Revision as of 13:49, 13 August 2007 editPleasantville (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,900 edits →Hugo Rules?: I honestly though you'd had the good sense to append your real name to your user name.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:04, 20 September 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,760,422 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(41 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=c|blp=yes|listas=Cramer, Kathryn|1= | |||
{{WPBiography | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes}} | ||
|living=yes | |||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|WA=yes|WA-importance=low|Seattle=yes|Seattle-importance=low}} | |||
|class=Start | |||
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Columbia=yes|Columbia-importance=Low}} | |||
|priority= | |||
{{WikiProject Electronic literature|women=yes}} | |||
|listas=Cramer, Kathryn | |||
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=MID}} | |||
⚫ | |a&e-work-group=yes | ||
}} | |||
⚫ | {{Connected contributor|Pleasantville|declared=yes|editedhere=yes}} | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| age=2160 | |||
| archiveprefix=Talk:Kathryn Cramer/Archive | |||
| numberstart=2 | |||
| maxarchsize=100000 | |||
| header={{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| minkeepthreads=4 | |||
| format= %%i | |||
| archivebox=yes | |||
| box-advert=yes | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{WikiProject Columbia University}} | |||
⚫ | {{ |
||
== Hugo Rules? == | |||
Is ] interested in a discussion of ] rules or does he dispute that ] is an authority on them, especially in the Semiprozine category? Does he claim any knowledge in ths subject area? My impression from ]'s talk page is that he claims no special knowledge in this subject matter and further is unfamiliar with the source cited. | |||
Does he dispute Locus's claim that ] has been nominted for the Hugo 41 times? I suspect not. | |||
Why then the revert? --] 01:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC) aka ] | |||
::I do not object that Locus is an authority. I object that the link is being misquoted. LOCUS was nominated for the hugo. Not Charles N. Brown. ] ] ] 01:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::I should further note that one does not need to be a subject matter expert to edit anything on Misplaced Pages, the '''encyclopedia anyone can edit'''. ] ] ] 01:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
The quote you delete is from Locus citing Charles N. Brown as having 41 Hugo nominations. Do you have any idea what for? (Semiprozine.) Certainly anyone can edit, but you are an admin and so you aren't just anyone, and you are interning for WM . . . | |||
==SF Encyclopedia online== | |||
Locus, as cited, gives credit to ''individuals'' listed on the ballot. Do you have another source? --] 02:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
The new online version of the ] has an indepth entry on me. --] (]) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) aka ] | |||
::My admin status does not entitle me to special privileges. I'm operating as an editor here. Nothing more. ] ] ] 02:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified == | |||
From the Locus page: | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
SEMIPROZINE | |||
# Ansible, David Langford, ed. | |||
# Interzone, David Pringle & Andy Cox, eds. | |||
# Locus, Charles N. Brown, ed. | |||
# The New York Review of Science Fiction, Kathryn Cramer, David G. Hartwell & Kevin J. Maroney, eds. | |||
# The Third Alternative, Andy Cox, ed. | |||
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
It nominates the SEMIPROZINE NAME, and then the editor's name. Not the editor. This is clear and unambiguous. You were not nominated, your magazine was. Misplaced Pages is not a tool for your advertisement. ] ] ] 02:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110920202744/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/text_761563123__1/Science_Fiction.html | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
Has Charlie Brown ever won a Hugo, or not? (You are walking over the precipice of much hilarity if you answer NOT.) --] 02:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
::I don't care whether Charles N. Brown has ever won a Hugo. He's never won one for SEMIPROZINE, but Locus has, several times over. You know why? Because he is a person. Not a magazine. Common sense would dictate that. The magazine that he edits has won, just as yours has been nominated (and not won).] ] ] 02:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 05:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
I rest my case. *shakes head* --] 02:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified == | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
::Please stop the attempts to gain advertisement for yourself, and the strawman arguments.. It's clear that Hugo semiprozine awards are given to the zine, not to the editor. An editor is not a zine. It says so on Locus' website as I quoted above, it says so on it says it on ], it says so on , and in the written rules , it does not mention at all that the editor is given the award: it lists the criteria for the 'zine. This is ridiculous, common sense tells you that a person cannot be a magazine. Kathryn Cramer, you have a direct conflict of interest in this.] ] ] 02:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
It is not clear. So novelists never win awards, only their novels? --] 03:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160121185518/http://www.locusmag.com/News/2016/01/david-g-hartwell-1941-2016/ to http://www.locusmag.com/News/2016/01/david-g-hartwell-1941-2016 | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222120924/http://math.cofc.edu/kasman/MATHFICT/mfview.php?callnumber=mf52 to http://math.cofc.edu/kasman/MATHFICT/mfview.php?callnumber=mf52 | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129025711/http://newbooksinsciencefiction.com/2014/11/05/kathryn-cramer-and-ed-finn-hieroglyph-stories-and-visions-for-a-better-future-william-morrow-2014/ to http://newbooksinsciencefiction.com/2014/11/05/kathryn-cramer-and-ed-finn-hieroglyph-stories-and-visions-for-a-better-future-william-morrow-2014/ | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
::Depends on the award. Novelists certainly win "best writer". But they do not win "Best new novel". But once again, this is what's called a ] fallacy. This is a Hugo award, not a novel. ] ] ] 03:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
I suppose I should be deighted to learn that I am not a serial Hugo loser and that Charlie Brown hasn't beat the pants off of us for many years running. But I should confess that this is really a first: No one has ever told me before that I wasn't a Hugo nominee. I'll tell the committee, since they are under the mistaken impression I'm nominated and need to appoint someone to accept in case I win. We've appointed ], who is going to the ceremony in Yokohama, and whom we had previously asked to accept on our behalf. --] 03:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 06:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Sarcasm is unbecoming. You are not nominated for it. Your magazine is. No matter how much you attempt to obfuscate it with ] arguments, that is the case. You are not a ], and physically cannot be, otherwise you would not be typing here. You are a ]. The difference is 100% clear. The Hugo award rules state it. The above cited sites state it. You have a conflict of interest, and the advertising needs to stop.] ] ] 04:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified (January 2018) == | |||
Denny: What exactly is your interpretation of Hugo rules supposed to inspire in me? What you seem to be looking for is a Catholic style confession that I have been simply misrepreensting my several decades long understanding of rules you have only just encountered. However, I am entirely serious: no one except you has ever represented to me that the magazine and NOT the editors listed on the ballot is the nominee. No one. Ever. There is a reason that people's names are listed on the ballot. They are not ornamental. Why are you pushing this point with out external references? It would seem to me that this would violate WP rules of civility. --] 04:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
::As you know from reading my user page, which you have made extensive reference to elsewhere, my name is not Denny, it's Dan. As a SF writer, I'm sure you are aware of William Shatner's role as ]. I'll pass it off as a momentary lapse in judgment. As for external references, do you have any that state the hugo award for semiprozine is awarded to a person? Any reliable sources? If you can find a reliable source that says "Awards for a written publication are awarded to the editor, not to the publication itself", that would satisfy this. But such a source does not exist, and it would be incumbent on you to find that. Verifiable, reliable sources, that are ACCURATELY representations. Your link to the Hugo site qualified as verifiable and accurate, the statement made was not an accurate representation of the material on that link.] ] ] 05:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
Swat, you are pouring vitriol into this discussion in an unseemly manner. Technically, your statement is correct: as you say, the nominations and awards are given to the magazines; but the custom in the field is to discuss the awards in terms of the editors. Thus, '']'' (along with '']'', the ''de facto'' publication of record for the field), talks of wins and losses for Charles Brown rather than for the zine itself. This is not a matter of advertisement and self-aggrandizement, it is a matter of ordinary usage in the field. (By the way, presuming an intimate familiarity with every morsel of Star Trek trivia is a none-too-subtle insult to a writer and editor of actual text science fiction.) --] 13:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019231720/http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/disextinction/ to http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/disextinction/ | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031110821/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit31.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit31.html | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
Dan, I apologize for calling you Denny, but I honestly though you'd had the good sense to append your real name to your user name. --] 13:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
== What links to this biography == | |||
See | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Archives == | |||
though May 2007 |
Latest revision as of 15:04, 20 September 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kathryn Cramer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
SF Encyclopedia online
The new online version of the Science Fiction Encyclopedia has an indepth entry on me. --Pleasantville (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) aka Kathryn Cramer
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kathryn Cramer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110920202744/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/text_761563123__1/Science_Fiction.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kathryn Cramer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160121185518/http://www.locusmag.com/News/2016/01/david-g-hartwell-1941-2016/ to http://www.locusmag.com/News/2016/01/david-g-hartwell-1941-2016
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222120924/http://math.cofc.edu/kasman/MATHFICT/mfview.php?callnumber=mf52 to http://math.cofc.edu/kasman/MATHFICT/mfview.php?callnumber=mf52
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129025711/http://newbooksinsciencefiction.com/2014/11/05/kathryn-cramer-and-ed-finn-hieroglyph-stories-and-visions-for-a-better-future-william-morrow-2014/ to http://newbooksinsciencefiction.com/2014/11/05/kathryn-cramer-and-ed-finn-hieroglyph-stories-and-visions-for-a-better-future-william-morrow-2014/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kathryn Cramer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019231720/http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/disextinction/ to http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/disextinction/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031110821/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit31.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit31.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Categories:- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- C-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- C-Class Columbia University articles
- Low-importance Columbia University articles
- WikiProject Columbia University articles
- C-Class Electronic literature articles
- WikiProject Electronic literature - Women electronic literature writers articles
- WikiProject Electronic literature articles
- C-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors