Revision as of 07:02, 27 September 2015 editAlstah (talk | contribs)425 edits →Significant Legal Work← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:02, 8 August 2024 edit undoLilianaUwU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,686 editsm spamTag: Rollback | ||
(37 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Australian law firm}} | |||
{{AFC submission|d|reason|The majority of the references centre around the PR for the merger(s). While this may have been a significant event for the org it is not particularly useful in establishing the passing of ] and smacks of ], the more so since it is the self same story rehashed over and over again. | |||
The org cannot inherit notability from its client list. So.me may say that by listing the clients it is touting for business here, is placing an advert. | |||
It is likely that this org passes ], but this article does not yet pass muster. There has to be something more than the fact if its existence to make it notable. | |||
Part of that is referencing. We require references from ''significant'' coverage ''about'' the topic of the article, and ''independent'' of it, and ''in ]'' please. See ]. Please also see ] which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and ] which has clear limitations on self published sources.|u=Alstah|ns=118|decliner=Timtrent|declinets=20150926124123|ts=20150926085103}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> | |||
{{AFC submission|d|corp|u=Alstah|ns=118|decliner=Dodger67|declinets=20150926074804|small=yes|ts=20150926034327}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> | |||
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2015}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2015}} | ||
{{Infobox Law Firm | {{Infobox Law Firm | ||
| firm_name = Thomson Geer | | firm_name = Thomson Geer | ||
| firm_logo = ] | | firm_logo = ] | ||
| num_offices = |
| num_offices = 6<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/sme-law/25834-law-firm-scoops-up-another-to-drive-perth-market-share |title=Law firm scoops up another to drive Perth market share |publisher=lawyersweekly.com.au |date=2019-06-13 |accessdate=2021-05-10}}</ref> | ||
| headquarters = |
| headquarters = Level 14, 60 Martin Place <br /> ] | ||
| num_employees = | | num_employees = | ||
| practice_areas = Full service commercial law<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/15112-exclusive-herbert-geer-and-hwl-ebsworth-had-merger |title=Exclusive: Herbert Geer and HWL Ebsworth had merger talks |publisher=Lawyersweekly.com.au |date=2014-02-14 |accessdate=2015-09-26}}</ref> | | practice_areas = Full service commercial law<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/15112-exclusive-herbert-geer-and-hwl-ebsworth-had-merger |title=Exclusive: Herbert Geer and HWL Ebsworth had merger talks |publisher=Lawyersweekly.com.au |date=2014-02-14 |accessdate=2015-09-26}}</ref> | ||
| key_people = (]) | | key_people = (]) | ||
| revenue = ] $ |
| revenue = ] $175 million | ||
| date_founded = 1885<ref name="bloomberg.com"> |
| date_founded = 1885<ref name="bloomberg.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=126901489|title=Thomson Geer: Private Company Information - Businessweek|work=Businessweek.com}}</ref> | ||
| founder = | | founder = | ||
| company_type = ] | | company_type = ] | ||
Line 25: | Line 16: | ||
| homepage = www.tglaw.com.au | | homepage = www.tglaw.com.au | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Thomson Geer''' is an independent Australian commercial law firm founded in 1885.<ref name="bloomberg.com" |
'''Thomson Geer''' is an independent Australian commercial law firm founded in 1885.<ref name="bloomberg.com"/><ref name="legalbusinessonline.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.legalbusinessonline.com/news/thomson-playford-cutlers-watermark-re-brand/58934|title=Thomson Playford Cutlers, Watermark re-brand|work=Legalbusinessonline.com}}</ref> Its predecessor firms included Thomsons Lawyers and Herbert Geer.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-and-herbert-geer-merger-focuses-on-midlevel-20140213-ixsnk|title=Thomsons and Herbert Geer merger focuses on mid-level|work=Financial Review|access-date=26 September 2015|archive-date=27 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927115759/http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-and-herbert-geer-merger-focuses-on-midlevel-20140213-ixsnk|url-status=dead}}</ref> The firm operates a full commercial law service as a fully integrated national firm with offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and Canberra.<ref name="legal500.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.legal500.com/firms/34159/34456|title=The Legal 500|work=Legal500.com}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Thomson Geer |first= |date=2023-03-14 |title=Home- Thomson Geer |url=https://www.tglaw.com.au/ |access-date=2021-05-10 |website=Thomson Geer company website |language=en-gb}}</ref> It is one of the top ten firms in the country by revenue, and the seventh largest firm in Australia by headcount.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.thelawyer.com/news/regions/asia-pacific-news/australian-mid-market-firms-merge-to-form-thomson-geer/3016314.article |title=Archived copy |access-date=26 September 2015 |archive-date=27 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927075547/http://www.thelawyer.com/news/regions/asia-pacific-news/australian-mid-market-firms-merge-to-form-thomson-geer/3016314.article |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
