Revision as of 16:07, 25 December 2023 editCornmazes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,679 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:06, 3 August 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,812 edits Move 2 urls. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#nbcnews.com | ||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
On October 5, 1970, the AEC issued its full-term, full-power Operating License (DPR-24) for Point Beach Unit 1. The loading fuel into the reactor commenced almost immediately. On November 2, 1970, operators achieved initial criticality, with the nuclear-powered electricity being produced four days later, on November 6. Full commercial service was reached on December 21, 1970, just 49 months from the initial groundbreaking ceremony. After delays from nuclear power opponents, Unit 2 was granted a full-term, full-power operating license (DPR-27) on March 8, 1973, almost {{frac|1|1|2}} years behind the original schedule.<ref name=":0" /> | On October 5, 1970, the AEC issued its full-term, full-power Operating License (DPR-24) for Point Beach Unit 1. The loading fuel into the reactor commenced almost immediately. On November 2, 1970, operators achieved initial criticality, with the nuclear-powered electricity being produced four days later, on November 6. Full commercial service was reached on December 21, 1970, just 49 months from the initial groundbreaking ceremony. After delays from nuclear power opponents, Unit 2 was granted a full-term, full-power operating license (DPR-27) on March 8, 1973, almost {{frac|1|1|2}} years behind the original schedule.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
Due to steam generator tube degradation and failures caused by intergranular stress corrosion cracking, Unit 1 was operated at approximately 75-80% of full power from December 1979 until October 1983, when replacement steam generators were installed.<ref>{{Cite book|title=20th Anniversary Point Beach Nuclear Plant|publisher=Wisconsin Electric Power Company|pages=35–36}}</ref> |
Due to steam generator tube degradation and failures caused by intergranular stress corrosion cracking, Unit 1 was operated at approximately 75-80% of full power from December 1979 until October 1983, when replacement steam generators were installed.<ref>{{Cite book|title=20th Anniversary Point Beach Nuclear Plant|publisher=Wisconsin Electric Power Company|pages=35–36}}</ref> The Unit 2 steam generators were replaced in 1996–1997.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nexteraenergyresources.com/pdf_redesign/pointbeach.pdf|title=NextEra Energy Point Beach Fact Sheet|website=NextEra Energy Resources}}</ref> | ||
In 2005, the NRC approved the initial license renewal application for the Point Beach plant, extending the operating license from forty years to sixty.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0531/ML053110031.pdf|title=RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Renewed License No. DPR-24|website=NRC.gov}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0531/ML053110034.pdf|title=RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Renewed License No. DPR-27|website=USNRC}}</ref> in 2011, the NRC approved a 17% increase in power output (a.k.a. extended power uprate) from both units. This entailed significant upgrades to several plant systems and components, including safety-related pumps and valves, as well as the turbine-generator sets.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/IT-Regulatory_approval_for_Point_Beach_uprate-0405114.html|title=Regulatory approval for Point Beach uprate|website=www.world-nuclear-news.org|access-date=2017-05-11}}</ref> | In 2005, the NRC approved the initial license renewal application for the Point Beach plant, extending the operating license from forty years to sixty.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0531/ML053110031.pdf|title=RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Renewed License No. DPR-24|website=NRC.gov}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0531/ML053110034.pdf|title=RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Renewed License No. DPR-27|website=USNRC}}</ref> in 2011, the NRC approved a 17% increase in power output (a.k.a. extended power uprate) from both units. This entailed significant upgrades to several plant systems and components, including safety-related pumps and valves, as well as the turbine-generator sets.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/IT-Regulatory_approval_for_Point_Beach_uprate-0405114.html|title=Regulatory approval for Point Beach uprate|website=www.world-nuclear-news.org|access-date=2017-05-11}}</ref> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+Generation (]) Point Beach Power Plant<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/4046?freq=M&start=200101&end=202210&ctype=linechart<ype=pin&pin=&maptype=0&linechart=ELEC.PLANT.GEN.4046-ALL-ALL.M&columnchart=ELEC.PLANT.GEN.4046-ALL-ALL.M |access-date=2022-12-30 |website=www.eia.gov}}</ref> (Nuclear Only)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/4046/?freq=M&pin= |access-date=2023- |
|+Generation (]) Point Beach Power Plant<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/4046?freq=M&start=200101&end=202210&ctype=linechart<ype=pin&pin=&maptype=0&linechart=ELEC.PLANT.GEN.4046-ALL-ALL.M&columnchart=ELEC.PLANT.GEN.4046-ALL-ALL.M |access-date=2022-12-30 |website=www.eia.gov}}</ref> (Nuclear Only)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/4046/?freq=M&pin= |access-date=2023-12-26 |website=www.eia.gov}}</ref> | ||
!Year | !Year | ||
!Jan | !Jan | ||
Line 418: | Line 418: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!2023 | !2023 | ||
|<small>896,138</small> | |||
⚫ | | | ||
|<small>800,625</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>569,821</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>787,181</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>897,143</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>857,775</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>883,965</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>878,340</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>847,220</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>521,677</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>845,414</small> | |||
