Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:22, 19 April 2007

This user is a part of WikiProject Supernatural, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the supernatural. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Old Conversations

• CCS
• Images
• Reach Out
• Project Paranormal
• Other
• KP

Sandbox

Award from Dynamo_ace

Keep up the good work!-Dynamo_ace Talk

Award from Jumping cheese

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I hereby award Perfectblue97 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar for all the hard work in expanding the Kim Possible pages. Keep it up! Jumping cheese 06:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Personal question

I hope you don't mind, but I noticed your userboxes that say you speak Chinese and that you're homesick, I was just wondering if you were living in the United States and what your background was? I was going to email you privately, but I don't think you have email enabled - you can write me at <removed email address> if you like! Dreadlocke ☥ 02:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting my email address. Actually, there's no personal information in it, I created it specially for use on Misplaced Pages. Many editors do that so they can email without sending any personal information or identifiers. I wouldn't put my own personal email address in either, so I understand where you're coming from. Thanks for the excellent answer, I get it! You can delete this whole section if you like. I'm happy to be editing with you, you are a very fine editor. Dreadlocke ☥ 18:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I love the Chinatown where I used to live. I lived in NYC for fifteen years (Manhattan). When my brother was visiting me, he and I would always make a pilgrimage to his favorite restaurant, Wo-hop on Mott Street, the best hot & sour soup in town! I miss New York; Florida is quite a different culture! (This stuff is ok to leave, I've already identified myself as a Floridian with user boxes!) I lived in California for a while too, the Chinatown there was magnificent - well, it was many moons ago when I was there. I'm getting old...;) Dreadlocke ☥ 22:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Bonnie pictures

I think the more pictures, the better. How does that picture not add to the text? Don't just think you can do whatever the hell you want without explaining, PB97. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by =CJK= (talk • contribs) 02:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC).

email

Perfectblue, it would be convienient if you were to create a special email account which you would be willing to share with Misplaced Pages users.

What is the status of EVP within parapsychology? Martin _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 21:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

EVP

Suggestion: let them work. Then later, we get together and sandbox it, and revise it to something NPOV. Martin _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 01:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Exactly- especially the part about getting more people together. I know little about the topic, my interest is purely NPOV. Martin _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 19:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes- I'm not even looking at the article now. Let them expend their energies making it all POV-skeptic. Then we'll sandbox it. Martin _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 19:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Opinion?

You might want to take a look here:

RfC

I know you've worked a lot with Martin, thought you might like to know about this; Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Martinphi. Dreadlocke ☥ 17:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

I don't know if you're watching the RfC page, but this was directed at you. I guess he was just trying to say that since you didn't comment on some of the actual charges that you weren't directly involved with, that you apparently had nothing good to say. It's an "outside view", so you can comment on any of it, even if you weren't directly involved in the incident. Dreadlocke ☥ 22:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

I hope I defended you correctly from the attack by Simões. I just couldn't stand by and see that go unremarked on. You're right, it was an ad-hominem attack from him that could only be meant to try and discredit you. Terrible. Dreadlocke ☥ 18:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I changed the heading structure of these sections because they appear to be separate subject. If I'm wrong, please revert or tell me to do it...Thanks! Dreadlocke ☥ 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

RFC

I have endorsed your opinion on the Martin RFC. And I think it's unconscionable for these skeptics trying to harass established editors who oppose them. Wooyi 03:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Apology

I'd like to apologize for the parenthetical insinuation of your motives I made on the RFC discussion. It added nothing to my post and was entirely uncalled for. Simões (/_contribs) 14:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Confused

I'm a litte bit confused. You put all sort of tags at Free energy suppression. --Pjacobi 17:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I posted all sorts of tags on free energy suppression. I did so because I think that the page was valid but is in need of work. If I didn't think that the page belonged, period, I'd have put up the deletion tag myself.

My personal standpoint is that the substance of free energy suppression conspiracy has no grounding in fact, but that the conspiracy itself (the belief that gas companies are suppressing free energy) does exist and is notable.

Think of the page as being about an urban myth. The myth doesn't have to be true to be told.

perfectblue 18:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your fast response -- I hope you don't mind that I've move it back kere to keep the topic together.

I've following one of Jimbo's remark, that adding all sort tags to dubious information, can be inferior to just deleting it.

The urban myth type of article is fine with me -- but, what seems doubtfull from your tagging and a quick seach I did myself, is whether there exists a coherent topic of free energy suppression, for which secondary sources can be found. Obviously there are persons X, Y and Z who voiced an opinion of some form of free energy suppression -- but that would only give primary sources. Stitching an article together from primary sources is discouraged.

Pjacobi 18:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

If you're referring to the comment by Jimbo that I think you're referring to, he was actually talking specifically referring to pages about living people, which you have to be particularly hot on because of the danger of being sued for libel.

According to policy, we should discuss deletions or otherwise allow for discussion. Adding a fact tag to something is one way of calling attention to point of concern. If I were simply to delete everything that I thought needed verifying, many pages might loose valuable content that just needs citing (a 5 minute job for somebody knowledgeable in the subject). Besides, half of the things that I tagged I personally know or believe to be true, but I can't think of a good enough citable source at this time (I can't just quote a college lecturer as etc being my source, it has to be a book or something).

perfectblue 20:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

By now I've tried myself finding sources and improving the article, also made a cautionary comment at the AfD. Still undecided. --Pjacobi 20:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

A Cookie for you

Arbcom

I just wanted to let you know, a case has been requested at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Paranormal. Feel free to add yourself as an involved party, otherwise participate, or follow along if you're interested in it. --Minderbinder 14:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I think you can add yourself as an involved party and add a Statement by X section. --Minderbinder 16:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I have added you as a party to the requested case. --Minderbinder 20:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)