], Thomson Geer’s Melbourne office]] | ], Thomson Geer’s Melbourne office]] | ||
Thomson Geer was formed on 31 March 2014 as a merger of two mid-tier Australian practices, Thomson Lawyers and Herbert Geer.<ref>http://www.asialawprofiles.com/JurisdictionFirm/10300/1/Thomson-Geer.html</ref> The result was a firm with annual revenue in excess of $120 million, and the seventh largest firm in Australia by headcount.<ref>http://www.iflr1000.com/newsandanalysis/australian-firms-thomsons-lawyers-and-herbert-geer-combine-to-form-thomson-geer/index/166</ref><ref>http://www.australasianlawyer.com.au/news/here-to-win-thomson-geer-190368.aspx?keyword=thomson%20geer</ref> | Thomson Geer was formed on 31 March 2014 as a merger of two mid-tier Australian practices, Thomson Lawyers and Herbert Geer.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asialawprofiles.com/JurisdictionFirm/10300/1/Thomson-Geer.html|title=Thomson Geer - Australia - Asialaw Profiles - Law firm recommendations|work=Asialawprofiles.com|access-date=27 September 2015|archive-date=27 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927174149/http://www.asialawprofiles.com/JurisdictionFirm/10300/1/Thomson-Geer.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The result was a firm with annual revenue in excess of $120 million, and the seventh largest firm in Australia by headcount.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iflr1000.com/newsandanalysis/australian-firms-thomsons-lawyers-and-herbert-geer-combine-to-form-thomson-geer/index/166|title=Australian firms Thomsons Lawyers and Herbert Geer combine to form Tho|work=Iflr1000.com|access-date=27 September 2015|archive-date=28 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150928025019/http://www.iflr1000.com/newsandanalysis/australian-firms-thomsons-lawyers-and-herbert-geer-combine-to-form-thomson-geer/index/166|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.australasianlawyer.com.au/news/here-to-win-thomson-geer-190368.aspx?keyword=thomson%20geer|title=Here to win: Thomson Geer|author=Aidan Devine|work=Australasian Lawyer}}</ref> | ||
===Thomsons Lawyers=== | ===Thomsons Lawyers=== | ||
Thomsons Lawyers was an incarnation of a number of prominent boutique firms throughout Australia that merged.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/><ref name="austlii.edu.au">http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/1989/7.pdf</ref> The firm's origins date back to 1885 when Hiram Wentworth Varley and Griffith Mostyn Evan began practice under the name of 'Varley & Evan'.<ref name="austlii.edu.au"/> In 1913 they were joined by Harry Thomson KC, and the name changed to 'Varley Evan & Thomson', the first of a succession of 'Thomson' firms, such as Thomsons Solicitors & Barristers, Thomson Simmons & Co and later, Thomson Playford.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/><ref name="austlii.edu.au"/> | Thomsons Lawyers was an incarnation of a number of prominent boutique firms throughout Australia that merged.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/><ref name="austlii.edu.au">{{cite web|url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/1989/7.pdf |title=University of Adelaide Law Library Sponsors Note}} (1989) 12(1) Adelaide Law Review 89.</ref> The firm's origins date back to 1885 when Hiram Wentworth Varley and Griffith Mostyn Evan began practice under the name of 'Varley & Evan'.<ref name="austlii.edu.au"/> In 1913 they were joined by Harry Thomson KC, and the name changed to 'Varley Evan & Thomson', the first of a succession of 'Thomson' firms, such as Thomsons Solicitors & Barristers, Thomson Simmons & Co and later, Thomson Playford.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/><ref name="austlii.edu.au"/> | ||
In 2006, Thomson Playford established a Sydney practice by merging with Cowley Hearne a North Sydney-based boutique founded in the 1960s.<ref>http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/1625-thomson-playford-s-growth-leaves-adelaide-behind</ref><ref>http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/8051-cowley-hearne-loses-cowley-but-keeps-hearne</ref> In 2008, Thomson Playford merged with Sydney CBD based boutique, Cutler, Hughes & Harris, becoming Thomson Playford Cutlers.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/><ref>http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/sa-business-journal/law-firm-announces-another-merger/story-e6fredel-1111118709388 | In 2006, Thomson Playford established a Sydney practice by merging with Cowley Hearne a North Sydney-based boutique founded in the 1960s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/1625-thomson-playford-s-growth-leaves-adelaide-behind|title=Thomson Playford's growth leaves Adelaide behind|author=|work=Lawyersweekly.com.au|date=2 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/8051-cowley-hearne-loses-cowley-but-keeps-hearne|title=Cowley Hearne loses Cowley but keeps Hearne|author=|work=Lawyersweekly.com.au|date=3 March 2012}}</ref> In 2008, Thomson Playford merged with Sydney CBD based boutique, Cutler, Hughes & Harris, becoming Thomson Playford Cutlers.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/><ref> | ||
</ref> Later that year, the firm controversially poached the entire Melbourne practice of national mid-tier firm, Dibbs Abbott Stillman.<ref>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/new-chief-seeks-thomson-playford-cutlers-synergies/story-e6frg97x-1225699708002</ref><ref name="lawyersweekly.com.au">http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/4112-dibbsbarker-unveiled-as-new-firm-identity</ref> This prompted Dibbs Abbott Stillman to rename itself to Dibbs Barker.<ref name="lawyersweekly.com.au"/> In 2010, the firm rebranded to Thomsons Lawyers.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/> | {{dead link|date=November 2021}}</ref> Later that year, the firm controversially poached the entire Melbourne practice of national mid-tier firm, Dibbs Abbott Stillman.<ref> {{dead link|date=November 2021}}</ref><ref name="lawyersweekly.com.au">{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/4112-dibbsbarker-unveiled-as-new-firm-identity|title=DibbsBarker unveiled as new firm identity|author=|work=Lawyersweekly.com.au|date=3 March 2012}}</ref> This prompted Dibbs Abbott Stillman to rename itself to Dibbs Barker.<ref name="lawyersweekly.com.au"/> In 2010, the firm rebranded to Thomsons Lawyers.<ref name="legalbusinessonline.com"/> | ||
In 2011, Thomsons Lawyers expanded to Brisbane, with 10 partners and 51 professional and support staff defecting from ] to establish the Brisbane practice.<ref>http://www.afr.com/news/policy/industrial-relations/thomsons-debuts-in-brisbane-with-rival-talent-20110314-iu6tm</ref><ref>http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-poaches-10-from-dla-phillips-fox-20110317-ij3bx</ref><ref>http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/lawyers-make-tracks-to-join-thompsons/story-e6freqmx-1226050116968</ref> | In 2011, Thomsons Lawyers expanded to Brisbane, with 10 partners and 51 professional and support staff defecting from ] to establish the Brisbane practice.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.afr.com/news/policy/industrial-relations/thomsons-debuts-in-brisbane-with-rival-talent-20110314-iu6tm|title=Thomsons debuts in Brisbane with rival talent|work=Financial Review|date=14 March 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-poaches-10-from-dla-phillips-fox-20110317-ij3bx|title=Thomsons poaches 10 from DLA Phillips Fox|work=Financial Review|date=17 March 2011}}</ref><ref> {{dead link|date=November 2021}}</ref> | ||
Prior to the 2014 merger with Herbert Geer, Thomsons experienced significant growth since 2009, with revenue and average profit per partner, tripling.<ref>http://www.australasianlawyer.com.au/news/here-to-win-thomson-geer-190368.aspx</ref> | Prior to the 2014 merger with Herbert Geer, Thomsons experienced significant growth since 2009, with revenue and average profit per partner, tripling.<ref name="aidandevine">{{cite web|url=http://www.australasianlawyer.com.au/news/here-to-win-thomson-geer-190368.aspx|title=Here to win: Thomson Geer|author=Aidan Devine|work=Australasian Lawyer}}</ref> | ||
===Herbert Geer=== | ===Herbert Geer=== | ||
], Thomson Geer’s Brisbane offices]] | ], Thomson Geer’s Brisbane offices]] | ||
Herbert Geer was a Melbourne |
Herbert Geer was a Melbourne-based law firm founded in 1939 when Keith Geer commenced his sole practice in Bank Place, off Collins Street, Melbourne. Temporarily suspending practice during the Second World War, he was joined by Geoffrey Herbert in 1946. In 1950 the partnership expanded further with the addition of Eric Rundell and in 1960 it assumed the name, Herbert Geer & Rundle.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/mid-market/mid_market_merger_thomsons_lawyers_NuPanGBhOfgBGMvHxOXniI|title=Mid-market merger: Thomsons Lawyers, Herbert Geer eye tie-up|work=BRW|access-date=26 September 2015|archive-date=27 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927065848/http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/mid-market/mid_market_merger_thomsons_lawyers_NuPanGBhOfgBGMvHxOXniI|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 1962, the Melbourne office relocated to 113 William Street, taking with it a total of ten partners and staff. Between 1962 and 1970, three small practices were absorbed into Herbert Geer & Rundle; Farmer & Ramsay, William & Matthews and the office of Cyril Brooks. | ||
The firm achieved publicity in the early 1970s by handling the defendant’s litigation for all workers' compensation claims arising from the ] collapse. Further office relocations occurred with moves to Owen Dixon Chambers and BHP House before arriving at the State Bank Building in 1983 when the firm had 12 partners and 110 staff. In April 1999, Herbert Geer & Rundle opened a Sydney office and expanded to Brisbane in early 2001.<ref name="afr.com">http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-lawyers-herbert-geer-eye-merger-20130808-j0iq0</ref> | The firm achieved publicity in the early 1970s by handling the defendant’s litigation for all workers' compensation claims arising from the ] collapse. Further office relocations occurred with moves to Owen Dixon Chambers and BHP House before arriving at the State Bank Building in 1983 when the firm had 12 partners and 110 staff. In April 1999, Herbert Geer & Rundle opened a Sydney office and expanded to Brisbane in early 2001.<ref name="afr.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-lawyers-herbert-geer-eye-merger-20130808-j0iq0|title=Thomsons Lawyers, Herbert Geer eye merger|work=Financial Review|access-date=26 September 2015|archive-date=27 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927115309/http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/investment-banking/thomsons-lawyers-herbert-geer-eye-merger-20130808-j0iq0|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
In 2008 the firm rebranded as Herbert Geer.<ref>http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/4586-rebranding-all-the-rage</ref> At the same time it joined with Brisbane firm Nicol Robinson Halletts Lawyers, as well as the boutique construction firm RDK in Sydney.<ref>http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/herbert-geer-amp-amp-rundle-and-nicol-robinson-hal</ref> | In 2008 the firm rebranded as Herbert Geer.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/4586-rebranding-all-the-rage|title=Rebranding all the rage|author=|work=Lawyersweekly.com.au|date=3 March 2012}}</ref> At the same time it joined with Brisbane firm Nicol Robinson Halletts Lawyers, as well as the boutique construction firm RDK in Sydney.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/herbert-geer-amp-amp-rundle-and-nicol-robinson-hal|title=Herbert Geer & Rundle and Nicol Robinson Halletts join forces|author=|work=Lawyersweekly.com.au}}</ref> | ||
Prior to the merger with Thomson Lawyers, Herbert Geer’s partnership had fallen by 28% from 53 partners to 38 in the preceding 3 years, due to lateral defections.<ref name="afr.com"/> | Prior to the merger with Thomson Lawyers, Herbert Geer’s partnership had fallen by 28% from 53 partners to 38 in the preceding 3 years, due to lateral defections.<ref name="afr.com"/> | ||
==Significant |
==Significant legal work== | ||
In 2022, Thomson Geer successfully defended former Prime Minister ], the 46th NSW Premier ], Liberal Party federal president ] and others in the ] intervention regarding the management of its NSW Division.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Thomson Geer successfully defends Scott Morrison, Dominic Perrottet and other senior members of the Liberal Party of Australia in the NSW Court of Appeal and High Court of Australia |url=https://www.tglaw.com.au/corporate/news/thomson-geer-successfully-defends-federal-liberal-party-candidate-intervention/ |website=Thomson Geer - News}}</ref> These cases were heard in the ], the ] and the ]. Notably, the ruling of the New South Wales Court of Appeal is the leading precedent in Australia on the justiciability of disputes arising out of the constitutions of unincorporated political parties.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-05-09 |title=Thomson Geer successfully defends Scott Morrison, Dominic Perrottet and other senior members of the Liberal Party of Australia in the NSW Court of Appeal and High Court of Australia |url=https://www.tglaw.com.au/corporate/news/thomson-geer-successfully-defends-federal-liberal-party-candidate-intervention/ |website=Thomson Geer - News}}</ref> | |||
In 2015, Thomson Geer defended ] and other ] such as ] and ] in Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited<ref> FCA 317 |
In 2015, Thomson Geer defended ] and other ] such as ] and ] in ''Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited'',<ref> FCA 317</ref><ref>{{cite AustLII|FCA|317|2015|litigants=Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited |date=7 April 2015) |courtname=auto}}.</ref> a case brought in the ] by ] for breach of copyright laws.<ref>{{cite web|author=Lia Timson |url=http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/digital-life-news/telstra-optus-not-worth-chasing-in-dallas-buyers-club-piracy-crackdown-lawyers-20141023-11az39.html |title=Telstra, Optus not worth chasing in Dallas Buyers Club piracy crackdown: lawyers |publisher=Smh.com.au |date=2015-09-22 |accessdate=2015-09-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-14/iinet-dallas-buyers-club/6697314 |title=Dallas Buyers Club: Federal Court backs ISPs in row over illegal downloads - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) |publisher=Abc.net.au |date=2015-08-14 |accessdate=2015-09-26}}</ref> The case set legal precedence in Australia, whereby copyright holders can gain access to the details of internet users who illegally obtain their copyright material.