| | |||
|<small>897,468</small> | |||
| | |||
!9,682,767 | |||
⚫ | |- | ||
!2024 | |||
|<small>894,969</small> | |||
|<small>836,930</small> | |||
|<small>896,880</small> | |||
|<small>868,750</small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
|<small></small> | |||
! | ! | ||
|} | |} | ||
] | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+Wisconsin electricity generation by fuel type<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/topic/0?agg=2,0,1&fuel=vtt9&geo=g0001&sec=008&freq=A&start=2001&end=2021&ctype=linechart<ype=pin&rtype=s&pin=&rse=0&maptype=0 |access-date=2022-12-31 |website=www.eia.gov}}</ref> (GWh) | |+Wisconsin electricity generation by fuel type<ref>{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/topic/0?agg=2,0,1&fuel=vtt9&geo=g0001&sec=008&freq=A&start=2001&end=2021&ctype=linechart<ype=pin&rtype=s&pin=&rse=0&maptype=0 |access-date=2022-12-31 |website=www.eia.gov}}</ref> (GWh) | ||
Line 551: | Line 567: | ||
The ] defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of {{convert|10|mi}}, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about {{convert|50|mi}}, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061002131207/http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html |archive-date= 2006-10-02 |title= Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants |website= NRC.gov}}</ref> | The ] defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of {{convert|10|mi}}, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about {{convert|50|mi}}, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061002131207/http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html |archive-date= 2006-10-02 |title= Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants |website= NRC.gov}}</ref> | ||
The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|10|mi}} of Point Beach was 19,975, a decrease of 6.7 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|50|mi}} was 777,556, an increase of 10.0 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Green Bay (28 miles to city center).<ref>{{cite web |author-link= Bill Dedman |last= Dedman |first= Bill |title= Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors |website= NBC News |date= April 14, 2011 |url= |
The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|10|mi}} of Point Beach was 19,975, a decrease of 6.7 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within {{convert|50|mi}} was 777,556, an increase of 10.0 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Green Bay (28 miles to city center).<ref>{{cite web |author-link= Bill Dedman |last= Dedman |first= Bill |title= Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors |website= NBC News |date= April 14, 2011 |url= https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42555888 |access-date= May 1, 2011 }}</ref> | ||
==Seismic risk== | ==Seismic risk== | ||
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Point Beach was 1 in 90,909, according to an NRC study published in August 2010. This was tied for 62 in a list of 104 with #1 being most at risk.<ref>{{cite web |author-link= Bill Dedman |last= Dedman |first= Bill |title= What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk |website= NBC News |date= March 17, 2011 |url= |
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Point Beach was 1 in 90,909, according to an NRC study published in August 2010. This was tied for 62 in a list of 104 with #1 being most at risk.<ref>{{cite web |author-link= Bill Dedman |last= Dedman |first= Bill |title= What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk |website= NBC News |date= March 17, 2011 |url= https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42103936 |access-date= April 19, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first= Patrick |last= Hiland |title= Safety / Risk Assessment Results for Generic Issue 199 |url= http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf |website= msnbc.com |publisher= Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |date= September 2, 2010 |access-date= April 19, 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170525170632/http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf |archive-date= May 25, 2017 |url-status= dead }}</ref> | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 20:06, 3 August 2024
Nuclear power plant in Two Creeks, Wisconsin, U.S.Point Beach Nuclear Plant | |
---|---|
Point Beach Nuclear Plant | |
Country | United States |
Location | Town of Two Creeks, Manitowoc County, near Two Rivers, Wisconsin |
Coordinates | 44°16′52″N 87°32′12″W / 44.28111°N 87.53667°W / 44.28111; -87.53667 |
Status | Operational |
Construction began | Unit 1: July 19, 1967 Unit 2: July 25, 1968 |
Commission date | Unit 1: December 21, 1970 Unit 2: October 1, 1972 |
Construction cost | Unit 1: $60.6 million, 1971 USD ($452 million, 2023 USD) Unit 2: $54.3 million, 1972 USD ($392 million, 2023 USD) |
Owner | NextEra Energy Resources |
Operator | NextEra Energy Resources |
Employees | 400 |
Nuclear power station | |
Reactor type | PWR |
Reactor supplier | Westinghouse |
Cooling source | Lake Michigan |
Thermal capacity | 2 × 1800 MWth |
Power generation | |
Units operational | 2 × 625 MW |
Make and model | WH 2-loop (DRYAMB) |
Nameplate capacity | 1182 MW |
Capacity factor | 96.87% (2019) 82.80% (lifetime) |
Annual net output | 10,077 GWh (2022) |
External links | |
Website | Point Beach Nuclear Plant |
Commons | Related media on Commons |
[edit on Wikidata] |
Point Beach Nuclear Plant is a nuclear power plant located on Lake Michigan in the town of Two Creeks, Wisconsin, United States. The plant was built by Wisconsin Electric Power Company (now We Energies, a subsidiary of Wisconsin Energy Corporation), and previously operated by the Nuclear Management Company. The plant is currently owned and operated by NextEra Energy Resources (prior to 2009 – FPL Energy), of Juno Beach, Florida.
The plant is composed of two, two-loop Westinghouse pressurized water reactors. There is also a visitors' center located just south of the administration building.
Construction for Unit 1 began in 1966 and it was placed into commercial operation in December 1970. Unit 2 was placed into commercial operation in September 1972. The plant was built for a total cost of $114.9 million ($844 million, 2023 USD).
The entire site covers 1,050 acres; approximately 70 acres are used for the nuclear power plant and transmission yard infrastructure and the remaining land used for agriculture or solar arrays.
History
The original letter of intent to purchase a single 454 megawatt (MW) nuclear unit from Westinghouse Electric Company for a fixed-price was issued by Wisconsin Electric and Wisconsin Michigan Power Company (a Wisconsin Electric subsidiary) on December 30, 1965. The right was reserved to order a second, duplicate unit under the same terms. In May, 1966, the announcement was made that the plant would be built on a 1,200-acre site in the town of Two Creeks.
On November 28, 1966, following Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) endorsement and a brief public hearing, Alfred Gruhl, Glenn Reed, and Sol Burstein turned the first symbolic spades of dirt for the official ground-breaking. In May, 1967, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), predecessor to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), issued the official construction permit (number 32) for Point Beach Unit 1. The Unit 2 construction permit (number 47) was issued approximately a year later.
On October 5, 1970, the AEC issued its full-term, full-power Operating License (DPR-24) for Point Beach Unit 1. The loading fuel into the reactor commenced almost immediately. On November 2, 1970, operators achieved initial criticality, with the nuclear-powered electricity being produced four days later, on November 6. Full commercial service was reached on December 21, 1970, just 49 months from the initial groundbreaking ceremony. After delays from nuclear power opponents, Unit 2 was granted a full-term, full-power operating license (DPR-27) on March 8, 1973, almost 1+1⁄2 years behind the original schedule.
Due to steam generator tube degradation and failures caused by intergranular stress corrosion cracking, Unit 1 was operated at approximately 75-80% of full power from December 1979 until October 1983, when replacement steam generators were installed. The Unit 2 steam generators were replaced in 1996–1997.
In 2005, the NRC approved the initial license renewal application for the Point Beach plant, extending the operating license from forty years to sixty. in 2011, the NRC approved a 17% increase in power output (a.k.a. extended power uprate) from both units. This entailed significant upgrades to several plant systems and components, including safety-related pumps and valves, as well as the turbine-generator sets.
NextEra Energy Resources purchased the plant from Wisconsin Electric Power Company in October 2007. As part of the sale, We Energies agreed to repurchase all of the power produced by the plant for at least 20 years. In 2000–2007 the plant was managed by the Nuclear Management Company.
Owners submitted applications for subsequent license extension (60 years to 80 years) for both reactors to the NRC in November 2020. The decision announcement was expected in July 2022, however this was delayed as the NRC required additional environmental impact evaluation be completed. A NRC public meeting was held on February 17, 2021 to solicit public comments on the scope of the environmental review.
Most of the power from this plant goes to the Green Bay area and communities along the Lake Michigan shoreline of Southeastern Wisconsin. The plant is connected to the grid by four 345 kV lines, one of which travels northwest towards Green Bay and then on to the We Energies North Appleton substation located about 12 miles north of Appleton, Wisconsin, and the other one interconnecting with the now-closed Kewaunee Nuclear Generating Station located a short distance away to the north from Point Beach. The other 345 kV lines going out of the plant go south towards Milwaukee. Several 138 kV lines going out of the plant supply electricity to the surrounding area.
In November 2020, construction of the nearby 150 MW Two Creeks Solar Park was completed, at a cost of $195 million. The solar farm is located several miles southwest of the nuclear plant.
Electricity generation
Point Beach generated 10,077 GWh in 2022, 16.5% of all electricity produced in Wisconsin.
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total (Annual) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | 747,957 | 634,093 | 750,906 | 433,802 | 562,905 | 693,537 | 728,365 | 707,943 | 569,003 | 742,015 | 734,847 | 739,695 | 8,045,068 |
2002 | 751,028 | 624,538 | 753,521 | 505,585 | 574,254 | 730,869 | 746,848 | 751,595 | 520,408 | 532,423 | 734,354 | 754,656 | 7,980,079 |
2003 | 753,611 | 689,821 | 765,308 | 682,667 | 743,000 | 735,053 | 587,460 | 755,886 | 690,771 | 405,146 | 479,990 | 767,623 | 8,056,336 |
2004 | 768,940 | 714,409 | 760,799 | 395,417 | 323,118 | 620,125 | 759,345 | 763,343 | 738,197 | 734,412 | 668,786 | 767,076 | 8,013,967 |
2005 | 766,668 | 687,003 | 765,872 | 379,312 | 378,941 | 366,707 | 588,370 | 753,784 | 646,520 | 384,587 | 436,960 | 718,979 | 6,873,703 |
2006 | 767,529 | 692,841 | 761,705 | 744,257 | 763,705 | 736,477 | 763,706 | 745,747 | 731,483 | 556,789 | 527,817 | 768,360 | 8,560,416 |
2007 | 765,914 | 694,126 | 765,807 | 370,255 | 668,624 | 576,726 | 758,404 | 747,943 | 656,843 | 764,043 | 750,088 | 765,740 | 8,284,513 |
2008 | 580,167 | 667,760 | 770,034 | 426,997 | 597,286 | 738,617 | 759,633 | 741,942 | 728,096 | 427,927 | 566,303 | 762,453 | 7,767,215 |
2009 | 763,248 | 691,021 | 765,343 | 742,080 | 696,917 | 736,501 | 757,545 | 758,499 | 714,270 | 543,595 | 327,645 | 671,169 | 8,167,833 |
2010 | 764,991 | 687,983 | 380,308 | 689,603 | 767,038 | 633,399 | 699,236 | 746,163 | 742,782 | 764,896 | 749,905 | 664,381 | 8,290,685 |
2011 | 769,544 | 694,377 | 381,450 | 367,461 | 377,870 | 444,345 | 825,187 | 813,999 | 795,349 | 469,283 | 434,287 | 591,874 | 6,965,026 |
2012 | 885,774 | 829,858 | 881,358 | 804,487 | 895,831 | 817,735 | 823,428 | 818,423 | 830,321 | 888,894 | 430,848 | 876,746 | 9,783,703 |
2013 | 888,923 | 803,648 | 686,951 | 577,038 | 892,324 | 865,249 | 889,843 | 849,959 | 855,549 | 894,609 | 866,060 | 871,562 | 9,941,715 |
2014 | 894,014 | 807,255 | 647,855 | 551,744 | 878,772 | 862,226 | 892,854 | 854,574 | 863,958 | 484,812 | 846,101 | 862,931 | 9,447,096 |
2015 | 894,261 | 807,599 | 889,908 | 865,194 | 894,308 | 862,785 | 890,823 | 886,946 | 848,182 | 471,374 | 826,112 | 870,691 | 10,008,183 |
2016 | 896,413 | 838,689 | 599,550 | 771,742 | 895,263 | 862,524 | 890,714 | 879,818 | 859,221 | 891,601 | 869,130 | 896,729 | 10,151,394 |
2017 | 896,822 | 809,449 | 680,478 | 604,968 | 899,032 | 869,363 | 884,636 | 880,360 | 848,354 | 522,531 | 852,038 | 900,948 | 9,648,979 |
2018 | 900,095 | 811,599 | 897,070 | 867,179 | 897,537 | 864,881 | 892,088 | 883,172 | 851,052 | 565,516 | 873,212 | 825,721 | 10,129,122 |
2019 | 891,565 | 799,500 | 754,943 | 569,831 | 858,658 | 867,739 | 896,065 | 858,088 | 866,670 | 896,614 | 873,465 | 897,167 | 10,030,305 |
2020 | 896,579 | 838,452 | 621,646 | 776,698 | 899,562 | 868,122 | 887,222 | 887,469 | 863,889 | 490,510 | 844,423 | 896,761 | 9,771,333 |
2021 | 894,739 | 802,967 | 892,180 | 852,662 | 898,669 | 865,696 | 876,100 | 822,904 | 828,038 | 532,678 | 805,580 | 897,977 | 9,970,190 |
2022 | 896,422 | 809,933 | 782,184 | 534,981 | 897,835 | 868,658 | 891,034 | 880,963 | 852,915 | 893,605 | 871,077 | 897,411 | 10,077,018 |
2023 | 896,138 | 800,625 | 569,821 | 787,181 | 897,143 | 857,775 | 883,965 | 878,340 | 847,220 | 521,677 | 845,414 | 897,468 | 9,682,767 |
2024 | 894,969 | 836,930 | 896,880 | 868,750 |
Source | Year | % of 2017
Total |
% of 2021
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||
Coal | 35,437 | 32,933 | 26,003 | 23,490 | 27,233 | 55.9 | 43.5 |
Petroleum oil | 32 | 35 | 52 | 18 | 162 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Petroleum coke | 111 | 101 | 90 | 86 | 154 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Natural gas | 13,110 | 16,067 | 19,514 | 21,098 | 20,369 | 20.7 | 32.5 |
Nuclear | 9,649 | 10,129 | 10,030 | 9,771 | 9,970 | 15.2 | 15.9 |
Hydroelectric | 2,489 | 2,251 | 2,527 | 2,661 | 2,023 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Wind | 1,633 | 1,611 | 1,849 | 1,735 | 1,566 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
Utility-scale solar | 21 | 35 | 36 | 90 | 363 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
Biomass | 842 | 816 | 764 | 686 | 721 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
Other | 17 | 17 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total generation | 63,341 | 63,995 | 60,886 | 59,655 | 62,584 |
Surrounding population
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.
The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Point Beach was 19,975, a decrease of 6.7 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 777,556, an increase of 10.0 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Green Bay (28 miles to city center).
Seismic risk
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Point Beach was 1 in 90,909, according to an NRC study published in August 2010. This was tied for 62 in a list of 104 with #1 being most at risk.
References
- "Nuclear Power Plant Construction Activity 1986". www.osti.gov. Retrieved 2 February 2023.
- "Point Beach" (PDF). NextEra Energy Resources. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
- "Nuclear Power Plant Construction Activity 1986 DOE/EIA—0473(86) DE87 013213". U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information. 1986. p. 32. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
- "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2023-02-27.
- "WEC History". www.wecenergygroup.com. Retrieved 2017-05-11.
- ^ 20th Anniversary Point Beach Nuclear Plant. Wisconsin Electric Power Company. 1991. pp. 1–2.
- 20th Anniversary Point Beach Nuclear Plant. Wisconsin Electric Power Company. pp. 35–36.
- "NextEra Energy Point Beach Fact Sheet" (PDF). NextEra Energy Resources.
- "RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Renewed License No. DPR-24" (PDF). NRC.gov.
- "RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Renewed License No. DPR-27" (PDF). USNRC.
- "Regulatory approval for Point Beach uprate". www.world-nuclear-news.org. Retrieved 2017-05-11.
- "Wisconsin Energy Transfers Ownership of Point Beach Nuclear Plant to FPL Energy". 2007-10-01.
- Matthew L. Wald (May 7, 2013). "As Price of Nuclear Energy Drops, a Wisconsin Plant Is Shut". The New York Times. Retrieved May 8, 2013.
- "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2022-12-30.
- "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
- "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2022-12-31.
- "Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants". NRC.gov. Archived from the original on 2006-10-02.
- Dedman, Bill (April 14, 2011). "Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors". NBC News. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
- Dedman, Bill (March 17, 2011). "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk". NBC News. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
- Hiland, Patrick (September 2, 2010). "Safety / Risk Assessment Results for Generic Issue 199" (PDF). msnbc.com. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 25, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
External links
- NukeWorker
- "Wisconsin Nuclear Plants#Point Beach". Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). September 1, 2010. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- "Point Beach 1 Pressurized Water Reactor". Operating Nuclear Power Reactors. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). February 14, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
- "Point Beach 2 Pressurized Water Reactor". Operating Nuclear Power Reactors. NRC. February 14, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
Nuclear power in the United States | |
---|---|
NRC Region I (Northeast) | |
NRC Region II (South) | |
NRC Region III (Midwest) | |
NRC Region IV (West) | |
Converted | |
Closed |
|
Cancelled (incomplete list, whole plants only) |
|
Future | |