| Revision as of 01:27, 13 November 2014 editAdam Cuerden (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers52,221 edits →Inscriptions and identity of sitter← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:14, 21 September 2024 edit undoCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers171,987 edits thinking about this, am uncomfortable with the claim as its not expanded below. The Panofsky article does say this, but doesn't labour it, so maybe not for the lead | ||
| (166 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|Small 1432 portrait of a man by Jan van Eyck in London}} | |||
| {{Use dmy dates|date=February 2017}} | |||
| {{EngvarB|date=February 2017}}{{featured article}} | |||
| {{italic title}} | {{italic title}} | ||
| ], London]] | ], London]] | ||
| '''''Léal Souvenir'''''<ref> |
'''''Léal Souvenir'''''<ref>Although the inscription on the parapet does not contain a ] on the e.</ref> (also known as '''''Timotheus''''' or '''''Portrait of a Man''''') is a small ] ] by the ] painter ], dated 1432. The sitter has not been identified, but his highly individual features suggest a historical person rather than the hypothetical ideal usual at the time in northern ] portraiture; his slight and unassuming torso is contrasted with a sophisticated facial expression. His features have been described as "plain and rustic", yet thoughtful and inward-looking. The sitter was apparently significant enough a member of the ] ]'s circle that his court painter portrayed him. | ||
| The |
The man sits before an imitation ] with three sets of painted inscriptions, each rendered to look as if chiselled or scratched into stone.<ref name="p80">Panofsky, 80</ref> Van Eyck did not have full command of either ] or ] and made errors, so readings by modern scholars vary. The first inscription is in Greek and seems to spell "TYΜ.ωΘΕΟϹ", which has not been satisfactorily interpreted but has led some to title the work ''Timotheus''. The middle reads in French ''"Leal Souvenir"'' ("Loyal Memory") and indicates that the portrait is a posthumous commemoration. The third records van Eyck's signature and the date of execution.<ref name="B37">Bauman, 37</ref> The 19th-century art historian ] identified the lettering "TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC"<ref name="p212">Paviot, 212</ref> with the Greek musician ]. Panofsky drew the same conclusion, eliminating other Greeks bearing the name Timothy; they were of religious or military background, professions that do not match the civilian dress of the sitter. Panofsky believed the man was probably a highly placed musician in Philip's court, possibly ].<ref name="w650">Wood, 650</ref> | ||
| More recent research focuses on the legalistic wording in one of the inscriptions, suggesting to some that he was in some way connected to the legal profession, or an employee of ].<ref name="p212" /> The panel was acquired in 1857 by the ], London, where it is on permanent display. | |||
| ==Description== | |||
| ⚫ | ''Léal Souvenir'' is one of the earliest surviving examples of secular portraiture in medieval European art and one of the earliest extant unidealised representations. This is apparent in its realism and acute observation of the details of the man's everyday appearance. Van Eyck worked in the early ] tradition |
||
| == |
== Description == | ||
| ⚫ | ''Léal Souvenir'' is one of the earliest surviving examples of secular ] in medieval European art and one of the earliest extant unidealised representations.<ref name="S42">Smith, 42</ref> This is apparent in its ] and acute observation of the details of the man's everyday appearance. Van Eyck worked in the early ] tradition and pioneered the manipulation of oil paint. Oil allowed smooth ] surfaces, could be applied across a range of thicknesses and was manipulable while wet, which allowed far more subtle detail than available to previous generations of painters.<ref name="s61">Smith, 61</ref><ref>Jones, 10–11</ref><ref>Borchert, 22</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | ]]] | ||
| ⚫ | The ] |
||
| The |
The parapet dominates the portrait, and his head seems oversized compared to his upper body.<ref name="p110" /> Some art historians speculate that this is a result of van Eyck's then inexperience; it was only his second known portrait.<ref>Although the dual portraits of the donors in his '']'' were probably completed in 1431 or in the early months of the following year.</ref> Meiss speculates that van Eyck may have "los control of design as a whole by indulging his astounding virtuosity."<ref>Meiss, 138</ref> | ||
| === |
=== Parapet === | ||
| ⚫ | ].]] | ||
| ⚫ | ], ''Portrait of ]'', |
||
| ⚫ | The decayed ] allows van Eyck to display his skill at mimicking stone chiselling and scarring,<ref name="p80" /> and shows the influence of classical Roman ], particularly stone memorials. The parapet gives the work ], the chips and cracks conveying a sense of the venerable, or, according to art historian ], a sense of the "fragility of life or of memory itself".<ref name="d182" /> | ||
| ⚫ | The man is positioned within an undefined narrow space and set against a flat black background. Typically for van |
||
| === Portrait === | |||
| ⚫ | ]'', |
||
| ⚫ | ], ''Portrait of ]'', {{Circa}} 1445. Here, Philip is captured in a similar but inverted pose. As in van{{nbsp}}Eyck's panel, the scroll is inscribed on the outside with fictive writing.<ref name="c223">Campbell, 223</ref>]] | ||
| ⚫ | Light falls from the left, leaving traces of shadow on the side of |
||
| ⚫ | The man is positioned within an undefined narrow space and set against a flat black background. Typically for van{{nbsp}}Eyck, the head is large in relation to the torso. He is dressed in typically ] fashion, with a red robe and a green wool ] with a bourrelet and cornette hanging forward. The headdress is trimmed with fur, fastened with two buttons, and extends to the parapet.<ref name="K19" /> His right hand might be holding the end of the cornette.<ref name="c218" /> Neither the shape of his head nor his facial features correspond to contemporary standard types, let alone canons of ideal beauty. The sitter appears to be bald, although there are some faint traces of fair hair, leading Erwin Panofsky to conclude that his "countenance is as 'Nordic' as his dress is Burgundian."<ref name="p82">Panofsky, 82</ref> Though he has neither eyebrows nor stubble, he does have eyelashes that are believed to have been added by a 19th-century restorer.<ref name="c218" /> Van Eyck's cool observation of the man's narrow shoulders, pursed lips, and thin eyebrows extends to detailing the moisture on his blue eyes.<ref name="K19">Kemperdick, 19</ref> | ||
| Unlike ], who paid especially close attention to detail in the rendering of his models' fingers, to van{{nbsp}}Eyck hands were often something of an afterthought.<ref>Kemperdick notes that ] "used the same pair of hands for many of his portraits, so that they look much the same on 70-year-old ] and ], forty years his junior." Kemperdick, 20</ref> They are generically rendered, do not contain much detail and may have been a later workshop addition. Yet they are very similar to those of the sitter in his {{Circa}} 1435 ''Portrait of ]''. The man holds a scroll that might be a legal document, letter, or pamphlet. In his early portraits, van{{nbsp}}Eyck's sitters are often shown holding objects indicative of their profession.<ref name="p110">Pächt, 110</ref> The scroll contains six lines of illegible writing. The abbreviations are more prominent and seem to be in Latin, but may be vernacular.<ref name="p212" /> | |||
| ⚫ | ]'', {{Circa}} 1435. ], ], Berlin. Van{{nbsp}}Eyck's early portraits typically show the sitter holding an emblem of his profession and class.<ref>Upton, 27</ref>]] | ||
| ⚫ | ===Inscriptions and identity of sitter=== | ||
| ⚫ | Light falls from the left, leaving traces of shadow on the side of the man's face, a device commonly found in van{{nbsp}}Eyck's early portraits.<ref name="m137">Meiss, 137</ref> He is youthful, and his face has a soft fleshiness achieved through shallow curves and flowing, harmonious brushstrokes, giving the appearance of a relaxed, warm, and open personality, which Meiss describes as evoking an almost "]esque warmth and sympathy".<ref name="m137" /> The sitter is not handsome; he has a flattish face, a stubby yet pointed nose, and prominent cheekbones that might, according to Panofsky, belong to a "] peasant".<ref name="p88">Panofsky, 88</ref> Dhanens describes him as having an honest expression.<ref name="d182">Dhanens, 182</ref> | ||
| {{Cite check|section}} | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | The parapet has three horizontal |
||
| A number of art historians have noted the apparent contradiction between the man's plain looks and enigmatic expression. Meiss describes him as "plain and rustic", and finds a resemblance between his rather generic face and a number of figures in the lower portions of the "Adoration of the Lamb" panel in the '']''.<ref name="m144">Meiss, 144</ref> Agreeing with Panofsky, he observes a "thoughtfulness on the high, wrinkled forehead, visionary force in the dreamy yet steady eyes, a formidable strength of passion in the wide, firm mouth". According to Panofsky, the man's face is not that of an intellectual, yet he detects a pensive and lonely nature, "the face of one who feels and produces rather than observes and dissects".<ref name="p88" /> | |||
| ⚫ | The top lettering is in chalk white and |
||
| ⚫ | === Inscriptions and identity of the sitter === | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| <small>"TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC"</small> was interpreted in 1857 by ] as "Timotheos", a proper name. However, if this was the intended meaning, more correct lettering would have read "TIM.OΘEOC", with differences in both the second and fourth characters. This may be due to spelling errors, or a misreading of the intended meaning by Eastlake.<ref name="p214">Paviot, 214</ref> The letters following the punctuation, ignoring the ''ω'',{{cn}}<!-- but obvious if you read greek--> probably read '<small>THEOS</small>', the Greek word for God. Campbell points out that van Eyck "appears to have employed the Greek alphabet systematically", and always employed the square sigma ''C'' for the Latin "S", and a majuscule omega ''ω'' (in the ] form) for the Latin "O".<ref name="c222" /> One proposal based on this by Dhanens is that it could be a variant of "Time Deum", meaning "Fear God", the motto of the Vilain family, using TYMω for "Time", combined with ΘEOC, Greek for "God". However, the Greek TIMΩ means "Honour".<ref name="p214" /> Eastlake's translation as "Timotheos" is generally accepted as representative of a ]. The possibility of it being a variant of "Timothy" has been discounted, as that word was not used in Northern Europe before the ]. There is no Germanic name which might, given the lettering in which it inscribed, imply a humanistic imitation of a Greek word.<ref name="p81">Panofsky, 81</ref> As such, art historians have sought to identify the man from Greek history or legend. Although some have advanced ] and ] generals, these have been discounted as the sitter is not wearing military clothing.<ref name="p82">Panofsky, 82</ref> ], first Bishop of ] and associate of ], has been suggested but eliminated as he is not dressed as a high cleric.<ref name="p82" /> | |||
| ⚫ | The parapet has three horizontal rows of inscriptions; on the upper and lower rows is smaller lettering that is often not visible in reproductions. In places, the Greek characters are unclear and have been subject to much speculation by art historians, not least due to van{{nbsp}}Eyck's sometimes erratic spelling and unusual spacing.<ref name="p80" /> | ||
| ⚫ | The top lettering is in chalk white and Greek script that reads <small>"TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC"</small>. The last character is deliberately concealed by a chip in the imitation stone, a touch described by Panofsky as a "terminal flourish".<ref name="p80" /> This makes the meaning of the inscription difficult to discern. A general consensus among art historians is that the final character is a square C or ] sign.<ref name="c222" /> | ||
| Panofsky considers the hypothesis that the final letter is a "N", and that the lettering forms two words rather than one. In this interpretation, the letters spell TYΜω ΘΕΟN, meaning "Honour God". While he admires the convenience of the interpretation, and the fact that it would make explanation more straight forward than if we accept "Timotheus", he rejects the possibility. He writes that "the presence of a shorter horizontal line connecting with the slightly tapering top of the vertical stroke and completing it into a Γ form ... evidently precludes a "N".<ref name="p8081">Panofsky, 80-81</ref> | |||
| <small>"TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC"</small> was interpreted in 1857 by ] as "Timotheos", a proper name.<ref name="p82" /><ref>However, if this were the intended meaning, more correct lettering would have read "TIM.OΘEOC". See Paviot, 214</ref><ref name="p214">Paviot, 214</ref> Campbell points out that van{{nbsp}}Eyck "appears to have employed the Greek alphabet systematically", and always employed the square sigma ''C'' for the Latin "S", and a ] ] ''ω'' (in the ] form) for the Latin "O".<ref name="c222" /> The inscription may be meant to read "Honour God", or "Be Honoured, O{{nbsp}}God", as written in the ].<ref name="p215">Paviot, 215</ref> Panofsky gives some consideration to the hypothesis that the final letter is a "]", and that the lettering forms two words rather than one. In this interpretation, the letters spell TYΜω ΘΕΟN, meaning "Honour God". While this would be more straightforward than "Timotheus", he rejects the possibility. He writes that "the presence of a shorter horizontal line connecting with the slightly tapering top of the vertical stroke and completing it into a ] form ... evidently precludes a "]".<ref name="p8081">Panofsky, 80–81</ref> Dhanens suggests the inscription can be read as "''Time Deum''" ("Fear God"), a known motto of the ] family.<ref name="d184" /> | |||
| ⚫ | The larger middle inscription is in French, using a 12th-century script. It reads "<small>LEAL SOVVENIR</small>" (''Loyal Remembrance'', or ''Faithful Souvenir''),<ref name="B36"/><ref name="B35">Bauman, 35</ref> and painted to give the impression that it was carved into the parapet.<ref name="w650" /> In 1927 |
||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | From the first two inscriptions the panel is generally accepted as a ]. Roman tombstones often showed a representation of the deceased behind a parapet with a carved inscription, and van |
||
| Eastlake's translation is generally accepted. The possibility of it being a variant of "Timothy" has been discounted, as that word was not used in Northern Europe before the ]. There is no Germanic name that might imply a humanistic imitation of a Greek word,<ref name="p81">Panofsky, 81</ref> so art historians have sought to identify the man from Greek history or legend. Although some have suggested certain ] and ] generals, these have been discounted as the sitter is not wearing military clothing.<ref name="p82">Panofsky, 82</ref> ], first Bishop of ] and an associate of ], has been suggested but eliminated as the man is not dressed as a high cleric.<ref name="p82" /> | |||
| ⚫ | ==Condition== | ||
| ⚫ | The panel consists of a single |
||
| ], ''Guillaume Dufay and Gilles Binchois'', {{Circa}} 1440s (Binchois right)]] | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The larger middle inscription is in French, using a 12th-century script. It reads "<small>LEAL SOVVENIR</small>" (''Loyal Remembrance'', or ''Faithful Souvenir''),<ref name="B36" /><ref name="B35">Bauman, 35</ref> and is painted to give the impression that it was carved into the parapet.<ref name="w650" /> In 1927 Hippolyte Fierens Gevaert put forward ], a Greek musician and ] poet born {{Circa}} 446. Gevaert held that the portrait was a commemoration of a court artist who had recently died and that the classical reference was intended to flatter his memory. Panofsky largely went with this position in 1949. He speculated that the sitter was the celebrated musician ], by 1430 a ] at ], Bruges.<ref name="c223" /> Campbell is sceptical, disclaiming that the sitter "is not dressed as a cleric".<ref name="c220">Campbell, 220</ref> Other theories include that the man was a Greek or ] merchant, ], ] or, less likely, that it is a self-portrait. Though there is much disagreement, it is probable that he was a native French speaker, and a notary, poet, or member of the ''Compagnie du Chapel Vert'' ("Society of the Green Hat") at ].<ref name="c220">Campbell, 220</ref> Dhanens rejects the theory that the man was a musician on the basis that van{{nbsp}}Eyck would have made this explicit, portraying him holding a device or emblem clearly symbolising music. She concludes that he is an accountant or lawyer holding a legal or financial document.<ref name="d184">Dhanens, 184</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | From the first two inscriptions, the panel is generally accepted as a ] portrait. Roman tombstones often showed a representation of the deceased behind a parapet with a carved inscription, and van{{nbsp}}Eyck may have known of these from travels to France.<ref name="S42" /> The lower inscription reads "Actu ano dni.1432.10.die octobris.a.ioh de Eyck" (''Finished in the year of our Lord 1432 on the 10th day of October by Jan van{{nbsp}}Eyck'').<ref name="B36" /> Campbell observes that the phrasing of this extended signature is surprisingly reminiscent of ], and that van{{nbsp}}Eyck seems to be reinforcing the idea that the man was a legal professional,<ref name="c222">Campbell, 222</ref> who may have worked for the ].<ref name="B36">Borchert, 36</ref> Jacques Paviot notes that it is written in the Gothic cursive script '']'', then favoured by the legal profession.<ref name="p212" /> In either case, although he is not grandly dressed and is probably a member of the middle class, he must have been highly regarded in Philip's court, given that such portraits rarely depicted non-nobles.<ref name="m137" /> | ||
| ⚫ | ==Provenance== | ||
| ], '']'', 1446. ], New York]] | |||
| ⚫ | == Condition == | ||
| ⚫ | The painting was widely copied and imitated during the 15th |
||
| ⚫ | The panel consists of a single {{convert|8|mm|1|adj=on}}-thick oak board, cut vertically down close to the painted surface. It has a small unpainted area at the upper left. The support's encasing was probably changed in the 19th century; today four of the eight supports are fixed to the edges of the interior borders, forming inner ]. The other four act as inner pins. The varnish is severely degraded, with key areas of paint and ground either removed or overpainted. ] of the reverse reveals traces of short vertical ] and underdrawings, but no hint as to the identity of the sitter. Its ground is mostly chalk-based; the pigments are predominantly blacks, red lake, and blues. The final portrait differs in many ways from the underdrawing – the fingers are shorter, the right thumb and the parapet are lower, and the right arm once extended over a larger area. In the final portrait, the ear is elevated, and the scroll occupies a larger pictorial space. Analysis of the pigment shows that the flesh of his face is painted with whites and ], and traced with greys, blacks, blues, and some ] over a red-lake glaze.<ref name="c218">Campbell, 218</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | The portrait is not particularly well preserved. There are yellowish layers of glaze over the face, probably later additions. The varnishes have degraded and lost their original colours. The panel has undergone a number of detrimental retouchings. In some instances, these have altered the sitter's appearance, most especially the removal of strands of fair hair below the chaperon. It has sustained structural damage, especially to the marble on the reverse. The National Gallery repaired some "slight injuries" when it came into their possession in 1857. Campbell notes a number of efforts by later restorers were imperfect and "rather disfiguring", including touchings to the man's nostrils and eyelashes, and the tip of his nose. There is a yellowish glaze over the eyes that seems to be either damage or overpaint. The panel is discoloured overall and suffers from aged and degenerated varnishes that make the original pigments hard to discern.<ref name="c218" /> | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | The painting is first recorded in the National Gallery's collector and later director |
||
| ⚫ | == Provenance == | ||
| ⚫ | Ink markings on the marble reverse show a small cross |
||
| ⚫ | ], London]] | ||
| <!--Below the bars is a capital G, and a faint shape resembling the end of a spade.<ref name="c218" />--> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ⚫ | The painting was widely copied and imitated during the 15th{{nbsp}}century. Near-contemporary copper reproductions are known from ] and ]. ] borrowed the illusionistic carving on the parapet for his 1446 '']''.<ref>"". ]. Retrieved 18 October 2014</ref> A {{Circa}} 1449–50 portrait of the Venetian Doge ] attributed to a follower of van{{nbsp}}Eyck is also heavily indebted to ''Léal Souvenir'' in that it is also unusually tall and narrow, with a large space above the sitter's head.<ref name="c222" /> | ||
| ⚫ | ==References== | ||
| ⚫ | ===Notes=== | ||
| ⚫ | The painting is first recorded in the notes of ], the National Gallery's collector and later director, in 1857, the year it was acquired. He mentions that it had been in the possession of the Scottish landscape painter Karl Ross (1816–1858) "before 1854". Like many of van{{nbsp}}Eyck's works and those of the Early Netherlandish painters in general, the painting's ] is murky before the 19th{{nbsp}}century. When the National Gallery was verifying attribution, the two copper reproductions were noted. The first was found by Eastlake in the collection of the Lochis family of Bergamo in Italy, the second in Turin, belonging to Count Castellane Harrach is described as smaller than the original and "very weak". Both are now lost.<ref name="c218" /> | ||
| ⚫ | Ink markings on the marble reverse show a small cross that may record a merchant's mark or emblem. Although it is incomplete and no identification has been made, ] detected the mark of "an early Italian, probably Venetian owner".<ref>Weale, 109</ref> An early provenance in Italy would not imply that the man came from that country; van{{nbsp}}Eyck's works were often purchased by collectors from that region.<ref name="c220" /> | ||
| ⚫ | == References == | ||
| ⚫ | === Notes === | ||
| {{reflist|30em}} | {{reflist|30em}} | ||
| ===Sources=== | === Sources === | ||
| {{refbegin}} | {{refbegin}} | ||
| * Bauman, Guy. "Early Flemish Portraits 1425–1525". ''The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin'', volume |
* Bauman, Guy. "Early Flemish Portraits 1425–1525". ''The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin'', volume{{nbsp}}43, No.{{nbsp}}4, Spring, 1986 | ||
| * ]. ''Van Eyck''. London: Taschen, 2008. ISBN |
* ]. ''Van Eyck''. London: Taschen, 2008. {{ISBN|3-8228-5687-8}} | ||
| * ]. ''The Fifteenth-Century Netherlandish Paintings''. London: National Gallery, 1998. ISBN |
* ]. ''The Fifteenth-Century Netherlandish Paintings''. London: National Gallery, 1998. {{ISBN|0-300-07701-7}} | ||
| * Dhanens, Elisabeth. ''Hubert and Jan van |
* Dhanens, Elisabeth. ''Hubert and Jan van{{nbsp}}Eyck''. New York: Tabard Press, 1980. {{ISBN|0-914427-00-8}} | ||
| * ]. ''Jan van Eyck, The Play of Realism''. London: Reaktion Books, 1991. ISBN |
* ]. ''Jan van Eyck, The Play of Realism''. London: Reaktion Books, 1991. {{ISBN|0-948462-18-3}} | ||
| * Jones, Susan Frances. ''Van Eyck to Gossaert''. London: National Gallery, 2011. ISBN |
* Jones, Susan Frances. ''Van Eyck to Gossaert''. London: National Gallery, 2011. {{ISBN|978-1-85709-504-3}} | ||
| * Kemperdick, Stephan. ''The Early Portrait, from the Collection of the Prince of Liechtenstein and the Kunstmuseum Basel''. Munich: Prestel, 2006. ISBN |
* Kemperdick, Stephan. ''The Early Portrait, from the Collection of the Prince of Liechtenstein and the Kunstmuseum Basel''. Munich: Prestel, 2006. {{ISBN|3-7913-3598-7}} | ||
| * Meiss, Millard. "'Nicholas Albergati' and the Chronology of Jan van Eyck's Portraits". ''Burlington Magazine'', volume |
* Meiss, Millard. "'Nicholas Albergati' and the Chronology of Jan van Eyck's Portraits". ''Burlington Magazine'', volume{{nbsp}}94, No.{{nbsp}}590, May 1952 | ||
| * Pächt, Otto. ''Van Eyck and the Founders of Early Netherlandish Painting''. 1999. London: Harvey Miller Publishers. ISBN |
* Pächt, Otto. ''Van Eyck and the Founders of Early Netherlandish Painting''. 1999. London: Harvey Miller Publishers. {{ISBN|1-872501-28-1}} | ||
| * |
* ]. "Who Is Jan van Eyck's 'Tymotheos'?". ''Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes'', volume{{nbsp}}12, 1949 | ||
| * |
* Paviot, Jacques. "The Sitter for Jan van Eyck's 'Leal Sovvenir". ''Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes'', volume{{nbsp}}58, 1995 | ||
| * ]. ''The Northern Renaissance''. London: Phaidon Press, 2004. ISBN |
* ]. ''The Northern Renaissance''. London: Phaidon Press, 2004. {{ISBN|0-7148-3867-5}} | ||
| * Upton, Joel Morgan. ''Petrus Christus: His Place in Fifteenth-Century Flemish painting''. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989 ISBN |
* Upton, Joel Morgan. ''Petrus Christus: His Place in Fifteenth-Century Flemish painting''. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989 {{ISBN|0-271-00672-2}} | ||
| * ] |
* ] ''Hubert and John Van Eyck, their life and work''. London: J. Lane Company, 1908 | ||
| * Wood, Wendy. "A new identification of the sitter in Jan van Eyck's Tymotheus portrait". ''The Art Bulletin'', volume |
* Wood, Wendy. "A new identification of the sitter in Jan van Eyck's Tymotheus portrait". ''The Art Bulletin'', volume{{nbsp}}60, No.{{nbsp}}4, December 1978 | ||
| {{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
| ==External links== | == External links == | ||
| * | * | ||
| {{Van Eyck}} | {{Van Eyck}} | ||
| {{Authority control (arts)}} | |||
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Leal Souvenir}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Leal Souvenir}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 21 September 2024
Small 1432 portrait of a man by Jan van Eyck in London
Léal Souvenir (also known as Timotheus or Portrait of a Man) is a small oil-on-oak panel portrait by the Early Netherlandish painter Jan van Eyck, dated 1432. The sitter has not been identified, but his highly individual features suggest a historical person rather than the hypothetical ideal usual at the time in northern Renaissance portraiture; his slight and unassuming torso is contrasted with a sophisticated facial expression. His features have been described as "plain and rustic", yet thoughtful and inward-looking. The sitter was apparently significant enough a member of the Burgundian duke Philip the Good's circle that his court painter portrayed him.
The man sits before an imitation parapet with three sets of painted inscriptions, each rendered to look as if chiselled or scratched into stone. Van Eyck did not have full command of either classical Greek or Latin and made errors, so readings by modern scholars vary. The first inscription is in Greek and seems to spell "TYΜ.ωΘΕΟϹ", which has not been satisfactorily interpreted but has led some to title the work Timotheus. The middle reads in French "Leal Souvenir" ("Loyal Memory") and indicates that the portrait is a posthumous commemoration. The third records van Eyck's signature and the date of execution. The 19th-century art historian Hippolyte Fierens-Gevaert identified the lettering "TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC" with the Greek musician Timotheus of Miletus. Panofsky drew the same conclusion, eliminating other Greeks bearing the name Timothy; they were of religious or military background, professions that do not match the civilian dress of the sitter. Panofsky believed the man was probably a highly placed musician in Philip's court, possibly Gilles Binchois.
More recent research focuses on the legalistic wording in one of the inscriptions, suggesting to some that he was in some way connected to the legal profession, or an employee of Philip the Good. The panel was acquired in 1857 by the National Gallery, London, where it is on permanent display.
Description
Léal Souvenir is one of the earliest surviving examples of secular portraiture in medieval European art and one of the earliest extant unidealised representations. This is apparent in its realism and acute observation of the details of the man's everyday appearance. Van Eyck worked in the early Renaissance tradition and pioneered the manipulation of oil paint. Oil allowed smooth translucent surfaces, could be applied across a range of thicknesses and was manipulable while wet, which allowed far more subtle detail than available to previous generations of painters.
The parapet dominates the portrait, and his head seems oversized compared to his upper body. Some art historians speculate that this is a result of van Eyck's then inexperience; it was only his second known portrait. Meiss speculates that van Eyck may have "los control of design as a whole by indulging his astounding virtuosity."
Parapet
The decayed parapet allows van Eyck to display his skill at mimicking stone chiselling and scarring, and shows the influence of classical Roman funerary art, particularly stone memorials. The parapet gives the work gravitas, the chips and cracks conveying a sense of the venerable, or, according to art historian Elisabeth Dhanens, a sense of the "fragility of life or of memory itself".
Portrait
The man is positioned within an undefined narrow space and set against a flat black background. Typically for van Eyck, the head is large in relation to the torso. He is dressed in typically Burgundian fashion, with a red robe and a green wool chaperon with a bourrelet and cornette hanging forward. The headdress is trimmed with fur, fastened with two buttons, and extends to the parapet. His right hand might be holding the end of the cornette. Neither the shape of his head nor his facial features correspond to contemporary standard types, let alone canons of ideal beauty. The sitter appears to be bald, although there are some faint traces of fair hair, leading Erwin Panofsky to conclude that his "countenance is as 'Nordic' as his dress is Burgundian." Though he has neither eyebrows nor stubble, he does have eyelashes that are believed to have been added by a 19th-century restorer. Van Eyck's cool observation of the man's narrow shoulders, pursed lips, and thin eyebrows extends to detailing the moisture on his blue eyes.
Unlike Rogier van der Weyden, who paid especially close attention to detail in the rendering of his models' fingers, to van Eyck hands were often something of an afterthought. They are generically rendered, do not contain much detail and may have been a later workshop addition. Yet they are very similar to those of the sitter in his c. 1435 Portrait of Baudouin de Lannoy. The man holds a scroll that might be a legal document, letter, or pamphlet. In his early portraits, van Eyck's sitters are often shown holding objects indicative of their profession. The scroll contains six lines of illegible writing. The abbreviations are more prominent and seem to be in Latin, but may be vernacular.
Light falls from the left, leaving traces of shadow on the side of the man's face, a device commonly found in van Eyck's early portraits. He is youthful, and his face has a soft fleshiness achieved through shallow curves and flowing, harmonious brushstrokes, giving the appearance of a relaxed, warm, and open personality, which Meiss describes as evoking an almost "Rembrandtesque warmth and sympathy". The sitter is not handsome; he has a flattish face, a stubby yet pointed nose, and prominent cheekbones that might, according to Panofsky, belong to a "Flemish peasant". Dhanens describes him as having an honest expression.
A number of art historians have noted the apparent contradiction between the man's plain looks and enigmatic expression. Meiss describes him as "plain and rustic", and finds a resemblance between his rather generic face and a number of figures in the lower portions of the "Adoration of the Lamb" panel in the Ghent Altarpiece. Agreeing with Panofsky, he observes a "thoughtfulness on the high, wrinkled forehead, visionary force in the dreamy yet steady eyes, a formidable strength of passion in the wide, firm mouth". According to Panofsky, the man's face is not that of an intellectual, yet he detects a pensive and lonely nature, "the face of one who feels and produces rather than observes and dissects".
Inscriptions and identity of the sitter
The parapet has three horizontal rows of inscriptions; on the upper and lower rows is smaller lettering that is often not visible in reproductions. In places, the Greek characters are unclear and have been subject to much speculation by art historians, not least due to van Eyck's sometimes erratic spelling and unusual spacing.
The top lettering is in chalk white and Greek script that reads "TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC". The last character is deliberately concealed by a chip in the imitation stone, a touch described by Panofsky as a "terminal flourish". This makes the meaning of the inscription difficult to discern. A general consensus among art historians is that the final character is a square C or sigma sign.
"TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC" was interpreted in 1857 by Charles Eastlake as "Timotheos", a proper name. Campbell points out that van Eyck "appears to have employed the Greek alphabet systematically", and always employed the square sigma C for the Latin "S", and a majuscule omega ω (in the uncial form) for the Latin "O". The inscription may be meant to read "Honour God", or "Be Honoured, O God", as written in the passive imperative. Panofsky gives some consideration to the hypothesis that the final letter is a "N", and that the lettering forms two words rather than one. In this interpretation, the letters spell TYΜω ΘΕΟN, meaning "Honour God". While this would be more straightforward than "Timotheus", he rejects the possibility. He writes that "the presence of a shorter horizontal line connecting with the slightly tapering top of the vertical stroke and completing it into a Γ form ... evidently precludes a "N". Dhanens suggests the inscription can be read as "Time Deum" ("Fear God"), a known motto of the Vilain family.
Eastlake's translation is generally accepted. The possibility of it being a variant of "Timothy" has been discounted, as that word was not used in Northern Europe before the Reformation. There is no Germanic name that might imply a humanistic imitation of a Greek word, so art historians have sought to identify the man from Greek history or legend. Although some have suggested certain Athenian and Syrian generals, these have been discounted as the sitter is not wearing military clothing. Saint Timothy, first Bishop of Ephesus and an associate of Saint Paul, has been suggested but eliminated as the man is not dressed as a high cleric.
The larger middle inscription is in French, using a 12th-century script. It reads "LEAL SOVVENIR" (Loyal Remembrance, or Faithful Souvenir), and is painted to give the impression that it was carved into the parapet. In 1927 Hippolyte Fierens Gevaert put forward Timotheus of Miletus, a Greek musician and dithyrambic poet born c. 446. Gevaert held that the portrait was a commemoration of a court artist who had recently died and that the classical reference was intended to flatter his memory. Panofsky largely went with this position in 1949. He speculated that the sitter was the celebrated musician Gilles Binchois, by 1430 a canon at St. Donatian's Cathedral, Bruges. Campbell is sceptical, disclaiming that the sitter "is not dressed as a cleric". Other theories include that the man was a Greek or Lucchese merchant, Henry the Navigator, Jean de Croÿ or, less likely, that it is a self-portrait. Though there is much disagreement, it is probable that he was a native French speaker, and a notary, poet, or member of the Compagnie du Chapel Vert ("Society of the Green Hat") at Tournai. Dhanens rejects the theory that the man was a musician on the basis that van Eyck would have made this explicit, portraying him holding a device or emblem clearly symbolising music. She concludes that he is an accountant or lawyer holding a legal or financial document.
From the first two inscriptions, the panel is generally accepted as a posthumous portrait. Roman tombstones often showed a representation of the deceased behind a parapet with a carved inscription, and van Eyck may have known of these from travels to France. The lower inscription reads "Actu ano dni.1432.10.die octobris.a.ioh de Eyck" (Finished in the year of our Lord 1432 on the 10th day of October by Jan van Eyck). Campbell observes that the phrasing of this extended signature is surprisingly reminiscent of legalese, and that van Eyck seems to be reinforcing the idea that the man was a legal professional, who may have worked for the Dukes of Burgundy. Jacques Paviot notes that it is written in the Gothic cursive script bastarda, then favoured by the legal profession. In either case, although he is not grandly dressed and is probably a member of the middle class, he must have been highly regarded in Philip's court, given that such portraits rarely depicted non-nobles.
Condition
The panel consists of a single 8-millimetre (0.3 in)-thick oak board, cut vertically down close to the painted surface. It has a small unpainted area at the upper left. The support's encasing was probably changed in the 19th century; today four of the eight supports are fixed to the edges of the interior borders, forming inner mouldings. The other four act as inner pins. The varnish is severely degraded, with key areas of paint and ground either removed or overpainted. Infrared photography of the reverse reveals traces of short vertical hatching and underdrawings, but no hint as to the identity of the sitter. Its ground is mostly chalk-based; the pigments are predominantly blacks, red lake, and blues. The final portrait differs in many ways from the underdrawing – the fingers are shorter, the right thumb and the parapet are lower, and the right arm once extended over a larger area. In the final portrait, the ear is elevated, and the scroll occupies a larger pictorial space. Analysis of the pigment shows that the flesh of his face is painted with whites and vermilion, and traced with greys, blacks, blues, and some ultramarine over a red-lake glaze.
The portrait is not particularly well preserved. There are yellowish layers of glaze over the face, probably later additions. The varnishes have degraded and lost their original colours. The panel has undergone a number of detrimental retouchings. In some instances, these have altered the sitter's appearance, most especially the removal of strands of fair hair below the chaperon. It has sustained structural damage, especially to the marble on the reverse. The National Gallery repaired some "slight injuries" when it came into their possession in 1857. Campbell notes a number of efforts by later restorers were imperfect and "rather disfiguring", including touchings to the man's nostrils and eyelashes, and the tip of his nose. There is a yellowish glaze over the eyes that seems to be either damage or overpaint. The panel is discoloured overall and suffers from aged and degenerated varnishes that make the original pigments hard to discern.
Provenance
The painting was widely copied and imitated during the 15th century. Near-contemporary copper reproductions are known from Bergamo and Turin. Petrus Christus borrowed the illusionistic carving on the parapet for his 1446 Portrait of a Carthusian. A c. 1449–50 portrait of the Venetian Doge Marco Barbarigo attributed to a follower of van Eyck is also heavily indebted to Léal Souvenir in that it is also unusually tall and narrow, with a large space above the sitter's head.
The painting is first recorded in the notes of Charles Eastlake, the National Gallery's collector and later director, in 1857, the year it was acquired. He mentions that it had been in the possession of the Scottish landscape painter Karl Ross (1816–1858) "before 1854". Like many of van Eyck's works and those of the Early Netherlandish painters in general, the painting's provenance is murky before the 19th century. When the National Gallery was verifying attribution, the two copper reproductions were noted. The first was found by Eastlake in the collection of the Lochis family of Bergamo in Italy, the second in Turin, belonging to Count Castellane Harrach is described as smaller than the original and "very weak". Both are now lost.
Ink markings on the marble reverse show a small cross that may record a merchant's mark or emblem. Although it is incomplete and no identification has been made, W. H. J. Weale detected the mark of "an early Italian, probably Venetian owner". An early provenance in Italy would not imply that the man came from that country; van Eyck's works were often purchased by collectors from that region.
References
Notes
- Although the inscription on the parapet does not contain a diacritic on the e.
- ^ Panofsky, 80
- Bauman, 37
- ^ Paviot, 212
- ^ Wood, 650
- ^ Smith, 42
- Smith, 61
- Jones, 10–11
- Borchert, 22
- ^ Pächt, 110
- Although the dual portraits of the donors in his Ghent Altarpiece were probably completed in 1431 or in the early months of the following year.
- Meiss, 138
- ^ Dhanens, 182
- ^ Campbell, 223
- ^ Kemperdick, 19
- ^ Campbell, 218
- ^ Panofsky, 82
- Kemperdick notes that Hans Holbein the Younger "used the same pair of hands for many of his portraits, so that they look much the same on 70-year-old William Warham and Anne Lovell, forty years his junior." Kemperdick, 20
- Upton, 27
- ^ Meiss, 137
- ^ Panofsky, 88
- Meiss, 144
- ^ Campbell, 222
- However, if this were the intended meaning, more correct lettering would have read "TIM.OΘEOC". See Paviot, 214
- Paviot, 214
- Paviot, 215
- Panofsky, 80–81
- ^ Dhanens, 184
- Panofsky, 81
- ^ Borchert, 36
- Bauman, 35
- ^ Campbell, 220
- "Jan van Eyck". Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved 18 October 2014
- Weale, 109
Sources
- Bauman, Guy. "Early Flemish Portraits 1425–1525". The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, volume 43, No. 4, Spring, 1986
- Borchert, Till-Holger. Van Eyck. London: Taschen, 2008. ISBN 3-8228-5687-8
- Campbell, Lorne. The Fifteenth-Century Netherlandish Paintings. London: National Gallery, 1998. ISBN 0-300-07701-7
- Dhanens, Elisabeth. Hubert and Jan van Eyck. New York: Tabard Press, 1980. ISBN 0-914427-00-8
- Harbison, Craig. Jan van Eyck, The Play of Realism. London: Reaktion Books, 1991. ISBN 0-948462-18-3
- Jones, Susan Frances. Van Eyck to Gossaert. London: National Gallery, 2011. ISBN 978-1-85709-504-3
- Kemperdick, Stephan. The Early Portrait, from the Collection of the Prince of Liechtenstein and the Kunstmuseum Basel. Munich: Prestel, 2006. ISBN 3-7913-3598-7
- Meiss, Millard. "'Nicholas Albergati' and the Chronology of Jan van Eyck's Portraits". Burlington Magazine, volume 94, No. 590, May 1952
- Pächt, Otto. Van Eyck and the Founders of Early Netherlandish Painting. 1999. London: Harvey Miller Publishers. ISBN 1-872501-28-1
- Panofsky, Erwin. "Who Is Jan van Eyck's 'Tymotheos'?". Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, volume 12, 1949
- Paviot, Jacques. "The Sitter for Jan van Eyck's 'Leal Sovvenir". Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, volume 58, 1995
- Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. The Northern Renaissance. London: Phaidon Press, 2004. ISBN 0-7148-3867-5
- Upton, Joel Morgan. Petrus Christus: His Place in Fifteenth-Century Flemish painting. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989 ISBN 0-271-00672-2
- Weale, W. H. J. Hubert and John Van Eyck, their life and work. London: J. Lane Company, 1908
- Wood, Wendy. "A new identification of the sitter in Jan van Eyck's Tymotheus portrait". The Art Bulletin, volume 60, No. 4, December 1978
_-_National_Gallery,_London.jpg)