<ref>{{cite web |author=Harry Tucker |url=http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/dallas-buyers-club-will-have-to-pay-bond-for-details-on-australian-pirates-court-rules/story-fnjwneld-1227483227372 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150815025030/http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/dallas-buyers-club-will-have-to-pay-bond-for-details-on-australian-pirates-court-rules/story-fnjwneld-1227483227372 |url-status=dead |archive-date=15 August 2015 |title=Dallas Buyers Club pirates identities kept private, for now |publisher=News.com.au |date=2015-08-14 |accessdate=2015-09-26 }}</ref> This will lead to individuals in breach of copyright be liable to damages by copyright holders.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.australasianlawyer.com.au/news/federal-court-rules-on-dallas-buyers-club-downloaders-204314.aspx |title=Federal Court rules on Dallas Buyers club downloaders |publisher=Australasianlawyer.com.au |date=2015-08-14 |accessdate=2015-09-26}}</ref> Thomson Geer successfully argued that any damages must only be compensatory and not exemplary, like in the United States.<ref>{{cite web|author=Paul Bibby and Hannah Francis |url=http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/digital-life-news/dallas-buyers-club-dealt-major-blow-in-federal-court-iinet-piracy-case-20150813-giyyd7.html |title=Dallas Buyers Club dealt major blow in Federal Court iiNet piracy case |publisher=Smh.com.au |date=2015-09-22 |accessdate=2015-09-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.afr.com/technology/dallas-buyers-club-court-rules-in-favour-of-films-illegal-downloaders-20150813-giyxd3|title=Dallas Buyers Club: Court rules in favour of film's illegal downloaders|work=Financial Review|date=13 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-14/iinet-dallas-buyers-club/6697314|title=Dallas Buyers Club: Federal Court backs ISPs in row over illegal downloads|work=ABC News|date=14 August 2015}}</ref> | ||
In 2013, Thomsons successfully acted for the Plaintiffs in the Maiden Civil Case in Australia under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA).<ref>http://www.corrs.com.au/thinking/insights/when-a-security-interest-beats-legal-title-only-under-the-ppsa/</ref><ref>https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/54a63a743004de94513dacb8</ref> The case established that the ] has been displaced in Australia where the PPSA applies, and businesses that lease personal property must declare their interests under the ], to maintain a priority.<ref>http://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/insights/legal-briefings/key-ppsa-decision-nswsc-confirms-vesting-of-unperfected</ref><ref>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/4_july_2013/20130704/personal_property_securities_the_importance_of_registration.page</ref> | In 2013, Thomsons successfully acted for the Plaintiffs in the Maiden Civil Case in Australia under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.corrs.com.au/thinking/insights/when-a-security-interest-beats-legal-title-only-under-the-ppsa/|title=When a security interest beats legal title - Only under the PPSA » Corrs Chambers Westgarth|work=Corrs.com.au}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/54a63a743004de94513dacb8|title=In the matter of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd; Richard Albarran and Blair Alexander Pleash as receivers and managers of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd & Ors v Queensland Excavation Services Pty Ltd & Ors - NSW Caselaw|work=Nsw.gov.au}}</ref> The case established that the ] has been displaced in Australia where the PPSA applies, and businesses that lease personal property must declare their interests under the ], to maintain a priority.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/insights/legal-briefings/key-ppsa-decision-nswsc-confirms-vesting-of-unperfected|title=Herbert Smith Freehills - Key PPSA decision: NSWSC confirms vesting of unperfected lessor's interest following insolvency of lessee|work=Herbertsmithfreehills.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/4_july_2013/20130704/personal_property_securities_the_importance_of_registration.page|title=Personal Property Securities: the importance of registration - Clayton Utz|work=Clayton Utz}}</ref> | ||
In 2011, Thomsons advised the Mitchell Group on the $1.2 billion Fitzroy Coal Terminal Project, which created coal chain supply infrastructure capable to transporting 22 million tonnes of coal per annum to and from Central Queensland.<ref>http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/deals/9498-thomsons-lawyers-and-mallesons-advise-on-billion-d</ref><ref>http://www.ftproject.com.au/</ref> The project created significant concerns about potential damage to the ], and in 2014 the project was indefinitely put on hold<ref>http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-04/decision-to-move-proposed-coal-terminal-cold/5571490</ref> | In 2011, Thomsons advised the Mitchell Group on the $1.2 billion Fitzroy Coal Terminal Project, which created coal chain supply infrastructure capable to transporting 22 million tonnes of coal per annum to and from Central Queensland.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/deals/9498-thomsons-lawyers-and-mallesons-advise-on-billion-d|title=Thomsons Lawyers and Mallesons advise on billion dollar Fitzroy Project|author=|work=Lawyersweekly.com.au|date=4 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ftproject.com.au/|title=Fitzroy Terminal - Home|work=Ftproject.com.au|access-date=27 September 2015|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304093522/http://www.ftproject.com.au/|url-status=dead}}</ref> The project created significant concerns about potential damage to the ], and in 2014 the project was indefinitely put on hold<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-04/decision-to-move-proposed-coal-terminal-cold/5571490|title=Decision to move proposed coal terminal cold comfort to Keppel Fitzroy Delta Alliance|work=ABC News|date=4 July 2014}}</ref> | ||
In 2010, Herbert Geer successfully argued that State Parliaments cannot prevent State Supreme Courts from issuing prerogative relief for jurisdictional error in the landmark High Court |
In 2010, Herbert Geer successfully argued that State Parliaments cannot prevent State Supreme Courts from issuing prerogative relief for jurisdictional error, in the landmark ] case of ''Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales''.<ref>(2010) 239 CLR 531</ref><ref>{{cite AustLII|HCA|1|2010|litigants=Kirk v Industrial Court of NSW |parallelcite=(2010) 239 ] 531 |courtname=auto |date=3 February 2010}}.</ref> The case set a significant precedent in administrative and constitutional law that ] of the ] protects the integrity of State Supreme Courts.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sydney.edu.au/law/our-research/publications/sydney-law-review.html|title=Sydney Law Review|website=The University of Sydney}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/government_insights/20100412/the_demise_of_state_privative_clauses_kirk_v_industrial_court_of_new_south_wales.page|title=Government Insights - Clayton Utz|work=Clayton Utz}}</ref> | ||
==Offices== | ==Offices== | ||
⚫ | Thomson Geer has six offices across Australia.<ref name="legal500.com"/> The firm is headquartered in Sydney, at 60 Martin Place.<ref name="tglaw4">{{cite web|date=|title=Contact Us|url=https://www.tglaw.com.au/contact-us/|website=Tglaw.com.au}}</ref> The Melbourne office is located at ] on 525 Collins Street, the Brisbane office is in ], the Adelaide office is on 19 Gouger Street, the Perth office is locate at Exchange Tower, 2 The Esplanade and the Canberra office is located at 33-35 Ainslie Place.<ref name="tglaw4" /><ref name=":0" /> | ||
⚫ | Thomson Geer has |
||
==Main practice areas== | |||
*Banking & Finance | |||
*Competition & Regulation | |||
*Construction & Projects | |||
*Corporate & Advisory | |||
*Environment & Planning | |||
*Insurance | |||
*Intellectual Property | |||
*Litigation & Dispute Resolution | |||
*Mergers & Acquisitions | |||
*Property | |||
*Restructuring & Insolvency | |||
*Superannuation & Wealth Management | |||
*Tax | |||
*Technology | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist |
{{reflist}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*http://www.tglaw.com.au | * | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Thomson Geer}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Thomson Geer}} | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
{{AFC submission|||ts=20150927064053|u=Alstah|ns=118}} |
Latest revision as of 01:02, 8 August 2024
Australian law firm
Headquarters | Level 14, 60 Martin Place Sydney, Australia |
---|---|
No. of offices | 6 |
Major practice areas | Full service commercial law |
Key people | Adrian Tembel (CEO) |
Revenue | $175 million |
Date founded | 1885 |
Company type | Partnership |
Website | www.tglaw.com.au |
Thomson Geer is an independent Australian commercial law firm founded in 1885. Its predecessor firms included Thomsons Lawyers and Herbert Geer. The firm operates a full commercial law service as a fully integrated national firm with offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and Canberra. It is one of the top ten firms in the country by revenue, and the seventh largest firm in Australia by headcount.
History
Thomson Geer was formed on 31 March 2014 as a merger of two mid-tier Australian practices, Thomson Lawyers and Herbert Geer. The result was a firm with annual revenue in excess of $120 million, and the seventh largest firm in Australia by headcount.
Thomsons Lawyers
Thomsons Lawyers was an incarnation of a number of prominent boutique firms throughout Australia that merged. The firm's origins date back to 1885 when Hiram Wentworth Varley and Griffith Mostyn Evan began practice under the name of 'Varley & Evan'. In 1913 they were joined by Harry Thomson KC, and the name changed to 'Varley Evan & Thomson', the first of a succession of 'Thomson' firms, such as Thomsons Solicitors & Barristers, Thomson Simmons & Co and later, Thomson Playford.
In 2006, Thomson Playford established a Sydney practice by merging with Cowley Hearne a North Sydney-based boutique founded in the 1960s. In 2008, Thomson Playford merged with Sydney CBD based boutique, Cutler, Hughes & Harris, becoming Thomson Playford Cutlers. Later that year, the firm controversially poached the entire Melbourne practice of national mid-tier firm, Dibbs Abbott Stillman. This prompted Dibbs Abbott Stillman to rename itself to Dibbs Barker. In 2010, the firm rebranded to Thomsons Lawyers.
In 2011, Thomsons Lawyers expanded to Brisbane, with 10 partners and 51 professional and support staff defecting from DLA Phillips Fox to establish the Brisbane practice.
Prior to the 2014 merger with Herbert Geer, Thomsons experienced significant growth since 2009, with revenue and average profit per partner, tripling.
Herbert Geer
Herbert Geer was a Melbourne-based law firm founded in 1939 when Keith Geer commenced his sole practice in Bank Place, off Collins Street, Melbourne. Temporarily suspending practice during the Second World War, he was joined by Geoffrey Herbert in 1946. In 1950 the partnership expanded further with the addition of Eric Rundell and in 1960 it assumed the name, Herbert Geer & Rundle. In 1962, the Melbourne office relocated to 113 William Street, taking with it a total of ten partners and staff. Between 1962 and 1970, three small practices were absorbed into Herbert Geer & Rundle; Farmer & Ramsay, William & Matthews and the office of Cyril Brooks.
The firm achieved publicity in the early 1970s by handling the defendant’s litigation for all workers' compensation claims arising from the West Gate Bridge collapse. Further office relocations occurred with moves to Owen Dixon Chambers and BHP House before arriving at the State Bank Building in 1983 when the firm had 12 partners and 110 staff. In April 1999, Herbert Geer & Rundle opened a Sydney office and expanded to Brisbane in early 2001.
In 2008 the firm rebranded as Herbert Geer. At the same time it joined with Brisbane firm Nicol Robinson Halletts Lawyers, as well as the boutique construction firm RDK in Sydney.
Prior to the merger with Thomson Lawyers, Herbert Geer’s partnership had fallen by 28% from 53 partners to 38 in the preceding 3 years, due to lateral defections.
Significant legal work
In 2022, Thomson Geer successfully defended former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, the 46th NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet, Liberal Party federal president John Olsen and others in the Federal Liberal Party intervention regarding the management of its NSW Division. These cases were heard in the Supreme Court of NSW, the NSW Court of Appeal and the High Court of Australia. Notably, the ruling of the New South Wales Court of Appeal is the leading precedent in Australia on the justiciability of disputes arising out of the constitutions of unincorporated political parties.
In 2015, Thomson Geer defended iiNet and other ISPs such as Telstra and Optus in Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited, a case brought in the Federal Court of Australia by Dallas Buyers Club for breach of copyright laws. The case set legal precedence in Australia, whereby copyright holders can gain access to the details of internet users who illegally obtain their copyright material. This will lead to individuals in breach of copyright be liable to damages by copyright holders. Thomson Geer successfully argued that any damages must only be compensatory and not exemplary, like in the United States.
In 2013, Thomsons successfully acted for the Plaintiffs in the Maiden Civil Case in Australia under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA). The case established that the nemo dat rule has been displaced in Australia where the PPSA applies, and businesses that lease personal property must declare their interests under the Personal Property Securities Register, to maintain a priority.
In 2011, Thomsons advised the Mitchell Group on the $1.2 billion Fitzroy Coal Terminal Project, which created coal chain supply infrastructure capable to transporting 22 million tonnes of coal per annum to and from Central Queensland. The project created significant concerns about potential damage to the Great Barrier Reef, and in 2014 the project was indefinitely put on hold
In 2010, Herbert Geer successfully argued that State Parliaments cannot prevent State Supreme Courts from issuing prerogative relief for jurisdictional error, in the landmark High Court case of Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales. The case set a significant precedent in administrative and constitutional law that s 71 of the Constitution of Australia protects the integrity of State Supreme Courts.
Offices
Thomson Geer has six offices across Australia. The firm is headquartered in Sydney, at 60 Martin Place. The Melbourne office is located at Rialto Towers on 525 Collins Street, the Brisbane office is in Waterfront Place, the Adelaide office is on 19 Gouger Street, the Perth office is locate at Exchange Tower, 2 The Esplanade and the Canberra office is located at 33-35 Ainslie Place.
References
- "Law firm scoops up another to drive Perth market share". lawyersweekly.com.au. 13 June 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "Exclusive: Herbert Geer and HWL Ebsworth had merger talks". Lawyersweekly.com.au. 14 February 2014. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- ^ "Thomson Geer: Private Company Information - Businessweek". Businessweek.com.
- ^ "Thomson Playford Cutlers, Watermark re-brand". Legalbusinessonline.com.
- "Thomsons and Herbert Geer merger focuses on mid-level". Financial Review. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- ^ "The Legal 500". Legal500.com.
- ^ Thomson Geer (14 March 2023). "Home- Thomson Geer". Thomson Geer company website. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - "Thomson Geer - Australia - Asialaw Profiles - Law firm recommendations". Asialawprofiles.com. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2015.
- "Australian firms Thomsons Lawyers and Herbert Geer combine to form Tho". Iflr1000.com. Archived from the original on 28 September 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2015.
- Aidan Devine. "Here to win: Thomson Geer". Australasian Lawyer.
- ^ "University of Adelaide Law Library Sponsors Note" (PDF). (1989) 12(1) Adelaide Law Review 89.
- "Thomson Playford's growth leaves Adelaide behind". Lawyersweekly.com.au. 2 March 2012.
- "Cowley Hearne loses Cowley but keeps Hearne". Lawyersweekly.com.au. 3 March 2012.
- ^ "DibbsBarker unveiled as new firm identity". Lawyersweekly.com.au. 3 March 2012.
- "Thomsons debuts in Brisbane with rival talent". Financial Review. 14 March 2011.
- "Thomsons poaches 10 from DLA Phillips Fox". Financial Review. 17 March 2011.
- Aidan Devine. "Here to win: Thomson Geer". Australasian Lawyer.
- "Mid-market merger: Thomsons Lawyers, Herbert Geer eye tie-up". BRW. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- ^ "Thomsons Lawyers, Herbert Geer eye merger". Financial Review. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- "Rebranding all the rage". Lawyersweekly.com.au. 3 March 2012.
- "Herbert Geer & Rundle and Nicol Robinson Halletts join forces". Lawyersweekly.com.au.
- "Thomson Geer successfully defends Scott Morrison, Dominic Perrottet and other senior members of the Liberal Party of Australia in the NSW Court of Appeal and High Court of Australia". Thomson Geer - News.
- "Thomson Geer successfully defends Scott Morrison, Dominic Perrottet and other senior members of the Liberal Party of Australia in the NSW Court of Appeal and High Court of Australia". Thomson Geer - News. 9 May 2022.
- FCA 317
- Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited [2015] FCA 317 (7 April 2015)), Federal Court (Australia).
- Lia Timson (22 September 2015). "Telstra, Optus not worth chasing in Dallas Buyers Club piracy crackdown: lawyers". Smh.com.au. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- "Dallas Buyers Club: Federal Court backs ISPs in row over illegal downloads - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)". Abc.net.au. 14 August 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- Harry Tucker (14 August 2015). "Dallas Buyers Club pirates identities kept private, for now". News.com.au. Archived from the original on 15 August 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- "Federal Court rules on Dallas Buyers club downloaders". Australasianlawyer.com.au. 14 August 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- Paul Bibby and Hannah Francis (22 September 2015). "Dallas Buyers Club dealt major blow in Federal Court iiNet piracy case". Smh.com.au. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- "Dallas Buyers Club: Court rules in favour of film's illegal downloaders". Financial Review. 13 August 2015.
- "Dallas Buyers Club: Federal Court backs ISPs in row over illegal downloads". ABC News. 14 August 2015.
- "When a security interest beats legal title - Only under the PPSA » Corrs Chambers Westgarth". Corrs.com.au.
- "In the matter of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd; Richard Albarran and Blair Alexander Pleash as receivers and managers of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd & Ors v Queensland Excavation Services Pty Ltd & Ors - NSW Caselaw". Nsw.gov.au.
- "Herbert Smith Freehills - Key PPSA decision: NSWSC confirms vesting of unperfected lessor's interest following insolvency of lessee". Herbertsmithfreehills.com.
- "Personal Property Securities: the importance of registration - Clayton Utz". Clayton Utz.
- "Thomsons Lawyers and Mallesons advise on billion dollar Fitzroy Project". Lawyersweekly.com.au. 4 March 2012.
- "Fitzroy Terminal - Home". Ftproject.com.au. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2015.
- "Decision to move proposed coal terminal cold comfort to Keppel Fitzroy Delta Alliance". ABC News. 4 July 2014.
- (2010) 239 CLR 531
- Kirk v Industrial Court of NSW [2010] HCA 1, (2010) 239 CLR 531 (3 February 2010), High Court (Australia).
- "Sydney Law Review". The University of Sydney.
- "Government Insights - Clayton Utz". Clayton Utz.
- ^ "Contact Us". Tglaw.com.au.