Revision as of 10:59, 26 February 2024 editFylindfotberserk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers165,547 edits →Indus defining much of the ecosystem of the Indian subcontinent is a dubious claim at best: Suggestion← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 22 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Indian subcontinent/Archive 4) (bot |
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
Line 27: |
Line 27: |
|
__TOC__ |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Indus defining much of the ecosystem of the Indian subcontinent is a dubious claim at best == |
|
== Wrong Map == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Indus is a river that runs on the periphery of the continent, I don't see how it can be said that the river defines the ecosystem on the subcontinent, instead representing a small portion of the varied ecosystems present across it ] (]) 21:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
The map used doesn't show complete India. The Gilgit Baltistan and Aksai Chin are considered part of India as per accepted Indian Map. ] (]) 16:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
⚫ |
:Seems sensible. Changed the caption to "The ] is a major river of the north-west of the Indian subcontinent" - bland, but there we are. ] (]) 23:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::{{ping|Johnbod}} How about keeping the original caption and adding northwestern in between, something like - "The ] defines much of the ] of the north-western part of the Indian subcontinent." ? - ] (]) 10:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I don't know if even that is true. Is it? ] (]) 13:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Btw, the caption to the same photo at ] is "Confluence of Indus and Zanskar rivers. The Indus is at the left of the picture, flowing left-to-right; the Zanskar, carrying more water, comes in from the top of the picture". So the Zanskar is actually the main river shown. ] (]) 13:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:::::{{ping|Johnbod}} What if we write exactly what's written in the image description. - ] (]) 18:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::We could do - are we sure ] is part of the subcontinent, rather than the ]? ] (]) 19:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== my edit was removed == |
|
:They are disputed territories claimed by India. ] (]) 03:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:The "accepted Indian Map" is irrelevant to whatever the consensus of reliable sources say. India is not the world, there are other views. ] (]) 23:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my edit was correct, it did not contain parts of ladakh and baluchistan (insular india) |
|
== Subcontinent or Bareazam is right pronouncing:- == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also empires like muarya and delhi sultanate and mughals called their empires as ' empire of jambudvipa' and 'empire of hind and sindh' and 'empire of hindustan' which all mean india or indian subcontinet so indai did exist as a political entity . greeks called mauray empire as ' indika' ] (]) 14:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
Before the freedom of all countries in subcontinent or Bareazam or before it's division it is called "Bareazam". And it also a right word describe " subcontinent" . The word Indian subcontinent is totally wrong because it's name was " Bareazam" and is also called " subcontinent" to refer all countries when in it before division. Indian subcontinent name is totally wrong because it refers only one country India.It should be " subcontinent " because we're part of it too. ] (]) 16:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Sources needed for BIOT == |
⚫ |
:"Indian subcontinent" is a widely sourced term. And is also the common name of the land mass. There is no point changing it. - ] (]) 16:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:"We" who? This is the English page for a subcontinent. The word in your language is totally irrelevant. ] (]) 23:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::It's important to acknowledge that 'Indian subcontinent' is a widely recognized term with historical and geographical significance. While 'Bareazam' might be another name, 'Indian subcontinent' is the commonly accepted term in English to describe this region. Changing it would only create confusion. ] (]) 19:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To say the British Indian Ocean Territory is part of the Indian subcontinent seems like a bit of a stretch. Please provide ]s for it. ] (]) 20:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Shouldn't it be the Indian Subcontinent? == |
|
|
I asked ] why is the "Indian subcontinent" not capitalized, this is the answer I got: |
|
|
|
|
|
"The term "Indian subcontinent" is a ] and should be capitalized. It refers to the southern region of Asia, which includes countries such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka. It is important to use proper capitalization when referring to specific geographic regions or proper nouns." |
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever invented this term initially obviously made a grammatical error. Why don't we correct it? ] (]) 01:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:As often happens, ChatGPT gave you a crap response. "Indian subcontinent" is an informal term without a complete consensus as to its precise limits or definition, and as such is not customarily capitalized. --] | ] 01:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:ChatGPT's responses don't give you correct answers, only those that sound like they are correct. "Indian subcontinent" is the correct term to use much like you wouldn't capitalist the letter 'M' in "Indian man" ] (]) 21:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::capitalise* ] (]) 21:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Indus defining much of the ecosystem of the Indian subcontinent is a dubious claim at best == |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Indus is a river that runs on the periphery of the continent, I don't see how it can be said that the river defines the ecosystem on the subcontinent, instead representing a small portion of the varied ecosystems present across it ] (]) 21:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:Seems sensible. Changed the caption to "The ] is a major river of the north-west of the Indian subcontinent" - bland, but there we are. ] (]) 23:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::{{ping|Johnbod}} How about keeping the original caption and adding northwestern in between, something like - "The ] defines much of the ] of the north-western part of the Indian subcontinent." ? - ] (]) 10:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
Indus is a river that runs on the periphery of the continent, I don't see how it can be said that the river defines the ecosystem on the subcontinent, instead representing a small portion of the varied ecosystems present across it Infernomoonsault (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
my edit was correct, it did not contain parts of ladakh and baluchistan (insular india)
also empires like muarya and delhi sultanate and mughals called their empires as ' empire of jambudvipa' and 'empire of hind and sindh' and 'empire of hindustan' which all mean india or indian subcontinet so indai did exist as a political entity . greeks called mauray empire as ' indika' WhatAGreatWikiTuber (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)