| Revision as of 06:39, 16 April 2007 editNealparr (talk | contribs)6,895 edits →On Wikibreak← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:22, 19 April 2007 edit undoMinderbinder~enwiki (talk | contribs)4,880 edits ArbcomNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ::I'm saying that the comment doesn't reflect your original intention in endorsing the RfC that asks that Martinphi to be removed from the discussions. I'm saying that my objection isn't just about original intentions and that it's really about dispute resolvement forking, which is what the RfC has become. In other words, I'm saying that you didn't necessarily endorse the complaint trying to create a dispute fork. I'm using your example that one helps decide the other, without saying you intended that when you endorsed it. | ::I'm saying that the comment doesn't reflect your original intention in endorsing the RfC that asks that Martinphi to be removed from the discussions. I'm saying that my objection isn't just about original intentions and that it's really about dispute resolvement forking, which is what the RfC has become. In other words, I'm saying that you didn't necessarily endorse the complaint trying to create a dispute fork. I'm using your example that one helps decide the other, without saying you intended that when you endorsed it. | ||
| ::--''']''' <sup>(]|])</sup> 20:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | ::--''']''' <sup>(]|])</sup> 20:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbcom == | |||
| I just wanted to let you know, a case has been requested at ]. Feel free to add yourself as an involved party, otherwise participate, or follow along if you're interested in it. --] 14:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:22, 19 April 2007
On Semi-Wikibreak
Poking around, editing here and there, nothing serious. --Nealparr 06:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
"original intention" ?
May I ask what you mean by this comment?:
-- Fyslee/talk 19:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm saying that the comment doesn't reflect your original intention in endorsing the RfC that asks that Martinphi to be removed from the discussions. I'm saying that my objection isn't just about original intentions and that it's really about dispute resolvement forking, which is what the RfC has become. In other words, I'm saying that you didn't necessarily endorse the complaint trying to create a dispute fork. I'm using your example that one helps decide the other, without saying you intended that when you endorsed it.
- --Nealparr 20:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Arbcom
I just wanted to let you know, a case has been requested at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Paranormal. Feel free to add yourself as an involved party, otherwise participate, or follow along if you're interested in it. --Minderbinder 14:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)