Revision as of 12:01, 6 December 2023 editHob Gadling (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,366 edits →Close minded explanation← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:47, 10 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,616 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Vitalism/Archive 2) (botTag: Manual revert |
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|class=B|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine|class=B}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid|class=B}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Psychology |class=B |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Psychology |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=B|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject History of Science|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject History of Science|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biology |class=B |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biology |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Chiropractic|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Chiropractic|importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{ArbComPseudoscience}} |
|
{{ArbComPseudoscience}} |
|
|
|
|
== Close minded explanation == |
|
|
|
|
|
Call me naive, but I felt the criticisms of the topic of vital energy far outweighed the subjective experiences of most people. Despite the fact that current science cannot experimentally prove what it is that gives life, every one of us experiences on an inherent level what most would call some type of energy flowing within us. |
|
|
I promote being critical, but the article felt more like it was proving a point vs giving an explanation on what we observe as what gives us life as conscious beings. ] (]) 07:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:Yes, science outweighs subjective experiences. That is how Misplaced Pages works. If you want to change something, you will need ]. --] (]) 09:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Actaullay science outweight subjective experience if and only if it has a scintific image to offer. Since on what is life we don't have one, vitalism it's not entairly discredit. The problem of vitalism is that it's not even wrong, as it's a circlular explanation. ] (]) 09:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Do you have any reliable sources? This is ]. --] (]) 12:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Malpighi and Bergson are alternative medicines practicioners? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine somebody who don't know Malpighi and Bergoson and learn about them for the first time on this page. I think that the problem is selfevident... no? Maybe the best label could be Superseded? ] (]) 09:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Malpighi is described as a doctor with a link to ]. Nobody called "Bergoson" is mentioned in this article. ] (]) 09:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
|