Misplaced Pages

Talk:William Rainsborowe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:23, 20 April 2007 editCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,550 edits A few questions  Revision as of 10:46, 20 April 2007 edit undoGeogre (talk | contribs)25,257 edits A few questions: Trying to answerNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
*I also tried to find ], and was wondering whether this is ] in ], or whether it is ]? *I also tried to find ], and was wondering whether this is ] in ], or whether it is ]?
Any ideas on these? ] 03:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Any ideas on these? ] 03:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

:Thanks for those. I think you're right, and I was very aggravated, when I was writing, by the knowledge that we certainly had better links but that I would have to get another window open and search and prod to find it. Misplaced Pages has always had a problem of organization as great as the problem of content, and I wish our editors with a rage for order would aim their efforts at the systemic problems. The Higham Park is frustrating, because this is a "former crown" area, which means that it may have passed out of parlance and might not be a royal land after the Restoration (and yet might be, too). I think, however, that it would be the former, not the latter. I really wanted those buying and selling bits in, though, because I consider it possibly the most interesting detail. If you were a radical anti-royalist, a radical protestant, then what did you do after 1649? Well, you put your money where your mouth was and bought church lands and royal lands to intentionally complicate matters and intentionally "reclaim" the lands. If you were a Leveller, a Ranter, or, most particularly a Digger, you'd definitely do that. ] 10:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:46, 20 April 2007

A few questions

Any ideas on these? Carcharoth 03:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for those. I think you're right, and I was very aggravated, when I was writing, by the knowledge that we certainly had better links but that I would have to get another window open and search and prod to find it. Misplaced Pages has always had a problem of organization as great as the problem of content, and I wish our editors with a rage for order would aim their efforts at the systemic problems. The Higham Park is frustrating, because this is a "former crown" area, which means that it may have passed out of parlance and might not be a royal land after the Restoration (and yet might be, too). I think, however, that it would be the former, not the latter. I really wanted those buying and selling bits in, though, because I consider it possibly the most interesting detail. If you were a radical anti-royalist, a radical protestant, then what did you do after 1649? Well, you put your money where your mouth was and bought church lands and royal lands to intentionally complicate matters and intentionally "reclaim" the lands. If you were a Leveller, a Ranter, or, most particularly a Digger, you'd definitely do that. Geogre 10:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)