| Revision as of 06:25, 23 June 2015 editPluto2012 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,612 edits →Dubious information← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:15, 3 August 2024 edit undoSadko (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers81,682 edits OneClickArchived "External links modified" to Talk:Carlos Latuff/Archive 4 | ||
| (191 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
| {{controversial}} | {{controversial}} | ||
| {{ARBPIA}} | |||
| {{pbneutral}} | |||
| {{Round in circles|search=yes}} | {{Round in circles|search=yes}} | ||
| {{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Latuff, Carlos| | ||
| {{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=low}} | ||
| {{WikiProject Brazil |
{{WikiProject Brazil|importance=Low|gov=yes|arts=yes}} | ||
| {{WikiProject Palestine |
{{WikiProject Palestine|importance=Low}} | ||
| {{WikiProject Comics|Creators-work-group=yes |
{{WikiProject Comics|importance=Low|Creators-work-group=yes}} | ||
| | blp=yes | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{ARBPIA}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 4 | ||
| |algo = old(90d) | |algo = old(90d) | ||
| |archive = Talk:Carlos Latuff/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Carlos Latuff/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== | |||
| {{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=90|small=no|dounreplied=yes}} | |||
| ] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ]. | |||
| == Original Research == | |||
| Huge segments of this article are interpretations of Latuff's art by editors (referenced to primary sources linking to Latuff's art). The interpretations are often negative and followed by labeling the cartoonist as "anti-American" or "antisemitic". This seems like a clear violation of both OR and BLP. I propose we remove these. Also the text contains a large volume claims of antisemitism by people who are not notable. Are these not against BLP and NOTE? ] (]) 23:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : You are correct. // ] (]) | |||
| :: Someone should correct it, tbh. When it comes to NPOV, this article is somewhat of a "joke". ] (]) 20:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Agreed. ] (]) 01:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == POV == | |||
| Also, when it says he depicts characters like former brazilian president Lula as either a monster or a nazi, in the same level he depicts Bush or Blair - this is simply not true. His criticism about Lula is of a different nature. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Guys, this article is not balanced at all. Reading it makes it seem like he is almost a self-professed Jew hater, which I don't think is quite accurate. ] (]) 19:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, you sound like an extremely naive ultra-leftist. This article is indeed biased, but for the opposite reason: it makes him seem like he is only anti-Israel, but the truth is that he is extremely anti-Semitic and advocates the genocide of Jews from the Land of Israel. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::Latuff has never attacked the Jews as a people, nor has he advocated "genocide" or even reversal of Jewish settlement since 1948 outside of the current occupied territories. Inserting these erroneous views into an article is a violation of NPOV as well as BLP. I would agree with Pikolas that the article as it stands is barely acceptable on these grounds anyway. ] (]) 06:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I agree with ]. This article is not balanced at all, and you do not need to be a "naive ultra-leftist" to see that. The only requirement is that you are not a party to the dispute or a person with strong opinions regarding the issue at hand. For the articles development, outbursts like "naive ultra-leftist" should be avoided. However, I guess all can agree on that such a statement says more about the political bias of the "proclamer". Regards, ] (]) 15:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I don't know about whether you guys are "extremely naive ultra-leftists" or not, but the guy is clearly a vicious antisemite whose cartoons wouldn't be out of place in the ]. It might help if you guys read WP's articles on ], ], and ]. Cheers. ] (]) 08:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Not everyone criticizing Isreal is anti-semitic. Latuff is sometimes a bit over the top with his cartoons but nothing that would justify such a classification. --] (]) 08:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image reinforcing bias== | |||
| I know Latuff authored ], however, the article is already very biased towards his accusations of antisemitism (in violation of ]), and that cartoon only reinforces that bias. In my opinion we should use a less controversial image, like ] (which also serves to illustrate better his themes, i.e. the Palestinian conflict). Let's please reach some sort of consensus before engaging in fruitless edit wars. ] (]) 06:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, let's face it: a) it was a drawing by Latuff, b) Latuff ''IS'' controversial for drawings like these and c)he is more known for being anti-Israel than being pro-Palestine. | |||
| :To give some evidence: when I search “Latuff Palestine” on Google, I get 225.000 results. However, if I search “Latuff Israel”, I get 413.000 results. Thus, your idea of Latuff as a non-controversial artist of Palestinian children is quite wrong. I’m afraid you are violating the ]-rule this way. Regards, ] (]) 07:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 16:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} | |||
| ::To be clear, my reasoning is not emotional on this topic, I am neither a Jew nor an Arab, so justdontlikeit (which is not a rule, but an essay) doesn't apply to my argument, which is essentially rational. Also, your third point is questionable. Where is he better known as anti-Israel? Anglophone media, for sure, as Portuguese media doesn't portray him as an antisemite at all. That's bias, uncompatible with an encyclopedia that purports to be universal. Google searching isn't exactly science either. | |||
| == Excessive external links == | |||
| ::All in all, what I mean to say is that 1) hell yes, he's controversial 2) yes, he did draw up polemic cartoons 3) from an objetive perspective, the cartoon serves to illustrate his "controversialness". ''However'', the article is already pretty biased, and on a subjective level, the image only reinforces that view on the reader. ] (]) 17:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| We now have five links in the external links section. As per ], this is excessive. See ]: {{tq|Normally, only one official link is included. If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances. However, Misplaced Pages does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. Misplaced Pages does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites. Complete directories lead to clutter and to placing undue emphasis on what the subject says.}} Can we choose which one or two to include and delete the others? | |||
| :::Just like you, I’m not jewish or Arabic. However, I fail to see how the quality of someone’s opinion on this article needs to be based on ethnicity. Having said that, it is preferable to have a picture in an article that supports it. As you are saying above, the Gaza Boat –image reinforces the article. And that is what images should do in an encyclopedic article. | |||
| :A Google search yields this article as the first result at the twitter page as the second, so I guess it is the most popular official link. ]]] 20:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::As for the google-search: whether you use the English “Palestine” or the Portugese “Palestina” in the search: the number of results stay the same. So much for being universal. If you find some ] which proves otherwise, I’ll be happy to read it. | |||
| :::Finally: if you think that the article is biased… well, nobody stops you from editing it in a way that you consider to be better. But then again, since we agree that he ''is'' controversial, I doubt my proposed image will be out of place. Regards,] (]) 10:09, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Cuckolding fetish == | |||
| It is undisputed that the cartoon is drawn by Latuff, and that he is well known for such drawings. If the implications of those facts are unflattering to Latuff, then perhaps he should rethink what he draws, but it is not a blp violation to show latuff's work on latuff's article. Both images are appropriately licensed. Use them both, but there is certainly no policy based reason to exclude the ship image. (Consensus could certainly choose to exclude it, but thus far there does not seem to be such). ] (]) 14:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Context is important. If the article insinuates that he's antisemitic, then displaying images out of context could be used to reinforce these accusations. I'd rather see some kind of critical reception and sourced commentary on his work, rather than just throwing a bunch of controversial, politically incorrect images on the page and guiding readers to a certain viewpoint. ] (]) 01:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *I don't see a real problem with the image in question. It appears to be representative of the artist's work, and it doesn't look at all anti-Semitic—just anti-Israel. There's certainly no BLP violation involved. And personally, I'm not a fan of the Bombman.gif image. Maybe the broken English was intentional, but it doesn't reflect particularly well on him either way. --] (]) 18:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::The RfC is over for two weeks, and I think that the consensus is more on my side for reinserting the picture. Moreover, the article isn't edited in such a way that the boat-image would be out of place by now. I think it is safe to put the boat-picture back. Regards.] (]) 20:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: The octopus is a traditional symbol in anti-Semitic literature; see ] and ] for a couple examples. talks about the octopus's negative connotations even in contexts distant from the Jews.--] (]) 20:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I certainly don't disagree that the octopus has antisemetic overtones. Not sure what your argument was (include or don't include?) Certainly latuff has been acused of anti-semitism, and his use of traditional anti-semetic imagery is relevant to the sources that are discussing such allegations. ] (]) 20:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Before anyone revert my edit, he actually has many cartoons about this topic. | |||
| == The Predictable and Tired Old "Alleged Anti-Semitism" Section == | |||
| https://twitter.com/latuffcartoons/status/842577690322501632 | |||
| Anytime you read an article in Misplaced Pages about someone sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, there is always a 'Alleged Anti-Semitism' section, which repeats the same tired and generally false slanders against whoever the article is about. In this piece, as usual, it's just a propaganda technique by the pro-Israel side, with pretty thin evidence. I vote we just remove the whole section, or at least cut it down to a couple of pro-and anti-sentences, without a subhead. ] (]) 17:09, 28 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *I agree wholeheartedly with your argument, but as you can see in this talk page, even raising concerns about the flagrant POV can lead to heated discussions. I would suggest expanding other sections to reduce the weight of the accusations against him, which are currently disproportionately large in the article. ] (]) 22:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :If you don't see how depicting Jews as inhuman monsters who drink the blood of Palestinian babies and wear Nazi uniforms is anti-semitic you are either in denial or have no idea what anti-semitism is.] (]) 16:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :It really doesn't matter if the accusation is right or wrong The accusation (and counterarguments) have been discussed in many reliable sources and are certainly a notable part of Latuff's career and reputation. It falls very clearly under ] ] (]) 17:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :: And ] then? // ] (]) | |||
| https://twitter.com/latuffcartoons/status/842577690322501632 | |||
| :So ] has got a point in that the section in question further detracts from the already pretty low quality of this article. So I've just fucking got rid of it. If any of you ]] don't like it, then do a proper job of putting together a semi-coherent section that doesn't read like it's been blurted out by a spoilt prat in a hissy fit. | |||
| etc <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| We have a detailed section on allegations of antisemitism, sourced to high quality sources (Stephen Roth Institute, Kotek, AKdH) . The lead should summarize the article, and include mention of this, with a statement the Latuff himself disputes the claim. There is no BLP issue here. ] (]) 00:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :That's ] or borders vandalism --] (]) 09:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :These are rotten activist sources, who generally find *anyone* critical of Israel "anti-semitic". At the same time, we know that A: the finances activist sources are often murky, B: Israel is actively supporting pro-Israeli "Hasbara" editing. Make you own conclusion. At the same time, independent Jewish sources, like the Forward, clearly states that Carlos Latuff is ''not'' anti-semitic: who do you place in the lead: rrrrrrrright, the "activist" sources. This is a clear ]-violation, and I´m talking it to that board, ] (]) 21:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Now I’ve linked an academic article about this. It is not original research anymore. :-) ] (]) 18:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, because socialist newspapers are always neutral on the question of Israel? This is what Latuff is known for. its not a BLP concern to repeat what is WIDELY reported in reliable sources, and the bias of those reliable sources is not an issue, straight from the policy. We ] and ]. ] (]) 21:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::this ref is worth nothing as your claim is not supported + its in a foreign language without translation. --] (]) 19:33, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::"WIDELY reported in reliable sources", yet only purely activist sources like ], ] and ] are used in the article? And I would assume ] would be as concerned about anti-semitism as anyone, after all, that is basically the definition of it: that it hits ''each and every'' Jew, not only those with certain opinions. ] (]) 21:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} Non english sources are allowed, but it is in bounds to ask for a translation of the relevant portion. ]. {{u|Azuizo}} Please provide a quote of the relevant section in both the original language and English. ] (]) 23:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Do you have the faintest idea what the ] is? Click on the article and read. If after reading you still think it is a "rotten activist source", then let me suggest you are not fit to be editing in this topic area. ] (]) 22:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I´m basically interested in *one* thing here, and that is: ''who'' funds them? Wouldn´t that be convenient for those who rule in Israel, if all who criticise Israel were called anti-semites? ] (]) 22:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Let me repeat, since you apparently didn't bother to read what