| Revision as of 06:25, 30 July 2024 editFyunck(click) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers63,474 edits →You should be careful on editing Taiwan topics← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:11, 30 July 2024 edit undoFyunck(click) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers63,474 edits →You should be careful on editing Taiwan topicsNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| :::I have something to say in the ]. ] (]) 18:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC) | :::I have something to say in the ]. ] (]) 18:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::::But there is another big problem that you may not realize. You opened a topic... fine. You want a change... fine. And you stated as such... fine. What is not fine is continually adding more to others "oppose" statement. That should really not be done unless they address you personally. Everyone gets their say and there is no need to comment on each one. We know your stance. Administration frowns on that a lot. ] (]) 06:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | ::::But there is another big problem that you may not realize. You opened a topic... fine. You want a change... fine. And you stated as such... fine. What is not fine is continually adding more to others "oppose" statement. That should really not be done unless they address you personally. Everyone gets their say and there is no need to comment on each one. We know your stance. Administration frowns on that a lot. ] (]) 06:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *And again you should be very careful on these one-track edits. I warned you about things back in February that all you are doing is editing Taiwan related articles and getting reverted. Then going to Taiwan related talk pages and running discussions into circles. You disappear for five months and reappear suddenly July 26 and what are you editing... Talk:Taiwan, Mainland China , and creating ] which has no chance of being implemented. I say once again, this one track approach does not always bode well. We just had an ] who was fixated on these topics but they also wouldn't respond to talk page requests (which hasn't occurred here). I'm not saying it has reached that level, but I don't want to see that happen here. So be careful in your approach, don't keep saying the same things and expect a different response, and branch out and find some other topics you'd like to improve. ] (]) 08:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:11, 30 July 2024
 | Before initiating a discussion on this page, please read the statement on the user page. Thank you for your cooperation. |
Welcome!
Hi ZeehanLin! I noticed your contributions to Republic of China and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Certes (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
You should be careful on editing Taiwan topics
You are brand new here and the only articles you have edited are Taiwan-related articles. You have been reverted on Taiwan (disambiguation) twice, and on Republic of China once. Your first post here was opening a discussion at Talk:Taiwan which was closed with "no new arguments" and "talking in circles." Now you open another topic at Talk:Taiwan which goes into the same thing. Perhaps you are unaware on how to read all the archives. Perhaps you don't understand Misplaced Pages protocols or how consensus works. I'm not sure. There are good editors and administrators who can help you with that.
What I am sure of is that continuing the same arguments on the same single topic does not bode well for your editing privileges down the line. I suggest stepping away from this single topic and finding other articles that bring you joy and editing fun. This can be a great place if you work well with others as a team, and move along when consensus is against you. But obversely, persistent beating a topic over and over can lead to blocks and bad feelings for all. I'd move along for what it's worth. Cheers and happy editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thx ZeehanLin (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop ignoring the existing RfC consensus and reliable sources cited by other editors. You are free to move on to other topics if you aren't able to understand or productively comment on this specific topic. Butterdiplomat (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have something to say in the Statement on some of the discussions I have made. ZeehanLin (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- But there is another big problem that you may not realize. You opened a topic... fine. You want a change... fine. And you stated as such... fine. What is not fine is continually adding more to others "oppose" statement. That should really not be done unless they address you personally. Everyone gets their say and there is no need to comment on each one. We know your stance. Administration frowns on that a lot. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have something to say in the Statement on some of the discussions I have made. ZeehanLin (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop ignoring the existing RfC consensus and reliable sources cited by other editors. You are free to move on to other topics if you aren't able to understand or productively comment on this specific topic. Butterdiplomat (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- And again you should be very careful on these one-track edits. I warned you about things back in February that all you are doing is editing Taiwan related articles and getting reverted. Then going to Taiwan related talk pages and running discussions into circles. You disappear for five months and reappear suddenly July 26 and what are you editing... Talk:Taiwan, Mainland China (and getting reverted), and creating Draft:Taiwan which has no chance of being implemented. I say once again, this one track approach does not always bode well. We just had an editor blocked indefinitely who was fixated on these topics but they also wouldn't respond to talk page requests (which hasn't occurred here). I'm not saying it has reached that level, but I don't want to see that happen here. So be careful in your approach, don't keep saying the same things and expect a different response, and branch out and find some other topics you'd like to improve. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)