Revision as of 00:47, 5 March 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:American imperialism/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:21, 15 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,037 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
(31 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=90|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Controversial}} |
|
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
|
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
{{Not a forum}} |
|
⚫ |
{{American English}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject International relations|class=C |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=c|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject United States History|class=C |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject United States |class=C |importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States |importance=low|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Colonial Empires |class=C |importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Economics |importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Economics |class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history |class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|US=y }} |
|
{{WikiProject Military history |class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|US=y }} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=C|importance=mid|social=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid|social=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject History|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject History|importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=Society|class=C}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Controversial}} |
|
⚫ |
{{American English}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
| algo = old(90d) |
|
| algo = old(90d) |
Line 25: |
Line 22: |
|
| counter = 4 |
|
| counter = 4 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Fullerton/Gender_and_Technoculture_(Spring_2022) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2022-01-24 | end_date = 2022-05-13 }} |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Fullerton/Gender_and_Technoculture_(Spring_2022) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2022-01-24 | end_date = 2022-05-13 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Gone too far == |
|
== Gone too far == |
Line 31: |
Line 28: |
|
The American Imperialism page has actually gone too far in one direction. Whilst this talk page was initially created to speak regarding the softness of the article regarding the topic, the entire article has been revamped in the opposite direction. Thus, it is still not a neutral article. In most other professional and encyclopedic versions of articles I have read on Misplaced Pages, historians are cited occasionally to give a point of view, but in this article it is so cluttered with negative historical views of America's foreign policy, you miss out on the actual informative things. A standard middle school textbook does a better job than the current article, which desperately needs to be fixed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:41, November 26, 2016 (UTC)</small> |
|
The American Imperialism page has actually gone too far in one direction. Whilst this talk page was initially created to speak regarding the softness of the article regarding the topic, the entire article has been revamped in the opposite direction. Thus, it is still not a neutral article. In most other professional and encyclopedic versions of articles I have read on Misplaced Pages, historians are cited occasionally to give a point of view, but in this article it is so cluttered with negative historical views of America's foreign policy, you miss out on the actual informative things. A standard middle school textbook does a better job than the current article, which desperately needs to be fixed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:41, November 26, 2016 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01== |
|
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == |
|
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Fullerton/Gender_and_Technoculture_320-01_(Fall_2022) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2022-08-23 | end_date = 2022-12-09 }} |
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: |
|
|
|
|
|
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-09-07T06:52:57.370520 | Kokbayraq flag.svg --> |
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 01:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)</span> |
|
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 06:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== is nayirah-al-sabah an example of American Imperialism? == |
|
|
|
|
|
yes no, and does it receive enough attention (WP:UNDUE ig) to have a mention in this article? ] (]) 05:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Expansion of timeline == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The timeline currently goes only up to the USA in Korea and Vietnam. Needs a massive edit to add everything after that, such as: |
|
== POV issue == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iraq War, Afghanistan, Operation Condor, Grenada, Indonesia and US support of the coup there (Jakarta Method) among many others. ] (]) 21:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
This article seems to make an effort to portray the topic in an as inoffensive light as possible. Instead of a criticism section there is only a "support" section, and the lead glorifies America and its interests in both the words of the "opponents" and the supporters. There is little to no material about the experiences and viewpoints of the countries that were subject to American imperialism. ] (]) 11:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01== |
|
== The Allies of the United States section belongs on a separate page == |
|
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Fullerton/Gender_and_Technoculture_320-01_(Fall_2023) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2023-08-21 | end_date = 2023-12-08 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|
The Allies of the United States section belongs on a separate page as it is more general and contemporary than the topic of the American imperialism page itself. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== 1800s American expansion through artistic expression == |
|
== Neutrality and "Against" section == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think that adding a section on how public opinion manifested itself in artistic expression with relation to American expansion would be beneficial in exploring responses and gauging the consensus at the time concerning American pursuits for territory. Looking into how C19th art was used to rally support and criticize US expansion will help conceptualize such a multifaceted period of time ] (]) 21:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
The "against" section seems to ironically support the United States. It mentions the Mashall plan, how US "stabilized" South Korea and helped Vietnam with humanitarian aid. |
|
|
It's also redacted as an original investigation.] (]) 15:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
The American Imperialism page has actually gone too far in one direction. Whilst this talk page was initially created to speak regarding the softness of the article regarding the topic, the entire article has been revamped in the opposite direction. Thus, it is still not a neutral article. In most other professional and encyclopedic versions of articles I have read on Misplaced Pages, historians are cited occasionally to give a point of view, but in this article it is so cluttered with negative historical views of America's foreign policy, you miss out on the actual informative things. A standard middle school textbook does a better job than the current article, which desperately needs to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.7.66.150 (talk • contribs) 22:41, November 26, 2016 (UTC)
The timeline currently goes only up to the USA in Korea and Vietnam. Needs a massive edit to add everything after that, such as:
Iraq War, Afghanistan, Operation Condor, Grenada, Indonesia and US support of the coup there (Jakarta Method) among many others. Genabab (talk) 21:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
I think that adding a section on how public opinion manifested itself in artistic expression with relation to American expansion would be beneficial in exploring responses and gauging the consensus at the time concerning American pursuits for territory. Looking into how C19th art was used to rally support and criticize US expansion will help conceptualize such a multifaceted period of time Maisiesucks (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)