I wrote: Read the ] article. If, after reading it , you still think it is a "rotten activist source", then let me suggest you are not fit to be editing in this topic area, and I will probably take action to see to it that you don't. ] (]) 23:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::On *this* issue is it. On other issues, it might be different. And I´m soooooo sick of these threats "not fit to be editing in this topic area, and I will probably take action to see to it that you don't" etc. Either report me, or just shut up. ] (]) 23:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Expect to see yourself at AE in the upcoming weeks. Someone who thinks that an academic institution that is a research organ of one of the world's top 200 universities, which is focused on research of antisemitism is a "rotten activist source" on topics of antisemitism either does not understand wikipedia's policy on reliable sources well enough to be editing, period, or possibly worse, understands it well enough, but knowingly violates it when it comes to a specific topic because she wants to push a POV, in which case she should be topic banned. It will probably take me a few days to put together an AE case. Adios. ] (]) 23:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The ] seems(*) wp:rs to me but what does it say about Latuff ? In the article we can find 2 links dated back from 2003 and this doesn't concern particularly controversial problems. If the ] didn't publish anything any more about Latuff, that would mean they abandonned their charges against him. | |||
| :::::(*) Seems... Because it should be analysed what , a President of the United States in activity has to deal with academic researches on antisemitism... | |||
| :::::] (]) 03:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The title of this section is extremely offensive. Allegations of anti-Semitism are serious allegations. I have changed it to allegations of Racism since anti-Semitism is a form of racism. | |||
| It is hard to be civil in talking to racists and I expect them to be civil back.] (]) 13:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Restored section title. Do you have anything constructive to write about or is this just an attempt to heat-up the discussion? --] (]) 13:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : I find it incredibly racist to say that Portuguese is a “foreign” language. ] (]) 20:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC : Should the antisemitism bit be mentioned in the lede == | |||
| ::you do know this ''is'' the ''English'' wiki right? ] (]) 21:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion == | |||
| {{rfc|pol|hist|reli|soc|bio|media|rfcid=4880B22}} | |||
| The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: | |||
| '''Should the statement that some of Latuff's cartoons have been called antisemetic be included in the lede''' | |||
| * ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2019-07-02T00:51:29.067344 | UsElections Obama Latuff.png --> | |||
| Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 00:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Stance on Russia-Ukraine war == | |||
| ===Survey=== | |||
| * '''include''' ] and ]. These are well sourced allegations, covered in detail in the body of the article. The lead should serve as a mini-article and cover all major controversies. ] (]) 15:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''don't include''' per ] and ]. ] (]) 20:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''don't include''' pr Pikolas, ] (]) 21:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''include''' The accusations of antisemitism against Latuff's cartoons are a major issue in this article. The ] exists to summarize essential facts (including controversies).--] (]) 02:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''don't include''' Per ] it should be reported (as a controversy, not a fact) according to the material in the article. But the material in the article should before be challenged. Half can be immediately removed because it reports false information, is not from wp:rs or is not linked with Latuff's alleged's antisemitism. Then the attacks should be put in the context of the propaganda war in which any virulent opponent to Irael's policy, such as Latuff, is attacked for antisemitism. Given the huge controversy around this, compliance with ] is more important from my point of view and should be predominant. ] (]) 04:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Include''' per V and LEAD, his alleged antisemitism is widely reported and appears in this article. The lead should summarize the body. It should naturally follow BLP in how it's worded, but BLP doesn't mean "no criticism of a living person". ] (]) 18:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Do not include''' any form of one-sided/biased form of this allegation. I believe the variant before revert and protection presented both sides and was rather neutral, in this form I would '''support inclusion'''. --] (]) 19:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Do not include''' As per ] and ]' observations. ] (]) 07:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''include'''. Latuff is well known for this. ] (]) 10:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Include'''. It is well supported by sources that antisemitism is one of the main themes of his works, it is covered in the article and the lead should summarize it. ]]] 06:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The article clearly lacks any mentions of pro-russian sentiment shared by the subject. | |||
| ===Threaded discussion=== | |||
| Since 2014 he made several caricatures depicting Ukrainians in a dehumanizing way, | |||
| like this: | |||
| https://twitter.com/LatuffCartoons/status/1504505076290891778 | |||
| == Dubious information == | |||
| https://ms-my.facebook.com/internationalriot/photos/ukraine-antimaidan-euromaidanfrom-latuff-brasil/671544492901910/ | |||
| I, as a Ukrainian, find it offensive | |||
| I live in Belgium and I never heard about this : <nowiki>{{cite news |title=Report: Anti-Semitism Keystone of Belgian School Curriculum |date= September 18, 2013 |time=8:35 |url=http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/09/18/report-anti-semitism-keystone-of-belgian-school-curriculum/ |newspaper=Algemeiner.com}}</nowiki> whereas we have several organisations taking care of such problems. This would have "made the buzz". This source is not reliable and the information should be crossed by several other sources. ] (]) 03:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| He oftentimes dubbs the Russian narrative about "all Ukrainians are nazis", examples: | |||
| {{od}}{{u|Pluto2012}} There are several other sources, apparently the story was originally broken by the belgian magazine "Joods Actueel" apparently the sep 2013 issue. Here are other sources covering it tho | |||
| * http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/184136/belgium-teachers-urged-to-compare-israel-to-nazi-g/ | |||
| * http://www.timesofisrael.com/belgian-education-ministry-website-publishes-vicious-cartoon/ | |||
| * http://www.jta.org/2013/09/18/news-opinion/israel-middle-east/israel-compared-to-nazi-germany-on-belgian-education-ministrys-website | |||
| * and also pro-palestinian sources confirming the basic story (though obviously interpreting things differently) http://www.shoah.org.uk/2013/09/20/belgian-ministrys-fleeting-moments-of-truth-about-irahell/ | |||
| https://www.irancartoon.com/site/media/zartists/75a4d29f877cd51c3aba2fb049b8611b/carlos-latuff-26.jpg | |||
| The BCH published a letter in response to the incident, reprinted in english here http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3976/belgium-jew-hatred | |||
| https://twitter.com/LatuffCartoons/status/1181257040913686528 | |||
| From what the subject posts in social media, his Iran-China-Russia bias is obvious, and it should be pointed out in the article. ] (]) 21:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I am not in Belgium and my connexion to the internet is poor so I cannot check by myself but none of these sources complies with ] and certainly not the ''magazine'' Joodsactueel which is totally unknown. | |||
| :We have plenty of official newspapers in Belgium : ] (fr), ] (fr), ] (nl), ] (nl), (ans many many others). A few weeks ago we have had 6 weeks controversy about a 2 hours BDS manifestation. There are strong associations fighting antisemitism. I can tell you that if students should have analysed such a drawing the days of the commemoration of the Holocaust with such a roleplaying exercise, that would have made a scandal. There is 95% that all this is just the usual propaganda of some ill minds. ] (]) 03:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have just found 1 WP:RS about the story : , and indeed the story is different. | |||
| ::This image was indeed published on a database website BeCement that gathers suggestions of lessons from the Flemish Goverment <u>but also from</u> anybody who wants to publish some. And this Cartoon was indeed posted by somebody unknown and had nothing to deal with the Official Flemish Government. the CCOJB Association complained about this officialy. It was removed immediately when the webmasters were informed. As usual, the important nuances are not reported in the Jewish and Israeli media. The attacks against the Flemish Government are not acceptable and the information is false. | |||
| ::This drawing and the information around this must be removed. ] (]) 04:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::"As usual" "the Jewish and Israeli media" can be and often are RS, as in this case both the Times of Israel and the Forward. You on the other hand are not RS and what you tell us about Belgium and the truthfulness of information printed in RS has no weight whatsoever. Interesting that you want the image removed. Did Latuf not draw it? ] (]) 05:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The fact that Latuf drew it is not the question. | |||
| :::: is wp:rs on this topic and the accusations reported by the other sources given here above are just false. | |||
| :::: ] (]) 07:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I'm sure you meant there's a controversy and we need to report what all RS said in an NPOV manner? I like how you keep repeating the "just false" thing as if you have some kind of firsthand knowledge here, or like it would matter even if you did. ] (]) 17:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::There is no controversy. The other sources LIE by omission. That is a perfect exemple of the fact that Jewish magazine and Israeli newspapers, even Times of Israel are NOT WP:RS and should be treated as such. ] (]) 14:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::That kind of statement is a perfect example of something someone who shouldn't be editing this topic area would say. Too bad the admins here care nothing about the integrity of the encyclopedia. ] (]) 21:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::<br/> | |||
| ::::::Lots of RS have reported what turned out to be untrue. When that is established, then we don´t go on reporting those false stories. That 260 people were murdered in the Deir Yassin massacre is a good example: none of the "regulars" here would write that (even if there are hundreds of WP:RS which say so): we now know that number to be too high. I don´t read French, but I take Pluto´s word for the lavenir.net story, ] (]) 17:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::That's an awful comparison. It's not like historians dug into this case and came to a much supported conclusion. Pluto didn't like what he read in the "Jewish and Israeli media" and found something he likes more in a Belgian paper. Now he declares what's true and what's false. The only thing guiding him here is what he'd like to truth to be. ] (]) 17:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::The thing is, (and I´m sorry to say this) but the Israeli press often makes a distorted picture about countries in Europe, and our apparent massive anti-semitism. (Yes, I live in Europe, too) Look at this discussion: ], to get an understanding on how some of that looks from outside Israel/US: "crazy", "vile and conspirator", etc, ] (]) 18:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::The thing is, (and I'm sorry to say this) but the European press often downplays the amount of anti-semitism in Europe. Tell me, have Jews been murdered recently in the country where you live, for being Jews (I can't remember in which Scandinavian country you live, but the odds are 3:1)? Do Jewish kindergartens need protection from violence in your city (if there even are any left)? Are there places where someone identifiable as a Jew can't walk without being molested near your house? You're the ones who don't understand how you look from the outside. And you glibly dismiss any concerns Jews might have about what's going on as "vile and conspirator". It's sad, really, but not surprising historically. | |||
| :::::::::But none of this is relevant here. The "Jewish and Israeli" press is considered RS here, like it or not. | |||
| :::::::::All that said, I just had a look and the caption on that image is not at all NPOV. It states as fact that it was used in primary education. It should say it was posted on a website used by the Belgian whatever, but they say it was in a user content generated area and was removed. Or something like that. ] (]) 18:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::The caption of the image is just traditionnial propaganda bullshiet and should be treated as such. The image can remain. It was drawn by Latuf. ] (]) 14:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} | |||
| *If you had read everything in the link above, you would have seen that it was actually the Jews of Norway who protested most strongly against what some Jerusalem-based people wrote about anti-semitism in Norway. And I have never, ''ever'' seen ms Anne Sender, the then elected leader of the Jewish community of Norway, as angry as when the Israeli ambassador to Norway played the role as a "spokesperson" for the Jews of Norway. The Jews of Scandinavia are *quite* capable of speaking for themselves, thank-you-very-much. What ''they'' say about anti-semitism in Scandinavia: now, *that* I will listen to, any day. What people in Jerusalem say about it: not so much. | |||
| *Back to the cartoon: I agree, that the caption should be changed "to posted in a user content generated area and was removed" etc. The question then remains: is this notable? To me it sounds extremely trivial? ] (]) 19:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::''They said'' it was in a user content generated area. That's their POV. The newspapers say it was on the site in general. That's their POV. NPOV requires we show both. I don't think it's trivial that this kind of crap gets to be displayed on a resource for teachers in Belgium. I think it's also a good example of the kind of cartoons Latuf produces and the controversy they generate, including when used by others. ] (]) 20:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree completely and it's a shame that it's not mentioned in the article. Do you know of any reliable sources so we can put it in? ] (]) 21:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| With the additional information from the new articles on this topic, I think we should change the way the material is presented. It is probably no longer correct to say that it was "featured in curriculum", which is sort of a ] against the Belgian educators (although ] is probably big enough to have this not be an issue). However, the revised version of events is further support that some of Latuff's Cartoons are considered antisemetic by many (including in this case the Belgian educators/website, who removed it when notified of it) ] (]) 14:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :It was indeed considered antisemitic but the idea that comparing Israel today to the Nazi regime would be antisemite is controversial and not shared by everybody. ] (]) 14:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Such discrepancy is handled by ] and ]. ] (]) 15:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::I agree with you. In the current situation, both points of view exist so it is a matter of ]. If the section is kept and/or developed and WP:CONSENUS considers WP:DUE WEIGHT is to keep all this, the picture could receive per WP:NPOV a caption such as : ''exemple of controversial cartoon by Latuff for which he is accused by some of antisemitism whereas other considers this accusation as part of the policy to attack for antisemitism virulent opponents to the policy of Israel'' (and as long as everything is sourced!). ] (]) 06:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:15, 3 August 2024
| Skip to table of contents |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carlos Latuff article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Markaberk.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Excessive external links
We now have five links in the external links section. As per WP:EXT, this is excessive. See WP:ELMINOFFICIAL: Normally, only one official link is included. If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances. However, Misplaced Pages does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. Misplaced Pages does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites. Complete directories lead to clutter and to placing undue emphasis on what the subject says.
Can we choose which one or two to include and delete the others?
- A Google search yields this article as the first result at the twitter page as the second, so I guess it is the most popular official link. “WarKosign” 20:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Cuckolding fetish
Before anyone revert my edit, he actually has many cartoons about this topic.
https://twitter.com/latuffcartoons/status/842577690322501632
https://twitter.com/latuffcartoons/status/842577690322501632
etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azuizo (talk • contribs) 05:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- That's WP:OR or borders vandalism --Denniss (talk) 09:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Now I’ve linked an academic article about this. It is not original research anymore. :-) Azuizo (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- this ref is worth nothing as your claim is not supported + its in a foreign language without translation. --Denniss (talk) 19:33, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Now I’ve linked an academic article about this. It is not original research anymore. :-) Azuizo (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Non english sources are allowed, but it is in bounds to ask for a translation of the relevant portion. Misplaced Pages:Verifiability#Non-English_sources. Azuizo Please provide a quote of the relevant section in both the original language and English. ResultingConstant (talk) 23:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- I find it incredibly racist to say that Portuguese is a “foreign” language. Azuizo (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- you do know this is the English wiki right? ResultingConstant (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance on Russia-Ukraine war
The article clearly lacks any mentions of pro-russian sentiment shared by the subject. Since 2014 he made several caricatures depicting Ukrainians in a dehumanizing way, like this:
https://twitter.com/LatuffCartoons/status/1504505076290891778 https://ms-my.facebook.com/internationalriot/photos/ukraine-antimaidan-euromaidanfrom-latuff-brasil/671544492901910/
I, as a Ukrainian, find it offensive
He oftentimes dubbs the Russian narrative about "all Ukrainians are nazis", examples:
https://www.irancartoon.com/site/media/zartists/75a4d29f877cd51c3aba2fb049b8611b/carlos-latuff-26.jpg https://twitter.com/LatuffCartoons/status/1181257040913686528
From what the subject posts in social media, his Iran-China-Russia bias is obvious, and it should be pointed out in the article. Choomaque (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree completely and it's a shame that it's not mentioned in the article. Do you know of any reliable sources so we can put it in? 84.148.208.43 (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Brazil articles
- Low-importance Brazil articles
- C-Class arts in Brazil articles
- Low-importance arts in Brazil articles
- Arts in Brazil task force articles
- C-Class government and laws of Brazil articles
- Low-importance government and laws of Brazil articles
- Government and laws of Brazil task force articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Low-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- C-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Comics creators articles
- Comics creators work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles