as just Ravi Hsnakar (There may be thousands of Ravi Shankar at any given time) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It's usually spelled ] and there's an explanation in this article in . But I don't think honorary titles like this are generally used as part of the name. Given that this has been a ], I'd be surprised if it hasn't already been carefully considered. Perhaps it's ok to use just in the article opening sentence and infobox, but not as the article title? Any views? ] (]) 12:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

== Anoushka--absurd statement ==

The article says: "After separating from Kamala Shastri in 1981, Anoushka Shankar was born to Shankar and Sukanya Rajan."<br />
How could Anoushka Shankar have separated from anybody before she was born? ] (]) 19:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)<br />

Now says "After Shankar separated from Kamala Shastri in 1981, Anoushka Shankar was born to Shankar and Sukanya Rajan", Anoushka's birth is given as 9th June 1981, if you are understandable trying to gloss over a little hanky-panky in the man's life, which is not relevant to his artistry only to a gossip mag , why not remove the whole statement altogether? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No, it was a grammar point. The way the statement was written, it said that Anoushka separated from Kamala Shastra before Anoushka was born. Of course it should have said Ravi separated from Kamala. But it didn't. It said Anoushka was born after ANOUSHKA separated from Kamala. ] (]) 13:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150530204253/http://sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/awardeeslist.htm to http://sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/awardeeslist.htm
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6U68ulwpb?url=http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf to http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023617/http://sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/fellowslist.htm to http://sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/fellowslist.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
== KBE ==


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 01:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
'''Note''': I moved this here so it's not spread across user talk pages ] (]) 23:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
Hi. With regards to : does it matter that he did not use it? He still had the title. And also, what evidence do we have that he did not want to use the title? As far as I can see e.g. external sources mention his KBE. Thanks, --]'''''<small>]</small>''''' 23:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
:He has so many titles, we would have to list his honorary doctorates, which are actual titles, and, because they much higher honors and from his home country, maybe list him as Padmavibhushan Ravi Shankar or Bharatratna Ravi Shankar (the Bharat Ratna even puts you in the order of precedence). When I google "ravi shankar kbe", the honorary knighthood mention of the UK Parliament is about all that pops up and the recent obituary flood does not appear to mention him as a KBE but mentions title separately if at all. ] (]) 23:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
::It's just that it seems conventional to list these type of titles (see e.g. ] who is in the same situation). Do you know if there's a policy about this? --]'''''<small>]</small>''''' 23:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
:::] and ] are the closest things we have to policy regarding this. ]&nbsp;<sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 23:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
== Award List ==


I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
There could be an award list listing the achievements of the pundit. Please give your suggestions
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
] (]) 12:14, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5rUTg6OvI?url=http://www.mpinfo.org/mpinfonew/hindi/award/kalidas.asp to http://www.mpinfo.org/mpinfonew/hindi/award/kalidas.asp


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
== Danseuse ==


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
The word danseuse appears in the section on his personal life and family. Seriously? How about dancer? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:We all strive for non-sexist language. It seems ] is a wiki word, even if ambiguous and not very appropriate here? But I would see no strong objection to using dancer, which seems much more natural. ] (]) 23:08, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
::Done. Thanks! ]&nbsp;<sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 23:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
== Superb images ==


== "sitar maestro" ==
The Daily Mail is usually spurned as a source here, but the range and quality of the images they have used in their article here is quite something: . Almost worthy of adding as an external link. ] (]) 23:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


Is "sitar maestro" actually used as a title, and not just a description or part of an introduction? If not, the statement in the lede that those words often precede Shankar's name are puffery and should be rephrased to simply state that he is (or is regarded as) a maestro. ] (]) 00:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
== 1956-69: International career section ==


:That's a distinction without a difference. He's a maestro, he's regarded as a maestro. It would be puffery if he were a hack, which he's not. ] (]) 09:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
In the fourth para of this section, there's a mention of Howard Worth's ''Raga'' being filmed during George Harrison's visit to India in Sept–Oct 1966; that's supported by a NY Times ref, which I'm not able to access. Would be good if someone could check perhaps, because I've always understood it that ''Raga'' was filmed mainly in 1967–68. In his autobiography, George says he was meant to join Ravi in the south of India after The Beatles' (well, him and Lennon) left Rishikesh in April 1968 (i.e., two Indian trips later); but George got dysentery, which is why his scene with Ravi had to be shot later, at Esalen in June '68. Having said that, this is only the Harrison side of things – perhaps shooting did begin in 1966?) Also, might be worth mentioning that Harrison salvaged the project (by offering Apple Films and producing the soundtrack) in late 1970, when the original backers pulled out? Howard Worth's very generous about this, from memory, in a . (It's a long clip, but lovely if you're in the mood – and have the time.) ] (]) 14:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:43, 10 July 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ravi Shankar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Good articleRavi Shankar has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 5, 2009Good article nomineeListed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on December 12, 2012.
This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconCalifornia: Southern California Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconComposers
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers
WikiProject iconIndia: Uttar Pradesh / Music Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian music workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconRecord Production
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconThe Beatles High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis Apple Records/Apple Corps-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Misplaced Pages. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:
For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?
WikiProject iconUniversity of California Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconVeganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

          Other talk page banners
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

Two Birthplaces?

Intro paragraph says he was born in Narail, which is in present-day Bangladesh, while in the Early Life section it says he was born in Benares, a city in India. I think the fact is that his father was from Narail, and the family was living in Benares at that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.242.217.46 (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Pundit

The name should be Pundit Ravi Shankar, that is how he is known. There is hardly anybody who ever knew of him as just Ravi Hsnakar (There may be thousands of Ravi Shankar at any given time) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.251.14 (talk) 10:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

It's usually spelled Pandit and there's an explanation in this article in The Daily Telegraph. But I don't think honorary titles like this are generally used as part of the name. Given that this has been a Good Article, I'd be surprised if it hasn't already been carefully considered. Perhaps it's ok to use just in the article opening sentence and infobox, but not as the article title? Any views? Martinevans123 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Anoushka--absurd statement

The article says: "After separating from Kamala Shastri in 1981, Anoushka Shankar was born to Shankar and Sukanya Rajan."
How could Anoushka Shankar have separated from anybody before she was born? Uporządnicki (talk) 19:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Now says "After Shankar separated from Kamala Shastri in 1981, Anoushka Shankar was born to Shankar and Sukanya Rajan", Anoushka's birth is given as 9th June 1981, if you are understandable trying to gloss over a little hanky-panky in the man's life, which is not relevant to his artistry only to a gossip mag , why not remove the whole statement altogether? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.206.106 (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

No, it was a grammar point. The way the statement was written, it said that Anoushka separated from Kamala Shastra before Anoushka was born. Of course it should have said Ravi separated from Kamala. But it didn't. It said Anoushka was born after ANOUSHKA separated from Kamala. Uporządnicki (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ravi Shankar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ravi Shankar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

"sitar maestro"

Is "sitar maestro" actually used as a title, and not just a description or part of an introduction? If not, the statement in the lede that those words often precede Shankar's name are puffery and should be rephrased to simply state that he is (or is regarded as) a maestro. 73.149.246.232 (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

That's a distinction without a difference. He's a maestro, he's regarded as a maestro. It would be puffery if he were a hack, which he's not. Binksternet (talk) 09:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Categories: