Revision as of 16:51, 14 October 2023 editFylindfotberserk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers165,547 edits →Subcontinent or Bareazam is right pronouncing:-← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 22 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Indian subcontinent/Archive 4) (bot |
(25 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Vital article|topic=Geography|subpage=Physical|level=5|class=C}} |
|
|
{{British English}} |
|
{{British English}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Geography |class=B |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Geography |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Geology |class=B |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Geology |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject South Asia |class=B |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject South Asia |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Afghanistan |class=B |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Afghanistan |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Bangladesh |class=B |importance=Mid |geography=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Bangladesh |importance=high|geography=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Bhutan |class=B |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Bhutan |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject India |class=B |importance=High |portal=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject India |importance=High |portal=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Maldives |class=B |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Maldives |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Nepal |class=B |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Nepal |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan |class=B |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan |importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Sri Lanka |class=B |importance=Mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Sri Lanka |importance=Mid }} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
Line 28: |
Line 27: |
|
__TOC__ |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Indus defining much of the ecosystem of the Indian subcontinent is a dubious claim at best == |
|
== Bhutan is not a republic == |
|
|
"Geopolitically, it includes the republics of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka." |
|
|
This reads wrong to me as Bhutan is a kingdom, not a republic. ] (]) 05:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indus is a river that runs on the periphery of the continent, I don't see how it can be said that the river defines the ecosystem on the subcontinent, instead representing a small portion of the varied ecosystems present across it ] (]) 21:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Agreed. Bhutan is also the only modern-day ] within the ]. Its foreign policy is controlled by India. ] (]) 02:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Seems sensible. Changed the caption to "The ] is a major river of the north-west of the Indian subcontinent" - bland, but there we are. ] (]) 23:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{ping|Johnbod}} How about keeping the original caption and adding northwestern in between, something like - "The ] defines much of the ] of the north-western part of the Indian subcontinent." ? - ] (]) 10:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I don't know if even that is true. Is it? ] (]) 13:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Btw, the caption to the same photo at ] is "Confluence of Indus and Zanskar rivers. The Indus is at the left of the picture, flowing left-to-right; the Zanskar, carrying more water, comes in from the top of the picture". So the Zanskar is actually the main river shown. ] (]) 13:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:::::{{ping|Johnbod}} What if we write exactly what's written in the image description. - ] (]) 18:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::We could do - are we sure ] is part of the subcontinent, rather than the ]? ] (]) 19:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Wrong Map == |
|
== my edit was removed == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
my edit was correct, it did not contain parts of ladakh and baluchistan (insular india) |
|
The map used doesn't show complete India. The Gilgit Baltistan and Aksai Chin are considered part of India as per accepted Indian Map. ] (]) 16:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also empires like muarya and delhi sultanate and mughals called their empires as ' empire of jambudvipa' and 'empire of hind and sindh' and 'empire of hindustan' which all mean india or indian subcontinet so indai did exist as a political entity . greeks called mauray empire as ' indika' ] (]) 14:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
:They are disputed territories claimed by India. ] (]) 03:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Sources needed for BIOT == |
|
== “India” can refer to the entire subcontinent == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To say the British Indian Ocean Territory is part of the Indian subcontinent seems like a bit of a stretch. Please provide ]s for it. ] (]) 20:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
I don’t know how to add citations in wiki articles, so I’ll post a source here: |
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/India |
|
|
|
|
|
First definition provides affirmation. |
|
|
|
|
|
I’m not sure why this was ever in dispute anyway, to the person that reverted my edit. Why do you think it’s called the INDIAN subcontinent? ] (]) 08:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dictionaries aren't authoritative sources. ] (]) 13:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Merriam-Webster is a reliable source. ] (]) 17:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::That link claims the first use of the term was in 1952, which is obviously incorrect. If you want to convince people to make this change to the article you're going to need a better source than a dictionary. In any case, we list alternative names in the 'Name' subection, where they can be presented with proper context and without confusing readers. ] (]) 17:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:South Asia has been suffering from Indian domination for too long, mate. As far as I know, a lot of countries are now using "South Asian Subcontinent" instead of "Indian Subcontinent" to describe this region. This is a correct move, hopefully, more mainstream media will start to use the term "South Asian Subcontinent" and eventually "Indian Subcontinent" will become a historical term. |
|
|
:Back to your question, no, Indian Subcontinent ≠ India. ] (]) 03:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Subcontinent or Bareazam is right pronouncing:- == |
|
|
|
|
|
Before the freedom of all countries in subcontinent or Bareazam or before it's division it is called "Bareazam". And it also a right word describe " subcontinent" . The word Indian subcontinent is totally wrong because it's name was " Bareazam" and is also called " subcontinent" to refer all countries when in it before division. Indian subcontinent name is totally wrong because it refers only one country India.It should be " subcontinent " because we're part of it too. ] (]) 16:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
:"Indian subcontinent" is a widely sourced term. And is also the common name of the land mass. There is no point changing it. - ] (]) 16:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
Indus is a river that runs on the periphery of the continent, I don't see how it can be said that the river defines the ecosystem on the subcontinent, instead representing a small portion of the varied ecosystems present across it Infernomoonsault (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
my edit was correct, it did not contain parts of ladakh and baluchistan (insular india)
also empires like muarya and delhi sultanate and mughals called their empires as ' empire of jambudvipa' and 'empire of hind and sindh' and 'empire of hindustan' which all mean india or indian subcontinet so indai did exist as a political entity . greeks called mauray empire as ' indika' WhatAGreatWikiTuber (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)