| Revision as of 02:33, 20 August 2024 editSashiRolls (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,626 edits →ClarificationsTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:42, 20 August 2024 edit undoBilledMammal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users49,325 edits →ClarificationsNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
| ==Clarifications== | ==Clarifications== | ||
| * This analysis counts the number of comments that an editor made in a discussion |
* This analysis counts the number of comments that an editor made in a discussion by looking for an editors signature. It does not count the number of edits. | ||
| * This analysis counts every comment made within the discussion | |||
| * This analysis lists all editors who |
* This analysis lists all editors who bludgeoned at least four discussions within the reviewed pages. Editors who bludgeoned less than four are not listed. | ||
| * The intent of this isn’t to get specific editors into trouble. This is a common issue in the topic area, and it can’t be resolved with targeted sanctions - instead, broad remedies are required. | * The intent of this isn’t to get specific editors into trouble. This is a common issue in the topic area, and it can’t be resolved with targeted sanctions - instead, broad remedies are required. | ||
| * While multiple pages were bludgeoned by sockpuppets (see in particular ] and ]) replies to aggressive comments by sockpuppets were counted just like any other comment. | |||
| ==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Revision as of 02:42, 20 August 2024
Editors are assumed to have bludgeoned a discussion if they made more than twenty comments in it. This is an approximation; while in most cases such a large number of comments will constitute bludgeoning exceptions will exist.
This review is limited to the talk pages of articles in the scope of both Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Palestine and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Israel (list). It also includes related discussions from Misplaced Pages:Reliable Sources Noticeboard, but does not currently include other discussions outside talk space, as constructing a list of such discussions is a difficult task.
In 2023 and 2024, 10 editors bludgeoned four or more discussions:
Additional analysis
I am willing to rerun this analysis with different configurations at any editors request. The options are:
- A different or expanded list of discussions
- A different number of comments considered bludgeoning
- A different date range
- A different number of discussions bludgeoned required for inclusion
Clarifications
- This analysis counts the number of comments that an editor made in a discussion by looking for an editors signature. It does not count the number of edits.
- This analysis counts every comment made within the discussion
- This analysis lists all editors who bludgeoned at least four discussions within the reviewed pages. Editors who bludgeoned less than four are not listed.
- The intent of this isn’t to get specific editors into trouble. This is a common issue in the topic area, and it can’t be resolved with targeted sanctions - instead, broad remedies are required.
Notes
- Chosen as under the original analysis, that was the number required to include myself in the list